Posterior Rib Fractures Research Articles

Fracture Mapping in High-Energy Chest Trauma

Background: High-energy chest trauma often results in rib fractures and associated chest injuries. This study explored fracture distribution patterns in high-energy chest trauma, using three-dimensional (3D) fracture mapping technology. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed cases of high-energy chest trauma with rib fractures treated at a Level 1 Trauma Center, from February 2012 to January 2023. Specifically, 3D computed tomography (CT) was used to reconstruct rib fractures and create fracture-frequency heat maps, analyzing the influence of other thoracic fractures on rib fracture distribution. Results: Rib fractures were frequently found in the anterior and posterior thoracic areas. On average, patients sustained 7 ± 3.87 rib fractures, with clavicle fractures in 25.5% and scapular fractures in 19.6% of cases. Scapular fractures led to more posterior rib fractures, while sternal fractures were associated with more anterior rib fractures. Clavicle fractures were linked to fractures of the first to third ribs. Conclusions: Rib fractures in high-energy chest trauma occurred most often in the anterior and posterior regions. Fractures of the scapula and sternum influence the positioning of the fracture lines. Clavicular fractures are associated with a higher incidence of upper rib fractures. These findings can help inform surgical decisions and complication management.

Aortic Laceration from Posterior Rib Fractures After a Ground-Level Fall: A Case Report

BackgroundRib fractures represent a common injury after blunt chest wall trauma with known complications including pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusion, and pneumonia. This case report describes an emergency department patient with acute decompensation from aortic laceration as a rare complication of rib fractures. There are rare documented cases of this complication occurring in admitted patients with rib fractures but this is one of the only cases which describes this complication occurring in a patient presenting to the emergency department. Case ReportThis case describes a patient who was found down at her home presenting to the emergency department in acute distress. She was found to have three left-sided posterior rib fractures which had lacerated her thoracic aorta causing a large left hemothorax and acute decompensation. The patient was resuscitated in the emergency department followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the operating room. The patient did well after surgical repair and was discharged from the hospital at her baseline mental and functional status.Why should an emergency physician be aware of this?It remains important to resuscitate an acutely ill patient based on history, physical exam, and vital signs. The key takeaway from this case report is that, although rare, aortic laceration remains a possible complication of posterior rib fractures in a patient who acutely decompensates

Application of preoperative 3D printing in the internal fixation of posterior rib fractures with embracing device: a cohort study

BackgroundTo explore the impact of preoperative 3D printing on the fixation of posterior rib fractures utilizing a memory alloy embracing device of rib under thoracoscopy.MethodsThe enrolled patients were divided into the 3D printing (11 patients) and the non-3D printing (18 patients) groups, based on whether a 3D model of ribs was prepared prior to surgery. Analysis was conducted comparing the average fixation time per fracture, postoperative fixation loss, and poor reduction of fractured end between the two groups.ResultsThe average fixation time of each fracture was 27.2 ± 7.7 min in the 3D printing group and 29.3 ± 8.2 min in the non-3D printing group, with no statistically significant difference observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of poor fracture fixation in the 3D printing group was statistically lower than that in the non-3D printing group (12.9% vs. 44.7%, P < 0.05). Further stratified analysis revealed that the off-plate rate in the 3D printing group and the non-3D group was (3.2% vs. 12.8%, P > 0.05), and the dislocation rate of the fractured end was (9.7% vs. 31.9%, P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe application of 3D printing technology to prepare the rib model before surgery is proves beneficial in reducing the occurrence of poor fixation of fractures and achieving precise and individualized treatment.

Surgical strategy for treating multiple symptomatic rib fracture malunions with bridging heterotopic ossifications: A case report

Rib fractures are common and serious injuries, which can negatively impact long-term quality of life. Here we present a woman in her early twenties who was referred to our trauma surgery outpatient clinic five years after a motor vehicle collision in which she sustained upper extremity injury and multiple displaced rib fractures. The rib fractures were initially managed non-operatively. At the time of the outpatient consultation, she endured persistent severe pain located between the left scapula and the thoracic spine. The pain worsened on repetitive motion and deep respiration. A new chest CT revealed left-sided posterior rib fracture malunions of ribs 4 to 8 with heterotopic ossifications (HO) that formed an osseous bridge between these ribs. Surgical excision of the bridging HO and remodeling of the angulated rib malunions resulted in significant alleviation of symptoms, which allowed her to return to work and other activities. Given the dramatic improvement after surgery, we suggest considering surgical remodeling and excision for rib fracture malunions and associated HO that cause local mechanical symptoms.

Characteristics of rib fracture patients who require chest computed tomography in the emergency department

BackgroundThe disadvantages and complications of computed tomography (CT) can be minimized if CT is performed in rib fracture patients with high probability of intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries and CT is omitted in rib fracture patients with low probability of intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the factors that can identify patients with rib fractures with intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in the emergency department among patients with rib fracture.MethodsThis retrospective observational study included adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with rib fracture on chest radiography prior to chest CT due to blunt chest trauma in the emergency department who underwent chest CT from January 2016 to February 2021. The primary outcomes were intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries that could be identified on a chest CT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.ResultsAmong the characteristics of rib fractures, the number of rib fractures was greater (5.0 [3.0–7.0] vs. 2.0 [1.0–3.0], p < 0.001), bilateral rib fractures were frequent (56 [20.1%] vs. 12 [9.8%], p = 0.018), and lateral and posterior rib fracture was more frequent (lateral rib fracture: 160 [57.3%] vs. 25 [20.5%], p < 0.001; posterior rib fracture: 129 [46.2%] vs. 21 [17.2%], p < 0.001), and displacement was more frequent (99 [35.5%] vs. 6 [6.6%], p < 0.001) in the group with intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries than in the group with no injury. The number of rib fractures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–1.78; p = 0.001), lateral rib fracture (aOR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.32–5.95; p = 0.008), and posterior rib fracture (aOR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.45–6.94; p = 0.004) were independently associated with intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries. The optimal cut-off for the number of rib fractures on the outcome was three. The number of rib fractures ≥ 3 (aOR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.35–6.71; p = 0.007) was independently associated with intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries.ConclusionIn patients with rib fractures due to blunt trauma, those with lateral or posterior rib fractures, those with ≥ 3 rib fractures, and those requiring O2 supplementation require chest CT to identify significant intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in the emergency department.

Injury patterns, management and outcomes of retroperitoneal haemorrhage caused by lower intercostal arterial bleeding at a level-1 trauma centre: A 10-year retrospective review.

Haemorrhagic shock is a life-threatening complication of trauma, but remains a preventable cause of death. Early recognition of retroperitoneal haemorrhage (RPH) is crucial in preventing deleterious outcomes including mortality. Injury to the 9-11th intercostal arteries (i.e. arteries of the lower thoracic region) are complicit in RPH. However, the associated injuries, implications and management of such bleeds remain poorly characterised. We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients diagnosed with RPH who presented to our level-1 trauma centre (2009-2019). We described the associated injuries, management and outcomes relating to RPH of the lower thoracic region (the 9-11th intercostal arteries) from this cohort to identify potential predictors and evaluate the impact of early identification and management of non-cavitary bleeds. Haemorrhage of the lower intercostal arteries (LIA) into the retroperitoneal space is associated with an increased number of posterior lower rib fractures and pneumothorax/haemothorax. A higher proportion of patients in the LIA group required massive transfusion, angioembolisation or surgical ligation when compared to other causes of RPH. The present study highlights the importance of injury patterns, particularly posterior lower rib fractures, as predictors for early recognition and management of RPH in the prevention of deleterious patient outcomes. RPH secondary to bleeding of the LIA may require early and aggressive management of haemorrhage through massive transfusion, and angioembolisation or surgical ligation when compared to RPH because of other causes.

Regional analgesia techniques for effective recovery from coronary artery bypass surgeries: a retrospective study involving the experience of a single center

BackgroundPain after cardiac surgery is both multifocal and multifactorial. Sternotomy, sternal retraction, internal mammary dissection, posterior rib dislocation or fracture, potential brachial plexus injury, and mediastinal and pleural drains all contribute to pain experienced in the immediate postoperative period. Ineffective pain management can result in systemic and pulmonary complications and significant cardiac consequences.MethodsThis study compared the effectiveness of regional anesthesia techniques for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery patients at our clinic. The effects of different analgesic methods, in terms of contributing to recovery, were examined.ResultsThe records of 221 patients who had undergone coronary bypass surgery were evaluated retrospectively. The extubation rate in the operating room was 91%. No patient received balloon pump support, and 20 patients were transferred to the cardiovascular intensive care unit while intubated. Regional anesthesia was performed on two of these 20 patients, but not on the remaining 18. Examination of intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption revealed significantly lower levels among patients receiving regional anesthesia. The most effective results among the regional anesthesia techniques applied were achieved with double injection erector spinae plane block.ConclusionRegional anesthesia techniques severely limit opioid consumption during cardiac surgery. Their importance will gradually increase in terms of rapid recovery criteria. Based on our study results, double injection of the erector spinae plane block seems to be the most effective technique in cardiac surgery. We therefore favor the use of fascial plane blocks during such procedures.Trial Numbers The study is registered with ClinicalTrials (NCT05282303). Ethics committee registration and approval were Granted under Number 2021.464.IRB1.131.

Prospective randomized trial of metal versus resorbable plates in surgical stabilization of rib fractures.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures has gained popularity as both metal and resorbable plates have been approved for fracture repair. Is there a difference between metal and resorbable plate rib fixation regarding rib fracture alignment, control of pain, and quality-of-life (QOL) scores (Rand SF-36 survey)? Eligible patients (pts) included 18 years or older with one or more of the following: flail chest, one or more bicortical displaced fractures (3-10), nondisplaced fractures with failure of medical management. Patients were randomized to either metal or resorbable plate fixation. Primary outcome was fracture alignment. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, opioid use, and QOL scores. Thirty pts were randomized (15 metal/15 resorbable). Total ribs plated 167 (88 metal/79 resorbable). Patients with rib displacement at day of discharge (DOD) metal 0/14 (one pt died, not from plating) versus resorbable 9/15 or 60% ( p = 0.001). Ribs displaced at DOD metal 0/88 versus resorbable 22/79 or 28% ( p < 0.001), 48% in posterior location. Patients with increased rib displacement 3 months to 6 months: metal, 0/11 versus resorbable, 3/9 or 33% ( p = 0.043). Ribs with increased displacement 3 months to 6 months metal 0 of 67 versus resorbable 6 of 49 or 12.2% ( p < 0.004). Pain scores and narcotic use at postoperative Days 1, 2, 3, DOD, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months showed no statistically significant difference between groups. QOL scores were also similar at 3 months and 6 months. Trauma recidivism in outpatient period resulted in fracture of resorbable plates in two pts requiring a second surgery. Metal plates provided better initial alignment with no displacement over time. Clinical outcomes were similar regarding pain, narcotic use, and QOL scores. Routine use of resorbable plates for posterior rib fractures is not warranted. Lateral repairs were technically most feasible for using resorbable plates but still resulted in significant displacement. Resorbable plates may not maintain rib alignment when exposed to subsequent injury. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Induced Posterior Rib Fractures in Nontraumatic Pediatric Deaths.

Posterior rib fractures are considered suspicious for nonaccidental injury when observed in infants without significant trauma history or underlying bone disease. The biomechanical mechanism postulated for causing posterior rib fractures is anterior/posterior compression of the chest with posterior levering of the rib head over the transverse process of the vertebra creating a focal area of stress. The recommended "2-thumb" cardiopulmonary resuscitation method involves the administrator placing both thumbs on the sternum of the patient, encircling the chest with the hands, and placing the finger tips lateral to the spine. From this position, the administrator compresses the chest in an anterior/posterior direction by pressing on the sternum. Theoretically, the 2-thumb method should focus all force on the sternum while the back is supported by the fingers limiting posterior levering of the ribs and reducing the risk of posterior rib fractures. However, posterior rib fractures have been found during the autopsy of infants who received 2-thumb cardiopulmonary resuscitation, had no traumatic history, had a nontraumatic cause of death, and had no indication of underlying bone disease. This case study series presents the demographics, birth histories, circumstances surrounding death, and autopsy findings of four such medical examiner cases.

