Positive High-risk Human Papillomavirus Research Articles

Good performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology for detection and post-treatment surveillance of high-grade CIN/VAIN in a prospective, cross-sectional study.

The limited sensitivity of Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology and the low specificity of HPV testing in detecting cervical or vaginal lesions means that either precancers are missed or women without lesions are overtreated. To improve performance outcomes, p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology has been introduced as a useful biomarker. A prospective, cross-sectional study was performed and included 599 patients. Clinical performance estimates of Pap cytology, HPV DNA assay, and p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology for the detection of CIN2+/VAIN2+ were determined and compared. The sensitivity and specificity of p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology in detecting histology proven CIN2+/VAIN2+ was 91.6% and 95.0%, respectively, while that of Pap cytology was 42.1% and 95.2%, respectively, and that of HPV DNA testing was 100% and 41.6%, respectively. Among the three tests, the AUC of p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry was the largest, both for detecting cervical lesions and vaginal lesions, at 0.932 and 0.966, respectively. Among women who were HPV 16/18 positive or 12-other hrHPV positive and Pap positive (≥ASCUS), dual staining reduced the number of unnecessary colposcopy referrals from 274 to 181. Among the women who were 12-other hrHPV positive and Pap negative, dual staining could prevent underdiagnosis in six patients with CIN2+/VAIN2+ when used as a triage marker. Dual staining also identified four women with high-grade lesions detected by diagnostic conization but with negative colposcopy-guided biopsy results. p16/Ki-67 dual staining may be a promising tool for predicting high-grade cervical and vaginal lesions.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of high-risk human papilloma self-sampling test for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia

BackgroundIn Bolivia the incidence and mortality rates of uterine cervix cancer are the highest in America. The main factor contributing to this situation is the difficulty of establishing and maintaining quality prevention programs based on cytology. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HR-HPV testing on self-collected samples to detect cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and identify the best combination of screening tests.MethodsA total of 469 women, divided in two groups, were included in this study. The first group included 362 women that underwent three consecutively primary screening tests: self-collected sampling for HR-HPV detection, conventional cervical cytology and visual inspection under acetic acid (VIA). The second group included 107 women referred with a positive HR-HPV test that underwent conventional cervical cytology and VIA. The presence of high grade intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2+) or invasive cancer was verified by colposcopy and biopsy.ResultIn the screening group the sensitivity to detect high grade intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2+) or invasive cancer were 100, 76, 44% for the VIA, HR-HPV test and cytology, respectively. In the referred group, the sensitivity to detect high grade intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2+) or invasive cancer by VIA and cytology were 100 and 81%, respectively.ConclusionsVIA and HR-HPV self-sampling were the best combination to detect CIN2+ lesions. Cytology analysis gave the poorest performance.

Detection of high-risk human papillomavirus RNA in urine for cervical cancer screening with HPV 16 & 18/45 genotyping

ObjectiveTo detect high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) messenger-RNA (mRNA) in urine samples, compare their concordance with cervical samples including HPV 16 & 18/45 genotyping, and to determine the utility in detecting ≥ CIN 2 lesions. MethodsA cohort of 189 non-pregnant patients (age ≥ 25) was recruited in three groups: Group 1 with abnormal pap-smears and hrHPV positivity, Group 2 with normal pap-smears and hrHPV positivity, and Group 3 with normal pap-smears and hrHPV negativity. Urine samples were tested for hrHPV-mRNA and subsequent hrHPV-mRNA genotype if positive. High-risk HPV detection and genotyping were performed using Aptima assays which are validated for cervical HPV testing. Colposcopy results from groups 1 & 2 were analyzed. ResultsThe sensitivity of urine hrHPV-mRNA detection was 31.5% while the specificity and PPV were above 95% (96.9% & 95.1% respectively) (p < 0.001). The kappa agreement with cervical samples was fair (0.22, p = 0.04). The sensitivity and specificity of urine hrHPV-mRNA genotyping were 20.0% & 100% respectively (p < 0.001) with 100% genotype-specific concordance. The kappa agreement with cervical samples was fair (0.25, p = 0.16). For urine hrHPV-mRNA detection of ASC-H/HSIL when grouped by age ≥ 30, the sensitivity and specificity were 45.4% & 63.9% respectively (p = 0.009). For urine hrHPV-mRNA detection of ≥ CIN 2 for all ages, the sensitivity and specificity were 45.5% & 75.0% respectively (p = 0.03). ConclusionUsing the Aptima Assay, urine hrHPV-mRNA detection is suboptimal for cervical cancer screening but given the high specificity, it has the potential to identify high-grade lesions (≥ CIN 2). Urine hrHPV-mRNA genotyping via this modality is not beneficial in triage settings of normal or abnormal cytology to determine the need for colposcopy.

