Changes In Positive End-expiratory Pressure Research Articles

Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study

BackgroundIndividualised bedside adjustment of mechanical ventilation is a standard strategy in acute coma neurocritical care patients. This involves customising positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which could improve ventilation homogeneity and arterial oxygenation. This study aimed to determine whether PEEP titrated by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) results in different lung ventilation homogeneity when compared to standard PEEP of 5 cmH2O in mechanically ventilated patients with healthy lungs.MethodsIn this prospective single-centre study, we evaluated 55 acute adult neurocritical care patients starting controlled ventilation with PEEPs close to 5 cmH2O. Next, the optimal PEEP was identified by EIT-guided decremental PEEP titration, probing PEEP levels between 9 and 2 cmH2O and finding the minimal amount of collapse and overdistension. EIT-derived parameters of ventilation homogeneity were evaluated before and after the PEEP titration and after the adjustment of PEEP to its optimal value. Non-EIT-based parameters, such as peripheral capillary Hb saturation (SpO2) and end-tidal pressure of CO2, were recorded hourly and analysed before PEEP titration and after PEEP adjustment.ResultsThe mean PEEP value before titration was 4.75 ± 0.94 cmH2O (ranging from 3 to max 8 cmH2O), 4.29 ± 1.24 cmH2O after titration and before PEEP adjustment, and 4.26 ± 1.5 cmH2O after PEEP adjustment. No statistically significant differences in ventilation homogeneity were observed due to the adjustment of PEEP found by PEEP titration. We also found non-significant changes in non-EIT-based parameters following the PEEP titration and subsequent PEEP adjustment, except for the mean arterial pressure, which dropped statistically significantly (with a mean difference of 3.2 mmHg, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.0 cmH2O, p < 0.001).ConclusionAdjusting PEEP to values derived from PEEP titration guided by EIT does not provide any significant changes in ventilation homogeneity as assessed by EIT to ventilated patients with healthy lungs, provided the change in PEEP does not exceed three cmH2O. Thus, a reduction in PEEP determined through PEEP titration that is not greater than 3 cmH2O from an initial value of 5 cmH2O is unlikely to affect ventilation homogeneity significantly, which could benefit mechanically ventilated neurocritical care patients.

How to interpret the two phenotypes of esophageal pressure response to the positive end expiratory pressure change?

How to interpret the two phenotypes of esophageal pressure response to the positive end expiratory pressure change?

Phenotypes of esophageal pressure response to the change of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Esophageal pressure (Pes) has been used as a surrogate of pleural pressure (Ppl) to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. The relationship between Pes and PEEP remains undetermined. A gastric tube with a balloon catheter was inserted to monitor Pes in moderate to severe ARDS patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation. To assess the end-expiratory Pes response (ΔPes) to PEEP changes (ΔPEEP), the PEEP level was decreased and increased subsequently (with an average change of 3 cmH2O). The patients underwent the following two series of PEEP adjustment: (I) from PEEP-3 cmH2O to PEEPbaseline; and (II) from PEEPbaseline to PEEP+3 cmH2O. The patients were classified as "PEEP-dependent type" if they had ΔPes ≥30% ΔPEEP and were otherwise classified as "PEEP-independent type" (ΔPes <30% ΔPEEP in any series). In total, 54 series of PEEP adjustments were performed in 18 ARDS patients. Of these patients, 12 were classified as PEEP-dependent type, and six were classified as PEEP-independent type. During the PEEP adjustment, end-expiratory Pes changed significantly in the PEEP-dependent patients, who had a Pes of 10.8 (7.9, 12.3), 12.5 (10.5, 14.9), and 14.5 (13.1, 18.3) cmH2O at PEEP-3 cmH2O, PEEPbaseline, and PEEP+3 cmH2O, respectively (median and quartiles; P<0.0001), while end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL) was maintained at an optimal range [-0.1 (-0.7, 0.4), 0.1 (-0.6, 0.5), and 0.3 (-0.3, 0.7) cmH2O, respectively]. In the PEEP-independent patients, the Pes remained unchanged, with a Pes of 15.4 (11.4, 17.8), 15.5 (11.6, 17.8), and 15.4 (11.7, 18.30) cmH2O at each of the three PEEP levels, respectively. Meanwhile, end-expiratory PL significantly improved [from -5.5 (-8.5, -3.4) at PEEP-3 cmH2O to -2.5 (-5.0, -1.6) at PEEPbaseline to -0.5 (-1.8, 0.3) at PEEP+3 cmH2O; P<0.01]. Two types of Pes phenotypes were identified according to the ΔPes to ΔPEEP. The underlying mechanisms and implications for clinical practice require further exploration.

Influence of Fractional Inspired Oxygen Tension on Lung Perfusion Distribution, Regional Ventilation, and Lung Volume during Mechanical Ventilation of Supine Healthy Swine.

