SESSION TITLE: Advances in Lung Cancer SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Slide PRESENTED ON: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 at 08:45 AM - 10:00 AM PURPOSE: The Bronchial Genomic Classifier (BGC) improves the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of bronchoscopy for lung cancer detection. The BGC identifies patients who, with a pre-test intermediate (10-60%) risk of malignancy, and an inconclusive diagnostic bronchoscopy result, are at low risk of malignancy (<10%) and may be considered for radiographic monitoring instead of an additional invasive procedure. We report a planned interim utility analysis from a prospective, multi-center registry study of the BGC, designed to observe patient selection, classifier performance, clinical utility and safety across varied clinical settings. METHODS: The BGC Registry enrolls patients at 43 medical centers who have had an inconclusive diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected lung cancer, and for whom the BGC was ordered. The BGC sample is obtained by brushing the normal appearing mucosa of the central airway during bronchoscopy. The BGC is measured in those samples after cytology on biospecimens collected at bronchoscopy are confirmed inconclusive. Pre- and post- BGC clinical management recommendations are recorded and follow-up clinical and imaging data are collected at regular time points up to 36 months. RESULTS: 665 eligible patients underwent a diagnostic bronchoscopy for evaluation of lung cancer. A diagnosis was made in 259 (39%) patients at index bronchoscopy: 182 (27%) with lung cancer and 77 (12%) with a benign condition. The BGC was not ordered in 39 (6%) patients and 13 (2%) were not consented, leaving 354 patients meeting enrollment criteria. Of these, 315 patients are evaluable with exclusions of 17 (2%) patients with a BGC ‘no-result’, and 22 patients with insufficient data. Demographics showed 60% ≥ 65 y/o; 50% female, with a median 40 pack-year smoking history. This interim analysis focuses on 209 (66%) patients with an intermediate pre-test risk of malignancy where CT scans showed 76% of index lesions were ≤ 30 mm, 69% were peripherally located, 60% were solid and 50% were in the upper lobe. Advanced bronchoscopic technologies were used in 68% of cases. The BGC test results reclassified 74 (35%) pre-test intermediate risk patients to post-test low risk. At 10-months median follow-up, the reclassified low risk group showed a 17% absolute (40% to 23%), or 40% relative reduction in the use of invasive procedures compared to their pre-test diagnostic management plan. Patients who remained intermediate post-test risk showed no increase in invasive procedures. Five (2%) reclassified low risk patients have, at a median of 10-months follow-up, been diagnosed with lung cancer, well within the NPV of the test (91%). Four of five patients have undergone successful resection without evidence of a stage shift. CONCLUSIONS: This interim analysis from this prospective registry confirms the performance of the BGC reported in the AEGIS I and II studies.The emerging safety of reclassified low risk patients is encouraging. Additional follow-up is required to evaluate the full impact of clinical utility. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The BGC improves the sensitivity of diagnostic bronchoscopy for patients undergoing evaluation for lung cancer and can reduce the number of unnecessary invasive procedures that are performed following an inconclusive procedure. DISCLOSURE: Douglas Hogarth: Grant monies (from industry related sources): Industry funded research, Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc.: Advisor Board Joshiah Gordon: Other: Paid for time it takes to enroll patients Kate Smith: Employee: I receive a salary and hold stock options from Veracyte. Pauline Bianchi: Employee: Employed by Veracyte Marc Lenburg: Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc.: Veracyte, Grant monies (from sources other than industry): NIH Avrum Spira: Consultant fee, speaker bureau, advisory committee, etc.: Advisor The following authors have nothing to disclose: Hans Lee, Patrick Whitten, Krish Bhadra, Travis Dotson, Sadia Benzaquen, Michael Pritchett, Ajay Bedekar, Mark Esterle No Product/Research Disclosure Information
Read full abstract