Post-transplant Biliary Complications Research Articles

Biliary complications in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: the Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit's experience.

Biliary complications are the most common complications of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation and the international experience with DCD transplants suggests increased rates of biliary complications compared to donation after brain death transplants. Therefore, it is important to understand factors that are associated with the development of biliary complications within the Australian DCD context in order to inform future practice. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of biliary complications after DCD liver transplantation at the Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit and identify factors associated with this outcome. A retrospective analysis of all adult DCD liver transplants at the Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit from 2007 to 2015 was undertaken. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of biliary complications and was censored on 31 December 2016. Recipients were then stratified into groups based on the development of biliary complications and risk factor analysis was performed. Biliary complications occurred in 35% of DCD transplants, including seven anastomotic strictures and 10 non-anastomotic strictures. Higher donor risk index scores (P = 0.03), post-transplant portal vein complications (P = 0.042) and peak gamma-glutamyl transferase levels within 7 days post-transplant (P = 0.047) were associated with biliary complications. Findings from this study demonstrate that biliary complications remain common in DCD liver recipients. Recipients who developed a biliary complication tended to have higher donor risk index, elevated peak gamma-glutamyl transferase levels within 7 days post-transplant or a portal vein complication. The presence of any of these factors should prompt close monitoring for post-transplant biliary complications.

The long-term outcomes of deceased-donor liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: a two-center study in China

Background & AimsFactors that influence the outcomes after deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) are not well known. We aimed to clarify these effects on the outcomes after DDLT.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with PBC who underwent DDLT from March 2006 to July 2018 at the organ transplantation center of the First Hospital of Jilin University and the First Central Hospital of Tianjin. Changes in liver function were assessed posttransplantation. Recurrence, survival rate, and complications were recorded at follow-up. The effect of liver transplantation on survival and recurrence was evaluated using univariate and/or multivariate Cox regression analyses.ResultsIn total, 69 patients with PBC undergoing DDLT were included in this study. At 4 weeks posttransplant, all liver function tests were normal. During a median follow-up time of 32 months, 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates were estimated as 95.1% and 21.8%, respectively. A recipient aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) greater than 2 was negatively associated with survival (P = 0.0018). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that age younger than 48 years was an independent risk factor for recurrent PBC in recipients undergoing liver transplantation (hazard ratio 0.028, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.71, P = 0.03). Posttransplant infections (62%) and biliary tract complications (26%) were the most common complications.ConclusionLiver transplantation is an effective treatment for patients with PBC. Liver function normalizes by 4 weeks posttransplant. Although posttransplant survival rate is high, recurrence is possible. To some extent, survival rate and recurrence rate can be predicted by APRI and age, respectively.

Decreased long-term graft survival in persistent biliary complications after right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation.

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic treatment of post-transplant biliary complications have not been fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of biliary complications on graft survival after right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (R-LDLT). From a single-institutional prospectively maintained database, all patients who underwent R-LDLT between 1999 and 2017 were included. Data on patient demographics, complications, endoscopic treatment, and graft survival were retrieved for analyses. Among 111 patients who underwent R-LDLT, 33 (29.7%) developed biliary complications; of these, 19 (17.1%) were treated with biliary stenting, and the stent was removed following resolution of biliary complications in 8 of the 19 (42.1%) patients. The graft survival rate was 88.0% and 85.6% at 5- and 10-year follow-up, respectively, in patients without biliary complications, which was similar to that of the patients with resolved biliary complications (81.3% at 5- and 10-year follow-up, P=.68) but higher than that of patients having persistent (unresolved) biliary complications (61.4% and 49.1% at 5- and 10-year follow-up, respectively, P=.04). Post-transplant persistent biliary complications, unresolved after endoscopic management and requiring prolonged biliary stenting, are associated with inferior graft survival. However, patients with resolved biliary complications achieve a favorable long-term survival similar to patients without biliary complications.

Percutaneous Management of Posttransplant Biliary Complications

AbstractInterventional radiology plays a major role in the management of posttransplant biliary complications. This review aims to discuss biliary complications of liver transplantation and will outline the role of interventional radiology, diagnosis, and management of these problems.

Biliary Complications Following Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors, Treatments, and Prognosis.

We present retrospective analysis of our 15-year experience with pediatric living donor liver transplantation, focusing on the risk factors, treatments, and long-term prognosis for posttransplant biliary complications (BCs). Between May 2001 and December 2017, 290 living donor liver transplantations were performed. The median age was 1.4 years old. The median observation period was 8.4 years. Biliary strictures were classified as anastomotic stricture (AS) or non-AS (NAS). Overall incidence of biliary complications was 18.6%, including AS in 46 cases, NAS in 6, and other classifications in 2. The mean period to diagnosis of the AS was 641 ± 810 postoperative days. The multivariate analysis showed that hepaticojejunostomy without external stent was an independent risk factor for AS (P = 0.011). The first treatments for AS were percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in 25 cases, double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in 19, and surgical reanastomosis in 2. The success and recurrence rates of PTBD treatments were 90.9% and 22.7%, respectively. The success and recurrence rates of endoscopic interventions under DBE were 93.6% and 75.3%, respectively. The 15-year graft survival rates in patients with and without AS were 95.7% and 89.1%, respectively (P = 0.255), but 2 patients with cholangitis due to multiple NAS underwent retransplantation. Posttransplant AS can be prevented by hepaticojejunostomy using external stent, and the long-term prognosis is good with early treatments using DBE or PTBD. However, the prognosis of multiple NAS is poor.

Role of Preoperative Viral Load and Presence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation Due to Hepatitis C Virus

BackgroundChronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a global health problem, and the need for liver transplants is ever-growing. For optimal surgical success, risk factors must be identified and HCV viral load must be reduced to a minimum to avoid complications. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of HCV viral load on the post-transplant biliary complications. MethodBetween 2004 and 2018, the cases of 114 liver transplant recipients with HCV infection were retrospectively reviewed. Data collection included demographic variables, preoperative and postoperative amount of serum HCV RNA copies, preoperative diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and postoperative biliary complications in the early and late period. After missing values were excluded, the remaining 97 patients were divided into 2 groups according to preoperative HCV RNA status (Group A: HCV RNA [+] and Group B: HCV RNA [-]). ResultsDemographic parameters were similar among both groups. There were 67 patients in Group A and 30 patients in Group B. The overall rate of biliary complications was higher in Group A without statistical significance (20% [n = 14] vs 13% [n = 4], respectively, P = .573). Biliary stricture occurrence in the late period was also higher in Group A. In HCC (+) patients (n = 26), biliary complications were significantly higher compared to HCC (-) patients (34% vs 12%, P = .018). However, in patients with biliary complications, the rate of multiple duct anastomoses was higher with no statistical significance (45% vs 26%, respectively, P = .14). ConclusionThe biliary complications on patient survival has been previously established, and this is mostly evident in those patients with viral etiology and hepatocellular carcinoma. As was also suggested in our study, hepatocellular carcinoma and positive viral status should be considered as predisposing factors for postoperative biliary complications after liver transplantation. However, the rate of multiple duct anastomoses should also be taken into consideration. New standards of antiviral medications and bridge therapy for HCC may improve transplant outcomes.

Is Surgery Necessary? Endoscopic Management of Post-transplant Biliary Complications in the Modern Era

BackgroundBiliary complications are common following liver transplantation (LT) and traditionally managed with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. However, endoscopic management has largely supplanted surgical revision in the modern era. Herein, we evaluate our experience with the management of biliary complications following LT. MethodsAll LTs from January 2013 to June 2018 at a single institution were reviewed. Patients with biliary bypass prior to, or at LT, were excluded. Patients were grouped by biliary complication of an isolated stricture, isolated leak, or concomitant stricture and leak (stricture/leak). ResultsA total of 462 grafts were transplanted into 449 patients. Ninety-five (21%) patients had post-transplant biliary complications, including 56 (59%) strictures, 28 (29%) leaks, and 11 (12%) stricture/leaks. Consequently, the overall stricture, leak, and stricture/leak rates were 12%, 6%, and 2%, respectively. Endoscopic management was pursued for all stricture and stricture/leak patients, as well as 75% of leak patients, reserving early surgery only for those patients with an uncontrolled leak and evidence of biliary peritonitis. Endoscopic management was successful in the majority of patients (stricture 94%, leak 90%, stricture/leak 90%). Only six patients (5.6%) received additional interventions—two required percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography catheters, three underwent surgical revision, and one was re-transplanted. ConclusionsEndoscopic management of post-transplant biliary complications resulted in long-term resolution without increased morbidity, mortality, or graft failure. Successful endoscopic treatment requires collaboration with a skilled endoscopist. Moreover, multidisciplinary transplant teams must develop treatment protocols based on the local availability and expertise at their center.

Normothermic regional perfusion vs. super-rapid recovery in controlled donation after circulatory death liver transplantation

Although there is increasing interest in its use, definitive evidence demonstrating a benefit for postmortem normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) liver transplantation is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare results of cDCD liver transplants performed with postmortem NRP vs. super-rapid recovery (SRR), the current standard for cDCD. This was an observational cohort study including all cDCD liver transplants performed in Spain between June 2012 and December 2016, with follow-up ending in December 2017. Each donor hospital determined whether organ recovery was performed using NRP or SRR. The propensity scores technique based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates across study groups; logistic and Cox regression models were used for binary and time-to-event outcomes. During the study period, there were 95 cDCD liver transplants performed with postmortem NRP and 117 with SRR. The median donor age was 56 years (interquartile range 45-65 years). After IPTW analysis, baseline covariates were balanced, with all absolute standardised differences <0.15. IPTW-adjusted risks were significantly improved among NRP livers for overall biliary complications (odds ratio 0.14; 95% CI 0.06-0.35, p <0.001), ischaemic type biliary lesions (odds ratio 0.11; 95% CI 0.02-0.57; p = 0.008), and graft loss (hazard ratio 0.39; 95% CI 0.20-0.78; p = 0.008). The use of postmortem NRP in cDCD liver transplantation appears to reduce postoperative biliary complications, ischaemic type biliary lesions and graft loss, and allows for the transplantation of livers even from cDCD donors of advanced age. This is a propensity-matched nationwide observational cohort study performed using livers recovered from donors undergoing cardiac arrest provoked by the intentional withdrawal of life support (controlled donation after circulatory death, cDCD). Approximately half of the livers were recovered after a period of postmortem in situ normothermic regional perfusion, which restored warm oxygenated blood to the abdominal organs, whereas the remainder were recovered after rapid preservation with a cold solution. The study results suggest that the use of postmortem normothermic regional perfusion helps reduce rates of post-transplant biliary complications and graft loss and allows for the successful transplantation of livers from older cDCD donors.

Impact of machine perfusion of the liver on post-transplant biliary complications: A systematic review.

AIMTo review the clinical impact of machine perfusion (MP) of the liver on biliary complications post-transplantation, particularly ischaemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL).METHODSThis systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. The following databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE and Scopus. The keyword “liver transplantation” was used in combination with the free term “machine perfusion”. Clinical studies reporting results of transplantation of donor human livers following ex situ or in situ MP were analysed. Details relating to donor characteristics, recipients, technique of MP performed and post-operative biliary complications (ITBL, bile leak and anastomotic strictures) were critically analysed.RESULTSFifteen articles were considered to fit the criteria for this review. Ex situ normothermic MP was used in 6 studies, ex situ hypothermic MP in 5 studies and the other 4 studies investigated in situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and controlled oxygenated rewarming. MP techniques which have per se the potential to alleviate ischaemia-reperfusion injury: Such as hypothermic MP and NRP, have also reported lower rates of ITBL. Other biliary complications, such as biliary leak and anastomotic biliary strictures, are reported with similar incidences with all MP techniques. There is currently less clinical evidence available to support normothermic MP as a mitigator of biliary complications following liver transplantation. On the other hand, restoration of organ to full metabolism during normothermic MP allows assessment of hepatobiliary function before transplantation, although universally accepted criteria have yet to be validated.CONCLUSIONMP of the liver has the potential to have a positive impact on post-transplant biliary complications, specifically ITBL, and expand extended criteria donor livers utilisation.

Abstract No. 557 Does donor anatomy impact biliary interventions in living donor liver transplantation?

Biliary intervention on living donor liver transplants (LDLT) is complicated by variant biliary anatomy found during donor harvest which require multiple anastomoses. This study sought to explore the outcomes of percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) in this unique population. An IRB approved retrospective review of 83 patients undergoing LDLT between 2007 and 2017 was performed. Fourteen of 83 LDLT recipients (median age 56 years; 7 males) had post-transplant biliary complications managed with percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) and stenting in the setting of failed or contraindicated ERCP. Etiologies of liver disease: hepatitis C (n = 6), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 2), primary biliary cirrhosis (n = 2), alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 2), biliary atresia (n = 1), and hemochromatosis (n = 1). Median follow-up was 52 months (range, 6-123 months), and median graft survival was 43 months (range, 2-123 months). Donor cholangiograms were reviewed for Huang classification. PBD was performed due to: biliary stricture (9), biliary leak (1), and biliary stricture with leak (4). Median duration of PBD was 8 months (range, 4-27). Ten of 14 (71%) patients were managed with 1 PBD, 3/14 (21%) with 2 PBD, and 1/14 (7%) with 3 PBD. Nine of 14 (64%) patients were successfully managed with PBD and did not require re-operation. Three of 14 (21%) underwent re-transplantation, and two of 14 (14%) had surgical revision. There was one death during follow-up, and PBD management for one patient is ongoing. Thirteen of 14 donors had cholangiograms available for review. Ten of 13 (77%) demonstrated variant anatomy. The most common variant anatomy (7/10, 70%) was a right posterior duct inserting to a left duct (type A3), which comprises 17% of the general population. All patients requiring more than one PBD had donor liver variant biliary anatomy. This corresponded to 40% of patients with donor variant anatomy requiring multiple PBDs. Interventional radiology plays an important, and often salvage, role in the management of biliary complications after LDLT, commonly requiring 2 or more drains. Therefore, knowing the donor biliary anatomy is imperative to treating LDLT patients.

Tobacco Use is a Modifiable Risk Factor for Post-Transplant Biliary Complications

PurposeBiliary complications following liver transplantation are a significant source of morbidity, potentially leading to graft failure necessitating retransplantation. We sought to evaluate smoking as an independent risk factor for post-transplant biliary complications. MethodsThe clinical course of all adult primary deceased donor liver transplants at our center from 1992 to 2012 was reviewed. Eligible patients were assigned to cohorts based on their lifetime tobacco exposure: never smokers indicating 0 pack-year exposure and all others were ever smokers. Biliary complications were defined as strictures, leaks, or bilomas requiring intervention. Complication rates were analyzed using univariate regression models correlated with donor and recipient characteristics. Associations found during univariate analysis were included in the final multivariate Cox model. ResultsEight hundred sixty-five subjects were followed for a median of 65 months; 482 (55.7%) of patients had a positive smoking history at the time of transplant. In univariate analysis, positive tobacco smoking history (HR = 1.36; p = 0.037) and increased time from quit date to transplantation (HR = 0.998; p = 0.011) were positive and negative predictors of biliary complication, respectively. Lifetime tobacco exposure remained a significant predictor of biliary complication on multivariate analysis (HR = 1.408; p = 0.023). ConclusionsSmoking status is an independent predictor of post-transplant biliary complications, and the data presented reinforces the importance of early smoking cessation in the pre-transplantation period.

Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for the diagnosis of post-transplant biliary complications.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT) are common. This study aimed to ascertain the value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) to evaluate anastomotic strictures (AS), non-anastomotic strictures (NAS) and biliary casts (BC). Sixty liver-transplanted patients with suspicion of biliary complications and T2w-MRCP and T1w-MRC followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) were analysed. Two readers reviewed the MRCs and rated image quality (IQ) and likelihood for AS/NAS/BC on Likert scales. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated, ROC curve analysis performed, and inter-reader variability assessed. The subjective added value of T1w-MRC was rated. IQ was high for all sequences without significant differences (2.83-2.88). In 39 patients ERCP/PTC detected a complication. Sensitivity and specificity for AS were 64-96 using T2w-MRCP, increasing to 79-100 using all sequences. Use of all sequences increased the sensitivity of detecting NAS/BC from 72-92% to 88-100% and 67-89% to 72-94%, respectively. Kappa values were substantial (0.45-0.62). T1w-MRC was found to be helpful in 75-83.3%. Combining T1w-MRC and T2w-MRCP increased sensitivity and specificity and diagnostic confidence in patients after LT with suspected biliary complications. T1w-MRC is a valuable tool for evaluating post-transplant biliary complications. • T1w-MRC is a valuable tool for evaluating post-transplant biliary complications. • Adding T1w-MRC to T2w-MRC increases diagnostic confidence for detection of biliary complications. • A combination of T1w-MRC and T2w-MRCP leads to the best results.

Dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion in liver transplants donated after circulatory death.

BackgroundExperimental studies have suggested that end‐ischaemic dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (DHOPE) may restore hepatocellular energy status and reduce reperfusion injury in donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver grafts. The aim of this prospective case–control study was to assess the safety and feasibility of DHOPE in DCD liver transplantation.MethodsIn consecutive DCD liver transplantations, liver grafts were treated with end‐ischaemic DHOPE. Outcome was compared with that in a control group of DCD liver transplantations without DHOPE, matched for donor age, donor warm ischaemia time, and recipient Model for End‐stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. All patients were followed for 1 year.ResultsTen transplantations involving liver grafts treated with DHOPE were compared with 20 control procedures. There were no technical problems. All 6‐month and 1‐year graft and patient survival rates were 100 per cent in the DHOPE group. Six‐month graft survival and 1‐year graft and patient survival rates in the control group were 80, 67 and 85 per cent respectively. During DHOPE, median (i.q.r.) hepatic adenosine 5′‐triphosphate (ATP) content increased 11‐fold, from 6 (3–10) to 66 (42–87) µmol per g protein (P = 0·005). All DHOPE‐preserved livers showed excellent early function. At 1 week after transplantation peak serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin levels were twofold lower in the DHOPE group than in the control group (ALT: median 966 versus 1858 units/l respectively, P = 0·006; bilirubin: median 1·0 (i.q.r. 0·7–1·4) versus 2·6 (0·9–5·1) mg/dl, P = 0·044). None of the ten DHOPE‐preserved livers required retransplantation for non‐anastomotic biliary stricture, compared with five of 20 in the control group (P = 0·140).ConclusionThis clinical study of end‐ischaemic DHOPE in DCD liver transplantation suggests that the technique restores hepatic ATP, reduces reperfusion injury, and is safe and feasible. RCTs with larger numbers of patients are warranted to assess the efficacy in reducing post‐transplant biliary complications.

Su1604 Long Term Outcomes of FCSEMS in Patients With Post-Transplant Biliary Complications. Is This the Time to Come Back to Plastic?

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the gold standard of treatment in patients with biliary complications after liver transplantation. The benefits of fully covered self expandable metallic stents (FCSEMS) lie in their relative simplicity and the need for only two procedures, one for insertion, and the other for removal. Several case series have been published on such stents after liver transplantation, with generally good outcomes. Our aim was to analyze definitive long-term outcomes of FCSEMS treatment in patients with posttransplant biliary complications, and not responding to Standard treatment.

Predictors of endoscopic treatment outcome in the management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation.

The most common complications after liver transplantation nowadays affect the biliary tract.We carried out a retrospective study to identify predictors of endoscopic treatment outcome in the management of post-transplantation biliary complications. Data from all patients with post-transplantation biliary complications subjected to endoscopic treatment at the University of Udine between 2000 and 2012 were extracted. To identify predictors of endoscopic treatment outcome, a logistic regression analysis was carried out. Cox modeling was used to identify factors associated with mortality. We identified 142 patients who developed biliary complications: 83 of these patients had a successful endoscopic therapy, whereas 45 had a failure. Fourteen patients, who developed nonanastomotic biliary stricture, were excluded from the analysis. Patients with biliary complications who had pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score more than 10 [odds ratio (OR) 3.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-12.95; P = 0.03] and stent retention time more than 12 months (OR 6.45; 95% CI 2.14-19.42; P < 0.01) were less likely to respond to endoscopic therapy. In contrast, both dilatation and stenting procedures (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03-0.30; P < 0.01) and 10 Fr diameter stent placement (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.70; P = 0.01) predicted favorable endoscopic treatment outcome. Time to the occurrence of biliary complications of more than 3 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24; 95% CI 0.10-0.56] and placement of five or more stents (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.79) were found to be protective against mortality, whereas hepatic artery thrombosis was a significant risk factor for mortality (HR 13.88; 95% CI 4.08-47.25). We found endoscopic treatment to be less effective in patients with pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score more than 10 and stent retention time more than 12, whereas dilatation and stenting procedure and 10 Fr diameter stent placement predicted a favorable outcome.

Endoscopic treatment of biliary complications following liver transplantation

The aims of the present study were to review biliary complications following liver transplantation in a single-center experience, to identify the factors associated with biliary complications, and to evaluate the success of endoscopic and percutaneous treatment in such patients. Between January 1994 and June 2010, a total of 176 patients with liver disease underwent liver transplantation; 119 recipients were included in this retrospective analysis. Median posttransplant follow-up period was 49 months. Mean age was 43.0±12.7 years. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) were performed in 71 and 48 patients, respectively. Duct-to-duct anastomosis and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy were performed in 68 and 51 patients, respectively. The overall incidence of posttransplant biliary complications was 36%; anastomotic biliary strictures were the most common biliary complications (42%), followed by biliary leakage (28%). On logistic regression analysis, duct-duct anastomosis was the only risk factor associated with the development of biliary complications (Odds ratio (OR), 3.346; p=0.005). Endoscopic and percutaneous treatment was successful in the majority of patients (81%), and the remaining 19% recipients underwent surgery for biliary repair. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guided drainage and balloon dilatation with stent placement were the most common treatment modalities. Biliary complications were most frequent after liver transplantation; biliary strictures were the most commonly seen. The use of duct-to-duct anastomosis for biliary reconstruction is a risk factor for the development of biliary complications. Endoscopic and percutaneous treatment was successful in the majority of these patients.

The emerging questionable benefit of sorafenib as a neo-adjuvant in HCC patients treated with Y-90 radioembolization pending liver transplantation

The emerging questionable benefit of sorafenib as a neo-adjuvant in HCC patients treated with Y-90 radioembolization pending liver transplantation

Strategies to Reduce Infectious Complication Using Epidemiologic Data Analysis in Liver Transplant Recipients

BackgroundInfectious complications are major factors for morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. To establish a proper strategy to reduce infectious complications, we analyzed epidemiologic and risk factors for post-transplant infections. MethodsWe analyzed the medical records of 231 consecutive liver transplant recipients from December 2007 to November 2011, including at least 1-year follow up, for comparison with those from 1996 to 2005. ResultsAmong 231 patients, 126 (54.5%) experienced 244 infectious episodes, a rate of 1.05 per patient. Among overall mortality of 9.9% (23/231), infections were more prevalent (P = .04). Predominant infections were postoperative intra-abdominal problems (36.1%), peritonitis (15.2%), pneumonia (13.5%), bacteremia (4.1%), wound complications (1.6%), viral etiologies (18.0%), and other causes (11.5%). Causative organisms were bacterial (68.9%), viral (14.7%), fungal (7.0%), and unproven ones (9.4%). Multivariate analysis of risks for infection showed significant impacts of Model for End-stage Liver Disease score [P = .027; odds ratio (OR), 1.04], post-transplant biliary complications (P < .001; OR, 3.50), and rejection episodes (P = .023; OR, 3.39). Mortality was related to retransplantation (P = .003), post-transplant dialysis (P = .006), and infection (P = .056) upon univariate analysis, none of which were significant in multivariate analysis. Compared with data from the previous period, overall and infection-related mortality decreased from 24.5% to 9.9% and 52.9% to 26.1%, respectively. There were no significant changes in the types of infection or rate of drug-resistant bacteria, but candidal infections and cytomegalovirus reactivations were more prevalent. ConclusionOur data showed current perioperative antimicrobial regimens need not be changed: however, new strategies are needed to reduce infectious complications after liver transplantation, to reduce biliary complications and to properly manage rejection episodes.

