Reviewed by: Italo Calvino and the Compass of Literature Rocco Capozzi (bio) Eugenio Bolongaro. Italo Calvino and the Compass of Literature University of Toronto Press. 239. $50.00 In the late 1960s, writer-critics, including Barth, Vidal, Updike, and Rushdie, praised Calvino as one of the most original, challenging, and entertaining writers of our times. Soon after, in the English-speaking world, numerous essays began to appear which examined mainly his so-called postmodern works like Cosmicomics, Invisible Cities, The Castle of Crossed Destinies, and If on a Winter Night a Traveler. Calvino's fame has grown after his death (1985), as readers continue to recognize the author's talent as a fantastic fabulator and his faith in literature, brilliantly illustrated in Six Memos for the Next Millennium. Eugenio Bolongaro's study 'stays away' from what he feels is the familiar beaten track of Calvino's recent criticism as he proposes instead to examine the author's earlier works from 1947 to 1963: I giovani del Po (written in 1950-51 and published in serial form in the journal Officina, 1957-58), the trilogy The Cloven Viscount, The Baron in the Trees, and The Non-Existent Knight (published between 1952 and 1959), and The Watcher (1963). Bolongaro claims that, whereas works dating from Cosmicomics to Palomar have drawn plenty of attention, the earlier ones have not. Although studies like those of Lucia Re, Martin McLaughlin, and Beno Weiss prove [End Page 581] the contrary, among English critics this may be partly true. But it certainly is not in Italy, where critics, especially those of Gramscian and left-wing formation, have delved at great length into Calvino's works associated with engagement and neo-realist narrative practices from the days of The Path to the Spiders' Nests to The Watcher. Bolongaro does an outstanding job in the introduction and first chapter in providing his readers with a clear and documented socio-historical background within which Calvino writes his earlier works. In pursuing his objective to 'reflect the foundation of the intellectual project that endures throughout Calvino's career' he discusses the relationships between Vittorini and Calvino and the ideological goals of journals such as Politecnico, Contemporaneo, Officina, and Menabò, in their attempt to 'shake the Italian intelligentsia out of its provincialism.' As other critics have done, Bolongaro focuses on Calvino's essays ('The Lion's Marrow,' 'The Sea of Objectivity,' and 'The Challenge of the Labyrinth') in which the author debates ideological and literary currents vis-à-vis the Gramscian definition of an 'organic intellectual.' Within his definition of neo-realism as a 'poetic' (however, neo-realism, as Calvino has also stated, was mainly a 'literary current' committed to narrate key socio-political issues of the time: the Resistance, Fascism, the war, the South, etc), Bolongaro develops an excellent discussion on political, sociological, and aesthetic elements of neo-realism and on intellectuals in postwar Italy. Never diverging from his position on Calvino's life-long commitment to the ethical function of literature, Bolongaro examines how the experience of writing I giovani remains in the back of Calvino's mind. This objective proves to be counterproductive, however, because Bolongaro is then forced to speak about the unsuccessful features of Calvino's work, beginning with the autobiographical protagonist: 'Nino's failure as a character mirrors directly Calvino's failure as a writer and intellectual'; 'this dream of cohesion, brotherhood, and clarity failed miserably in I giovani.' It is difficult to say why the author did not choose instead to examine The Path to the Spiders' Nests as the foundation of Calvino's work; after all, Calvino refused to publish I giovani in book form because he considered it 'a rather muddled neo-realist grotesque novel' (Weiss). Consequently, at the end of the analysis of each novel under examination, Bolongaro is compelled to point out Calvino's failures: 'the attempt to portray a convincing social synthesis, which Calvino has been pursuing since I giovani, has once again failed.' Bolongaro's stimulating close reading of the 'fantastic' trilogy demonstrates that he appreciates Calvino's narratological skills, including the metafictional ones. However, because he is constantly returning to I giovani as a point of reference of 'commitment...
Read full abstract