Presence Of Extra Centrosomes Research Articles

Whole-Genome Duplication and Genome Instability in Cancer Cells: Double the Trouble.

Whole-genome duplication (WGD) is one of the most common genomic abnormalities in cancers. WGD can provide a source of redundant genes to buffer the deleterious effect of somatic alterations and facilitate clonal evolution in cancer cells. The extra DNA and centrosome burden after WGD is associated with an elevation of genome instability. Causes of genome instability are multifaceted and occur throughout the cell cycle. Among these are DNA damage caused by the abortive mitosis that initially triggers tetraploidization, replication stress and DNA damage associated with an enlarged genome, and chromosomal instability during the subsequent mitosis in the presence of extra centrosomes and altered spindle morphology. Here, we chronicle the events after WGD, from tetraploidization instigated by abortive mitosis including mitotic slippage and cytokinesis failure to the replication of the tetraploid genome, and finally, to the mitosis in the presence of supernumerary centrosomes. A recurring theme is the ability of some cancer cells to overcome the obstacles in place for preventing WGD. The underlying mechanisms range from the attenuation of the p53-dependent G1 checkpoint to enabling pseudobipolar spindle formation via the clustering of supernumerary centrosomes. These survival tactics and the resulting genome instability confer a subset of polyploid cancer cells proliferative advantage over their diploid counterparts and the development of therapeutic resistance.

A selective LIS1 requirement for mitotic spindle assembly discriminates distinct T-cell division mechanisms within the T-cell lineage.

The ability to proliferate is a common feature of most T-cell populations. However, proliferation follows different cell-cycle dynamics and is coupled to different functional outcomes according to T-cell subsets. Whether the mitotic machineries supporting these qualitatively distinct proliferative responses are identical remains unknown. Here, we show that disruption of the microtubule-associated protein LIS1 in mouse models leads to proliferative defects associated with a blockade of T-cell development after b-selection and of peripheral CD4+ T cell expansion after antigen priming. In contrast, cell divisions in CD8+ T cells occurred independently of LIS1 following T-cell antigen receptor stimulation, although LIS1 was required for proliferation elicited by pharmacological activation. In thymocytes and CD4+ T cells, LIS1-deficiency did not affect signaling events leading to activation but led to an interruption of proliferation after the initial round of division and to p53-induced cell death. Proliferative defects resulted from a mitotic failure, characterized by the presence of extra-centrosomes and the formation of multipolar spindles, causing abnormal chromosomes congression during metaphase and separation during telophase. LIS1 was required to stabilize dynein/dynactin complexes, which promote chromosome attachment to mitotic spindles and ensure centrosome integrity. Together, these results suggest that proliferative responses are supported by distinct mitotic machineries across T-cell subsets.

Centrosome reduction in newly-generated tetraploid cancer cells obtained by separase depletion

Tetraploidy, a common feature in cancer, results in the presence of extra centrosomes, which has been associated with chromosome instability (CIN) and aneuploidy. Deregulation in the number of centrosomes triggers tumorigenesis. However, how supernumerary centrosomes evolve during the emergence of tetraploid cells remains yet to be elucidated. Here, generating tetraploid isogenic clones in colorectal cancer and in non-transformed cells, we show that near-tetraploid clones exhibit a significant increase in the number of centrosomes. Moreover, we find that centrosome area in near-tetraploids is twice as large as in near-diploids. To evaluate whether centrosome clustering was occurring, we next analysed the number of centrioles revealing centriole amplification. Notwithstanding, more than half of the near-tetraploids maintained in culture do not present centrosome aberrations. To test whether cells progressively lost centrioles after becoming near-tetraploid, we transiently transfected diploid cells with siRNA against ESPL1/Separase, a protease responsible for triggering anaphase, to generate newly near-tetraploid cells. Finally, using this model, we assessed the number of centrioles at different time-points after tetraploidization finding that near-tetraploids rapidly lose centrosomes over time. Taken together, these data demonstrate that although most cells reduce supernumerary centrosomes after tetraploidization, a small fraction retains extra centrioles, potentially resulting in CIN.

Cell scientist to watch – Susana Godinho

ABSTRACT Susana Godinho graduated with a master's degree in biology from the University of Lisbon, Portugal. She then pursued her PhD with Alvaro Tavares at the Gulbenkian Institute of Science, including a year at the University of Cambridge, UK, in the laboratory of David Glover. In 2006, she joined the laboratory of David Pellman at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA, to work on the mechanisms of extra centrosome clustering in cancer cells during mitosis. Susana established her own research group at the Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), in 2013. She was the first lecturer of QMUL to be awarded the Lister Prize (2016). Her group investigates how tumour progression is affected by the presence of extra centrosomes in a cancer cell, and how these cancer cells employ mechanisms to adapt to supernumerary centrosomes.