Prevalence of positive screening test results and agreement between cytology and human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical cancer screening in North-Western Romania.

Using data from a pilot study conducted in North-Western Romania, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of abnormal cytology and positive high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) test results in an ethnically diverse screening population and to assess the agreement between cytology and hr-HPV testing to evaluate the feasibility of integrating the latter as a primary test in the national cervical cancer screening program. The cross-sectional pilot study included Roma women, other ethnic minorities, and women in rural remote areas. Samples were taken for liquid-based cytology and hr-HPV testing (Hybrid Capture 2 DNA test) by a mobile health unit. The prevalence of positive screening results and the agreement between cytology and hr-HPV testing were estimated by κ coefficient. A total of 1019 women were included in the study. The population prevalence of positive screening results was similar for both tests (12%). The prevalence of abnormal cytology increased with increasing age, whereas the prevalence of positive hr-HPV test showed a bimodal age pattern. Substantial differences in the prevalence of abnormal cytology were found by ethnicity, with highest prevalence in Romanian women (14%), followed by Roma women (6%) and women of other ethnicities (5%) (P = 0.002). Similar ethnic differences in the prevalence of positive hr-HPV test were not observed. The overall agreement of positive screening results between the two methods was fair (κ = 0.25; 95% confidence interval = 0.18-0.30, P < 0.001) and ranged from poor to substantial depending on the age group. The prevalence of abnormal cytology result was high and similar to the prevalence of positive hr-HPV test result, which could allow for the implementation of hr-HPV testing as a primary test in the cervical cancer screening program in Romania.

Evaluation of guidelines for observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in young women

A high rate of regression in young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 has been recorded. However, there are few prospective data by which to evaluate management guidelines. This study evaluates the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology recommendations for follow-up of young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 using data created by a large prospective multicenter study of observational management. Participants were 616 women under 25 years with biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 following a referral to colposcopy for an abnormal smear with no previous high-grade abnormality. The protocol included colposcopy, cytology, and colposcopically directed biopsy at the initial visit and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups visits, and these data were analyzed. Histology from the corresponding cervical biopsy was treated as the reference diagnostic test. For young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, we aimed to determine the following: (1) the ability of colposcopy to identify women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or worse at 6 months; and (2) the ability of colposcopy, cytology, and a combination of cytology and colposcopy to identify residual high-grade abnormalities at 12 months. In addition, although not specified in the guidelines, we investigated the ability of high-risk human papillomavirus positivity alone or with cytology as a co-test to identify residual high-grade abnormalities at 12 months. At 6 months, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3+ colposcopic appearance identified only 28% (95% confidence interval, 18-40%) of women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3. At 12 months, a high-grade colposcopic appearance identified only 58% (95% confidence interval, 48-68%) of women with residual histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3. At 12 months, high-grade cytology identified only 58% (95% confidence interval, 48-68%) of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3. However, the combination of either high-grade cytology or colposcopic appearance proved substantially more sensitive (81%; 95% confidence interval, 72-88%). High-risk human papillomavirus positivity at 12 months was a sensitive (96%; 95% confidence interval, 89-99%) indicator of persisting high-grade histology. However, this sensitivity came at the expense of specificity (52%; 95% confidence interval, 45-58%). A co-test of high-risk human papillomavirus positivity or high-grade cytology at 12 months provided a high sensitivity (97%; 95% confidence interval, 90-99%) but low specificity (51%; 95% confidence interval, 45%-58%). Colposcopy and cytology are limited in their ability to exclude persistent high-grade abnormality for young women undergoing observational management for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2. We recommend biopsy for all women at 12 months. High-risk human papillomavirus positivity is a sensitive indicator of persistent abnormality and should be considered in those not having a biopsy.

