Abstract Background Management of patients with metastatic bone disease for which there is risk of pathological fracture remains a clinical challenge. Surgeries performed in cancer patients are procedures at a high risk of thromboembolic and infectious complications. Expected survival is the most important factor to determine the treatment modality. This study evaluated preoperative different survival scores in metastatic bone disease surgery. Methods An electronic search of medical literature was conducted through MEDLINE (accessed via Ovid), EMBASE (accessed via Ovid), and PubMed. We performed a systematic review for studies involving prognostic scores that assessed the survival rates of patients with bone metastases. Further, we conducted a meta-analysis including studies that measured the sensitivity and specificity of the Tokuhashi and Tomita score in predicting 6- month survival rates for spinal metastases. Results A total of 68 studies were included in our study; of them, 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Sensitivities ranged from 27 to 92% for the Tokuhashi score and from 76 to 99% for the Tomita score, and specificities ranged from 44 to 96% for the Tokuhashi score and from 1 to 44% for the Tomita score. The pooled DOR was 6.04 (95 % CI, 3.96– 9.21; Tau-squared= 0.90; I2= 86%) for the Tokuhashi score and 1.34 (95 % CI, 0.67–2.67; Tau-squared = 1.02; I2= 85%) for the Tomita score. The SORG Nomogram, developed in a large surgical cohort, showed good discrimination on 3-month and 1-year survival, good calibration and was superior in direct comparison with low risk of bias and low concern regarding applicability. PATHFx 3.0, 2013-SPRING and potentially Optimodel were found to be the best models in terms of performance in predicting survival for surgery for extremity metastasis. Conclusion Regarding spinal metastases, the SORG Nomogram and machine learning algorithms showed better performance in survival prediction for surgery. Regarding extremity metastases, we found PATHFx 3.0, 2013-SPRING and Optimodel to be the best models in terms of performance. Although Tokuhashi score was more accurate than Tomita score slightly, both showed low accuracy to predict 6 months residual survival.
Read full abstract