Post-dissection Aneurysms Research Articles

Management of the False Lumen in Post Type A Aortic Dissection Arch Aneurysms Treated With Branched Endografts

Introduction: The treatment of chronic postdissection aneurysms of the aortic arch is a challenge. This study aims to describe false lumen management after aortic arch endovascular repair of post-type A dissection aneurysms treated with a branched endograft. Methods: In this single-center retrospective observational study, all consecutive patients undergoing endovascular treatment of aneurysmal degeneration of chronic type A aortic dissections following open repair were enrolled. The primary endpoint was maximal aortic diameter evolution measured on computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included procedural success, aortic re intervention, and remodeling during follow-up. Results: Between January 2017 and June 2020, 22 patients underwent endovascular branched arch repair for post type A dissection aneurysms. Technical success was 100%. Thirteen patients (59%) had dissection involvement of at least 1 supra-aortic vessel. Midterm follow-up CTA was performed for 20 patients, 23.1 (±13.3) months after the procedure. Maximal aortic diameter at the level of the repair was decreasing in 13 (65%) patients, increasing in 2 (10%) patients, and no change was observed in 5 (25%) patients. During follow-up, 7 patients (35%) required aortic reintervention. Thoracic candy plugs were implanted for distal false lumen occlusion in 15 patients and associated with a high rate of complete remodeling (6/15 patients, 40%). Conclusion: Arch branch endografting of aneurysmal evolution of a post type A dissection aortic arch is a safe and feasible option in experienced hands. Candy plug use in favorable anatomies seems to be associated with accelerated remodeling of the aorta. Clinical Impact There are currently no recommendations on dissected supra- aortic vessels management and the use of thoracic aorta false lumen occlusion devices during endovascular repair of chronic post dissection aneurysm of the aortic arch with branched endografts. Based on our clinical experience reported in the current manuscript, we propose a treatment algorithm for the management of the false lumen in this setting.

Preliminary results from an Italian National Registry on the outcomes of the Najuta fenestrated aortic arch endograft

BackgroundArch pathology represents one of the last frontiers in aortic aneurysm endovascular management. Several companies recently developed dedicated branched and fenestrated endografts specifically designed for the aortic arch, aiming to overcome some of the issues associated with standard thoracic endograft and supra-aortic vessels extra-anatomic debranching. This study aimed to evaluate early outcomes obtained with a custom-made fenestrated endograft approved for thoracic aortic aneurysms exclusion. MethodsAll consecutive patients treated with the Najuta endograft (Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc, Tokyo, Japan) in Italy were enrolled prospectively and included in the study population. Anatomic characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed retrospectively. Study end points were technical success, 30-day clinical success, overall survival, supra-aortic vessel patency, endoleak, and need for reintervention or surgical conversion. ResultsBetween 2018 and 2022, 76 patients received a Najuta endograft in Italy and were enrolled in the study. The median patient age was 72 years (interquartile range, 69-76 years) and 80.3% were male. Most of the patients received treatment for atherosclerotic aneurysms (80.3%); others were treated for postdissection aneurysms (7.9%), penetrating aortic ulcer (9.2%), or type I endoleak correction after previous thoracic endovascular repair (2.6%). Overall, 161 supra-aortic vessels were preserved through a dedicated fenestration. Technical success was achieved in 74 of 76 procedure (97.4%); both failures were associated with endoleak detection at final angiography (one type I and one type III endoleak). Two distal migrations occurred during the implanting procedure. Clinical success at 30 days was 94.7%. Two early reinterventions were needed within 30 days after index procedure: in one case, an aortic false lumen coils embolization was performed, because distal re-entry caused enlargement of the postdissection thoracic aneurysm. The other procedure consisted of a femoral pseudoaneurysm repair. The median follow-up was 7 months (interquartile range, 3-15 months); no supra-aortic vessel occlusions occurred and no patients needed surgical conversion. ConclusionsEarly results suggest that, in selected patients with aortic arch pathology needing a proximal landing, an endovascular approach with the Najuta system is safe and effective, especially for those at high surgical risk. A strict follow-up with high-quality computed tomography angiography images and eventual evaluation for long-term complications is needed to confirm these initial experience findings.

Three-vessel fenestrated repair of 6-cm thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair after chronic type B dissection.

Experience with fenestrated endovascular aortic endograft (FEVAR) in the treatment of post dissection aneurysms remains challenging. A 49-year-old male with a history of type A dissection repair (ascending tube graft) presented with a residual 6-cm expanding extent III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Our objective was to perform a 3-vessel FEVAR with a custom-made endograft with preloaded wires for each fenestration. Serial deployment technique was utilized. This technique allowed us to cannulate each target artery from above while keeping the rest of the fenestrated endograft below each fenestration still in the sheath.

Initial Single-Center Experience With the Knickerbocker Technique During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair to Block Retrograde False Lumen Flow in Patients With Type B Aortic Dissection

Objective: Effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in type B aortic dissection is impaired by persistent retrograde false lumen flow via distal re-entry tears. Controlled, stentgraft-assisted balloon dilatation of the true lumen at its lower end, or Knickerbocker technique, may block retrograde false lumen flow and consequently improve effectiveness by inducing immediate thrombosis along the entire descending thoracic aorta. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed for all consecutive patients with aortic dissection treated with the Knickerbocker technique to block retrograde false lumen flow. Results: Eleven patients were included for analysis. Intraoperative control angiography showed successful occlusion of the false lumen at the level of balloon dilatation in 9 out of 11 patients (82%). There was one perioperative mortality (9%), due to stroke. There were 2 early reinterventions, due to retroperitoneal bleeding and due to chyle leakage in the neck after left subclavian artery bypass. Median clinical follow-up duration was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 2–11] months. There were 2 deaths during follow-up, one at 2 months after TEVAR from unknown cause of death, and one after 11 months due to rupture of an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm. The Knickerbocker technique led to positive aortic remodeling. At 3 months follow-up, 100% of patients showed complete false lumen thrombosis in the thoracic aorta proximal to the level of balloon dilatation, with decreasing false lumen diameters (100%) and stable (44%) or decreasing (56%) total aortic diameters. In most patients, the false lumen distal to the stentgraft (i.e. at visceral level) remained patent (11% false lumen thrombosis rate), leading to ≥2 mm dilatation at this level (78% of patients) and in the infrarenal abdominal aorta (56% of patients) at 3 months postoperatively. No distal stent-graft-induced new entry tears were noticed during follow-up. Conclusion: The Knickerbocker technique is feasible and effective, leading to positive aortic remodeling of the aorta covered by stentgraft in all of a small cohort of patients. Clinical Impact Persistent, retrograde false lumen perfusion from distal re-entries following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection, may lead to progressive, aneurysmal dilatation. Controlled, stent graft-assisted balloon dilatation of the true lumen in the distal descending aorta (i.e. Knickerbocker technique) during TEVAR effectively excludes the false lumen from persistent flow resulting in positive aortic remodeling in our small cohort of patients, and hence potentially eliminates the risk of late post-dissection aneurysm formation in the descending thoracic aorta.

Postoperative Outcomes and Reinterventions Following Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair in Post-Dissection and Complex Degenerative Abdominal and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Background: The outcome of FBEVAR in post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has not been well established in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare midterm outcomes following FBEVAR in post-dissection aneurysms to degenerative aneurysms. (2) Methods: This was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing FBEVAR in a single center between 2017 and 2020. The baseline characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes of patients with post-dissection aneurysms were compared to those with degenerative outcomes. The primary end point was unplanned reinterventions. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the determinants of worse outcomes. Results: A total of 137 subjects with a mean age of 70 ± 10 years were included in the study, out of which 30 presented post-dissection aneurysms (22%). Custom-made devices were employed in 119 patients, off-the-shelf devices in 13 and physician-modified endografts in 5, with incorporation in 505 target vessels. The technical success rate was comparable in both groups (97% vs. 98%, p = 0.21). However, the one-year freedom from unplanned reintervention was lower in the post-dissection group (67% vs. 89%, p = 0.011). Conclusion: FBEVAR in post-dissection aneurysms is associated with a favorable technical success rate, but reintervention rates remain high. Long procedural duration and the use of adjunctive techniques are associated with increased risk of reinterventions.

Single-Center Experience With the Thoraflex™ Hybrid Prosthesis: Indications, Implantation Technique and Results.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the early and mid-term results after the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure for the treatment of complex arch and proximal descending aortic disease in a single-center institution.MethodsFrom April 2015 to July 2021, 72 patients (25 women, 60.4 ± 10.3 years) underwent Thoraflex™ Hybrid implantation at our institution. The indications were thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (n = 16, 22.2%), post-dissection aneurysm (n = 21, 29.2%), and acute aortic dissection (AAD) (n = 35, 48.6%). Antegrade cerebral perfusion under moderate hypothermia (28°C) was employed in all cases. Eighteen patients (25%) have already been operated due to heart or aortic disease.ResultsOverall in-hospital mortality was 12.5% (9 patients). Rates of permanent neurological dysfunction and spinal cord injury were 9.7 and 5.5%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate among patients operated on AAD, TAA, and post-dissection aneurysm were 8.6, 6.2, and 23.8%, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 26 ± 20 months, mortality was 9.7%. Furthermore, 23 patients (31.9%) required a subsequent procedure in distal aorta: endovascular stentgraft extension in 19 patients (26.4%) and open aortic surgery in 4 patients (5.5%). The mid-term survival of patients with type A aortic dissection was 97%.ConclusionsOur experience with the Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis demonstrates its surgical applicability for different types of aortic pathologies with promising outcomes during early and midterm follow-up. Our technique and perioperative management lead to comparable or even superior neurological outcomes and mortality in urgent cases considering other high-volume centers.

Beware of the distal last remnant: how we should deal with the remaining dissected aorta after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in case of post-dissection aneurysm.

Beware of the distal last remnant: how we should deal with the remaining dissected aorta after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in case of post-dissection aneurysm.

Pre-Loaded Fenestrated Thoracic Endografts for Distal Aortic Arch Pathologies: Multicentre Retrospective Analysis of Short and Mid Term Outcomes

To determine short and midterm outcomes of a pre-loaded fenestrated thoracic endograft (f-TEVAR) for exclusion of distal aortic arch pathologies. This was a multicentre, retrospective study including consecutive patients from six experienced European vascular centres undergoing f-TEVAR for distal arch pathologies. Primary endpoints included peri-operative mortality and peri-operative stroke and/or spinal cord ischaemia rates. Secondary outcomes were technical success and mid to late events, including death and re-interventions. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 26. Mid to late term events were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. One hundred and eight patients were included (mean age 68 ± 11 years, 70% men). A total of 38% (n= 42) had a prior history of aortic dissection, and 24% (n= 26) prior aortic surgery. The mean aneurysm diameter was 59 ± 12 mm and the most frequent indication for treatment was post-dissection aneurysms (n= 42, 39%). Technical success was 99% (n= 107) despite intra-operative wire entanglement occurring in 29% (n= 31). The 30 day mortality rate was 3.7% (n= 4), with a 5.6% major stroke incidence (n= 6) and 3.7% (n= 4) spinal cord ischaemia rate. Three cases of retrograde dissection occurred (two of which were fatal), all in post-type B dissecting aneurysm patients without prior aortic surgery (three of 19, 15.8%). Median follow up was 12 months (range, 1 - 26). Endoleaks were documented during follow up, with 3.5% type Ia (4/104) and 2.9% type Ib (3/104) as a result of persistent false lumen perfusion. The one, two, and three year survivals and freedom from re-intervention rates were 93.2% and 92.1%, 89.1% and 86.3%, and 84.4% and 73%, respectively. This multicentre study shows that treatment of the distal aortic arch by f-TEVAR is feasible, with promising 30 day mortality, stroke, and spinal cord ischaemia rates.

Post-implantation syndrome after frozen elephant trunk is associated with the volume of new-onset aortic thrombus.

BackgroundPost-implantation syndrome (PIS) is defined as non-infectious continuous fever and a concomitant rise in inflammatory markers shortly after endovascular aortic repair. PIS occurrence after hybrid procedures, such as the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique, has not been adequately investigated. The current study aims to define the incidence of PIS after the FET and to identify possible risk factors associated with its occurrence.MethodsThe clinical charts of 59 patients undergoing the FET between February 2015 and April 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The occurrence of PIS was defined as the presence of fever (>38 °C lasting longer than one day during the hospitalisation) and leucocytosis (white blood cell count >12,000/µL). Patients with concomitant conditions possibly leading to fever and/or leucocytosis were excluded. Beside demographic and procedure-related data, serum/plasma inflammatory markers were evaluated before surgery and daily up to seven days postoperatively. Computed tomography scans (CT) were examined to calculate the volume of pre-existent and new-onset mural thrombus after the FET.ResultsThirty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on the occurrence of PIS (17 cases; 44.7%). Patients with PIS were significantly younger than those without PIS (53.5±8.9 vs. 62.5±9.6 years; P=0.005). Female patients were less likely to develop PIS (5.2% vs. 26.3%, P=0.018). Patients with PIS had a higher volume of new-onset thrombus in the postoperative CT (P<0.001). Patients treated for post-dissection aneurysm had, postoperatively, significantly more thrombus material developed in a false lumen (P=0.02). Among the PIS markers, CRP (C-reactive protein) levels on the third postoperative day were independently associated with the volume of new-onset thrombus (P=0.011). After multivariate analysis, the volume of new-onset thrombus (P=0.028) and age (P=0.036) remained the variable associated with a statistically significant increased incidence of PIS.ConclusionsPIS can occur after the frozen elephant trunk procedure. The volume of new-onset thrombus seems to be associated with an increased incidence of PIS. These findings need to be confirmed in larger patient cohorts.

Endovascular Repair of Postdissection Aortic Aneurysms Using Physician-Modified Endografts

The purpose of this study was to report our experience and evaluate the technical and clinical outcomes of physician-modified endovascular aortic repair of chronic postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients presenting with chronic postdissection aneurysms unfit for open surgery and treated by physician-modified stent grafts between January 2016 and December 2019 was conducted. Outcome data were collected retrospectively. Early outcomes included technical success, perioperative mortality, and major adverse events. Late outcomes included reintervention, false lumen thrombosis rate, aneurysm size regression, and survival. Sixty-two patients (80.1% men with a mean age of 64 ± 9.9 years) were treated. The technical success was 98.3%. There was 1 (1.6%) death within 30 days. Perioperative major adverse events included respiratory failure (1.6%), spinal cord injury (0%), acute kidney injury (3.2%; 1 dialysis), bowel ischemia (1.6%), myocardial infarction (1.6%), and lower limb ischemia (1.6%). A reintervention was required in 6 (9.8%) patients. The false lumen thrombosis rates were 91.8% (n= 45 of 49) at 1-year follow-up. One patient died during follow-up from an aneurysm-related cause. The estimated overall survival rates were 98.4% and 96.8% at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. The report confirmed the feasibility and safety of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair in the setting of postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Despite the associated perioperative risk and high probability of intended or unintended reintervention, the procedure could lead to favorable aortic remodeling.