Efficacy of serratus anterior plane block in pain control in traumatic posterior rib fractures: A case series

Blunt trauma patients commonly present with multiple rib fractures, which increases overall morbidity and mortality due to pulmonary complications. Effective chest wall analgesia may be challenging due to positioning difficulty, body habitus, anticoagulation issues with neuraxial interventions, etc. Serratus anterior plane block has been shown to be beneficial in anterior and lateral rib fractures in recent studies. We propose the efficacy of this block in posterior rib fractures as well, through this small case series of blunt trauma patients with posterior rib fractures, reporting significant pain relief after the block.

Re-evaluation of abusive head trauma in Norway appears flawed.

A review by Wester et al in Acta Paediatrica presented 17 adjudicated cases of Norwegian infants with abusive head trauma (AHT).(1) Their interpretation of the medical findings identified alternative diagnoses for 16 of the 17 children and suggested that the injuries were not inflicted and may have been the result of spontaneously occurring events. The authors stated that eight children had clinical and radiological characteristics consistent with external hydrocephalus, complicated by chronic subdural haematoma, and that six had findings compatible with hypoxic-ischaemic insults. Fractures were attributed to prematurity and sequelae from birth trauma. If their interpretations are correct, this study calls for a thorough review of how the medical community, forensic experts and the courts manage AHT cases. However, there are several elements of concern in the Wester et al study that we believe need clarification before a conclusion can be reached.

Far posterior rib plating: Preliminary results of a retrospective case series.

Far posterior, or paraspinal rib fractures, defined as fractures that are medial to the medial border of the scapula (and may involve the costovertebral articulation), are often treated nonoperatively. However, in certain cases, including severe displacement, persistent pain, nonunion, or persistent respiratory distress, stabilization with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) may be warranted. There is a paucity of literature regarding the surgical approach and clinical outcomes following ORIF for far posterior rib fractures and fracture-dislocations. The purpose of this paper is to describe the surgical approach and to report the first collection of clinical outcomes for patients undergoing paraspinal rib ORIF. A retrospective case series was performed at a single urban level 1 trauma center. Patients 18 years of age or older who underwent ORIF of far posterior rib fractures were included in this study. Far posterior rib fractures were defined as fractures that occurred medial to the medial border of the scapula underneath the paraspinal musculature. Data collection including patient demographics, injury characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Twenty-six patients, with a mean age of 50.7 years, who underwent paraspinal rib ORIF were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 12.1 months. 80.8% of patients had a flail chest injury. On average, 3.4 ribs were instrumented posteriorly with 22.8% of patients requiring fixation spanning the costotransverse articulation. No intraoperative complications occurred. Only one patient required a repeat procedure. Total hospital length of stay averaged 17.3 days with an intensive care unit stay averaging 6.2 days. Total ventilator time averaged 4 days. 7 patients were diagnosed with postoperative pneumonia and 6 patients required tracheostomy. Open reduction and internal fixation for far posterior, or paraspinal rib fractures and fracture-dislocations is a safe procedure with low complications rates and favorable postoperative outcomes including hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, need for tracheostomy, postoperative pneumonia, and mechanical ventilation time.

Comparing thoracoabdominal injuries of manual versus load-distributing band cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

To identify and compare manual and load-distributing band (LDB) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-related injuries. Retrospective observational cohort study. Adult, nontraumatic deaths with a postmortem computed tomography scan (PMCT) performed were classified into two groups: deceased after LDB CPR or after manual CPR. PMCT scans were reviewed for thoracoabdominal injuries such as fractures, pneumothorax and hemorrhage. The injuries between groups were compared. LDB CPR (n = 43) showed increased incidences of posterior rib fractures (53 vs 18%, P = 0.006), pneumothorax (23 vs 4%, P = 0.04) and more pericardial fluid (median 12 vs 6 mm, P = 0.002) compared with manual CPR (n = 29). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that LDB CPR was significantly associated with posterior rib fractures [odds ratio (OR) 5.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-20.09, P = 0.01). Pneumothorax (OR 6.80, 95% CI: 0.73-62.99, P = 0.09) and the amount of pericardial fluid (OR 3.40, 95% CI: 0.20-56.32) were not significantly associated with LDB CPR. No significant difference was found for anterolateral rib fractures, sternal fractures, vertebral fractures, pleural fluid, hemothorax, hemopericardium, pneumoperitoneum, perihepatic, perisplenic and perirenal hemorrhage. Rib fractures, sternal fractures, hemothorax and hemopericardium are common CPR-related injuries. LDB CPR is significantly associated with more posterior rib fractures and a trend toward more pneumothoraces is observed when compared with manual CPR. This knowledge is important for caretakers in the case of ongoing CPR, as a pneumothorax may attribute to not achieving persistent return of spontaneous circulation, and to improve postresuscitation care of survivors.