The resurrection of the PIDDosome - emerging roles in the DNA-damage response and centrosome surveillance.

The PIDDosome is often used as the alias for a multi-protein complex that includes the p53-induced death domain protein 1 (PIDD1), the bipartite linker protein CRADD (also known as RAIDD) and the pro-form of an endopeptidase belonging to the caspase family, i.e. caspase-2. Yet, PIDD1 variants can also interact with a number of other proteins that include RIPK1 (also known as RIP1) and IKBKG (also known as NEMO), PCNA and RFC5, as well as nucleolar components such as NPM1 or NCL. This promiscuity in protein binding is facilitated mainly by autoprocessing of the full-length protein into various fragments that contain different structural domains. As a result, multiple responses can be mediated by protein complexes that contain a PIDD1 domain. This suggests that PIDD1 acts as an integrator for multiple types of stress that need instant attention. Examples are various types of DNA lesion but also the presence of extra centrosomes that can foster aneuploidy and, ultimately, promote DNA damage. Here, we review the role of PIDD1 in response to DNA damage and also highlight novel functions of PIDD1, such as in centrosome surveillance and scheduled polyploidisation as part of a cellular differentiation program during organogenesis.

Asymmetric Centriole Numbers at Spindle Poles Cause Chromosome Missegregation in Cancer

Chromosomal instability is a hallmark of cancer and correlates with the presence of extra centrosomes, which originate from centriole overduplication. Overduplicated centrioles lead to the formation of centriole rosettes, which mature into supernumerary centrosomes in the subsequent cell cycle. While extra centrosomes promote chromosome missegregation by clustering into pseudo-bipolar spindles, the contribution of centriole rosettes to chromosome missegregation is unknown. We used multi-modal imaging of cells with conditional centriole overduplication to show that mitotic rosettes in bipolar spindles frequently harbor unequal centriole numbers, leading to biased chromosome capture that favors binding to the prominent pole. This results in chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy. Rosette mitoses lead to viable offspring and significantly contribute to progeny production. We further show that centrosome abnormalities in primary human malignancies frequently consist of centriole rosettes. Asasymmetric centriole rosettes generate mitotic errors that can be propagated, rosette mitoses are sufficient to cause chromosome missegregation in cancer.

Tumorigenesis: Extra! Extra! Read all about it!

Two papers demonstrate that centrosome amplification can cause cancer in mammals and that a PIDDosome–p53-dependent control mechanism acts to prevent cell proliferation in the presence of extra centrosomes.

Dividing with Extra Centrosomes: A Double Edged Sword for Cancer Cells.

The presence of supernumerary centrosomes is a hallmark of human tumours. Recent work in animal models suggests that extra centrosomes are not just bystanders in cancer but can accelerate tumourigenesis in the absence of the tumour suppressor p53. Centrosome amplification could indeed actively participate in tumour progression through the induction of chromosome instability, disruption of tissue architecture and promoting cell invasion. Paradoxically, however, centrosome amplification is rather poorly tolerated in normal cells and there are several hurdles cells need to overcome in order to efficiently proliferate in the presence of extra centrosomes. Here, we review the adaptation mechanisms that allow cells to efficiently divide in the presence of extra centrosomes and how these could be exploited to develop selective cancer therapies.

Microcephaly: STIL(l) a Tale of Too Many Centrosomes

Centrosome mutations associated with microcephaly are normally thought to result in loss-of-function phenotypes. A new study shows, however, that mutations found in the human microcephaly STIL gene cause centrosome amplification, suggesting a direct link between the presence of extra centrosomes and the establishment of this disease.

2013 ASCB Annual Meeting abstracts

To characterize how cell cycle-related defects can impact on mouse brain development, we have generated a simulation model that recapitulates the divisions of NSCs (Neural Stem Cells) during neurogenesis in silico. This model is based on cell cycle parameters of the progenitor populations evaluated in normal brains over the neurogenesis period (E10 to P0). To exemplify the use of our mathematical simulation, we have predicted the consequences of cell cycle perturbations due to centrosome amplification (the presence of more than two centrosomes in a cell) measured in a mouse model that we have recently generated and that exhibit microcephaly (brain size reduction). We have compared the brain volume reduction experimentally measured to the one simulated as a consequence of the observed defects that contribute to the depletion of the progenitor populations. First, we took into account the mitotic delay observed at different developmental stages and second the fraction of progenitor cells undergoing apoptosis, as a result of multipolar divisions that generate unviable aneuploid progeny. Our simulations provide evidence that depleting the fraction of NSCs undergoing multipolar divisions from the cycling population is sufficient to mimic over time the experimental curve and the extent of microcephaly that we observed during development. To further validate our scenario, we also tested the extent of microcephaly to be expected while considering that the whole population of NSCs with centrosome amplification at the onset of mitosis would be depleted. In such scenario, the extent of microcephaly predicted was much higher than what we observed experimentally; suggesting that brain size would be more reduced if all NSCs with extra centrosomes would die. We concluded from this simulation that molecular mechanisms exist that enable normal NSC divisions in the presence of extra centrosomes. Indeed, we observed centrosome clustering mechanisms that favor bipolar spindle formation in the presence of extra centrosomes. Our model allows to study the impact of cell cycle parameters during mammalian brain development. We believe this computational model could contribute to the identification of the mechanisms responsible for brain size reduction in the context of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability: a vicious cycle driving cellular evolution and cancer genome chaos

Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability frequently co-exist, and aneuploidy is recognized as a direct outcome of chromosomal instability. However, chromosomal instability is widely viewed as a consequence of mutations in genes involved in DNA replication, chromosome segregation, and cell cycle checkpoints. Telomere attrition and presence of extra centrosomes have also been recognized as causative for errors in genomic transmission. Here, we examine recent studies suggesting that aneuploidy itself can be responsible for the procreation of chromosomal instability. Evidence from both yeast and mammalian experimental models suggests that changes in chromosome copy number can cause changes in dosage of the products of many genes located on aneuploid chromosomes. These effects on gene expression can alter the balanced stoichiometry of various protein complexes, causing perturbations of their functions. Therefore, phenotypic consequences of aneuploidy will include chromosomal instability if the balanced stoichiometry of protein machineries responsible for accurate chromosome segregation is affected enough to perturb the function. The degree of chromosomal instability will depend on specific karyotypic changes, which may be due to dosage imbalances of specific genes or lack of scaling between chromosome segregation load and the capacity of the mitotic system. We propose that the relationship between aneuploidy and chromosomal instability can be envisioned as a "vicious cycle," where aneuploidy potentiates chromosomal instability leading to further karyotype diversity in the affected population.

Abstract C65: Mechanisms to maintain extra centrosomes in cancer cells

Abstract Multiple centrosomes in tumor cells create the potential for multipolar divisions that can lead to aneuploidy and cell death. Nevertheless, many cancer cells successfully divide because of mechanisms that suppress multipolar mitoses. Using a genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila S2 cells, we defined several mechanisms that suppress multipolar mitoses. We also found that HSET, a normally non-essential kinesin motor was essential for the viability of cancer cells containing extra centrosomes. Interestingly, using fibronectin micropatterns, we found that interphase cell shape and adhesion pattern can determine the success of the subsequent mitosis in cells with extra centrosomes. Thus, cell adhesion is an important morphological feature that contributes to centrosome clustering. Importantly, during tumor progression, changes in cell architecture and adhesion patterns, such as loss of E-cadherin and acquisition of an elongated cell shape, are often observed. This is referred to as the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The presence of extra centrosomes is often correlated with more malignant tumors, which lost their epithelial phenotype most likely through EMT. Thus, we hypothesized that the ability of cells to cluster extra centrosomes varies between epithelial cells and non-epithelial cells. To test this idea we used a panel of non-transformed mammalian epithelial and non-epithelial cell lines and quantified their ability to cluster extra centrosomes. We treated cells with DCB to generate tetraploid cells containing extra centrosomes and followed them by live-cell imaging. We found that non-epithelial cells cluster their extra centrosomes much more efficiently than epithelial cells. This finding suggests that loss of cell-cell adhesion might facilitate centrosome clustering. Consistent with this idea, our preliminary data indicate that induction of EMT in the epithelial cell lines MCF10A and MDCK increases the number of tetraploid cells that undergo a bipolar mitosis. We propose that changes that take place during tumor progression, such as loss of cell-cell adhesion, might facilitate centrosome clustering and therefore increase the ability of cancer cells to maintain extra centrosomes. We are currently investigating the nature of the changes that occur during EMT that facilitate centrosome clustering. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(23 Suppl):C65.

Centrosome Amplification Can Initiate Tumorigenesis in Flies

Centrosome amplification is a common feature of many cancer cells, and it has been previously proposed that centrosome amplification can drive genetic instability and so tumorigenesis. To test this hypothesis, we generated Drosophila lines that have extra centrosomes in approximately 60% of their somatic cells. Many cells with extra centrosomes initially form multipolar spindles, but these spindles ultimately become bipolar. This requires a delay in mitosis that is mediated by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). As a result of this delay, there is no dramatic increase in genetic instability in flies with extra centrosomes, and these flies maintain a stable diploid genome over many generations. The asymmetric division of the larval neural stem cells, however, is compromised in the presence of extra centrosomes, and larval brain cells with extra centrosomes can generate metastatic tumors when transplanted into the abdomens of wild-type hosts. Thus, centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies.