Preconception Lifestyle Intervention Research Articles

O-286 Weight loss interventions prior to infertility treatment does it make sense?

Abstract Obesity in women is negatively associated with reproductive outcomes such as decreased natural conception and pregnancy rate in assisted reproductive technique (ART), as well as increased risks of miscarriage and maternal and foetal complications, including risks of perinatal and neonatal death. The reproductive consequences of obesity stem from a combination of ovarian, uterine and systemic pathophysiological changes, although not all fully elucidated. These alterations contribute to reduced oocyte and embryo quality, reduced uterine receptivity and systemic inflammatory responses. Various guidelines recommend lifestyle interventions based on dietary and/or physical activity targeting at a 5 to 10% reduction in body weight as an initial step prior to fertility treatment for women with infertility and overweight or obesity. However, evidence from well powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions aiming at weight loss prior to fertility treatments is scarce and not unequivocally positive with respect to reproductive outcomes. First, this presentation will focus on the effectiveness of pre-conception lifestyle intervention targeting weight loss, on reproductive outcomes documented in the latest systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis and preliminary results of an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA). The latest SR in 2021 (Obesity reviews DOI: 10.1111/obr.13325) including 15 RCTs until March 2020 (N = 1852 women) suggests more weight loss in the intervention group. An increase in live birth rates (LBR) in nine RCTs (N = 1203 women) and a higher natural conception rate following lifestyle intervention compared to no intervention were reported. However, no effect of lifestyle intervention preceding ART in six RCTs (N = 1040 women). With respect to potential harm of lifestyle intervention there is no significant increased risk of early pregnancy loss. Complications during pregnancy, such as early pregnancy loss and maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes are underreported in most included studies. The VENUS IPDMA (BMJ Open 2022;12:e065206) analyzed individual patient data of 11 RCTs of 14 eligible RCTs (N = 1903 participants; 1010 in the intervention group and 893 in the control group). Preliminary data (abstract ESHRE 2023) showed that physical activity and/or dietary interventions prior to fertility treatment resulted in more weight reduction compared to those in the control group in 11 RCTs. The intervention group, however, did not have a significantly higher rate of LBR in nine RCTs (N = 1702 participants). Compared to the control group, the intervention group had smaller waist and hip circumference, lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and lower triglycerides, total cholesterol, glucose, and insulin levels at the time of study follow up. Do we have a definitive answer to the question: “weight loss interventions prior to fertility treatment; does it make sense” using data of IPDMA? Shortcomings of the available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of dietary and/or physical activity interventions in women with overweight or obesity prior to fertility treatments will be presented. Limitations of the studies and future perspectives and challenges in this field of research will be highlighted. Finally, the question “does it make sense” is broader than the effectivity of the intervention. Do we as clinicians adopt our role as health advocates to advice and guide future parents to adopt a healthy lifestyle, with weight reduction as a result? Could this lead to a healthier lifestyle for the future of parents and children? To conclude: “does it make sense” is not an easy question to answer.

Diverse Preconception Cohort of Digital Health Platform Shows Promise for Addressing Fertility Care Gaps

About 10 percent of women (6.1 million) in the United States ages 15-44 have difficulty getting pregnant or staying pregnant. Addressing fertility challenges requires an understanding of not only the causes of infertility, but also modifiable risk factors that can impact the likelihood of pregnancy. However, current research on factors influencing conception is often conducted among people who are already engaged in medical fertility treatments. In addition, existing databases are not representative of the U.S. population demographically. This retrospective study describes the demographics of participants of a digital fertility platform who were seeking fertility guidance prior to conception. Demographic data collected from participants who enrolled in Doveras Fertility Inc. (Doveras)’s digital health offerings in 2023 and 2024 were analyzed. Doveras offers personalized preconception lifestyle and behavioral intervention programs, delivered through an innovative digital fertility health platform, for individuals and couples to improve various endpoints along the reproductive and maternal health journey. This paper reports on the inception cohort of the first 600 enrolled participants (Doveras Preconception Cohort I), a subset of a wider pool of Doveras participants enrolled. Doveras achieved this enrollment of a notably diverse and representative population: 65.9% of female-identifying participants identify as White and 34.1% as non-white; 60.5% of male-identifying participants identify as White and 39.5% identify as non-white. The cohort also demonstrates a wide geographical spread, with participants recruited from 46 U.S. states, and represents a population that may have limited access to preconception healthcare: more than half (61%) of participants live in states with 13 OBGYNS or fewer per 100,000 population. The Doveras digital fertility platform presented herein may provide an opportunity to reach a broader and more diverse U.S. population during the preconception period than currently has access to medical fertility care.

Randomised controlled trial of preconception lifestyle intervention on maternal and offspring health in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: study protocol for the BEFORE THE BEGINNING trial

IntroductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with increased risk for type 2 diabetes in the mother and cardiometabolic diseases in the child. The preconception period is an optimal window to...

A pre-conception clinical trial to reduce intergenerational obesity and diabetes risks: The NDPP-NextGen trial protocol

BackgroundIntrauterine exposure to maternal overweight/obesity or diabetes transmits risks to offspring, perpetuating a disease cycle across generations. Prenatal interventions to reduce maternal weight or dysglycemia have limited impact, while postpartum interventions can alter the intrauterine environment only if child-bearing continues. Efficacious preconception interventions are needed, especially for underserved populations, and with the potential to be scaled up sustainably. Research is also needed to assess intervention effects at conception, throughout pregnancy, and among offspring. MethodsThis two-arm, parallel randomized clinical trial will include 360 biological females with overweight/obesity and moderate-to-high likelihood of pregnancy within 24 months. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to a yearlong pre-conception lifestyle intervention based on the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP-NextGen) or usual care. Data collection will occur at enrollment (before conception), post-conception (<8 weeks gestation), late pregnancy (28–32 weeks gestation), and delivery (before discharge) for participants who become pregnant within 24 months of enrollment. Main outcomes are post-conception body mass index (<8 weeks gestation; primary outcome), post-conception fasting glucose (<8 weeks gestation; secondary outcome), and neonatal adiposity (<2 days post-birth). Additional clinical, behavioral, perinatal and offspring data will be collected, and biospecimens (blood, urine, stool, cord blood) will be banked for future ancillary studies. ConclusionThis clinical trial will evaluate an intervention model (NDPP-NextGen) with potential to improve maternal health among the >50% of US females with overweight/obesity or diabetes risks in pregnancy. If successful, it can be scaled among >1800 organizations delivering NDPP in the United States to benefit the health of future generations.

Randomized controlled trial of prepregnancy lifestyle intervention to reduce recurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus

Preconception lifestyle intervention holds potential for reducing gestational diabetes mellitus, but clinical trial data are lacking. This study aimed to determine the effects of a prepregnancy weight loss intervention on gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence in women with overweight/obesity and previous gestational diabetes mellitus. A 2-site, randomized controlled trial comparing a prepregnancy lifestyle intervention with educational control was conducted between December 2017 and February 2022. A total of 199 English- and Spanish-speaking adults with overweight/obesity and previous gestational diabetes mellitus were randomized to a 16-week prepregnancy lifestyle intervention with ongoing treatment until conception or educational control. The primary outcome was gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence. Analyses excluded 6 participants who conceived but did not have gestational diabetes mellitus ascertained by standard methods. In the 63 (33%) women who conceived and had gestational diabetes mellitus ascertained (Ns=38/102 [37%] intervention vs 25/91 [28.0%] control; P=.17), those in the intervention group had significantly greater weight loss at 16 weeks compared with controls (4.8 [3.4-6.0] vs 0.7 [-0.9 to 2.3] kg; P=.001) and a greater proportion lost ≥5% of body weight (50.0% [17/34] vs 13.6% [3/22]; P=.005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence between the intervention (57.9% [ns=23/38]) and the control group (44.0% [ns=11/25]; odds ratio, 1.8 [0.59-5.8]). Independent of group, greater prepregnancy weight loss predicted 21% lower odds of gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence (odds ratio, 0.79 [0.66-0.94]; P=.008). A ≥5% weight loss before conception reduced the odds of gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence by 82% (odds ratio, 0.18 [0.04-0.88]; P=.03). Lifestyle intervention produced considerable prepregnancy weight loss but did not affect gestational diabetes mellitus rates. Given that the conception rate was 50% lower than expected, this study was underpowered.

Which factors play a role in the decision of mothers to participate in child follow-up examinations after participation in an RCT?: a semi-quantitative study

ObjectivesTo determine which factors contribute to the decision of mothers to participate with their child in follow-up (FU) examinations after participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) prior to conception.DesignA...

Preconception lifestyle intervention in women with obesity and echocardiographic indices of cardiovascular health in their children

Improving maternal lifestyle before conception may prevent the adverse effects of maternal obesity on their children's future cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. In the current study, we examined whether a preconception lifestyle intervention in women with obesity could alter echocardiographic indices of cardiovascular health in their children. Six years after a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a 6-month preconception lifestyle intervention in women with obesity and infertility prior to fertility care to prompt fertility care, 315 of the 341 children conceived within 24 months after randomization were eligible for this study. The intervention was aimed at weight loss (≥5% or until BMI < 29 kg/m2). Children underwent echocardiographic assessment of cardiac structure and function, conducted by a single pediatric cardiologist, blinded to group allocation. Results were adjusted for multiple variables including body surface area, age, and sex in linear regression analyses. Sixty children (32 girls, 53%) were included, mean age 6.5 years (SD 1.09). Twenty-four children (40%) were born to mothers in the intervention group. Children of mothers from the intervention group had a lower end-diastolic interventricular septum thickness (-0.88 Z-score, 95%CI -1.18 to -0.58), a lower left ventricle mass index (-8.56 g/m2, 95%CI -13.09 to -4.03), and higher peak systolic and early diastolic annular velocity of the left ventricle (1.43 cm/s 95%CI 0.65 to 2.20 and 2.39 cm/s 95%CI 0.68 to 4.11, respectively) compared to children of mothers from the control group. Children of women with obesity, who underwent a preconception lifestyle intervention, had improved cardiac structure and function; a thinner interventricular septum, lower left ventricle mass, and improved systolic and diastolic tissue Doppler velocities. Despite its high attrition rates, our study provides the first experimental human evidence suggesting that preconception lifestyle interventions may present a method of reducing CVD risk in the next generation. LIFEstyle study: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR1530 ( https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/1461 ). This follow-up study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the University Medical Centre Groningen (METC code: 2008/284).

Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial.

BackgroundWomen with obesity and infertility are counseled to lose weight prior to conception and infertility treatment to improve pregnancy rates and birth outcomes, although confirmatory evidence from randomized trials is lacking. We assessed whether a preconception intensive lifestyle intervention with acute weight loss is superior to a weight neutral intervention at achieving a healthy live birth.Methods and findingsIn this open-label, randomized controlled study (FIT-PLESE), 379 women with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and unexplained infertility were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 2 preconception lifestyle modification groups lasting 16 weeks, between July 2015 and July 2018 (final follow-up September 2019) followed by infertility therapy. The primary outcome was the healthy live birth (term infant of normal weight without major anomalies) incidence. This was conducted at 9 academic health centers across the United States. The intensive group underwent increased physical activity and weight loss (target 7%) through meal replacements and medication (Orlistat) compared to a standard group with increased physical activity alone without weight loss. This was followed by standardized empiric infertility treatment consisting of 3 cycles of ovarian stimulation/intrauterine insemination. Outcomes of any resulting pregnancy were tracked. Among 191 women randomized to standard lifestyle group, 40 dropped out of the study before conception; among 188 women randomized to intensive lifestyle group, 31 dropped out of the study before conception. All the randomized women were included in the intent-to-treat analysis for primary outcome of a healthy live birth. There were no significant differences in the incidence of healthy live births [standard 29/191(15.2%), intensive 23/188(12.2%), rate ratio 0.81 (0.48 to 1.34), P = 0.40]. Intensive had significant weight loss compared to standard (−6.6 ± 5.4% versus −0.3 ± 3.2%, P < 0.001). There were improvements in metabolic health, including a marked decrease in incidence of the metabolic syndrome (baseline to 16 weeks: standard: 53.6% to 49.4%, intensive 52.8% to 32.2%, P = 0.003). Gastrointestinal side effects were significantly more common in intensive. There was a higher, but nonsignificant, first trimester pregnancy loss in the intensive group (33.3% versus 23.7% in standard, 95% rate ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 2.50). The main limitations of the study are the limited power of the study to detect rare complications and the design difficulty in finding an adequate time matched control intervention, as the standard exercise intervention may have potentially been helpful or harmful.ConclusionsA preconception intensive lifestyle intervention for weight loss did not improve fertility or birth outcomes compared to an exercise intervention without targeted weight loss. Improvement in metabolic health may not translate into improved female fecundity.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02432209.

Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial

Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial

The Effects of a Preconception Lifestyle Intervention on Childhood Cardiometabolic Health-Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Maternal obesity is associated with adverse metabolic outcomes in her offspring, from the earliest stages of development leading to obesity and poorer cardiometabolic health in her offspring. We investigated whether an effective preconception lifestyle intervention in obese women affected cardiometabolic health of their offspring. We randomly allocated 577 infertile women with obesity to a 6-month lifestyle intervention, or to prompt infertility management. Of the 305 eligible children, despite intensive efforts, 17 in the intervention and 29 in the control group were available for follow-up at age 3–6 years. We compared the child’s Body Mass Index (BMI) Z score, waist and hip circumference, body-fat percentage, blood pressure Z scores, pulse wave velocity and serum lipids, glucose and insulin concentrations. Between the intervention and control groups, the mean (±SD) offspring BMI Z score (0.69 (±1.17) vs. 0.62 (±1.04)) and systolic and diastolic blood pressure Z scores (0.45 (±0.65) vs. 0.54 (±0.57); 0.91 (±0.66) vs. 0.96 (±0.57)) were similar, although elevated compared to the norm population. We also did not detect any differences between the groups in the other outcomes. In this study, we could not detect effects of a preconception lifestyle intervention in obese infertile women on the cardiometabolic health of their offspring. Low follow-up rates, perhaps due to the children’s age or the subject matter, combined with selection bias abating contrast in periconceptional weight between participating mothers, hampered the detection of potential effects. Future studies that account for these factors are needed to confirm whether a preconception lifestyle intervention may improve the cardiometabolic health of children of obese mothers.

Preconception Lifestyle Intervention could Reduce the Incidence of Recurrent or New GDM: An Interventional Body Mass Index-Based Study

Preconception Lifestyle Intervention could Reduce the Incidence of Recurrent or New GDM: An Interventional Body Mass Index-Based Study

Pre-Conception Interventions for Subfertile Couples Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment: Modeling Analysis.

BackgroundApproximately 1 in 7 couples experience subfertility, many of whom have lifestyles that negatively affect fertility, such as poor nutrition, low physical activity, obesity, smoking, or alcohol consumption. Reducing lifestyle risk factors prior to pregnancy or assisted reproductive technology treatment contributes to the improvement of reproductive health, but cost-implications are unknown.ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to evaluate reproductive, maternal pregnancy, and birth outcomes, as well as the costs of pre-conception lifestyle intervention programs in subfertile couples and obese women undergoing assisted reproductive technology.MethodsUsing a hypothetical model based on quantitative parameters from published literature and expert opinion, we evaluated the following lifestyle intervention programs: (1) Smarter Pregnancy, an online tool; (2) LIFEstyle, which provides outpatient support for obese women; (3) concurrent use of both Smarter Pregnancy and LIFEstyle for obese women; (4) smoking cessation in men; and (5) a mindfulness mental health support program using group therapy sessions. The model population was based on data from the Netherlands.ResultsAll model-based analyses of the lifestyle interventions showed a reduction in the number of in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, or intrauterine insemination treatments required to achieve pregnancy and successful birth for couples in the Netherlands. Smarter Pregnancy was modeled to have the largest increase in spontaneous pregnancy rate (13.0%) and the largest absolute reduction in potential assisted reproductive technology treatments. Among obese subfertile women, LIFEstyle was modeled to show a reduction in the occurrence of gestational diabetes, maternal hypertensive pregnancy complications, and preterm births by 4.4%, 3.8%, and 3.0%, respectively, per couple. Modeled cost savings per couple per year were €41 (US $48.66), €360 (US $427.23), €513 (US $608.80), €586 (US $695.43), and €1163 (US $1380.18) for smoking cessation, mindfulness, Smarter Pregnancy, combined Smarter Pregnancy AND LIFEstyle, and LIFEstyle interventions, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough we modeled the potential impact on reproductive outcomes and costs of fertility treatment rather than collecting real-world data, our model suggests that of the lifestyle interventions for encouraging healthier behaviors, all are likely to be cost effective and appear to have positive effects on reproductive, maternal pregnancy, and birth outcomes. Further real-world data are required to determine the cost-effectiveness of pre-conception lifestyle interventions, including mobile apps and web-based tools that help improve lifestyle, and their effects on reproductive health. We believe that further implementation of the lifestyle app Smarter Pregnancy designed for subfertile couples seeking assistance to become pregnant is likely to be cost-effective and would allow reproductive health outcomes to be collected.

A lifestyle intervention randomized controlled trial in obese women with infertility improved body composition among those who experienced childhood adversity

Previous research indicates that tailoring lifestyle interventions to participant characteristics optimizes intervention effectiveness. Our objective was to assess whether the effects of a preconception lifestyle intervention in obese infertile women depended on women's exposure to adversity in childhood. A follow‐up of a preconception lifestyle intervention randomized controlled trial (the LIFEstyle study) was conducted in the Netherlands among 577 infertile women (age 18–39 years) with a body mass index (BMI) ≥29 kg/m2 at time of randomization; N = 110 (19%) consented to the follow‐up assessment, 6 years later. A 6‐month preconception lifestyle intervention aimed weight loss through improving diet and increasing physical activity. The control group received care as usual. Outcome measures included weight, BMI, waist and hip circumference, body fat percentage, blood pressure and metabolic syndrome. The potential moderator, childhood adversity, was assessed with the Life Events Checklist‐5 questionnaire. Among the 110 women in our follow‐up study, n = 65 (59%) reported no childhood adverse events, n = 28 (25.5%) reported 1 type of childhood adverse events and n = 17 (15.5%) reported ≥2 types of childhood adverse events. Regression models showed significant interactions between childhood adversity and effects of lifestyle intervention at the 6‐year follow‐up. Among women who experienced childhood adversity, the intervention significantly reduced weight (−10.0 [95% CI −18.5 to −1.5] kg, p = 0.02), BMI (−3.2 [−6.1 to −0.2] kg/m2, p = 0.04) and body fat percentage (−4.5 [95% CI −7.2 to −1.9] p < 0.01). Among women without childhood adversity, the intervention did not affect these outcomes (2.7 [−3.9 to 9.4] kg, p = 0.42), (0.9 [−1.4 to 3.3] kg/m2, p = 0.42) and (1.7 [95% CI −0.3 to 3.7] p = 0.10), respectively. Having a history of childhood adversity modified the effect of a preconception lifestyle intervention on women's body composition. If replicated, it may be important to consider childhood adversity as a determinant of lifestyle intervention effectiveness.

OR11-04 Effect of Preconception Intensive vs. Standard Lifestyle Intervention on Birth Outcomes in Obese Women With Unexplained Infertility: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

We hypothesized that weight loss with an intensive preconception lifestyle (IL) intervention of caloric restriction with meal replacements, daily orlistat and increased physical activity in women with obesity and unexplained infertility (UI) was more likely to result in Good Birth Outcome than a standard lifestyle modification (SL) with increased physical activity alone. The 16 week period of lifestyle modification was followed by an open label empiric infertility treatment regimen of 3 cycles of ovarian stimulation with clomiphene, ovulation triggering with hCG and intrauterine insemination. We randomized 379 obese women 18-40y with UI (regular menses, normal ovarian reserve, patent reproductive tract and normal male factor). A Good Birth Outcome (GBO) was the primary outcome, defined as a live birth of an infant born at ≥37wks with a birthweight between 2500-4000g and no major congenital anomaly. Key secondary outcomes were live birth, pregnancy loss and pregnancy complication rates. The study had 80% power and an alpha of 0.05 to detect an absolute 15% difference in GBO. An Intention-to-Treat analysis was used. Both groups (SL N=191, IL N =188) were well matched at baseline(e.g. weight (kg), mean ± SD, SL:107±21, IL: 108 ±23). Women in the IL arm lost significantly more weight preconception than SL (SL -0.3±3.4 vs IL -7.3±6.6 kg, P<.001) with similar decreases in associated biometric and biochemical parameters. Overall 59.4% of the IL group lost >5% weight vs 6.5% in SL group(P<.001). Despite achieving the targeted weight loss, GBO rate between groups was not significantly different (IL12.2% vs SL 15.2%, IL Rate Ratio, 95% CI: 0.8, 0.5-1.3) or in live birth (IL 20.2% vs SL 22.0%, IL RR: 0.9, 0.6-1.4). Pregnancy loss among women who conceived trended higher in the IL group (IL 38.1% vs SL 23.7%, IL RR:1.6, 0.9-2.8) but miscarriage rates (loss after visualized intrauterine pregnancy), were significantly higher in IL (IL 20.6% vs SL 3.4%, IL RR: 6.1, 1.4-25.8, P=0.005). Birthweights were similar in both groups (IL: 3199±712 vs SL: 3106±794g). Major pregnancy complications trended lower in IL: Preterm Labor (IL 3.2% vs SL 10.2%), Pre-eclampsia (IL 6.3% vs SL 11.9%), Gestational DM (IL 9.5% vs SL 16.9%). Adverse events were more common in the IL group, i.e. increased GI side effects of bloating, flatulence, diarrhea and steatorrhea, likely related to use of orlistat. Moderate weight loss prior to conception does not improve live birth or GBO rates compared to exercise alone in obese women. Of concern, early pregnancy loss is more common when conception occurs after IL intervention. However a benefit to IL modification preconception may be lower perinatal morbidity, although further larger studies are necessary to confirm this potential benefit.

MON-LB8 A Preconception Lifestyle Intervention Maintained Throughout Pregnancy Improves Some Gestational and Neonatal Outcomes in Women With Obesity and Infertility

Background: Obesity in women of childbearing age is associated with infertility and increases significantly the risks of many pregnancy and neonatal complications. Adopting a healthy lifestyle prior conception and maintaining it during pregnancy may reduce these complications. Our aim was therefore to determine whether a lifestyle program targeting women with obesity and infertility and maintained during pregnancy improves gestational and neonatal outcomes. Methods: We report on 46 women who became pregnant and had available outcome data during pregnancy and at birth, among 127 women with infertility and obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥30 kg/m²), or overweight with PCOS (BMI ≥27 kg/m²), who were enrolled in a lifestyle randomized-controlled trial. Participants were randomized to the control group (CG, n=20), who received standard of care, or the lifestyle group (LSG, n=26), who followed a lifestyle program alone for 6 months, and then in combination with usual fertility care for 18 months or until the end of pregnancy. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were retrospectively retrieved from mothers’ and newborns’ medical records. Results: At enrollment, both groups were similar for age (29.3 vs 31.0 years), BMI (38.7 vs 38.4 kg/m2) and waist circumference (113.7 vs 112.7 cm). Preconception weight loss was significantly higher in the LSG compared to the CG (4.86 kg vs 1.21 kg, p=0.013), but gestational weight gains were similar (+10.83 vs +10.52 kg, p=0.987). During pregnancy, groups did not differ for the rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes or other clinical outcomes, but significantly less women in the LSG required insulin for treatment of their gestational diabetes (12.5% vs 42.1%, p=0.027) as well as urgent cesarean section due to failure of vaginal delivery (0.0% vs 21.1%, p=0.021). Regarding neonatal outcomes, there was no significant difference between groups for gestational age, weight at birth and head circumference, as well as rates of prematurity, LGA, SGA, birth defects or other clinical outcomes, but babies from the LSG displayed significantly lower tricipital skinfolds (4.73 mm vs 5.72 mm, p=0.031) and trends for lower sum of four skinfolds (16.61 mm vs 19.06 mm, p=0.056) and increased length at birth (50.82 cm vs 49.63 cm, p=0,053). Conclusion: In women with obesity and infertility, our lifestyle program initiated prior to fertility treatments and maintained throughout pregnancy improved their preconception weight and lifestyle, but not their gestational weight gain. Such intervention was nonetheless effective to reduce significantly some clinically relevant pregnancy and neonatal complications. If these results are replicated in a larger sample, it would strongly suggest that women with obesity should be supported to adopt a healthy lifestyle prior conception in order to increase their likelihood of giving birth to a healthy baby.

Towards Prepared mums (TOP-mums) for a healthy start, a lifestyle intervention for women with overweight and a child wish: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in the Netherlands

IntroductionPericonception obesity is associated with a higher risk for adverse perinatal outcomes such as gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, large for gestational age, operative delivery and preterm birth. Lifestyle interventions during...

Preconception Lifestyle and Cardiovascular Health in the Offspring of Overweight and Obese Women.

Women’s lifestyle has important implications for the development and health of their offspring. Yet little is known about the association between women’s preconception dietary intake and physical activity with cardiovascular health of the offspring. We therefore examined this association in a group of Dutch women with overweight or obesity (BMI ≥ 29 kg/m2) and infertility, who participated in a 6-month randomized preconception lifestyle intervention trial, and their offspring (n = 46). Preconception dietary intake and physical activity were assessed during the 6-month intervention using a food frequency questionnaire and the Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH), respectively. Offspring cardiovascular health (i.e., BMI, waist:height ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fat and fat free mass, and pulse wave velocity) was measured at age 3–6 years. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to examine the associations between preconception lifestyle and offspring cardiovascular health. Higher preconception vegetable intake (per 10 g/day) was associated with lower offspring diastolic blood pressure (Z-score: −0.05 (−0.08; −0.01); p = 0.007) and higher preconception fruit intake (per 10 g/day) was associated with lower offspring pulse wave velocity (−0.05 m/s (−0.10; −0.01); p = 0.03). Against our expectations, higher preconception intake of sugary drinks was associated with a higher offspring fat free mass (0.54 kg (0.01; 1.07); p = 0.045). To conclude, preconception dietary intake is associated with offspring health.

The effects of a pre-conception lifestyle intervention in women with obesity and infertility on perceived stress, mood symptoms, sleep and quality of life.

BackgroundObesity is an increasing problem worldwide and is associated with serious health risks. Obesity not only reduces physical health, but can also negatively affect levels of perceived stress, mood symptoms, sleep quality and quality of life (QoL), which may lead to further weight gain. We have previously shown that a pre-conception lifestyle intervention reduced weight and improved physical QoL in the short term. In the current study, we assessed the effects of this intervention in women with obesity and infertility on perceived stress, mood symptoms, sleep quality and QoL five years after randomization.Methods and findingsWe followed women who participated in the LIFEstyle study. This is a multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing a six-month lifestyle intervention to improve diet and increase physical activity followed by infertility treatment, versus prompt infertility treatment. Participants were 577 women with infertility between 18 and 39 years of age with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 29 kg/m2. For the current study we measured perceived stress, mood symptoms, sleep quality and QoL in 178 women five years after randomization. T-tests and linear regression models were used to assess differences between the intervention and control groups.Five years after randomization, no differences were observed for perceived stress, mood symptoms, sleep quality and QoL between the intervention (n = 84) and control groups (n = 94). There was selective participation: women who did not participate in the follow-up had lower baseline mental QoL, and benefitted more from the intervention in terms of improved physical QoL during the original LIFEstyle intervention.ConclusionsWe found no evidence that a pre-conception lifestyle intervention improved female well-being five years after randomization.