Embolization of the false lumen using IMPEDE-FX embolization plugs as part of treatment of an infrarenal post-dissection aneurysm: a case report

BackgroundThis case report demonstrates the value of IMPEDE-FX plugs in an embolization procedure of a false lumen of an infrarenal post-dissection aneurysm.Case presentationA 69-year-old patient was treated with mitral valve replacement, complicated by a Stanford type-A dissection. After 9 years he presented with an enlarging infrarenal post-dissection aneurysm. The false lumen was embolized using multiple IMPEDE-FX plugs as part of the treatment in addition to embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and overstenting of the re-entry in the right iliac artery. At 15 months the CTA showed a fully thrombosed false lumen and remodeling of the true lumen.ConclusionsThe false lumen of an infrarenal post-dissection aneurysm can successfully be embolized using IMPEDE-FX embolization plugs as part of the treatment strategy. Prospective trials on patients with non-thrombosed false lumina are indicated.

Fenestrated versus debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair for endovascular treatment of distal aortic arch and descending aortic lesions

BackgroundCervical debranching, followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), is well-established for treating aortic arch lesions. However, total endovascular repair with fenestrated endografts has not been adequately studied. Thus, we performed a comparison of the two techniques. MethodsThe present study was a single-center, retrospective study comparing the treatment of thoracic aortic lesions with custom-made fenestrated stent-grafts (fenestrated TEVAR [fTEVAR]) with a single fenestration for the left subclavian artery (LSA), a scallop for the left carotid artery, and hybrid repair with a thoracic stent-graft and cervical debranching of the LSA. Emergency cases were excluded. ResultsFrom 2012 to 2018, 19 patients (58% male) underwent elective fTEVAR (group A) and 17 patients (82% male) underwent debranching TEVAR (dTEVAR; group B). The mean age ± standard deviation in group A was 65.8 ± 2 years and 68 ± 3 years in group B. Left carotid–subclavian bypass was performed in 15 of 17 patients (88%) and transposition of the LSA in 2 of 17 patients (12%) in group B. The two groups were comparable regarding comorbidities, except for peripheral arterial disease: 5 of 19 patients in group A (26%) and none in group B had had peripheral arterial disease (P = .049). Dissection or post-dissection aneurysm was the indication for treatment in 6 of 19 patients in the fTEVAR group (group A) and in 12 of 17 patients in the dTEVAR group (group B; 31.6% vs 70.6%; P = .04). The indication for the remaining patients was a degenerative aortic aneurysm. Technical success was achieved in all cases, except for one case of dTEVAR owing to a type Ia endoleak. The mean endovascular operative time was 191 ± 120 minutes for fTEVAR and 130 ± 75 minutes for dTEVAR (P = NS). The mean operative time for the debranching procedure was 181 ± 97 minutes. No deaths or major strokes had occurred in the early postoperative period (30 days). Of the 17 patients in group B, 5 (29.4%) had experienced a local complication related to the debranching procedure. The mean follow-up was 14.6 ± 2 months for group A and 17 ± 2 months for group B. Of the 19 patients in group A and 17 patients in group B, 2 (10.5%) and 6 (35.3%) had required an unplanned reintervention related to the thoracic stent-graft during the follow-up period, respectively (P = NS). The estimated freedom from unplanned reintervention at 12 months was 86% for group A and 81% for group B. Primary patency of the LSA stent-graft or the carotid–subclavian bypass/transposition was 100% in both groups. ConclusionsBoth techniques showed excellent midterm patency rates for the target vessel and high technical success rate. The operation times were shorter for the fTEVAR group and complications related to the debranching procedure were avoided.

Staged total arch replacement, followed by fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair, for patients with mega aortic syndrome

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to review the clinical outcomes of a staged approach using total arch replacement (TAR) with an elephant trunk or a frozen elephant trunk, followed by fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) for patients with mega aortic syndrome. MethodsWe reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of 11 consecutive patients (8 men; mean age, 71 ± 7 years) treated by staged TAR and F-BEVAR from January 2014 to December 2018. The F-BEVAR procedures were performed under a prospective, nonrandomized, physician-sponsored investigational device exemption protocol. All patients had had mega aortic syndrome, defined by an ascending aorta, arch, and extent I-II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The endpoints were 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAE), patient survival, freedom from reintervention, and freedom from target vessel instability. ResultsOf the 11 patients, 6 had developed chronic postdissection aneurysms after previous Stanford A (three A11, two A10, one A9) dissection repair and 5 had had degenerative aneurysms with no suitable landing zone in the aortic arch. The thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were classified as extent I in four patients and extent II in seven. One patient had died within 30 days after TAR (9.0%). However, none of the remaining 10 patients who had undergone F-BEVAR had died. First-stage TAR resulted in MAE in three patients (27%), including one spinal cord injury. The mean length of stay was 12 ± 6 days. The mean interval between TAR and F-BEVAR was 245 ± 138 days with no aneurysm rupture during the interval. Second-stage F-BEVAR was associated with MAE in two patients (20%), including spinal cord injury in one patient from spinal hematoma due to placement of a cerebrospinal fluid drain. The mean follow-up period was 14 ± 10 months. At 2 years postoperatively, patient survival, primary patency, secondary patency, and freedom from renal–mesenteric target vessel instability was 80% ± 9%, 94% ± 6%, 100%, and 86% ± 8%, respectively. No aortic-related deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Four patients had required reintervention, all performed using an endovascular approach. ConclusionsA staged approach to treatment of mega aortic syndrome using TAR and F-BEVAR is a feasible alternative for selected high-risk patients. Larger clinical experience and longer follow-up are needed.

Endovascular treatment of chronic aortic dissection with fenestrated and branched stent grafts

ObjectiveChronic aortic dissection with aneurysm development that includes the aortic arch and/or thoracoabdominal aorta (TAAA) is traditionally treated with open or hybrid surgery. Total endovascular treatment with fenestrated and branched aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) has recently been introduced as a less invasive alternative. The aim was to report the short- and midterm outcomes from a single tertiary vascular center. MethodsAll patients with chronic aortic dissection treated with F/B-EVAR from 2010 to 2019 at Uppsala University Hospital were identified. Perioperative and postoperative parameters were analyzed, with focus on short- (<30 days) and midterm survival, complication, and reintervention rates. ResultsF/B-EVAR was performed on 26 patients (median age, 63 years; range, 33-87 years; 18 men; median aortic diameter, 70 mm; range, 50-98 mm); with a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 0.5-118.0 months). One patient underwent both arch and TAAA repair. Overall, 13 arch repairs (arch group) after type A (n = 8) and type B (n = 5) dissection (all elective) were performed, and 14 TAAA repairs (TAAA group) after type A (n = 5) and type B (n = 9) dissection (one rupture). A total of 72 aortic branches were targeted (22 arch, 50 TAAA). Short-term technical success was achieved in 24 of 27 procedures (89%). Failures were related to one intraoperative retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) requiring open conversion (arch group), one persistent type IC endoleak on completion angiography (arch group), and one persistent type III endoleak (TAAA group). Mortality was 4% (n = 1) at 30 days and related to a second RTAD that occurred after discharge and was found on autopsy. Both RTADs occurred in patients with chronic type B dissection undergoing fenestrated arch repair. Paraplegia occurred in three cases (two arch, one TAAA) (11%), none permanent, and stroke in three cases (one arch, one TAAA) (11%); one was permanent. In the midterm, endoleaks were detected in 12 patients (44%); persistent false lumen flow (n = 3), type IB (n = 1), type IC (n = 3), type II (n = 7), and type IIIC (n = 2). The 3-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) of the arch repair was 75% and for the TAAA, 93%. Freedom from reintervention at 3 years were 100% for arch repairs and 48% for TAAA. In patients with a follow-up of more than 6 months (n = 23), all had stable or decreased aortic diameters and complete false lumen thrombosis at the level of stent graft was present in 65% (n = 15). ConclusionsEndovascular treatment of postdissection aneurysms is feasible, with acceptable short-term and midterm outcomes. RTAD after fenestrated and branched endovascular arch repair warrants caution when performed on patients with native ascending aortas, and reinterventions are frequent in TAAA repair.

Clinical and Morphologic Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Subacute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

The objective of the study was to assess long-term remodeling, survival, and reintervention outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for subacute and chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD). All patients who underwent TEVAR for subacute or chronic TBAD at a tertiary referral center between 1999 and 2015 were included in this cohort study. The primary outcome was aortic remodeling, and secondary outcomes included survival, rate of major complications, and reinterventions. Fifty patients were included, with mean age of 62.4years, 10 (20%) DeBakey type IIIA and 40 (80%) DeBakey type IIIB dissection; 45 standard TEVAR, 2 branched TEVAR, 3 TEVAR combined with fenestrated or branched EVAR. Indication for TEVAR was intact (n=40) or ruptured (n=1) postdissection aneurysm, hypoperfusion (n=4), treatment-refractory pain (n=2), or a combination (n=3). Mean clinical follow-up was 76months, and median radiological follow-up was 46months. Thirty-day survival was 96%, stroke 4%, renal failure 0%, paraplegia 0%. Three- and five-year survival was 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) [79; 97]) and 77% (95% CI [61; 87]), respectively. Of 19 late deaths, 6 were confirmed aorta related. Five-year freedom from reintervention was 69% (95% CI [53-80]). Distal stent graft extension due to aortic dilatation composed most reinterventions. Mean maximal aortic diameter was 58.7mm preoperatively and 51.9mm on last follow-up (P=0.003). On thoracic level, true lumen expanded (+10.0mm, 95% CI [6.4; 13.6]) (P<0.001) and false lumen decreased (-11.9mm, 95% CI [-15.2; -8.5]) (P<0.001) from baseline to the last computed tomography. In the abdominal aorta, true lumen diameter change was +3.1mm (95% CI [1.4; 4.8]) (P=0.001); false lumen diameter change was +1.0mm (95% CI [-1.8; 3.8]) (P=0.464). TEVAR for subacute and chronic TBAD results in favorable remodeling of the thoracic but not the abdominal aorta. Five-year survival is almost 80%, but late aortic deaths still occur. Aortic dilatation distal to the treated segment requiring reintervention is common, emphasizing the importance of follow-up.

Single-Stage Treatment of Extensive Aortic Pathology Using the Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure.

Extensive pathology involving the aortic arch and descending aorta traditionally has been treated with two open procedures. We report our institutional experience with a single stage frozen elephant trunk procedure for treatment of extensive aortic pathology. Between June 2018 and October 2019, nine patients (eight males, 89%, mean age 61 ± 6 years) with extensive aortic pathology were operated using the frozen elephant trunk procedure. Five (56%) patients underwent primary operation for chronic arch and proximal descending aneurysm in two (22%) patients, chronic type B aortic dissection in two (22%) patients and penetrating aortic ulcer in one (11%) patient. The other four (44%) patients received reoperative surgery for chronic post-dissection aneurysms. For organ protection during the aortic arch procedure, we used selective antegrade cerebral perfusion and mild systemic hypothermia at 28°C. Early mortality was not observed. A single (11%) patient developed focal stroke. Unilateral vocal cord palsy was present in two (22%) patients. Spinal cord injury was not observed. Reexploration for bleeding was required in two (22%) patients. Prolonged ventilation, liver and kidney failure as well as cardiac morbidity were not observed. Two patients (22%) with anticipated Endoleak type Ib received TEVAR extension at follow up. Mid-term mortality was observed in two (22%) patients, due to pneumonia. The frozen elephant trunk procedure can be used for a single-stage treatment of patients with extensive aortic pathology, due to chronic degenerative aneurysms or post-dissection aneurysms involving the aortic arch and the descending aorta, with acceptable mortality and morbidity.

Anatomical aspects and feasibility of endovascular repair for chronic post-dissection arch and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Aortic dissection is a complex pathology that carries significant morbidity and mortality if not treated in a timely fashion. While the open repair remains the gold standard treatment for patients with acute type A dissection, ascending aortic replacement is associated with high incidence of arch and descending thoracic aorta residual false lumen patency and aneurysmal degeneration. Multiple approaches have been used over the decades to address aneurysmal degeneration in the arch and thoracoabdominal aorta. This article summarizes anatomical requirements for total endovascular repair of aortic arch and TAAAs using fenestrated and branched endografts.

Endovascular management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch.

This article reviews endovascular management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch. Therapeutic strategies intended for this complex aortic condition are evolving rapidly to allow the treatment of various hostile aortic anatomy and frail patients. Principles, technical considerations, devices and outcomes of each technique are reviewed and summarized. Hybrid repair offer similar early mortality and stroke rates compared to open conventional surgery. Arch chimney and other parallel graft techniques present poor long term outcome, and should be limited to emergency situations where no other option is available. Fenestrated stent-grafting is subjected to many technical challenges in aortic arch due to difficulties in stent-graft orientation and fenestration positioning. In situ fenestration is an off-label technique that should only be used as an emergency bailout maneuver, considering that temporary coverage of supra aortic trunk vessel and its long-term durability raise concern. Finally, in experienced hands and appropriate anatomic conditions, arch branched graft technology has shown itself to be a safe and effective alternative to open conventional surgery. No randomized controlled trials have yet compared total endovascular aortic arch repair with hybrid techniques and open arch repair. The management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch is challenging, decision-making and interventions should continue to be performed in high-volume centers with a dedicated aortic team with an expertise in both open and endovascular repairs.

Komplike Akut Tip B Aortik Diseksiyonların Tedavisinde Donmuş Fil Hortumu Prosedürü

Introduction: This study aimed to define midterm clinical outcomes and morphological changes of acute complicated type B aortic dissections after the application of frozen elephant trunk technique. Patients and Methods: Data were collected from 143 patients treated with frozen elephant trunk procedure for complex thoracic aortic diseases between May 2012 and October 2018. Twenty-seven patients with acute complicated type B aortic dissection were included in the study. Results: The mean age of the study population was 56.9 ± 9.1 years, and 23 (85.2%)patients were male. Complete false lumen thrombosis in the descending aorta before the distal end of the stent graft was achieved in 88.9% of cases. There was no late mortality observed at a mean follow-up of 50.7 ± 22.5 months. Only one patient died due to multiple organ failure 62 days after the operation. Five patients underwent secondary distal aortic endovascular repair because of stent graft-induced new entry (n= 3) and second-stage treatment for post-dissection aneurysm (n= 2). Conclusion: Aortic arch involvement in acute complicated type B aortic dissections requires more extensive treatment, and frozen elephant trunk procedure serves as an alternative treatment modality.

Endovascular treatment of the persistent false lumen of post-dissection aneurysms with "candy-plug" technique

A 79-year-old male patient was operated with Bentall procedure, thoracic aorta-aortic interposition and stent graft implantation for aortic dissection type A. Because of the persistent false lumen a chronic, 60 mm thoraco-abdominal post-dissection aortic aneurysm developed, which we managed with a new endovascular treatment, the so-called "candy-plug" technique. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can induce the thrombosis of the false lumen and the aortic remodelling via the covering of the proximal intimal tear. However, the thrombosis of the false lumen is often - in 60% of the cases - incomplete. In these cases we have to prepare for the persistent expansion of the aorta, which can be managed only with high-risk open or endovascular repair. Hence a new solution with lower risk was investigated, which combines TEVAR and the false lumen closure devices. Such a new treatment is the "candy-plug" technique, which was performed in our case. This minimally invasive technique, which excludes the circulation of the false lumen and stops the progression of the aneurysm expansion, can be an effective and safe solution for the treatment of the chronic post-dissection aortic aneurysms. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(11): 437-439.