Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries Research Articles

Intraoperative CT-assisted sacroiliac screws fixation for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury: a comparative study with conventional intraoperative imaging

Pelvic injuries refer to the disruption of the inherent structural and mechanical integrity of the pelvic ring. Sacroiliac screw fixation technique is often applied for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury, which is prone to the iatrogenic injury. This study will compare the intraoperative and postoperative variables of patients underwent sacroiliac screw fixation with intraoperative CT and conventional imaging to evaluate the effect. Thirty-two patients with posterior pelvic ring injury treated by sacroiliac screw fixation from January 2019 to December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients were divided into two groups according to the different assistance of intraoperative imaging. Subsequently, the correlative data were compared and analysed statistically. Twelves cases were assigned to intraoperative CT group, and the remaining twenty cases were assigned to conventional group. There was no significant difference in duration of surgery, fracture healing time, time to ambulation, complications, and Matta radiological score. There was statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in sacroiliac screws insertion time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, quality of screws position, and adjusted Majeed functional score, especially in the sexual intercourse part. With the assistance of intraoperative CT, a less misposition and functional impairment could be achieved, and a more satisfactory curative effect could be developed. Sacroiliac screws fixation with intraoperative CT is a more accurate and ideal method to treat posterior pelvic ring injuries.

Minimally invasive transiliac anatomical locking plate for posterior pelvic ring injury: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters for the gull wing plate

BackgroundPosterior pelvic ring injuries are challenging for surgeons to treat adequately due to difficulties with reduction and stabilization. Surgical intervention is a beneficial option to protect neurological structures and provide sufficient stability for early mobilization. The gull wing plate (GWP) is a pre-contoured anatomical locking plate with six screws, and its design is unique among posterior transiliac tension-band plates. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical results of the GWP.MethodsPatients who had an unstable posterior pelvic ring injury and underwent internal fixation with GWP were retrospectively analyzed at a trauma center. Demographic data, fracture type, perioperative data, and radiological evaluation with computed tomography (CT) were collected. Clinical outcomes were graded using the functional independence measure (FIM) and Majeed outcome score.ResultsTwenty-six patients were enrolled (mean age, 54 years), and the mean follow-up period was 23 months. The mean Injury Severity Score was 24 points, and internal fixation was performed 6.6 days post-trauma. CT evaluation showed the lateral surface angle of the uninjured ilium was approximately 68°. The GWP pre-contoured anatomical design closely matched this angle. The mean FIM and Majeed score were 119 and 76 points, respectively, which were graded as excellent (n = 14), good (n = 9), or fair (n = 3).ConclusionsWith the retrospective single-center data available, the GWP seems to be a minimally-invasive alternative, provides reliable stability of the posterior pelvic ring and allows for rehabilitation within normal ranges.

TiRobot-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac cannulated screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injury with sacral variations

To investigate the effectiveness of TiRobot-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries with sacral variations, and to evaluate its feasibility and safety. The clinical data of 7 patients with Tile type C pelvic fractures and sacral variations treated with TiRobot-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac cannulated screw fixation between January 2020 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 males and 2 females with an average age of 36 years (range, 17-56 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 4 cases and falling from height in 3 cases. According to Tile classification of pelvic fractures, there were 1 case of type C1.1, 1 case of type C1.2, and 5 cases of type C1.3; according to Denis classification of sacral fractures, there were 3 cases of zone Ⅰ and 4 cases of zone Ⅱ; sacral deformities included 3 cases of lumbar sacralization, 2 cases of sacral lumbarization, and 2 cases of accessory auricular surface of the sacrum. The time from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 7 days, with an average of 4.6 days. The implantation time of each screw, the fluoroscopy times of each guide pin, the quality of fracture reduction (according to Matta score), the excellent and good rate of screw position, the healing time of fracture, and the incidence of complications were recorded, and the effectiveness was evaluated by Majeed score. A total of 13 screws were implanted during the operation, the implantation time of each screw was 10-23 minutes, with an average of 18.2 minutes; the position of the guide pin was good, and no guide pin was adjusted, the fluoroscopy times of each guide pin were 3-7 times, with a median of 4 times. Postoperative imaging data at 3 days showed that the position of sacroiliac screw implantation was evaluated as excellent. No complication such as incision infection or vascular nerve injury occurred, and no adverse events related to robotic devices occurred. At 3 days after operation, according to Matta score, the quality of fracture reduction was excellent in 6 cases and good in 1 case, and the excellent and good rate was 100%. All the 7 patients were followed up 6-15 months, with an average of 12.4 months. Bone union was achieved in all patients, and the healing time ranged from 18 to 24 weeks, with an average of 21.2 weeks. Majeed score at last follow-up was 81-95, with an average of 91.5; 5 cases were excellent, 2 cases were good, and the excellent and good rate was 100%. TiRobot-assisted percutaneous sacroiliac cannulated screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injury with sacral variation is accurate, safe, minimally invasive, and intelligent, and the effectiveness is satisfactory.

TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system for percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury

To evaluate the effectiveness of TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system for percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury. The clinical data of 76 patients with posterior pelvic ring injury between January 2016 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 45 cases were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation assisted by TiRobot and O-arm navigation system (study group), 31 cases were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation under the guidance of C-arm X-ray machine (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, Tile classification, time from injury to operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the times of nail track adjustment, and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were recorded. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by Matta score. At last follow-up, Majeed score was used to evaluate the recovery of pelvic function. A total of 72 screws were implanted in the study group, with a median of 1 (1, 2) screws per patient. In the control group, 47 screws were implanted, with a median of 1 (1, 2) screws per patient. There was no significant difference in the number of screws between the two groups ( Z=-0.392, P=0.695). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, times of nail track adjustment, and intraoperative fluoroscopy times in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group ( P<0.05). All patients were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 14 months). No serious complications was found after operation and during follow-up. Matta score was used to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction at 1 week after operation, and there was no significant difference between the two groups ( Z=-1.135, P=0.256). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference of Majeed score between the two groups ( Z=-1.279, P=0.201). TiRobot-assisted surgery by O-arm navigation system is a reliable surgical method for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury, which can reduce the operation time and fluoroscopy times when compared with the traditional operation under the guidance of C-arm X-ray machine. The safety, accuracy, and efficiency of the operation were improved.

Posterior Pelvik Halka Yaralanmalarında Posterior Perkütan Transiliak Plak Tespiti Sonuçları

The diagnose and treatment of sacrum fractures are still difficult to manage. Various surgical methods have been reported for the treatment of sacral fractures in the literature. The aim of our study is to examine the functional results of patients treated with posterior percutaneous transiliac plate in our clinic. 56 patients who underwent surgical treatment for posterior pelvic ring injury between June 2013 and September 2020 and who had a minimum 6-month follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, radiological images, Pelvic Outcome Scores (POS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) results in the 6th postoperative month were analyzed. When the POS data detected at the 6th month examination were examined, the mean pelvic outcome score was found to be 32 (26-37) and the SF-36 results as 80 (48-90). The mean duration of the surgical procedure was 32.2 minutes, and the median number of fluoroscopy shots taken during surgery was 2 (1-6). The functional results of the patients who underwent posterior percutaneous transiliac plate fixation were good at the6th month examinations. With this technique, it was observed that the operation time was short and fluoroscopy exposures were low. We believe that this technique, which has a short learning curve, can be used safely in sacrum surgery. For that reason, this method seems to be an easier and more convenient method for surgeons who are not experienced in pelvic surgery.

