You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology & Simulation: Training & Skills Assessment I1 Apr 2016MP11-02 IMPACT OF RESIDENT TRAINEE INVOLVEMENT ON ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY (RARP) OUTCOMES. Eric Schommer, Kolbi Tonkovich, Zhou Li, and David Thiel Eric SchommerEric Schommer More articles by this author , Kolbi TonkovichKolbi Tonkovich More articles by this author , Zhou LiZhou Li More articles by this author , and David ThielDavid Thiel More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2373AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES This study examines peri-operative outcomes of RARP and their association with resident trainee involvement in different steps of RARP. METHODS RARP was divided into 7 steps: bladder takedown (BTD), endopelvic fascia, bladder neck (BN), seminal vesicle/vas deferens (sv/vas), pedicle/nerve sparing, apex, and anastomosis. 372 RARP performed by a single surgeon from July 2007 to February 2015 were analyzed. Resident console time (RCT) during each of the 7 key steps was recorded. Peri-operative variables were compared between surgeon-only (SO) and resident-involved (RI) cases. Vital outcomes of trainee performance on the key steps were compared using two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS Residents performed on the console for 232 of 372 cases (62.4%). Preoperative BMI (mean 28.4), PSA (mean 6.7), Gleason score (6-7 88.7%, 8-10 11.3%), ASA score (mean 2.4), AUA score (mean 8.9) and SHIM score (mean 15.9) were similar between SO and RI cases. 2nd year resident status (P <0.0001) and pre-operative PSA > 10 (P=0.0093) were associated with no RCT. Estimated blood loss (P=0.09), transfusion (P=0.11), and complications (P=.33) were no different between SO and RI cases. Mean OR time (ORT) was less for the SO cases (190.4 vs. 206.4 min, P=0.003). There was no difference in positive margins (P=0.79), length of stay (LOS) (P=0.30), catheter days (P=0.17), readmission (P=0.33), reoperation (P=0.73), home with drain (P=0.88), or undetectable 6 month PSA (P=0.07) when comparing SO to RI cases. Residents performing BN step had no effect on BN margins (P=0.73), prolonged catheterization (P=0.62), home with drain (P=0.4121), or 6 month undetectable PSA (P=0.1070). ORT was not affected by resident performing anastomosis (P=0.08) or sv/vas (P=0.82), but was significantly prolonged if BTD performed by trainee (233.0 vs. 191.7min, P <0.0001). Residents performing anastomosis had no effect on prolonged catheter time (P=0.62), home with drain (P=0.41), or LOS (P=0.20). Residents were more likely to be involved in at least one portion of the case (74.0% vs. 56.6%, P=0.0012), in BN (63.4% vs. 30.6% P <0.0001), and anastomosis (48.0% vs. 15.3%, P <0.0001) following purchase of Mimic simulator (Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) in January 2012. CONCLUSIONS Supervised RCT in RARP does not negatively affect peri-operative patient outcomes although it prolongs ORT compared to SO cases with the BTD step adding the most operative time. The acquisition of a robotic simulator appears to have increased RCT in various steps of RARP. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e111 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Eric Schommer More articles by this author Kolbi Tonkovich More articles by this author Zhou Li More articles by this author David Thiel More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract