Power lifting (PL) & middle distance (MD) track performances are distinct points on the fitness continuum. Military performance tasks require a multitude of fitness factors. PURPOSE: Examine the impact of fitness on the performance of two military, field assessments: Simulated Casualty Evacuation Test (SCET) and 5-km, 22.7 kg loaded Ruck-Run (R-R) in four distinct U.S. service academy (SA) groups. METHODS: Male (n=75) U.S. SA, college-age students {Div 1 (MD) track, Div 1 Club (PL), general population (GP), and remedial fitness population (RFP)} were tested during a 3-week period in a controlled, supervised field environment on a SCET and a R-R. 3-Mile Run (3MR), Bench Press (79.5 kg, BP), Cadence Pull-ups, Back Squats (102.3 kg, SQ) were also tested in all but one group. Attire was standardized to include: combat boots, Army-Combat Uniform (ACU), dummy weapon (3.2 kg) and Body Armor (BA; 8.5 kg) for the SCET, and running shoes, ACU and load carrying equipment (22.7 kg) for the R-R. The 5-km R-R course, (out-back route), was generally flat with 8% ascent & descent grade encountered twice. The SCET{400 meter run, immediately followed by a 100 meter 45.5 kg dummy carry (100-MDC)} was conducted on an outdoor/indoor, measured running track. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed for the SCET that MD/PL were significantly faster than GP (p =.004). MD runners were faster in the 400 meter run, slower in the 100-MDC, while being 16.8 kg lighter than the PL, yet there was no significant difference in total SCET time between MD and PL (p=.99). ANOVA revealed for R-R that MD were significantly faster than PL (p =.004) who were significantly faster than RFP (p=.0007). MD athlete's loads were ∼31% vs ∼25% BW compared to the PL. Multiple regression yielded different potent predictors for both SCET and 5-km R-R which was dependent on specificity of training/adaptations (MD vs PL). CONCLUSIONS: For U.S. (SA)-age men, fitness status whether attained via cardiorespiratory or muscular strength/power training, significantly influences performance on a 5-km R-R or a 400 meter/100-MDC simulated casualty evac (SCET) assessment. Specifically, two distinct points on the fitness continuum yielded better results on two military, field assessment methods than either the general or remediated population scores and may serve as predictors of combat functional readiness.
Read full abstract