Preoperative CT simulation of iliosacral screws for treating unstable posterior pelvic ring injury

BackgroundThe percutaneous iliosacral screw is a common procedure for treating pelvic posterior ring instability. Traditional X-ray fluoroscopy screw placement has the advantages of decreased bleeding and trauma, but it also has some drawbacks, such as increased radiation exposure and screw dislocation. The purpose of this study was to establish a safe, effective, and quick approach for putting iliosacral screws for the treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring damage utilizing simulated screws based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) planning.MethodsFrom February 2019 to June 2020, we retrospectively assessed 41 patients with posterior pelvic ring instability who were treated with percutaneous iliosacral screws in our institution, and randomly separated them into two groups: conventional surgery (n = 20) and preoperative planning (n = 21). Pelvic radiographs (anteroposterior, inlet, outlet), as well as normal CT scans of the pelvis, were all taken postoperatively to confirm the screw position. After that, the screw insertion time, the radiation exposure time, and the screw misplacement rate (as assessed by postoperative CT) were all examined. Screw position grading was evaluated by Smith grading.ResultsIn the conventional surgery group, 26 screws were inserted in 20 patients, with each screw insertion taking 23.15 ± 4.19 min and 1.02 ± 0.17 min to expose to radiation. Eight of the 26 screws were misplaced (30.8%). In the preoperative planning group, 24 screws were inserted in 21 patients, with each screw taking 19.57 ± 4.05 min to implant and 0.67 ± 0.09 min to expose to radiation. One of 24 screws was misplaced (4.2%). Screw insertion time, radiation exposure time, and screw dislocation rate were all significantly reduced when preoperative planning aided iliosacral screw placement (P < 0.05).ConclusionsPreoperative CT simulation of iliosacral screws for placement planning, screw trajectory, and intraoperative screw placement is a safe way for reducing surgical time, radiation exposure, and ensuring accurate screw placement.

Starr frame-assisted minimally invasive internal fixation for pelvic fractures: Simultaneous anterior and posterior ring stability

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the surgical techniques, efficacy, and safety of Starr frame-assisted minimally invasive internal fixation for simultaneous anterior and posterior ring stability in pelvic fractures. MethodsThe clinical data of 22 patients with anterior and posterior pelvic ring injuries who underwent Starr frame-assisted minimally invasive internal fixation were retrospectively collected. The anterior pelvic ring was fixed with an anterior subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX), and the posterior pelvic ring was fixed with sacroiliac screws. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, number of assistants, complications, and weight-bearing time were analyzed. The Matta score was used to evaluate the fracture reduction. The Majeed score was used to evaluate clinical efficacy, and Gibbon's classification was used to estimate the occurrence of sacral nerve injury. ResultsAll 22 patients were treated with sacroiliac screws for posterior ring injuries, including 12 cases with single sacroiliac screws, nine with two sacroiliac screws, and one with three sacroiliac screws. INFIX was used for all anterior ring fixation, including two screws in seven cases, three screws in 13 cases, and four screws in two cases. The fracture reduction quality was excellent in 15 cases, good in four cases, and moderate in three cases by Matta scores. All patients were followed up for 6–20 (12.5 ± 5.7) months. Callus-formation time based on postoperative X-ray was 3–8 (4.3 ± 1.2) weeks. Weight-bearing time was 3–12 (6.3 ± 2.8) weeks after surgery. At the last follow-up, 15 patients were evaluated as excellent, five as good, and two as fair according to the Majeed score. Gibbons’ classification showed that one of the three patients with sacral nerve injury recovered completely and two did not recover. Complications occurred in six patients, including one with internal fixation loosening, two with anterolateral thigh paresthesia, one with malunion, one with nonunion, and one with heterotopic ossification. ConclusionsStarr frame-assisted minimally invasive internal fixation could stabilize the anterior and posterior pelvic rings simultaneously, overcoming the difficulty of fracture reduction. This technique can help patients with early postoperative weight-bearing and improved functional outcomes, providing a novel modality for the minimally invasive treatment of pelvic ring injuries.

Effect of Percutaneous Posterior Pelvic Ring Reduction and Fixation on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to assess patient outcomes using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurements Information System (PROMIS) scores after closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) of the posterior pelvic ring and determine whether quality of reduction affects the outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort study. The study involved a Level I trauma center. The study included 46 adult patients with operatively treated pelvic ring injuries (63% OTA/AO 61-B) who underwent CRPF between 2014 and 2018 at a single institution. The intervention involved closed reduction and percutaneous posterior pelvic ring fixation. The main outcome measurements were postoperative patient PROMIS scores, including physical function, pain interference, anxiety, and depression, and radiographic measurements of postoperative displacement and pelvic deformity. After CRPF, PROMIS scores of physical function, pain interference, and anxiety were significantly improved at the time of final follow-up when compared with the first postoperative visit. The amount of malreduction or pelvic deformity did not significantly affect outcome scores; however, results were limited by small sample size. CRPF of posterior pelvic ring injuries results in good functional and radiographic outcomes. Degree of malreduction may not affect outcomes as much as previously believed. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical Analysis of Single and Double Sacroiliac Screws in the Treatment of Tile C1 Pelvic Fracture.

We investigated the difference between fixation of single and double sacroiliac screws in the treatment of Tile C1 pelvic fractures. The data of 54 patients with Tile C1 pelvic fractures who were admitted to the trauma center of the Red Society Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University between August 2016 and August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries underwent fixation with sacroiliac screws assisted by a percutaneous robotic navigation system. The operative time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative follow-up time between the two groups (single sacroiliac and double sacroiliac screw groups) were compared. The Matta and Majeed scores at the last follow-up were compared between the groups to evaluate fracture reduction and functional recovery. Forty-nine patients were followed up for 17.2 (±4.5) months and 16.2 (±3.4) months in the single and double sacroiliac screw groups, respectively. All patients had excellent fracture reduction immediately after surgery, according to the Matta score. All fractures healed without complications. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative general information, amount intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative anterior ring fixation method, and postoperative follow-up time between the two groups (P > 0.05). The operative time of the single sacroiliac screw group was shorter than that of the double sacroiliac screw group (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the Matta score of the double sacroiliac screw group was significantly better than that of the single sacroiliac screw group (P < 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the Majeed functional scores (P > 0.05). For Tile C1 pelvic fractures, double sacroiliac screw fixation of posterior ring injuries can provide a more stable treatment with no statistically significant difference in functional recovery.

Percutaneous Robot-Assisted versus Freehand S2 Iliosacral Screw Fixation in Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Fracture.

ObjectivesTo assess the efficiency, safety, and accuracy of S2 (IS) screw fixation using a robot‐assisted method compared with a freehand method.MethodsThis is a retrospective clinical study. We analyzed the patients treated with S2 IS screw fixation for unstable pelvic fractures from January 2016 to January 2019 in our institution. Sixty‐three patients (17 men and 46 women) aged between 21 and 55 years (with an average age of 39.22 ± 9.28) were included in this study. According to the Tile classification, there were 26 (41.3%) type B fractures and 37 (58.7%) type C fractures. All patients were divided into robot‐assisted (RA) group (38 patients) or the traditional freehand (FH) group (25 patients). In RA group, the S2 IS screws were implanted with a robot‐assisted technique. And S2 IS screws were implanted with a traditional freehand technique in FH group. The screw‐related complications were recorded during and after the surgery. The position of all screws and fracture reduction was assessed by postoperative CT scans according to the Gras classification. The number of guide wire attempts and the radiation exposure for S2 screw implantation during operation were also recorded. Finally, the Matta standard was used to evaluate the fracture reduction of the IS joint.ResultsA total of 89 IS screws were implanted into S2 iliosacral joint. Fifty‐four screws were placed by RA (38 patients) and 35 screws were by FH (25 patients). There was no difference between the two groups with respect to demographic data. There was no screw‐related complications or revision surgery in any group. In terms of screw placement, the excellent and good rate was 100% in the RA group, better than that in the FH group where it was only 85.7% (P < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time was 8.06 ± 3.54 s in RA group, which was much less than that in the FH group (27.37 ± 8.82 s, P < 0.001). The guide wire attempts in the RA group (0.685 ± 0.820) were much less than those in the FH group (5.77 ± 3.34) (P < 0.001). Both the fluoroscopy time per screw and the number of guide wire attempts in the RA group were much less than those in the FH group (P < 0.001). The overall postoperative excellent and good rate of Matta standard in RA and FH groups were 86.8% (34/4) and 90.0% (23/25), respectively (P = 0.750), and there was no statistical difference.ConclusionThe robot‐assisted surgery is an accurate and minimally invasive technique. S2 IS screw implantation assisted by TiRobot to treat the posterior pelvic ring fractures, have a high success rate than the freehand technique. Percutaneous RA S2 IS screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries is safe and clinically feasible and has great clinical application value.