Test Accuracy of Human Papillomavirus in Urine for Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

The objective was to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing of self-collected urine and cervicovaginal samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+). We recruited a convenience sample of women 25 to 65 years of age who were undergoing clinically indicated colposcopy at two medical centers in North Carolina between November 2016 and January 2019. Women with normal cytology results and positive hrHPV results were also recruited. Urine samples, self-collected cervicovaginal samples, provider-collected cervical samples, and cervical biopsy samples were obtained from all enrolled women. Samples were tested for hrHPV DNA using the Onclarity assay (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD). Biopsy samples were histologically graded as CIN2+ or <CIN2. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for detection of CIN2+ and assessed agreement between sample collection methods. We included 307 women (median age, 36 years) with valid histology results and triple-matched urine, self-collected cervicovaginal, and provider-collected cervical hrHPV results; 83 women (27%) had CIN2+. Urine-based hrHPV testing correctly identified 80% of CIN2+ cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 71 to 88%) using the PCR cycle threshold (CT ) established for provider-collected cervical samples, but sensitivity remained below the estimates for self-collected cervicovaginal and provider-collected cervical samples (both 94% [95% CI, 89 to 99%]). Using a higher CT cutoff value of ≤40, 90% sensitivity was achieved for urine-based hrHPV testing. Agreement between results for urine samples and self-collected cervicovaginal samples (kappa = 0.58) or provider-collected cervical samples (kappa = 0.54) was moderate. Urine-based hrHPV testing may be a promising approach to improve cervical cancer screening coverage, especially among women with limited access to health care.

Infiltrates of M2-Like Tumour-Associated Macrophages Are Adverse Prognostic Factor in Patients with Human Papillomavirus-Negative but Not in Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Introduction: Human papillomavirus with a high oncogenic potential (HR-HPV) is responsible for more than a half of squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx. The HR-HPV-dependent cases of this tumour have a better prognosis compared to the HR-HPV-negative cases, despite the usually more advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. In addition to genetic and epigenetic factors, the causes of this more favourable course of the disease are also seen in the participation of the tumour microenvironment, including the patient’s immune system. Macrophages are one of the most important elements of the immunocompetent cells landscape that make up the tumour microenvironment. Traditionally, they are divided into 2 groups: inflammatory macrophages with the M1 phenotype and tumour-associated macrophages known as M2 phenotype macrophages. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the macrophage infiltrates intensity of the M1/M2 and M2 phenotype separately on the clinical outcome of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (OPSCC), taking into account the HR-HPV status of tumours. Methods: The study involved 85 patients with OPSCC in which HR-HPV status in tumour tissue was determined using a double-check algorithm including the detection of viral DNA by RT-PCR method with subsequent confirmation of its biological activity by immunohistochemical demonstrating the P16^INK4A protein overexpression. In each of the groups formed on the basis of HR-HPV status, macrophages were discriminated using CD68 and CD163 proteins as markers of pan-macrophage and M2 phenotype. The intensity of infiltrates was quantified by means of computer-assisted analysis in digital images of whole slides (virtual slides) separately in tumour tissue and stroma. Results: In HPV-positive patients, significantly more intense infiltration of both M1/M2 and M2 macrophages was found in the tumour stroma compared to HPV-negative patients. The infiltrates from both types of macrophages in the tumour tissue were less intense and did not differ between these groups. Intensive infiltration of CD68⁺ macrophages in the tumour front was associated with higher rate of nodal failures and a shorter nodal control in both HR-HPV groups. In the group of HR-HPV-negative patients, heavy infiltration of CD163⁺ macrophages was associated with significantly shorter: loco-regional control (LRC), metastasis-free survival and overall survival (OS). These parameters and prognosis in patients with scanty CD163⁺ infiltration were similar to favourable outcomes in HR-HPV-positive patients. The relative risk of local-regional recurrence, distant metastases and disease-related death in HR-HPV-negative patients with intense CD163⁺ infiltrates was, respectively, 4.7, 5.4 and 5.7 compared to patients with scanty infiltrates. Conclusions: Tumours with a positive HR-HPV status demonstrate intense infiltrations of total pool M1/M2 and M2 macrophages. In the group of HPV-negative patients, intensive M1/M2 macrophage infiltrates correlate with higher risk of nodal failures, and intensive M2 infiltrates are an adverse prognostic factor for LRC, metastasis-free survival and OS.

Performance of HPV Genotyping Combined with p16/Ki-67 in Detection of Cervical Precancer and Cancer Among HPV-Positive Chinese Women.

Women with positive high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) need efficient triage testing to determine colposcopy referrals. Triage strategies of combining p16/Ki-67 with extended HPV genotyping were evaluated in this study. In total, 899 women attending cervical cancer screening program and 858 women referred to colposcopy from five hospitals were recruited. All the participants were tested by HPV assays and p16/Ki-67 dual staining. Colposcopy and biopsy were performed on women with any abnormal results. HPV genotypes were divided into four strata (HPV16/18, HPV31/33/58/52, HPV45/59/56/66, and HPV51/39/68/35) according to their risks for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+). The positive rates of four genotype strata among CIN3+ women were 3.47% (HPV51/39/68/35), 7.73% (HPV45/59/56/66), 14.7% (HPV31/33/58/52), and 78.1% (HPV16/18), respectively (P trend < 0.001). The positive rates of p16/Ki-67 increased with the elevation of HPV risk hierarchical from 65.0% in HPV51/39/68/35-positive women to 88.0% in HPV16/18-positive women (P trend < 0.001). p16/Ki-67 was an effective method for risk stratification of CIN2+ among HPV31/33/58/52- and HPV45/59/56/66-positive women [HPV31/33/58/52: OR for dual stain+ (ORDS+) of 26.7 (16.8-42.4) and OR for dual stain- (ORDS-) of 3.87(1.89-7.91); HPV45/59/56/66: ORDS+ of 10.3(5.05-21.0) and ORDS- of 1.27(0.38-4.26)]. The combination of HPV16/18 genotyping and p16/Ki-67 triage of HPV31/33/58/52/45/59/56/66-positive women resulted in a lower referral rate (40.1% vs. 41.3%; P < 0.001) as compared with triage of 12 other HPV-positive women with p16/Ki-67, although sensitivity and specificity levels for these two strategies were identical. Combining HPV extended genotyping and p16/Ki-67 can be considered as a promising strategy for cervical cancer screening and triage.

Prevalence of active infection by herpes simplex virus type 2 in patients with high-risk human papillomavirus infection: A cross-sectional study.

The aim is to determine the prevalence of active infection by herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) among Mexican women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) cervical infection, recruited from public gynecology and colposcopy services. In a cross-sectional study, HSV-2 antibodies, HSV-2 DNA, and HR-HPV DNA were quantified. Significant differences in HSV-2 seroprevalence and HSV-2 active infection rates were found between negative and positive HR-HPV cases. HSV-2 seroprevalence was 28.15% and 16.1% (P = .0001), while HSV-2 active infection rates were 6.83% and 0.62% (P = .001) for positive and negative HR-HPV groups, respectively. The risk of HSV-2 seropositivity was 1.7 times greater for HR-HPV-positive cases (P = .02). Similarly, HR-HPV-positive cases were nine times more likely to have an HSV-2 active infection than HR-HPV-negative cases (P = .03). High HSV-2/h-HPV coinfection rates were observed among women recruited from public gynecology and colposcopy services. The main factors related to an HSV-2 active infection are a history of risky sexual behavior and HR-HPV infection. The prevalence of HSV-2 active infection among positive HR-HPV subjects indicate that these infections constitute an important group of STIs in Mexico.