Preconception lifestyle intervention in obese infertile women is more effective for those with a history of childhood adversity

Federal recommendations for providing quality family planning services were published in 2014 and included preconception care (PCC). This paper aims to describe the prevalence of PCC delivery among publicly funded clinics, prior to the recommendations.Prevalence of providing occasional or frequent PCC in the last 3 months and having written protocols for recommended PCC screenings were estimated in 2015 using survey data collected from a nationally representative sample of publicly funded clinic administrators (2013–2014, N=1,615). Analyses included examination of differential distributions of outcomes by clinic characteristics (p<0.05) and multivariable regression.Prevalence of occasional or frequent PCC delivery was 81% for women and 38% for men. The percentage of clinics with written protocols for specific PCC screenings ranged from 74% to 88% (women) and 66% to 83% (men). Prevalence of having written protocols for all PCC screenings was 29% for women and 22% for men. Characteristics negatively associated with having written protocols for all PCC screenings for women and men (respectively) were as follows: not receiving Title X funding (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR]=0.6, 95% CI=0.50, 0.76; APR=0.6, 95% CI=0.47, 0.77) and being a community health center (APR=0.5, 95% CI=0.37, 0.72; APR=0.5, 95% CI=0.30, 0.67); health department (APR=0.7, 95% CI=0.61, 0.87; APR=0.6, 95% CI=0.49, 0.76); or hospital/other (APR=0.6, 95% CI=0.50, 0.79; APR=0.6, 95% CI=0.43, 0.75) (versus Planned Parenthood).Provision of PCC appears to differ by clinic characteristics and by interpretation of the phrase “preconception care,” suggesting opportunities for education and improvement.

Preconception lifestyle intervention reduces long term energy intake in women with obesity and infertility: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundThe preconceptional period may be an optimal window of opportunity to improve lifestyle. We previously showed that a 6 month preconception lifestyle intervention among women with obesity and infertility was successful in decreasing the intake of high caloric snacks and beverages, increasing physical activity and in reducing weight in the short term. We now report the effects of the preconception lifestyle intervention on diet, physical activity and body mass index (BMI) at 5.5 years (range = 3.7–7.0 years) after the intervention.MethodsWe followed women who participated in the LIFEstyle study, a multicentre RCT in which women with obesity and infertility were assigned to a six-month lifestyle intervention program or prompt infertility treatment (N = 577). Diet and physical activity 5.5 years later were assessed with an 173-item food frequency questionnaire (N = 175) and Actigraph triaxial accelerometers (N = 155), respectively. BMI was calculated from self-reported weight and previously measured height (N = 179). Dietary intake, physical activity, and BMI in the intervention and control group were compared using multivariate regression models. Additionally, dietary intake, physical activity and BMI of women allocated to the intervention arm with successful weight loss during the intervention (i.e. BMI < 29 kg/m2 or ≥ 5% weight loss), unsuccessful weight loss and the control group were compared with ANCOVA.ResultsAlthough BMI did not differ between the intervention and control group 5.5 years after the intervention (− 0.5 kg/m2 [− 2.0;1.1]; P = 0.56), the intervention group did report a lower energy intake (− 216 kcal/day [− 417;-16]; P = 0.04). Women in the intervention arm who successfully lost weight during the intervention had a significantly lower BMI at follow-up compared to women in the intervention arm who did not lose weight successfully (− 3.4 kg/m2 [− 6.3;-0.6]; P = 0.01), and they reported a significantly lower energy intake compared to the control group (− 301 kcal [− 589;-14]; P = 0.04). Macronutrient intake, diet quality, and physical activity did not differ between the intervention and control group, irrespective of successful weight loss during the intervention.ConclusionsIn our study population, a preconception lifestyle intervention led to reduced energy intake 5.5 years later. Additionally, women allocated to the intervention group who were successful in losing weight during the intervention also had a lower BMI at follow-up. This shows the potential sustainable effect of a preconception lifestyle intervention.Trial registrationThis trial was registered on 16 November 2008 in the Dutch trial register; clinical trial registry number NTR1530.