You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy I1 Apr 2016MP41-01 COMPARISON OF OVERALL SURVIVAL RATE BETWEEN PARTIAL AND RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IN PATIENTS WITH PRE-EXISTING CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: A MULTICENTER STUDY Jae Seung Chung, Seok-Soo Byun, Sang Eun Lee, Sung Kyu Hong, Sang Chul Lee, Cheol Kwak, Sung Hoo Hong, Yong June Kim, and Seok Ho Kang Jae Seung ChungJae Seung Chung More articles by this author , Seok-Soo ByunSeok-Soo Byun More articles by this author , Sang Eun LeeSang Eun Lee More articles by this author , Sung Kyu HongSung Kyu Hong More articles by this author , Sang Chul LeeSang Chul Lee More articles by this author , Cheol KwakCheol Kwak More articles by this author , Sung Hoo HongSung Hoo Hong More articles by this author , Yong June KimYong June Kim More articles by this author , and Seok Ho KangSeok Ho Kang More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.168AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES We examine the impact of PN relative to RN on overall survival and renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage III. METHODS We studied 4178 patients who underwent PN or RN for pathological T1a-T2NOMO RCC from 1988 to 2014. To investigate the relative effectiveness of PN in terms of OS according to CKD stage, we divided the RCC patients into two subgroups: CKD I-II (eGFR≥60 ml/min/1.73m2) and CKD III (30≤eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2). To achieve equal distributions of patients between PN and RN, we pair-matched the patients using propensity scores in terms of age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, charlson index, BMI, tumor size, preoperative kidney function. Overall survival, cancer specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazard method. Renal function was evaluated by using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS Of 3534 patients with CKD I-II groups, 878 RN patients were matched with 878 PN patients. In CKD III group, which was comprised of 628 patients, 138 RN patients were matched with 138 PN patients. The median follow-up durations in the RN and PN arms were 52.3 and 43.2 months in CKD I-II group, 56.2 and 50.3 months in CKD III group, respectively. The 5-year OS rates after PN and RN differed in CKD I-II groups (99.4% for PN and 96.5% for RN, p=0.001). 5-year CSS rate were 99.7% for PN and 99.5% for RN (p=0.551). However, the 5-year OS rate after surgery were not different between RN and PN in CKD III-IV groups ( 97.8% vs 93.5%, p=0.069). The difference in kidney cancer specific survival (PN vs RN) was not statistically significant (p=0.524). The Cox hazard analysis showed that the operative method was a significant factor for overall survival in CKD I-II (HR 0.275, CI 0.121-0.623, p=0.002). However, PN was not beneficial in terms of OS in CKD III (HR 0.317, CI 0.086-1.172, p=0.085). PN had better postoperative renal function preservation compared to RN regardless of CKD stages. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that PN is associated with a higher overall survival rate for patients with preoperative CKD I and II. However, benefits for PN were not observed in CKD III patients. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e559-e560 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Jae Seung Chung More articles by this author Seok-Soo Byun More articles by this author Sang Eun Lee More articles by this author Sung Kyu Hong More articles by this author Sang Chul Lee More articles by this author Cheol Kwak More articles by this author Sung Hoo Hong More articles by this author Yong June Kim More articles by this author Seok Ho Kang More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract