Potential Non-infectious Causes Research Articles

Failure of pregnancy in horses and camelids

Determining pregnancy failures in horses and camelids is approached as a diagnostic investigation of an individual animal. Itbegins with the preliminary discussion around expectations of the investigation and apparently, diagnostic success rate is highin horses. However, diagnostic success in camelids is low. General approach from a pathology point of view is to identify severalof noninfectious fetal and fetal membranes’ lesions and then determine the potential infectious causes; agents include viruses,eubacteria, protozoa, and fungi. Bacterial and fungal infections are mostly ascending infections whereas viral and protozoal aresystemic infections. When an infectious cause is excluded, the focus is directed on potential noninfectious causes and particularlythose with detectible lesions. Maternal evaluation, specifically, via endometrial biopsy and examination of fetus and fetal membranes(including umbilical cord) in horses, normally provide an explanation for noninfectious failure of pregnancy in severalcircumstances. Special attention should be given to fetal thyroid gland, tracheal contents, and musculoskeletal system, particularly,the medulla of long bones. In horses, noninfectious failure of pregnancy with no lesions (idiopathic abortion) is observed in asmall percentage of cases. In camelids, it is a common ‘diagnosis.’

Frequency of Testing for Clostridioides difficile in Adults Hospitalized with Diarrhea in Louisville, Kentucky

Background: Although Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, CDI disease burden may be underestimated if a high proportion of inpatients with diarrhea do not have stool specimens collected for CDI diagnostic testing. The objective of this study was to define the frequency of stool specimen collection and testing for CDI in adult hospitalized patients with diarrhea. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in all 9 adult hospitals (total, 3,532 beds) in Louisville (adult aged ≥18 years; population 599,276) to identify patients with diarrhea and to observe the frequency of stool specimen collection for CDI diagnosis. For 7 consecutive days in December 2018, each ward was visited to identify new onset diarrhea (>3 loose stools in 24 hours) among Louisville adults: first via electronic medical record (EMR) review, then by nurse interviews, and finally by interviewing patients. For patients with diarrhea, research staff reviewed EMRs to determine whether a stool specimen was collected for CDI diagnosis, and they interviewed nurses about potential noninfectious causes of diarrhea. Results: Among 2,565 hospitalized adults (with 14,042 patient days), research staff identified 167 patients (47% men; median age, 64 years) with new onset diarrhea, 1.2 diarrhea cases per 100 patient days. Patients with diarrhea were initially ascertained by EMR review (50%), nurse interviews (42%) or patient interviews (8%); all cases identified by patient interviews were identified by nurses the following day (but many cases identified by nurses were never identified by EMR review). Nurses indicated that 67 cases had a potential noninfectious cause of diarrhea (eg, laxatives, feeding tube, colostomy, liquid diet, etc). Stool specimens were collected by hospital staff for CDI testing from 53 of 167 patients (32%) with diarrhea; 10 of 67 patients (15%) with diarrhea for whom nurses reported potential noninfectious causes of diarrhea (laxative use, enteric feeding, or gastric survey) in the past 24 hours; and 43 of 100 patients (43%) with diarrhea with no reported potential noninfectious causes of diarrhea. Stool collection frequency was similar on weekdays and weekends. Conclusions: The low frequency of CDI diagnostic testing of hospitalized patients with diarrhea indicates that CDI may be underdiagnosed in these hospitals and suggests, given that only 32% of patients with diarrhea had a stool specimen collected, that the CDI disease burden may be 3 times larger than currently appreciated. New-onset diarrhea occurred in >1% of patients each day; the most effective method for identifying patients with diarrhea was via nurse interviews.Funding: Pfizer Vaccines supported this study.Disclosures: Frederick Angulo, Kimbal D. Ford, Joann Zamparo, Elisa Gonzalez, Sharon Gray, David Swerdlow, and Catia Ferreira all report salary from Pfizer.

Frequency of Testing for Clostridioides difficile in Long-Term Care Facilities in Louisville, Kentucky

Background:Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), caused by toxigenic C. difficile and predominately manifested by moderate-to-severe diarrhea, is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). However, for CDI to be diagnosed in an LTCF resident, an LTCF resident with diarrhea must have a stool specimen collected for CDI diagnostic testing. The objective of this study was to define the frequency of stool specimen collection and testing for CDI in adult LTCF residents with diarrhea in Louisville, Kentucky. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 14 (31%) of the 45 LTCFs in Louisville (adults aged ≥18 years; population, 599,276) to identify LTCF residents with diarrhea and to observe the frequency of stool specimen collection for CDI diagnosis. For 14 consecutive days in February 2019, each LTCF was visited to identify new onset diarrhea (≥3 loose stools in 24 hours) by interviews of nursing staff. For residents with diarrhea, staff reviewed electronic medical records to determine whether a stool specimen was collected for CDI diagnosis and interviewed nurses about potential noninfectious causes of diarrhea. Results: The 14 participating LTCFs have 1,208 beds (median, 86 beds and 43 occupied beds per participating LTCF). Among 743 LTCF residents (with 10,402 patient days of surveillance), new-onset diarrhea was identified in 63 residents (21% male; median age 75 years); 0.6 diarrhea cases per 100 patient days (diarrhea attack rate, 0.6% per day). Nurses indicated that 16 (25%) of the 63 residents with diarrhea had a potential noninfectious cause of diarrhea (11 laxatives, 3 feeding tube, 1 colostomy, and 1 gastric surgery). Stool specimens were collected for CDI testing from 20 of 63 of residents (32%) with diarrhea; none with potential noninfectious cause of diarrhea and from 20 of 47 other residents (42%) with diarrhea. Of 20 stool specimens tested, 9 (47%) yielded toxigenic C. difficile (8.6 CDI cases per 10,000 patient days). During this survey, none of the 63 LTCF residents with diarrhea were transferred to a hospital or other healthcare facility. Conclusions: Diarrhea was common among LTCF residents, and toxigenic C. difficile was frequently identified in stool specimens collected from LTCF residents with diarrhea. The majority of non–laxative-receiving LTCF residents with diarrhea did not have a stool specimen collected for CDI diagnosis. The low frequency of CDI diagnostic testing of LTCF residents with diarrhea indicates that CDI may be underdiagnosed in these LTCFs and suggests that the CDI disease burden may be larger than currently appreciated.Funding: Pfizer Vaccines provided support for this study.Disclosures: Frederick Angulo, Kimbal D. Ford, Joann Zamparo, Elisa Gonzalez, Sharon Gray, David Swerdlow, and Catia Ferreira all report salary from Pfizer.

Evaluating Exaggerated, Prolonged, or Delayed Postoperative Intraocular Inflammation

To provide a diagnostic approach for the evaluation of patients with exaggerated, prolonged, or delayed postoperative intraocular inflammation. Perspective. Selected articles on normal and abnormal postoperative intraocular inflammation were reviewed and interpreted in the context of the authors' clinical and research experience. In addition to infectious endophthalmitis, a number of noninfectious conditions characterized by exaggerated, prolonged, or delayed postoperative inflammation have been described. Heuristically, increased postsurgical inflammation may be categorized by time from surgery to first recognition using the following general guidelines: as immediate and occurring within 2 days after surgery; as early and occurring after 2 days, but within the first 2 weeks, after surgery; and as delayed and occurring more than 2 weeks after surgery. Although infectious endophthalmitis always must be excluded as a cause of increased postoperative intraocular inflammation, potential noninfectious causes also exist. We review both infectious and noninfectious causes of increased postoperative inflammation and provide a diagnostic framework for evaluating such patients.