This paper discusses the complex dynamics of natural resource governance in Sudan, focusing on the interactions between local communities, regional elites, and the state. With abundant natural resources such as oil, minerals, and fertile agricultural land, Sudan has great potential to advance its economic development. However, historical legacies of marginalization, socio-political inequalities, and centralized models of governance have turned this into a landscape marked by power struggles and conflict. Local communities, often dependent on these resources for their livelihood, experience issues related to their exclusion from decision-making, receiving low compensation, and environmental depredation. Regional elites position themselves as brokers, and use their socio-political influence to gain benefits from both the state and corporate actors at the expense of the local population. Meanwhile, central state governance strategies of national revenue generation often align with external investors and widen the rift with local and regional stakeholders. This paper highlights the fundamental causes of resource-related conflicts and inequalities in Sudan through a critical analysis of historical contexts, power dynamics, and governance frameworks. It advocates for an urgent need to adopt inclusive and decentralized governance structures that give priority to equity, sustainability, and the active participation of local communities in decision-making. The findings contribute to broader discourses on natural resource governance, conflict resolution, and sustainable development in resource-rich but politically complex nations.
Read full abstract