Prior Permission Research Articles

Retraction: Blockage of intracellular proton extrusion with proton pump inhibitor induces apoptosis in gastric cancer

The following article from Cancer Science, 'Blockage of intracellular proton extrusion with proton pump inhibitor induces apoptosis in gastric cancer' by Marie Yeo, Dong-Kyu Kim, Hee Jin Park, Sung Won Cho, Jae Youn Cheong and Kwang Jae Lee (doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00642.x), published online on 23 October 2007 on Blackwell Synergy (http://www.blackwell-synergy.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal Editor in Chief, Takashi Tsuruo, and Blackwell Publishing. All authors wish to retract this paper because of the use of RGM-1 without the prior permission of the original establisher.

Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing

© Russell W. Belk, 2006All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system ortransmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording, orotherwise without the prior permission of the publisher.Published byEdward Elgar Publishing LimitedGlensanda HouseMontpellier ParadeCheltenhamGlos GL50 1UAUKEdward Elgar Publishing, Inc.William Pratt House9 Dewey CourtNorthamptonMassachusetts 01060USAA catalogue record for this bookis available from the British Library

Trauma: Life in the ER—Education or Entertainment? The Patient’s Perspective

To determine whether patients felt that the show Trauma: Life in the ER has primarily educational or entertainment value. To determine if people felt that this show violated privacy. Survey in an academic emergency department. Subjects were asked to participate in an initial survey, then asked to watch video clips from the show and complete a second survey. Three hundred ninety two participated in the initial survey. Fifty-six percent surveyed had seen the program, and of those, 55% stated that they watched the show for both educational and entertainment value. Of the initial participants, 267 watched the video and completed the second survey. Sixty-four percent stated that they would feel comfortable being filmed without prior permission. Eighteen percent of patients felt that the show violated patients' privacy. Most patients felt that this show was educational and did not invade their privacy. The majority were willing to be filmed for this television show, even without prior permission.

No dogs. Guide dogs by prior permission

Esther Rantzen created the Jobsworth Award before the National Health Service (NHS) invented clinical governance. One wonders sometimes if the NHS would have scooped all their awards had the programme continued. Television presenters also caution against involvement with children or animals, or worst of all both simultaneously. Clearly child and adolescent mental health professionals planning to involve animals in therapy should be cautious even in a semi-rural locality. Animals and children are, however, within our knowledge and skills framework, but not so the finer points of clinical governance.

WEARING THE VEIL TO COLLEGE: THE PARADOX OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE LIVES OF IRANIAN WOMEN

College education, whatever its form, has always carried with it a consciousness of possibilities for women.In the Company of Educated Women, B. M. Solomon Iranian college campuses are highly guarded terrains. One enters the gated and walled campuses through security guard offices. Until recently, women's attire—hijāb—and makeup would be entirely checked by one of the khwāharān at these gates. Today, Iranian women nonchalantly pass through the gates, despite their heavily applied makeup and revealing hijāb—a sign of changing social order. Student identification cards allow them through the gates, whereas nonstudent visitors, such as myself, need the prior permission of an administrator to enter. The time of my entrance is recorded, a birth certificate or an identity card is withheld, and a slip is issued to be signed by the hosting administrator. I am instructed to “fix my hijāb” and then am allowed to enter the campus.

Roaming in the USA

Wireless technologies have dramatically increased the accessibility of the Internet. Because it is fast, cheap, and easy to install and use, Wi-Fi wireless LAN technology has played a leading role in this expansion. Wi-Fi has revolutionized the way people use the Internet in their homes, offices, and increasingly, in public places. Wi-Fi access points can easily be secured by activating standard encryption technology. However, many home and office users choose not to activate this encryption, sometimes because they choose to provide Internet access to outsiders, sometimes because they are not willing to go to the trouble of securing their networks, and sometimes because they do not understand the risks of leaving a network open. As a result, open networks are ubiquitous. It is possible in almost any populated area (and many rural areas) to find an open Wi-Fi access point, and to use that access point as a means to get highspeed Internet access. In fact, the popular Windows XP operating system frequently alerts users that wireless networks are nearby, and prompts users as to whether they would like to connect, or may connect automatically, depending on the user's settings. Using a random open network is certainly convenient. Is this practice illegal? Maybe. Should the law allow this type of access? Definitely. This article explores the legality of accessing the Internet through open Wi-Fi connections in situations where the user has not obtained prior permission from the network operator. This article will first discuss the policy considerations behind permitting or prohibiting such roaming Wi-Fi access. The article will then summarize US law that applies to this type of behavior. Finally, the article will propose an approach that legislators and courts worldwide should take to conform the law to the policy considerations identified in the article.