Mode of delivery does not have a relationship with high-risk HPV positivity

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the delivery room data for patients who give birth with standard vaginal delivery and caesarean section (C/S), to estimate whether high-risk (HR) HPV status affected the mode of delivery. Methods: Between January 2014 and January 2018, 8,376 pregnant women gave birth in our hospital. Of 8,376 patients, 1,039 pregnant women were aged 30 years and older and had HPV results known. They had a singleton pregnancy and no contraindications for standard delivery. Results: C/S rates for all HR HPV groups were lower than for all HPV-negative groups. However, no statistically significant difference was found between HR HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients for C/S rates got all 987 patients (18.75% vs. 24.39%) (p = 0.463), 245 primiparous patients (50.0% vs. 59.83%) (p = 0.629) and 742 multiparous patients (11.53% vs. 12.56%) (p = 0.876). Conclusion: HR HPV positivity does not affect normal vaginal labour progress and does not statistically increase C/S rates at the labour ward. Therefore, HR HPV positivity should not be regarded as a negative risk factor for normal vaginal labour progress.

Is there a Relationship between Combined Oral Contraceptive Use and Intrauterine Device Use with Abnormal Smear Results and Cervical Atypia?

Introduction: The relationship between the use of contraceptive method and the presence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) persistent infection and precancerous cervical lesions has not been fully established. Aim: To investigate the frequency of cervical atypia and risk factors affecting it in women using Combined Oral Contraceptive (COC) and Copper-Intrauterine Device Use (Cu-IUD). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary centre between 2017 to 2019, involving 835 patients using Cu-IUD and 538 patients using COC. Age, obstetric data, high-risk HPV type positivity, education level, location, occupation, Body Mass Index (BMI), smoking, cervical cytology results and colposcopic biopsy results were noted for each group. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 program was used to analyse the data. Pearson chi-square test and multivariate binary logistic regression test were performed. Model compatibility was good in binary logistics test (omnibus test p&lt;0.001). The p&lt;0.05 value was considered statistically significant. Results: The frequency of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia l (CIN l) lesions increased in women using Cu-IUD (p=0.038), while the frequency of CIN II+ lesions increased in COC users. The use of COC increased the risk of CIN II+ (p=0.014). High-risk HPV type positivity was common in those using COC (p&lt;0.05). In addition, age group 40-51 years, education level being primary, being multiparous, urban location, high risk HPV positivity were other risk factors for the presence of cervical atypia (p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: The risk of CIN I increased in those using Cu-IUD, while the risk of CIN II+ increased in those using COC.

Prognostic significance of negative conversion of high-risk Human Papillomavirus DNA after treatment in Cervical Cancer patients.

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of conversion of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) status after treatment for cervical cancer.Methods: A total of 112 cervical cancer patients with HR-HPV positivity without distant metastasis treated with surgery or radical concurrent radiochemotherapy were enrolled. HR-HPV status was analyzed before and after treatment and at the time point of recurrence or metastasis. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between conversion of HR-HPV status after treatment and survival.Results: Eighty-four (75%) patients had negative conversion HR-HPV (ncHR-HPV) after treatment and twenty-eight (25%) were persistent positive HR-HPV (ppHR-HPV). The negative conversion rate was 75.8% in patients who received surgical treatment and 71.4% in patients who received radical concurrent radiochemotherapy. There was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). There was no significant correlation between HR-HPV conversion after treatment with age (χ2=0.616, P=0.252), FIGO stage (χ2=0.051, P=0.823) and pathological type (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). Univariate analysis showed that treatment regimen and ncHR-HPV was closely related to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of cervical cancer patients. Multivariate COX regression model showed that treatment regimen (HR=3.57, 95% CI: 1.57-8.11, P=0.002) and ncHR-HPV (HR=5.14, 95% CI: 2.32-11.46, P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors for PFS, while only ncHR-HPV (HR=12.56, 95% CI: 3.54-44.65, P<0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for OS. The presence of ppHR-HPV after treatment (χ2=14.827, P<0.001) was associated with recurrence and metastasis. Eleven of the patients with ncHR-HPV after treatment had recurrence or metastasis, and HPV reinfection was not detected in any of them.Conclusion: ncHR-HPV after treatment in cervical cancer patients indicated better PFS and OS, while ppHR-HPV indicated worse prognosis and high risk of recurrence or metastasis. For patients with ncHR-HPV after treatment, continued HPV screening may not predict recurrence or metastasis. This study suggested that HR-HPV monitoring is necessary for ppHR-HPV patients after treatment but may not be for ncHR-HPV patients. However, further large and multi-center prospective studies should be performed to confirm these findings.

Frequency and genotype distribution of high-risk human papilloma virus types in Karabuk province, Turkey: A hospital based cross-sectional study

Aim: In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and genotype distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV; HR-HPV) infection in patients admitted to the gynecology and obstetrics outpatient clinics of Karabuk University Training and Research Hospital.Material and Methods: A total of 402 women aged 18–65 years who were admitted to the gynecology and obstetrics Clinic, Karabuk University Training and Research Hospital, between October 2016 and June 2019 were included. The presence of HR-HPV and genotyping of HPV were investigated using real-time polymerase chain reaction in cervical swab samples.Results: HR-HPV infection was found in 23.9% of women. HR-HPV positivity was detected most commonly in the age group of 20–29 years. Regarding genotype distribution among HPV-positive women, the genotypes that included multiple HR-HPV infections (mixed HR-HPV) were the most common genotype (38.5%), followed by HPV-16 (13.1%) and HPV-52 (9.8%).Conclusion: Prevalence of HR-HPV infection was found to be high in our region, with the most commonly observed genotypes being those containing mixed HR-HPV. We believe that these results would be helpful during the selection of primary and secondary preventive measures for cervical cancer while planning vaccination and screening programs.

Long-term predictors of residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 after treatment with a large loop excision of the transformation zone: a retrospective study.

To assess the long-term risk factors predicting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) and time to recurrence after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Retrospective study. Colposcopy clinic. 242 women with CIN 2-3 treated between 1996 and 2006 and followed up until June 2016. Age, margins, and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard and unconditional logistic regression models. The cumulative probability of treatment failure was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Histologically confirmed CIN 2-3, HR-HPV, margins, age. CIN 2-3 was associated with HR-HPV (HR=30.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.80-246.20), age >35years (HR=5.53, 95% CI=1.22-25.13), and margins (HR=7.31, 95% CI=1.60-33.44). HR-HPV showed a sensitivity of 88.8% and a specificity of 80%. Ecto+ /endocervical+ (16.7%), uncertain (19.4%) and ecto- /endocervical+ margins (9.1%) showed a higher risk of recurrence (odds ratio [OR]=13.20, 95% CI=1.02-170.96; OR = 15.84, 95% CI=3.02-83.01; and OR = 6.60, 95% CI=0.88-49.53, respectively). Women with involved margins and/or who were HR-HPV positive had more treatment failure than those who were HR-HPV negative or had clear margins (P-log-rank<0.001). HR-HPV and margins seem essential for stratifying post-LLETZ risk, and enable personalised management. Given that clear margins present a lower risk, a large excision may be indicated in older women to reduce the risk. After LLETZ for CIN 2-3, recurrences appear more often in women with positive HR-HPV and involved margins and aged over 35.

Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Based on Cervical Cytology Specimen.

Objective:High-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) was associated with the development of cervical cancer. Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) infection is the most common bacterial, sexually-transmitted infection. This study aimed to investigate the association of C. trachomatis in positive HR HPV and the cytological results from liquid-based cytology (LBC). Methods:150 residual LBC specimens were collected; all of which had undergone cytology and HPV testing by Cobas. The samples were established as C. trachomatis using real-time PCR (RT-PCR) with Cryptic F/Cryptic R primers. Results:Of 150 positive HPV findings, the most common (72.7%, 109/150) were the 12 other HR HPVs (viz., 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68). The cervical cytology of those positive HR HPVs were mostly negative (70.0%, 105/150). The C. trachomatis infections in positive HR HPV were 16% (24/150) HPV. The analysis of the abnormal cytology revealed that 41.6% had C. trachomatis co-infection (C. trachomatis and HPV infection) viz., LSIL (20.8%), HSIL (12.5%), and ASC-US (8.3%). A comparison with positive HPV without C. trachomatis co-infection revealed that the highest prevalence was for LSIL, ASC-US, and HSIL (11.1%, 10.3%, and 6.4%, respectively). There was no difference between the abnormalities and negative cervical cytology with negative and positive C. trachomatis co-infection in HR HPV positive (p = 0.174). Conclusion: C. trachomatis infection was not significantly associated HR-HPV and abnormal cytology. This study confirms the increasing rate of C. trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women so routine screening for these infections has been suggested to (a) prevent complications such as the chronic pelvic pain associated with prolong infection and (b) reduce sexual transmission of the infection.