Lower fractional inspired oxygen tension (Fio2) during general anesthesia can reduce lung atelectasis. The objectives are to evaluate the effect of two Fio2 (0.4 and 1) during low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation over lung perfusion distribution, volume, and regional ventilation. These variables were evaluated at two PEEP levels and unilateral lung atelectasis. In this exploratory study, 10 healthy female piglets (32.3 ± 3.4 kg) underwent mechanical ventilation in two atelectasis models: (1) bilateral gravitational atelectasis (n = 6), induced by changes in PEEP and Fio2 in three combinations: high PEEP with low Fio2 (Fio2 = 0.4), zero PEEP (PEEP0) with low Fio2 (Fio2 = 0.4), and PEEP0 with high Fio2 (Fio2 = 1); and (2) unilateral atelectasis (n = 6), induced by left bronchial occlusion, with the left lung aerated (Fio2 = 0.21) and low aerated (Fio2 = 1; n = 5 for this step). Measurements were conducted after 10 min in each step, encompassing assessment of respiratory mechanics, oxygenation, and hemodynamics; lung ventilation and perfusion by electrical impedance tomography; and lung aeration and perfusion by computed tomography. During bilateral gravitational atelectasis, PEEP reduction increased atelectasis in dorsal regions, decreased respiratory compliance, and distributed lung ventilation to ventral regions with a parallel shift of perfusion to the same areas. With PEEP0, there were no differences between low and high Fio2 in respiratory compliance (23.9 ± 6.5 ml/cm H2O vs. 21.9 ± 5.0; P = 0.441), regional ventilation, and regional perfusion, despite higher lung collapse (18.6 ± 7.6% vs. 32.7 ± 14.5%; P = 0.045) with high Fio2. During unilateral lung atelectasis, the deaerated lung had a lower shunt (19.3 ± 3.6% vs. 25.3 ± 5.5%; P = 0.045) and lower computed tomography perfusion to the left lung (8.8 ± 1.8% vs. 23.8 ± 7.1%; P = 0.007). PEEP0 with low Fio2, compared with high Fio2, did not produce significant changes in respiratory system compliance, regional lung ventilation, and perfusion despite significantly lower lung collapse. After left bronchial occlusion, the shrinkage of the parenchyma with Fio2 = 1 enhanced hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, reducing intrapulmonary shunt and perfusion of the nonventilated areas.

Capnodynamic end-expiratory lung volume assessment in anesthetized healthy children.

Capnodynamic lung function monitoring generates variables that may be useful for pediatric perioperative ventilation. Establish normal values for end-expiratory lung volume CO2 in healthy children undergoing anesthesia and to compare these values to previously published values obtained with alternative end-expiratory lung volume methods. The secondary aim was to investigate the ability of end-expiratory lung volume CO2 to react to positive end-expiratory pressure-induced changes in end-expiratory lung volume. In addition, normal values for associated volumetric capnography lung function variables were examined. Fifteen pediatric patients with healthy lungs (median age 8 months, range 1-36 months) undergoing general anesthesia were examined before start of surgery. Tested variables were recorded at baseline positive end-expiratory pressure 3 cmH2 O, 1 and 3 min after positive end-expiratory pressure 10 cmH2 O and 3 min after returning to baseline positive end-expiratory pressure 3 cmH2 O. Baseline end-expiratory lung volume CO2 was 32 mL kg-1 (95% CI 29-34 mL kg-1 ) which increased to 39 mL kg-1 (95% CI 35-43 mL kg-1 , p < .0001) and 37 mL kg-1 (95% CI 34-41 mL kg-1 , p = .0003) 1 and 3 min after positive end-expiratory pressure 10 cmH2 O, respectively. End-expiratory lung volume CO2 returned to baseline, 33 mL kg-1 (95% CI 29-37 mL kg-1 , p = .72) 3 min after re-establishing positive end-expiratory pressure 3 cmH2 O. Airway dead space increased from 1.1 mL kg-1 (95% CI 0.9-1.4 mL kg-1 ) to 1.4 (95% CI 1.1-1.8 mL kg-1 , p = .003) and 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-1.8 mL kg-1 , p < .0001) 1 and 3 min after positive end-expiratory pressure 10 cmH2 O, respectively, and 1.2 mL kg-1 (95% CI 0.9-1.4 mL kg-1 , p = .08) after 3 min of positive end-expiratory pressure 3 cmH2 O. Additional volumetric capnography and lung function variables showed no major changes in response to positive end-expiratory pressure variations. Capnodynamic noninvasive and continuous end-expiratory lung volume CO2 values assessed during anesthesia in children were in close agreement with previously reported end-expiratory lung volume values generated by alternative methods. Furthermore, positive end-expiratory pressure changes resulted in physiologically expected end-expiratory lung volume CO2 responses in a timely manner, suggesting that it can be used to trend end-expiratory lung volume changes during anesthesia.

PCV-VG combined individualized PEEP determination in one-lung ventilated patients with PEEP step change direction: A randomized controlled trial.

