In 1913, at the Pasteur Institute of the University of Michigan an attempt was made to establish the Wassermann reaction on a chemical basis. The research in this direction dealt chiefly with the influence of salts, acids, and alkalies on the hemolytic system. It was first noted that any one of these, even in high dilution, had its influence on this biologic reaction. A specimen known to be negative to the Wassermann test, could be made to give a positive reaction by the addition of a trace of either acid or alkali. Furthermore, on the addition of a somewhat larger quantity of acid or of alkali, a positive specimen would give a negative reaction. Similarly, neutral salts would influence a negative specimen to the extent of causing a positive reaction. The opposite of this, however, was not true. Further experiments developed the fact that a series of positive and negative reactions, analogous in result to positive and negative Wassermann reactions, could be produced by an acid solution as antigen, and by rabbit serum, rendered acid or alkaline, as positive or negative serum. The acid serum would give a positive end result; while the alkaline serum would be negative. The analogy between the final results of these experiments and those of the Wassermann, coupled with the fact that the actual Wassermann could be influenced with acids or alkalies, and a negative specimen influenced with neutral salts, led to the assumption that the positive Wassermanns might be due to an increase in ions during the first incubation, either acid or alkaline ions, or those of neutral salts. This assumed to be a fact, the next step in the work was an investigation of the action of acids and alkalies on the hemolysis of certain blood cells. By allowing a fixed time interval for complete hemolysis of a definite blood cell suspension, the percentage of acid or of alkali
Read full abstract