Human papillomavirus and human telomerase RNA component gene in cervical cancer progression

This study aimed to examine hTERC gene in different grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer, and the association between hTERC and high risk-human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Patients who underwent cervical cancer screening at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between October 2010 and December 2011 were enrolled. All patients underwent liquid-based cytology test and hybrid capture 2 (HC2) for HPV detection. hTERC was examined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Cervical colposcopy biopsy was performed if any of the three results was positive. HC2, FISH, and pathology were compared. A total of 1200 women underwent screening, 150 patients underwent cervical biopsy: 32 in the normal group, 38 in the CIN1 group, 66 in the CIN2/3 group, and 14 in the invasive cervical cancer group. More patients had HR-HPV infection in the CIN2/3 group and ICC group compared with the CIN1 group. hTERC increased with increasing histological dysplasia. There was significant difference in hTERC positive rate between each of the three groups. More patients with hTERC gene amplification were observed in the positive HR-HPV group than in the HR-HPV negative group. In conclusion, hTERC is a potential marker for precancerous cervical cancer lesions. hTERC might be correlated with HR-HPV infection in cervical diseases.

Screening for Anal Cancer in Women With a History of Vulvar High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

The primary obkective was to determine the prevalence of (a) a positive anal cancer screen and (b) histological anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in women undergoing surveillance for previously diagnosed and treated human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated vulvar HSIL. The secondary objective was to determine the patients' acceptability of the screen. This is a single-institution, cross-sectional pilot study. Women, aged 30 to 80 years, with a history of biopsy-proven vulvar HSIL were invited to undergo screening for anal cancer. Positive screen characterized by abnormalities in any of the following: anal high-risk HPV (HR-HPV); anal cytology; and digital anorectal examination. All women with an abnormal screen were referred for high-resolution anoscopy. All women completed a postscreen questionnaire. Fifty-seven patients were recruited. The median (interquartile range) age was 61.5 (51.0-68.0) years. The prevalence of a positive screen was 56.1% (95% CI = 43.3%-68.2%). Of the 32 screen-positive patients, 12 had both abnormal cytology and HR-HPV, 3 had positive HR-HPV alone, and 17 had abnormal cytology alone. Of the 29 patients with a positive screen who went on to anoscopy, the prevalence of anal HSIL was 33.3% (95% CI = 19.2%-51.2%). The prevalence of anal HSIL among all of those who had screening (N = 57) was 18.2% (95% CI = 10.2%-30.3%). The examination was well tolerated with 100% of patients, indicating that they would have the screening again. Women with vulvar HSIL have an increased risk of developing anal HSIL. Larger studies are needed to define optimal screening protocols as well as algorithms for management in high-risk populations.

Implementation of HPV-based Cervical Cancer Screening Combined with Self-sampling Using a Midwifery Network Across Rural Greece: The GRECOSELF Study

Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is an alternative to physician sampling particularly for cervical cancer screening nonattenders. The GRECOSELF study is a nationwide observational cross-sectional study aiming to suggest a way to implement HPV-DNA testing in conjunction with self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Greece, utilizing a midwifery network. Women residing in remote areas of Greece were approached by midwives, of a nationwide network, and were provided with a self-collection kit (dry swab) for cervicovaginal sampling and asked to answer a questionnaire about their cervical cancer screening history. Each sample was tested for high-risk (hr) HPV with the Cobas HPV test. HrHPV-Positive women were referred to undergo colposcopy and, if needed, treatment according to colposcopy/biopsy results. Between May 2016 and November 2018, 13,111 women were recruited. Of these, 12,787 women gave valid answers in the study questionnaire and had valid HPV-DNA results; hrHPV prevalence was 8.3%; high-grade cervical/vaginal disease or cancer prevalence was 0.6%. HrHPV positivity rate decreased with age from 20.7% for women aged 25-29 years to 5.1% for women aged 50-60 years. Positive predictive value for hrHPV testing and for HPV16/18 genotyping ranged from 5.0% to 11.6% and from 11.8% to 27.0%, respectively, in different age groups. Compliance to colposcopy referral rate ranged from 68.6% (for women 25-29) to 76.3% (for women 40-49). For women residing in remote areas of Greece, the detection of hrHPV DNA with the Cobas HPV test, on self-collected cervicovaginal samples using dry cotton swabs, which are provided by visiting midwives, is a promising method for cervical cancer secondary prevention.

