Azide ion competition experiments and oxygen-17 and -18 studies have been used to determine the extent of cleavage of the coordinated oxygen–carbon bond when (amide- O)pentaamminecobalt(III) complexes were reacted in aqueous base. Base hydrolysis in the presence of azide ion at 22°C (0.10 M NaOH, 1.0 M NaN 3) of [(NH 3) 5CoOC(CH 3)NH 2] 2(S 2O 6) 3·3H 2O and [(NH 3) 5CoOC(CH 3)N(CH 3) 2](CF 3SO 3) 3·H 2O produced 12.5 and 13.0% azido complex respectively, as expected for tripositive complexes reacting solely by cobalt–ligand bond cleavage. However reaction of [(NH 3) 5CoOC(C 6H 5)NH 2] 2(S 2O 6) 3·3H 2O produced only 10.5% azido complex and this implied that 17% of the complex was reacting by carbon–oxygen bond cleavage. 17O NMR spectroscopy of the products of base hydrolysis of [(NH 3) 5CoOC(CH 3)N(CH 3) 2](CF 3SO 3) 3·H 2O in 22 atom% H 2 17O confirmed that it reacted largely by ligand substitution but the same experiment using [(NH 3) 5CoOC(CH 2F)NH 2] 2(S 2O 6) 3·3H 2O was inconclusive because of secondary hydrolysis of the liberated amide. Oxygen-18 analysis of coordinated water has demonstrated conclusively that for complexes of primary or secondary amides with electron-withdrawing substituents carbon–oxygen bond cleavage in aqueous base is a significant reaction: [(NH 3) 5CoOC(C 6H 5)NH 2] 2(S 2O 6) 3·3H 2O, 19%; [(NH 3) 5CoOC(CH 2F)NH 2] 2(S 2O 6) 3·3H 2O, 10%; and [(NH 3) 5Co(succinimido- O)](CF 3SO 3) 2·H 2O, 9%. The reaction was not detected when [(NH 3) 5CoOC(CH 3)NH 2] 2(S 2O 6) 3·3H 2O and [(NH 3) 5CoOC(CH 3)N(CH 3) 2](CF 3SO 3) 3·H 2O were dissolved in aqueous base as these amides are not electronically activated, nor was it detected for reaction of [(NH 3) 5CoOC(H)N(CH 3) 2](CF 3SO 3) 3·H 2O; this complex is activated towards addition by hydroxide ion (84% C–N cleavage) but lacks an ionisable proton on the amide nitrogen to facilitate proton transfer in the intermediate in the C–O bond rupture process.