Reviewed by: The Fragility of Power: Statius, Domitian and the Politics of the Thebaid by Stefano Rebeggiani Tim Stover Stefano Rebeggiani. The Fragility of Power: Statius, Domitian and the Politics of the Thebaid. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. xiv, 321. $74.00. ISBN 978-0-19-025181-9. In this stimulating book, Rebeggiani pushes back against those for whom Statius’ Thebaid is critical of Domitian and/or of monarchical power. For Rebeggiani, the poem is a vehicle for instructing the princeps on how to be a successful ruler: [End Page 113] the epic’s many images of abuse of power serve as negative exempla designed to guide Domitian away from the pitfalls of Neronian tyranny and onto the path of Thesean clementia. Rebeggiani thus accords to the Thebaid a protreptic function like that of Seneca’s De Clementia. It will be a tough sell for some that Statius’ poem of mindless madness, vengeful and petty gods, and familial dys-function should be seen as a speculum principis of sorts, but this perspective enables Rebeggiani to reorient the Thebaid’s ideological investments, as well as to offer many original and persuasive readings of individual passages. This is a work that critics of Flavian literary culture will have to take seriously, and one from which they will reap many rewards. For Rebeggiani, the Thebaid reflects both the vilification of Nero that was a hallmark of Flavian ideology and the cautious optimism that attended Domitian’s accession in 81. He reads the epic’s tyrants as symbols of Nero, a ruler not to be emulated, whereas Theseus and others offer Domitian positive role models. This is an interesting strategy, but there are some chronological problems. For example, except for the consulship of Helvidius Priscus’ son, the incidents Rebeggiani cites as evidence that Domitian cultivated friendships with victims of Nero’s tyranny early in his reign, moves which Rebeggiani sees reflected in the “anti-Neronian” Thebaid, took place from 85 on (50). Even if we agree that 85 qualifies as being early in Domitian’s reign, by then Statius had been working on the Thebaid for five years, nearly half the time he would need to complete the whole poem. So how can these incidents be adduced as providing the context in which Statius first conceived of his epic’s elaborations of kingship? A similar issue arises from Rebeggiani’s reading of the proem as reflective of the beginning of Domitian’s reign (103–105). Statius refers to Domitian’s second victories over the Chatti and the Dacians (1.19), which took place in 89. Chapters 5 and 6 are generally superb, and elsewhere in the book Rebeggiani breaks new ground in his analyses of Statius’ depiction of Hercules, the function of Senecan tragedy in the Thebaid, and Statius’ dynamic engagement with Lucan. And yet I wish there was more balance in his discussions of these topics. During an excellent examination of Hercules (123–152), the hero is said to provide an avenue for criticism of the Herculean Nero, but not of the Herculean Domitian. Likewise, Rebeggiani gives us a first-rate discussion of Statius’ reception of Lucan (153–196), but not everyone will agree that the Bellum Civile is narrowly anti-Neronian, not anti-Caesarian. And if Statius adopts a stance similar to that of Seneca (92), whereby he can both praise and blame the emperor (a view I find persuasive), Rebeggiani sees blame of Domitian as only a possibility if he fails to live up to the standard offered him by the poet. The Thebaid contains no criticisms of the princeps, only the threat of criticism should Domitian falter. At times, I wish Rebeggiani had included more context for some of his readings. For example, his view on the symbolic importance of Thiodamas’ succession as the Argives’ new vates following the death of Amphiaraus is persuasive (114–116). But it is not clear that Thiodamas should be regarded as a symbol of positive succession, as Rebeggiani does. Whereas Amphiaraus warned the Argives not to participate in the impious war (3.643), Thiodamas’ savagery while slaughtering sleeping Thebans is remarkable: he urges the Argives to yield to the pleasure of limitless...