Prevalence of HPV-16/18 genotypes and immediate histopathologic correlation results in a Chinese population with negative cytology and positive high-risk HPV testing.

The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of human papillomavirus 16/18 (HPV-16/18) genotypes and immediate histopathologic correlations in a Chinese population with negative cytology and positive high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing. Patients who had documented negative cytology with immediate follow-up (within the 6 months after negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy Papanicolaou [Pap] testing), including a histopathologic examination and/or hrHPV testing, between 2011 and 2018 were included, and the data were analyzed. Among 1,424,182 Pap tests, 1,333,453 (93.6%) were interpreted as negative cytology. Although conventional Pap smears had the highest reporting rate, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and higher (CIN-2+) lesions were detected significantly more with liquid-based cytology preparations (2.1%) than the conventional method (1.4%; P<.01). The overall hrHPV-positive rate was 14.9% (25,507 of 171,273) in the women with negative cytology. Among the 18,423 cytology-negative, HPV-positive cases tested with the Cobas assay, the overall HPV-16/18 prevalence was 24.7%, with 17.9% being HPV-16-positive, 6.2% being HPV-18-positive, and 0.6% being positive for both HPV-16 and HPV-18. The immediate histopathologic examination was documented for 21,796 women with cotesting results, including 8915 HPV-positive cases and 12,881 HPV-negative cases. CIN-2+ lesions were diagnosed in 15.2% of the HPV-16-positive cases; this rate was significantly higher than the rates seen in the HPV-18-positive cases (4.8%) and the cases positive for 1 of the other 12 types of HPV (3.0%). This is by far the largest routine clinical practice report of HPV-16/18 genotyping and histopathologic examination in negative-cytology women and the first report of such an investigation in the Chinese population. This study indicates enhanced risk stratification with HPV-16/18 genotype testing in HPV-positive, cytology-negative women in the Chinese population.

Patient factors affecting successful linkage to treatment in a cervical cancer prevention program in Kenya: A prospective cohort study.

To identify patient factors associated with whether women who screened positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) successfully accessed treatment in a cervical cancer prevention program in Kenya. A prospective cohort study was conducted as part of a trial of implementation strategies for hrHPV-based cervical cancer screening in western Kenya from January 2018 to February 2019. In this larger trial, women underwent hrHPV testing during community health campaigns (CHCs), and hrHPV+ women were referred to government facilities for cryotherapy. For this analysis, we looked at rates of and predictors of presenting for treatment and presenting within 30 days of receiving positive hrHPV results ("timely" presentation). Data came from questionnaires completed at the time of screening and treatment. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with each outcome. Of the 505 hrHPV+ women, 266 (53%) presented for treatment. Cryotherapy was performed in 236 (89%) of the women who presented, while 30 (11%) were not treated: 15 (6%) due to gas outage, six (2%) due to pregnancy, five (2%) due to concern for cervical cancer, and four (2%) due to an unknown or other reason. After adjusting for other factors in the multivariable analysis, higher education level and missing work to come to the CHC were associated with presenting for treatment. Variables that were associated with increased likelihood of timely presentation were missing work to come to the CHC, absence of depressive symptoms, told by someone important to come to the CHC, and shorter distance to the treatment site. The majority of hrHPV+ women who did not get treated were lost at the stage of decision-making or accessing treatment, with a small number encountering barriers at the treatment sites. Patient education and financial support are potential areas for intervention to increase rates of hrHPV+ women seeking treatment.