The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards

Are federal regulations on Institutional Review Boards - commonly known as IRBs - compatible with the First Amendment? The regulations aim to protect human subjects by creating a system of licensing research. Under this system, universities establish IRBs, and researchers must get the prior permission of an IRB before doing research on human subjects. At first glance, it may seem only appropriate that researchers should get permission before performing research on human beings. The First Amendment, however, prohibits the federal government from imposing a system of licensing speech or the press, and it therefore seems necessary to consider whether the regulations on IRBs are unconstitutional.

Ethics and the Observer’s Paradox

In attempting to provide empirical qualitative data analysis, the researcher has to work within many constraints. There are ethical issues that need to be considered and evaluated in the managing of data, especially one that is naturally occurring. One of the more popular methods of ‘capturing’ this data is through audio recording and to be able to record, prior permission has to be sought. This pre-requisite is in itself a constraint within which a young researcher has to persevere. This research is part of PhD work in progress and relates the many constraints faced and coming to the crossroads between ethics and the observer’s paradox (Labov cited in Kontra and Varadi 1997). This work does no prescribe alternative methods in the recording and collection of data, but highlights the problems that emerged in the process of doing research.

Author Experiences with the IS Journal Review Process

Copyright 1999, by the Association for Information Systems. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page. Copyright for components of this work owned by others than the Association for Information Systems must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers for commercial use, or to redistribute to lists requires prior specific permission and/or fee. Request permission to publish from: AIS Administrative Office, P.O. Box 2712 Atlanta, GA, 30301-2712 Attn: Reprints, or via e-mail from ais@gsu.edu.

The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards

Are federal regulations on Institutional Review Boards - commonly known as IRBs - compatible with the First Amendment? The regulations aim to protect human subjects by creating a system of licensing research. Under this system, universities establish IRBs, and researchers must get the prior permission of an IRB before doing research on human subjects. At first glance, it may seem only appropriate that researchers should get permission before performing research on human beings. The First Amendment, however, prohibits the federal government from imposing a system of licensing speech or the press, and it therefore seems necessary to consider whether the regulations on IRBs are unconstitutional.

“Friedliche Imperialisten”: Deutsche Auslandsvereine und auswärtige Kulturpolitik, 1906–1918. By Jürgen Kloosterhuis. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main. 1994. Pp. 919. EUR 101.20. ISBN 3-631-46876-8.

“Friedliche Imperialisten”: Deutsche Auslandsvereine und auswärtige Kulturpolitik, 1906–1918. By Jürgen Kloosterhuis. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main. 1994. Pp. 919. EUR 101.20. ISBN 3-631-46876-8. - Volume 36 Issue 4

Improving Informed Consent: The Medium Is Not the Message

An important type of research on informed consent involves empirically testing interventions designed to improve the consent process. Here we report on the experience of eight teams that conducted research involving interventions designed primarily to impact one of three categories: decision-making, knowledge, and the therapeutic misconception. Comments © The Hastings Center. Reprinted by Permission. This article originally appeared in IRB: Ethics and Human Research Special Supplement, Volume 25, Issue 5, September 2003, pages S11-S19. Publisher URL: http://www.thehastingscenter.org/publications/irb/irb.asp Author(s) Patricia Agre, Frances A. Campbell, Barbara D. Goldman, Nancy Kass, Maria L. Boccia, Laurence B. McCullough, Jon F. Merz, Suzanne M. Miller, Jim Mintz, Bruce Rapkin, Jeremy Sugarman, James Sorenson, and Donna Wirshing This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/bioethics_papers/9 Improving Informed Consent: The Medium Is Not the Message Patricia Agre; Frances A. Campbell; Barbara D. Goldman; Maria L. Boccia; Nancy Kass; Laurence B. McCullough; Jon F. Merz; Suzanne M. Miller; Jim Mintz; Bruce Rapkin; Jeremy Sugarman; James Sorenson; Donna Wirshing IRB: Ethics and Human Research, Vol. 25, No. 5, Supplement. (Sep. Oct., 2003), pp. S11-S19. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0193-7758%28200309%2F10%2925%3A5%3CS11%3AIICTMI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0 IRB: Ethics and Human Research is currently published by The Hastings Center. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/hastings.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. http://www.jstor.org Mon Mar 12 10:00:36 2007

