Abstract
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the applicable safety and biomechanical stability of iliosacral triangular osteosynthesis (ITO) through 3D modeling and finite element (FE) analysis.MethodsPelvic CT imaging data from 100 cases were imported into Mimics software for the construction of 3D pelvic models. The S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws and S2 sacroiliac screws were placed in the S2 segment with optimal distribution and their compatibility rate on the S2 safe channel was observed and analyzed. In the FE model, the posterior pelvic ring was fixed with two transsacral screws (TTS), triangular osteosynthesis (TO) and ITO, respectively. Four different loading methods were implemented in sequence to simulate the force in standing, flexion, right bending, and left twisting, respectively. The relative displacement and change in relative displacement of the three fixing methods were recorded and analyzed.ResultsThe theoretical compatibility rate of S2AI screw and S2 sacroiliac screw in S2 segment was 94%, of which 100% were in males and 88% in females. In the FE model, in terms of overall relative displacement, TTS group showed the smallest relative displacement, the ITO group showed the second smallest, and the TO group the largest relative displacement. The change in relative displacement of the TTS group displayed the smaller fluctuations in motion. The change in relative displacement of the TO group under right bending and left twisting displayed larger fluctuations, while the ITO group under flexion displayed larger fluctuations.ConclusionsThe simultaneous placement of S2AI screw and S2 sacroiliac screw in the S2 segment is theoretically safe. Although the biomechanical stability of ITO is slightly lower than TTS, it is better than TO, and can be used as a new method for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries.
Highlights
The aim of this study was to investigate the applicable safety and biomechanical stability of iliosacral triangular osteosynthesis (ITO) through 3D modeling and finite element (FE) analysis
We propose the combination of S2-alar-iliac screw and S1 pedicle screw fixation (S2AI-S1) fixation with an S2 sacroiliac screw for the treatment of sacral fractures
Except for 2 patients who did not have the S2 safety channel, 94 patients were able to accommodate the S2AI screw and S2 sacroiliac screw in the S2 segment, and 4 patients could not accommodate S2AI screw and S2 sacroiliac screw in the S2 segment
Summary
The aim of this study was to investigate the applicable safety and biomechanical stability of iliosacral triangular osteosynthesis (ITO) through 3D modeling and finite element (FE) analysis. Zheng et al BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2021) 22:971 fixation (unilateral LPF) and horizontal fixation (sacroiliac screw) for the treatment of sacral fractures. Biomechanical studies have shown that TO provides higher stability than a sacroiliac screw, tension band plate, and unilateral LPF [7,8,9]. The protruding iliac screws often cause local pain and even pressure sores to patients [4]. Modified designs for the TO to avoid fixing the lumbar spine have been proposed, problems caused by the protrusion of the iliac screw cannot be avoided [12, 13]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have