Treatment of Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury with S2-Alar-Iliac Screw and S1 Pedicle Screw Fixation

The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws have been described as an alternative method for lumbosacropelvic fixation in place of iliac screws. However, the clinical effect of the short-segment S2AI screw fixation technique in the treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries remains unclear. In this study, we report the preliminary clinical results of the internal fixation connecting a S2-alar-iliac screw and a S1 pedicle screw (i.e., S2AI-S1 fixation) in the treatment of unstable pelvic posterior ring injuries. Twenty-five patients with unstable posterior pelvic ring injury were treated with S2AI-S1 fixation from February 2019 to June 2020. The incision length, surgical time, blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, quality of reduction, complications, and functional outcome were analyzed. A total of 29 groups of S2AI-S1 fixation were used in 25 patients. The mean incision length was 8.3 (6.2- 10.3) cm, mean operative time was 86.4 (60- 142) minutes, mean frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy was 7.9 (4- 12) times, and mean blood loss was 148 (50- 500) mL. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 17.8 (10- 26) months. The satisfaction rate of pelvic reduction quality was 25/29, and the satisfactory rate of functional outcome was 23/25. There were no obvious signs of screw prominence, screw loosening, or implant failure. The case series presented in this study show the successful use of S2AI-S1 fixation to treat unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. The S2AI-S1 fixation, not including the lumbar spine in the fixation range, is a simple, safe, and effective fixation method.

Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation is a new technology with promising benefits on intraoperative outcomes for patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. We aim to compare robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation to the traditional fluoroscopy-assisted technique with regards to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used along with a search of electronic information to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional screw fixation in patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Primary outcomes included operative duration(minutes), intraoperative bleeding(mL), fluoroscopy exposure and intraoperative drillingfrequency. Secondary outcome measures included Majeed score, healing time (minutes) and rate (%), postoperative complications, screw positioning, incision length (cm) and guide wire insertion times (minutes). The random effects model was used for analysis. Four observational studies including a total of 294 patients were identified. There was a significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional groups in terms of operative duration (MD = -24.66, p < 0.05), intraoperative bleeding (MD = -10.37, P < 0.05), fluoroscopy exposure (MD = -2.15, P < 0.05) and intraoperative drilling frequency (MD = -2.42, P = < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was seen in Majeed score, healing time and rate and postoperative complications. The robot-assisted group had better screw positioning, smaller incision length, and shorter anaesthesia and guide wire insertion times. Robot-assisted fixation has superior intraoperative outcomes compared to conventional fixation. Further studies are needed to look at postoperative outcomes as there is no significant difference in postoperative prognosis between the techniques.

Applicable safety analysis and biomechanical study of iliosacral triangular osteosynthesis