Conference report

Permission to make digital/hard copy of all or part of this material without fee for personal or classroom use provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, the ACM copyright/server notice, the title of the publication, and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the ACM, Inc. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.

RETRACTED: Dip effect and surface barrier in single crystal YBa2Cu3Ox

This article has been retracted at the request of the chief editor and the author.Reason: Experimental raw data presented in the paper is the property of Dr Sean Ling, and was used without his prior permission and has at this point, not yet been formally published by Dr Sean Ling.

Delivering learning on the net: the why, what & how of online education

125 © International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS). The authors and the forum jointly retain the copyright of the articles. Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than IFETS must be honoured. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from the authors of the articles you wish to copy or kinshuk@massey.ac.nz. Delivering Learning on the Net: the Why, What & How of Online Education (Book Review)

In schools we trust: creating communities of learning in an era of testing and standardization

173 © International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS). The authors and the forum jointly retain the copyright of the articles. Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than IFETS must be honoured. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from the authors of the articles you wish to copy or kinshuk@massey.ac.nz. In Schools We Trust: Creating Communities of Learning in an Era of Testing and Standardization (Book Review)

Dip effect and its disappearance

Abstract This article has been retracted at the request of the chief editor and the author. Reason: Experimental raw data presented in the paper is the property of Dr Sean Ling, and was used without his prior permission and has at this point, not yet been formally published by Dr Sean Ling.

RETRACTED: Dip effect and its disappearance

This article has been retracted at the request of the chief editor and the author. Reason: Experimental raw data presented in the paper is the property of Dr Sean Ling, and was used without his prior permission and has at this point, not yet been formally published by Dr Sean Ling.

A critical approach to the current understanding of Islamic scholars on using cadaver organs without prior permission.

Chronic organ diseases and the increasing demand for organ transplantation have become an important health care problem within the last few decades. Campaigns and regulations to encourage people to donate organs after death have not met with much success. This article discusses the subject from an Islamic perspective. It beings with some basic information on how Muslims reach legal rulings on a particular issue, and goes on to debate contemporary thinking among Islamic scholars on the ethical-legal issues of organ donation and organ transplantation. It is shown that there are two groups of scholars, one allowing organ donation and organ transplantation, the other refusing it in any circumstances. Both groups agree that is is fundamentally wrong to harvest organs from cadavers without prior permission of the deceased or the relatives. This dogma is re-examined, and it is argued that, under the rule of necessity and the imperative to preserve life, there is enough moral and theological ground to allow the state to harvest organs from the deceased without prior permission.

Recycling rubble into aggregates: a model for local governments

Old buildings are being demolished to make way for newer and taller ones almost everywhere; Turkey is no exception. New zoning bye-laws and legitimization of squatter settlements has led to the demolition of many old and sometimes historically significant buildings. To assess the situation in Turkey, it's capital city Ankara was chosen as the study area and data pertaining to rubble disposal was collected from one of it's eight municipalities. This data was then analysed with the help of statistical tools to estimate the amount of rubble dumped annually within the jurisdiction of and with the prior permission of the authority concerned. This study revealed that in the absence of a proper control mechanism most of the rubble, which composed the bulk of the demolition waste, was being dumped, and not always in assigned landfills. Based on these findings, the author proposes a model for the benefit of local governments/civic authorities, whereupon wanton dumping of rubble may be controlled. Further, in view of the rubble disposal problems in urban centers it was also considered essential to formulate a method, which would enable recycling of rubble near dumping grounds, with the purpose of producing aggregate for non-structural concrete components requisite in urban development work.