A Rare Case Report of a Consecutive Rib Fractures as an Isolated Obstetrical Complication

AIM: The aim of the following paper is to present the case of a term neonate with consecutive posterior rib fractures as an isolated finding after birth.&#x0D; METHODS: In the medical literature, there have been reported some sporadic cases indicating rib fractures in neonates. We present literature review and report a rare case of consecutive posterior rib fractures in neonate born following an uneventful pregnancy and uncomplicated labor.&#x0D; MAIN FINDING: The most common factors that can lead to rib fractures are birth trauma, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and underlying disorders influencing bone development. In the presented case, there were no signs of other bone fractures or systems involved.&#x0D; CONCLUSION: Isolated form of consecutive posterior rib fracture after birth is a rare obstetrical complication. It is most likely caused by birth trauma but should be interpreted as a clinical sign of the potential syndrome. A decision whether to perform an X-ray depends on a physical examination of the newborn within the 1st h of life.

Posterior chest wall reconstruction: A novel approach

Traditional access for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of posterior rib fractures occurs through either a posterior lateral thoracotomy or posterior paramedian approach. We report the case of severe blunt chest wall injury reconstruction using the novel implementation of an Opening Wedge Thoracostomy (OWT) approach. This approach is conventionally indicated for expansion thoracostomy in the surgical management of scoliosis. The OWT approach facilitates chest wall reconstruction vis-a-vis reflection of the trapezius and latissimus dorsi muscles providing excellent exposure of the posterior thoracic cage facilitating surgical reduction and fixation. Satisfactory stability of the posterior chest is not achievable using previously described approaches. OWT approach exposure for posterior thoracic reconstruction absents the surveyed literature.

Prevalence of Abuse and Additional Injury in Young Children With Rib Fractures as Their Presenting Injury.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of (a) additional injuries, (b) abuse as determined by a standardized scale, and (c) reports to child protective services (CPS) among children younger than 5 years in whom a rib fracture was the first presenting injury concerning for abuse. A retrospective study of children younger than 5 years diagnosed with rib fractures at a tertiary pediatric hospital between 2007 and 2018 was performed. Children in motor vehicle crashes, hospitalized after birth, or with previously diagnosed metabolic bone disease were excluded. We included only those children whose rib fractures were the first presenting injury. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from the records. Prevalence of additional injuries, a diagnosis of abuse, and a report to CPS were calculated. Associations between patient demographic and clinical characteristics and the outcomes of interest were examined. Of the 67 cases included, additional injuries concerning for abuse were identified in 40 (60%), and 58% were deemed likely or definite abuse. Reports to CPS were filed in 72% of cases. Posterior rib fractures, multiple rib fractures, and presence of rib fractures of multiple ages were all associated with presence of additional injuries and classification as definite or likely abuse (all P ≤ 0.05). The presence of a rib fracture in young children is associated with a high likelihood of additional concerning injuries and should prompt a thorough evaluation for child abuse.

Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Indications, Techniques, and Pitfalls.