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the applicable safety and biomechanical stability of iliosacral triangular osteosynthesis (ITO) through 3D modeling and finite element (FE) analysis.MethodsPelvic CT imaging data from 100 cases were imported into Mimics software for the construction of 3D pelvic models. The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws and S2 sacroiliac screws were placed in the S2 segment with optimal distribution and their compatibility rate on the S2 safe channel was observed and analyzed. In the FE model, the posterior pelvic ring was fixed with two transsacral screws (TTS), triangular osteosynthesis (TO) and ITO, respectively. Four different loading methods were implemented in sequence to simulate the force in standing, flexion, right bending, and left twisting, respectively. The relative displacement and change in relative displacement of the three fixing methods were recorded and analyzed.ResultsThe theoretical compatibility rate of S2AI screw and S2 sacroiliac screw in S2 segment was 94%, of which 100% were in males and 88% in females. In the FE model, in terms of overall relative displacement, TTS group showed the smallest relative displacement, the ITO group showed the second smallest, and the TO group the largest relative displacement. The change in relative displacement of the TTS group displayed the smaller fluctuations in motion. The change in relative displacement of the TO group under right bending and left twisting displayed larger fluctuations, while the ITO group under flexion displayed larger fluctuations.ConclusionsThe simultaneous placement of S2AI screw and S2 sacroiliac screw in the S2 segment is theoretically safe. Although the biomechanical stability of ITO is slightly lower than TTS, it is better than TO, and can be used as a new method for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries.

Technical Note on Placement of Low-Profile Triangular Osteosynthesis for Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries.

Triangular osteosynthesis is a technique used to stabilize posterior pelvic ring injuries. Conventional triangular fixation can be problematic for several reasons, including the need for advanced skill sets to place instrumentation, difficulty with pelvic reduction and placing the connecting construct, and prominent instrumentation. The purpose of this study is 2-fold: (1) to describe in detail a technique for lumbopelvic fixation using implants that are easy to connect, allow distraction for complex lumbosacral displacements, and are placed in a location minimizing soft tissue prominence and (2) to present our initial case series using this technique. We present a retrospective review of 18 consecutively treated patients with this technique. Inclusion criteria were patients with complete disruption through the sacrum or sacroiliac joint from blunt trauma (OTA/AO type C injuries). Outcomes included pelvic reduction/malreduction, wound healing, and complications. Fourteen patients underwent unilateral fixation (81%), and 4 patients underwent bilateral fixation (19%). All patients (18 of the 18) had a well-reduced pelvis after fixation. No patient (0%) required a return trip to the operating room for loss of reduction/malreduction, wound breakdown, or implant failure. This study presents an updated technique for a low-profile triangular osteosynthesis construct with straightforward application for unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. This technique does not require rod bending, results in a consistently more recessed iliac screw and connecting rod, and can be used in a wide variety of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries, including comminuted sacral fractures, L5/S1 facet fractures, and vertical shear injuries.

Comparison of lumbopelvic fixation and iliosacral screw fixation for the treatment of bilateral sacral fractures

BackgroundBilateral sacral fractures result in traumatic disruption of the posterior pelvic ring. Treatment for unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures should aim for fracture reduction and rigid fixation to facilitate early mobilization. Iliosacral screw fixation (ISF) and lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) were recommended for the treatment of these injuries. No algorithm or gold standard exists for surgery of these fractures.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences between ISF and LPF in bilateral sacral fractures regarding intraoperative procedures, complications and postoperative mobilization. The secondary aim was to determine whether demographics influence surgical treatment.MethodsOver a 4-year period (2016–2019), 188 consecutive patients with pelvic ring injuries were treated at one academic level 1 trauma center and retrospectively identified. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification system. Seventy-seven patients were treated with LPF or ISF in combination with internal fixation of pubic rami fractures and could be included in this study. Comparisons were made between demographic and perioperative data. Infection, hematoma and hardware malpositioning were used as complication variables. Mobilization with unrestricted weight bearing was used as outcome variable. Follow-up was at least 6 months postoperatively.ResultsOperative stabilization of bilateral posterior pelvic ring injuries was performed in 77 patients. Therefore, 29 patients (females 59%) underwent LPF whereas 48 patients (females 83%) had bilateral ISF. The ISF group was older (76 yrs.) compared to the LPF group (62 yrs.) (p = 0.001), but no differences regarding BMI or comorbidities were detected. Time for surgery was reduced for patients who were treated with ISF compared to lumbopelvic fixation (73 min vs. 165 min; respectively, p < 0.001). But this did not result in reduced fluoroscopic time or radiation exposure. Overall complication rate was not different between the groups. Patients with LPF had a greater length of stay (p = 0.008) but were all weight bearing as tolerated when discharged (p < 0.001).ConclusionBilateral posterior pelvic ring injuries of the sacrum can be sufficiently treated by LPF or ISF. LPF allows immediate weight bearing which may benefit younger patients and patients with an elevated risk for pneumonia or other pulmonary complications. Treatment with ISF reduces operative time, length of stay and postoperative wound infection. Elderly patients may be better suited for treatment with ISF if there is concern that the patient may not tolerate the increased operative time.

