Summary In summary, there exists a definite clinical syndrome marked by worsening subjective complaints associated with increased activity, especially those activities that unduly stress the lumbar articulations and their soft tissue investitures. The complaint of low back pain is frequently associated with pain of a referred nature into one or both legs, usually limited to an area above the knee. Unusual areas of pain perception have been described as emanating from noxious stimuli to the periarticular nerves, which are branches of the posterior primary ramus. Objective findings are scarce, with the x-ray studies of myelography and CT scanning being normal. These patients are refractory to time-honored conservative methods of treatment such as bracing, bed rest, analgesics, and physical therapy. A treatment alternative exists that employs, as its basis of approach, known anatomic facts. It relies on the fact that certain miniscule nerves and their branches bear a constant and reproducible location with respect to bony landmarks of the spine. By virtue of this anatomy, these nerves are readily accessible to percutaneous destruction. The procedure of radiofrequency denervation is safe, and in my experience, it has yet to cause permanent worsening of a patient's clinical condition, a claim that cannot often be made for spine fusion or laminectomy. The procedure of radiofrequency denervation has been shown to be effective in satisfactorily reducing pain perception in greater than 70 per cent of patients, provided that those patients were screened first with preoperative facet blocks. For a patient to be considered a candidate for the procedure, pain relief from the blocks must be substantial and reproducible. Consideration of the procedure as a denervation of the motion segment must be disposed of. At best, I have come to think of it as a desensitizing procedure, a concept for which I am indebted to Dr. Vert Mooney. I seek to reduce the sensory input from the only nociceptive site accessible to percutaneous destruction. There still remain the innervations to the neural contents of the spinal canal, the annulus fibrosis, and the posterior longitudinal ligament made via the sinuvertebral nerve with this being multisegmental in its innervation.23 It is possible that this nociceptive input is responsible for the tendency toward partial relief of symptoms and a seemingly time dependent deterioration of relief following facet denervation procedures. No alteration is being made in the stability of the motion segments, so as such, the pathologic process continues, labeled by many as “mechanical instability.” All that I have attempted to do is to modify the host response to the noxious stimulation from one area of the spine. As degeneration of the motion segment continues, made possible by vocational stress, body habitus, or decreased muscle conditioning, further segmental instability ensues. The part played by the sinovertebral nerve may then become more important, thus explaining these late failures. The procedure of radiofrequency facet denervation should be applied only in a well thought out treatment program and should never act as a substitute for the time honored treatment modality of rest, immobilization, analgesia, weight reduction, graduated exercise, and spinal education.
Read full abstract