Background:Rib fractures are a common thoracic injury that is encountered in 20% to 39% of patients with blunt chest trauma and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality1,2. Traditionally, the majority of patient with rib fractures have been managed nonoperatively. Recently, the utilization of surgical stabilization of rib fractures has increased considerably because the procedure has shown improved outcomes3-5.Description:Surgical stabilization should be considered in cases of multiple bicortically displaced rib fractures, especially in those with a flail chest and/or a concomitant ipsilateral displaced midshaft clavicular fracture or sternal fracture, as such cases may result in thoracic wall instability. For surgical stabilization of rib fractures, we classify rib fractures by location, type of fracture, and degree of displacement after obtaining thin-sliced chest computed tomography (CT) scans. The incision is selected depending on the fracture location, and the surgical technique is chosen relevant to the type of fracture. Single-lung intubation is preferred if there is no severe contralateral pulmonary contusion. We favor performing video-assisted thoracoscopy if possible to control bleeding, evacuate hematomas, repair a lung, and perform cryoablation of the intercostal nerves. A lateral approach is considered to be the main surgical approach because it allows access to the majority of rib fractures. A curvilinear skin incision is made overlying the fractured ribs. Posterior rib fractures are exposed through a vertical incision within the triangle of auscultation, and anterior fractures, through a transverse inframammary incision. The muscle-sparing technique, splitting alongside fibers without transection, should be utilized if possible and supplemented by muscle retraction. For surgical stabilization of rib fractures, we currently prefer precontoured side and rib-specific plates with threaded holes and self-tapping locking screws. Polymer cable cerclage is used to enhance plating of longitudinal fractures, rib fractures near the spine, osteoporotic ribs, and injuries of rib cartilage. The third to eighth ribs are plated most often. Intercostal muscle deficit, if present, is repaired with a xenograft patch. In comminuted rib fractures, the bone gap is bridged with bone graft. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures is recommended within the first 7 days after trauma, preferably within the first 3 days6-8.Alternatives:Nonoperative treatment alternatives include (1) epidural analgesia when not contraindicated because of anticoagulant venous thromboembolism prophylaxis9,10; (2) thoracic paravertebral blockage, e.g., serratus anterior or erector spinae plane nerve block11,12; (3) intercostal nerve block; (4) intravenous or enteral analgesics, e.g., opioids, acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); (5) intrapleural analgesia, e.g., bupivacaine infusion; and (6) multimodal analgesia that incorporates regional techniques, systemic analgesics, and analgesic adjuncts9.Rationale:Surgical stabilization of rib fractures is a safe and effective method to treat displaced rib fractures. The procedure provides definitive stabilization of fractures, improves pulmonary function, lessens pain medication requirements, prevents deformity formation, and results in reduced morbidity and mortality.

Rescue Re-Do Inline Osteosynthesis with Wire Cerclage for Failed Rib Plating of Multilevel Rib Nonunion.

Rib nonunion is a rare occurrence that requires surgical management and has a high rate of failure that may necessitate repeated intervention. We present the case of successful rescue redo repair of previously failed plating of chronic nonunion for multilevel posterior rib fractures, reinforced by wire cerclage of the osteosynthesis plate. Our objective is to illustrate the feasibility of repeated interventions, and the technique to resolve this challenging problem.

Rib fractures: elusive, but important

Rib fractures: elusive, but important

Rib Fracture Location Should be Evaluated When Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Trauma Patients

Rib fractures represent up to 55 per cent of thoracic blunt traumatic injuries and lead to significant mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study is to determine whether not only number but also the location of rib fractures can be used to risk stratify patients. This is a retrospective study of all blunt trauma patients who presented with rib fractures from January 1, 2013 to April 1, 2015 and underwent chest CT. Rib fractures were categorized by location. Primary outcome was mortality, secondary outcomes were total hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, and disposition. Multivariate regressions were performed to determine whether mortality and morbidity was dependent on the number of rib fractures as related to location. Nine hundred and twenty-nine patients were reviewed, 669 fit inclusion criteria, and 35 patients died. Mean Injury Severity Score (18 ± 10), total number of rib fractures (6 ± 5), and age (54 ± 19) significantly correlated with mortality. LOS correlated with the number of rib fractures (P < 0.001). Flail chest of indeterminate location significantly increased mortality (P = 0.002). Controlling for age, gender, and Injury Severity Score and for every lateral rib fracture, patients were 1.13 times (OR; P = 0.001) more likely to die. Posterior rib fractures only effected patient outcome if the patient has three or more posterior ribs broken and the patient was 45 years of age or older (P = 0.044); these patients were 12 times more likely to die. When evaluating blunt force trauma in patients with rib fractures, it is imperative to look at rib fracture location and not only the number of rib fractures sustained to predict outcomes.