Analysis of trans-sacral corridors in stabilization of fractures of the pelvic ring.

Percutaneous screw fixation combined with pelvic reduction is a surgical technique used to stabilize fractures of the posterior pelvic ring. This is the standard surgical treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. The primary goal of this treatment is an anatomic reduction and stable fixation. This has been shown to reduce pain and improve the patients' long-term well-being. The aim of this analysis was to determine the possible screw lengths and the positioning of the screws in the S1 and S2 sacral segments. A population of 697 pelvises from the Stryker Orthopaedic Modeling and Analytics database were analyzed. The dimensions of the S1 and S2 screw corridors were determined and after assessing for sacral dysmorphism, the correct screw placement was chosen to determine the necessary screw length for surgical treatment. The measurements of the screw lengths show a Gaussian distribution for the analyzed population. The percentage of dysmorphic pelvises for the S1 screw corridor was 31.3% and for the S2 corridor 8%. Average screw length for S1 was 163.8 ± 16.2 mm and for the S2 137.3 ± 9.5 mm. The results show that the S1/S2 axis cannot be used for a trans-sacral screw placement in every patient. The study shows that intraosseous screw corridors are present in 68.7% of the patients in the S1 position and in 92% at the S2 level where an intended implant can be placed fully intraosseous.

Minimally invasive triangular lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation of posterior pelvic ring injuries with vertical instability: Technical note

To date, no strong consensus exists on the best way to treat posterior pelvic ring injuries when there is no neurological deficit. Various fixation methods have been described; more recently, constructs that combine lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation have been introduced. This type of fixation is mainly indicated in cases of spinopelvic dissociation with large displacement of fracture fragments in the sagittal plane. However, these techniques are associated with postoperative complications, particularly infections and severe skin complications. This led us to propose a minimally invasive lumboiliac and iliosacral fixation technique for posterior pelvic ring injuries. The procedure is done with the patient prone. It consists of pedicle screw insertion into L4 or L5 and screw fixation of the ilium with fluoroscopy guidance; intraoperative distraction can be done depending on the amount of displacement. An iliosacral screw is then inserted percutaneously to allow reduction in the transverse plane and yield a triangular construct. In the five patients that we have operated using this technique, the mean preoperative vertical displacement was 11.9±6.9mm (SD) (min 1.3, max 19.7) versus 3.7±3.2mm (min 0.3, max 6.7) postoperatively and the mean preoperative frontal displacement was 7.5±3.7mm (min 4.2, max 12.4) versus 2.5±2.0mm (min 0.3, max 4.3) postoperatively. Minimally invasive iliosacral and lumboiliac fixation is an option for treating posterior pelvic ring fractures free of neurological deficit and especially spinopelvic dissociation.

Evaluation of the early radiological and functional results of percutaneous fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries

Recent years have seen improvements in all phases of pelvic fracture management. The surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries is technically demanding The aim of treatment is to achieve anatomical or near anatomical restoration of the articular surface, accurate reduction of the pelvic ring in mechanically unstable injuries, reduce pain, allows early mobilization of the patient and optimizes long term functional results This study aimed to evaluate the early radiological and functional results of percutaneous fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. From October 2019 till December 2020 twenty patients (11male and 9 female) with unstable pelvic ring injuries were included in the study. The mean age 42 years (range 18–66 years). The most common mode of injury was road traffic accident (RTA) followed by fall from height. The most common injury pattern according to Young and Burgess lateral compression injury, anteroposterior compression injury and vertically unstable. Four patients had medical comorbidities diabetes mellitus and hypertension at presentation. All patients treated by DCO protocol. 3 patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries treated by percutaneous iliosacral screw. 3 patients with anterior pelvic ring injuries treated by external fixator. 2 patient with anterior pelvic ring injuries treated by INFIX .8 patients with anterior and posterior pelvic ring injuries treated by external fixator and percutaneous iliosacral screw.1 patients with anterior and posterior pelvic ring injuries treated by INFIX and percutaneous iliosacral screw.2patients with anterior pelvic ring and posterior pelvic ring injuries treated by INFIX and spinopelvic fixation.1 patients with anterior pelvic ring and posterior pelvic ring injuries treated by external fixator and spinopelvic fixation. The mean injury-to-surgery interval was 6.1 days (range 0-12 days). The mean intraoperative blood loss 160ml range 100ml -240 ml. Percutaneous fixation of pelvic ring injuries offers safe, short operative time technique, less complication, with better results, short hospital stay, early healing and should be the standard way for pelvic ring fractures fixation. High quality pre-operative and intra-operative imaging, image-guidance, are essential for an equally high quality of surgical results.

Early results of iliosacral screw(s) fixation in the treatment of Tile’s type C unstable pelvic injuries

Background Pelvic ring disruptions are associated with increased patients’ morbidity and mortality. Several methods have been advocated for treatment of such devastating injuries. Surgical fixation is now regarded as the treatment of choice of unstable pelvic disruptions. Among different methods of surgical fixation, iliosacral screws (ISS) have shown promising results in the treatment of the disruption of the posterior pelvic ring. Aim The aim of this study was to report the clinical and radiological results of ISS for fixation of the posterior pelvic disruption in completely unstable pelvic ring injury (Tile’s C). Settings and design A prospective study was held at Alexandria University. Patients and methods This study involved a prospective assessment of 27 patients with Tile’s C pelvic disruption who had ISS fixation. The mean duration of postoperative follow up was 28.96±9.28 (12–49) months. The clinical outcome was assessed with postoperative Majeed score and the rate of the postoperative complications. The radiological outcome was evaluated by the degree of postoperative displacement on the anteroposterior plain radiographs. Statistical analysis SPSS version 20.0. Results The mean postoperative Majeed score was 79.11±13.01. There was a statistically significant improvement in the postoperative vertical displacement (P Conclusion Fixation with ISS is an effective procedure in the management of completely unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries.

O-arm navigation for sacroiliac screw placement in the treatment for posterior pelvic ring injury.

This study aims to investigate the application value of O-arm navigation system in sacroiliac screw placement for the treatment of unstable pelvic ring injury. A total of 40 patients (mean age = 30.75 ± 14.99years, 25 males, 15 females) were included. From January 2016 to July 2018, 40 patients with posterior pelvic ring injury treated in our hospital were included. Of them, 19 patients underwent O-arm navigation for screw placement (O-arm group) while the other 21 received C-arm fluoroscopy guidance (C-arm group) for sacroiliac screw placement. Intraoperative outcomes and the outcome of screw placement were compared between groups. The quality of radiological images was assessed by Matta's radiological outcome grade. The outcome of complex pelvic fracture treatment was evaluated by Majeed Functional score. All demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Compared with the C-arm groups, the O-arm group had a shorter surgery time (33.19 ± 3.14 vs. 48.35 ± 4.38min, P < 0.001), a higher overall good outcome "excellent + good" rate of screw placement (95.45% vs. 73.91%, P < 0.05), and a significantly higher Majeed Functional score better outcome of complex pelvic fracture treatment at 1 and 3months postoperation (both P < 0.05). Our results demonstrated that O-arm navigation system is feasible and safe for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury and can effectively improve the accuracy and safety of sacroiliac screw placement, shorten the operation time, and help rapid postoperative functional recovery.