Educational Exhibit Abstract No. 264 - Detection, diagnosis, and interventions for treatment of biliary complications in liver transplant patients: current state of the art

Learning Objectives We discuss the timing, incidence, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis and pitfalls in the management of (1) Strictures in living related and cadaveric transplant recipients and their distinguishing features, including an algorithm for management, dilation, manometry, and permanent and temporary metallic stent use, (2) Disappearing ducts, (3) Late ischemic necrotic ducts, and (4) Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. In addition, this exhibit will review: (4) The under-recognized limitations and clinical implications of MRCP and US imaging for stricture diagnosis, (5) Novel techniques for embolization of bile leaks, and (6) Interventions in stenotic or occluded transplant arteries and their impact upon subsequent biliary pathology. Background Orthotopic and living donor liver transplantation are the mainstays of therapy for end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure. The combined incidence of post-transplant biliary complications (all comers) has been reported as high as 34%, commonly warranting interventional management. Common problems include strictures, obstructive debris, and bilomas and bile leaks. Clinical Findings/Procedure Details While the incidence of post-transplant biliary strictures is 3-8% in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients, it still averages ≥25% in living donor (LDLT) recipients. The greatest risk factors for these adverse effects include biliary ischemia due to arterial insufficiency and surgical reconstruction techniques. Conventional imaging criteria (for MR, CT, and US) under-report clinically relevant obstruction, delaying potentially definitive intervention and organ preservation. Interventional and endoscopic dilation and drainage, and newer covered stents and devices can offer potentially durable first line therapies. Conclusion and/or Teaching Points Biliary complications remain a notable source of transplant morbidity. New results and interventional techniques warrant an updated review and approach to their comprehensive management.

Development, management, and resolution of biliary complications after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: A report from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study consortium

Adult recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have a higher incidence of biliary complications than recipients of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Our objective was to define the intensity of the interventions and the time to resolution after the diagnosis of biliary complications after liver transplantation. We analyzed the management and resolution of posttransplant biliary complications and investigated the comparative effectiveness of interventions in LDLT and DDLT recipients. For the analysis of biliary complications (leaks or strictures), we used a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent liver transplantation at 8 centers between 1998 and 2006 (median follow-up from onset=4.7 years). The numbers, procedure types, and times to resolution were compared for LDLT and DDLT recipients. Posttransplant biliary complications occurred in 47 of the 189 DDLT recipients (25%) and in 141 of the 356 LDLT recipients (40%). Biliary leaks constituted 38% of the post-DDLT biliary complications (n=18) and 65% of the post-LDLT biliary complications (n=91). The median times to first biliary complications were similar for DDLT and LDLT (11 versus 14 days for leaks, P=0.63; 69 versus 107 days for strictures, P=0.34). Overall, 1225 diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, including reoperation and retransplantation, were performed (6.5±5.4 per recipient; 5.5±3.6 for DDLT versus 6.8±5.8 for LDLT, P=0.52). The median number of months to the resolution of a biliary complication (i.e., a tube-, stent-, and drain-free status) did not significantly differ between the DDLT and LDLT groups for leaks (2.3 versus 1.3 months, P=0.29) or strictures (4.9 versus 2.3 months, P=0.61). Although the incidence of biliary complications is higher after LDLT versus DDLT, the treatment requirements and the time to resolution after the development of a biliary complication are similar for LDLT and DDLT recipients.