The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the problem of international macroprudential regulation from the standpoint of benefits and threats produced for national economies in the process of its implementation. It has been established that the macroeconomic situation in each individual country is increasingly being influenced by forces that go beyond both traditional cycle theories and the conventional understanding of non-economic factors. As a result, long-term macroeconomic stability, the key to which is the stability of the national financial and, above all, the banking system, to external shocks, is called into question, and the main way to ensure it is to conduct a risk-weighted macroprudential policy. Capital inflows driven by changes in financial regulations in the country of origin of capital could lead to excessive credit growth and asset price pressures in capital recipient countries, which could be partly mitigated by regulatory and macroeconomic policies in those countries. Conversely, effective domestic macroprudential policies that help contain systemic risks in one country can contribute to financial stability in other countries by generating positive externalities. Reducing the likelihood of a financial crisis in one country through timely macroprudential policies can reduce the scale of negative trade and financial spillovers or spillovers at the regional or international level. Based on the assumption that, when policymaking is inconsistent, each country's regulator is free to choose policy instruments to minimize its own political losses or maximize public welfare, assuming that regulators in other countries can make similar arbitrary choices of macroprudential instruments as a given, it has been found that such policy, generally does not take full account of cross-border spillovers, that is, the real and financial externalities caused by domestic shocks, or the consequences of national policy responses to those shocks. The article determines that, theoretically, international coordination of macroprudential policies can achieve a reduction in political losses or contribute to an increase in public welfare. Both domestic macroprudential policies and prudential capital controls produce spillover effects internationally, which can lead to “capital wars” based on races to lower interest rates. Keywords: macroprudential policy, international economic policy, international capital flows, financial integration, international policy coordination, global instability, regulatory wars.