The efficacy of pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) combined with a gradient-directional change in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery was investigated. Ninety patients were randomly divided into the PC (PCV-VG + 5 cm H2 O fixed PEEP), PI (PCV-VG + incremental PEEP titration), and PD (PCV-VG + decremental PEEP titration) groups. Hemodynamic (heart rate [HR] and mean arterial pressure [MAP]), respiratory mechanics (Ppeak , Pmean, and Cdyn), and arterial blood gas (pH, PaCO2 , PaO2 , and PaO2 /FiO2 ) indices were evaluated at T1 (10 min of two-lung ventilation [TLV]), T2 (10 min of OLV), and T3 (10 min of recovery, TLV). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to detect neutrophil elastase (NE), clara cell secretory protein (CC16), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels at T1 and T3. At T2 and T3 , Ppeak was lower in the PI and PD groups than in the PC group, while Pmean and Cdyn were higher than in the PC group. Ppeak in the PD group was lower than that in the PI group; however, Pmean was higher at T2 and T3 (P < 0.05). At T2 , PaO2 and PaO2 /FiO2 were higher, but PaO2 /FiO2 and VD /VT were lower in the PD and PI groups than in the PC group (P < 0.05). NE, CC16, IL-6, and IL-8 levels were elevated in all three groups at T3 , but the PI and PD groups had lower levels than the PC group (P < 0.05). The incidences of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and surgical intensive care unit hospitalizations in the PD and PI groups were much lower. Gradient-directed altered PEEP titration could improve respiratory mechanics, arterial blood gases, and inflammatory responses and reduce the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

Effects of different positive end-expiratory pressure titration strategies on mechanical power during ultraprotective ventilation in ARDS patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A prospective interventional study

PurposeUltraprotective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) reduces mechanical power (MP) through changes in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP); however, the optimal approach to titrate PEEP is unknown. This study assesses the effects of three PEEP titration strategies on MP, hemodynamic parameters, and oxygen delivery in twenty ARDS patients with VV ECMO. Material and methodsPEEP was titrated according to: (A) a PEEP of 10 cmH2O representing the lowest recommendation by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (PEEPELSO), (B) the highest static compliance of the respiratory system (PEEPCstat,RS), and (C) a target end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure of 0 cmH2O (PEEPPtpexp). ResultsPEEPELSO was lower compared to PEEPCstat,RS and PEEPPtpexp (10.0 ± 0.0 vs. 16.2 ± 4.7 cmH2O and 17.3 ± 4.0 cmH2O, p < 0.001 each, respectively). PEEPELSO reduced MP compared to PEEPCstat,RS and PEEPPtpexp (5.3 ± 1.3 vs. 6.8 ± 2.0 and 6.9 ± 2.3 J/min, p < 0.001 each, respectively). PEEPELSO resulted in less lung stress compared to PEEPCstat,RS (p = 0.011) and PEEPPtpexp (p < 0.001) and increased cardiac output and oxygen delivery (p < 0.001 each). ConclusionsAn empirical PEEP of 10 cmH2O minimized MP, provided favorable hemodynamics, and increased oxygen delivery in ARDS patients treated with VV ECMO. Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013967). Registered 02/09/2018https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00013967

Measuring Expiratory Diaphragm Activity: An Electrifying Tool to Guide Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategy in Critically Ill Children?

Measuring Expiratory Diaphragm Activity: An Electrifying Tool to Guide Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategy in Critically Ill Children?

Association of lung recruitment and change in recruitment-to-inflation ratio from supine to prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Prone positioning is an evidence-based treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lung recruitment has been proposed as one of the mechanisms by which prone positioning reduces mortality in this group of patients. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I) is a method to measure potential for lung recruitment induced by a change in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the ventilator. The association between R/I and potential for lung recruitment in supine and prone position has not been studied with computed tomography (CT) scan imaging. In this secondary analysis, we sought to investigate the correlation between R/I measured in supine and prone position with CT and the potential for lung recruitment as measured by CT scan. Among 23 patients, the median R/I did not significantly change from supine (1.9 IQR 1.6–2.6) to prone position (1.7 IQR 1.3–2.8) (paired t test p = 0.051) but the individual changes correlated with the different response to PEEP. In supine and in prone position, R/I significantly correlated with the proportion of lung tissue recruitment induced by the change of PEEP. Lung tissue recruitment induced by a change of PEEP from 5 to 15 cmH2O was 16% (IQR 11–24%) in supine and 14.3% (IQR 8.4–22.6%) in prone position, as measured by CT scan analysis (paired t test p = 0.56). In this analysis, PEEP-induced recruitability as measured by R/I correlated with PEEP-induced lung recruitment as measured by CT scan, and could help to readjust PEEP in prone position.

Electric impedance tomography-guided PEEP titration reduces mechanical power in ARDS: a randomized crossover pilot trial

BackgroundIn patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can lead to recruitment or overdistension. Current strategies utilized for PEEP titration do not permit the distinction. Electric impedance tomography (EIT) detects and quantifies the presence of both collapse and overdistension. We investigated whether using EIT-guided PEEP titration leads to decreased mechanical power compared to high-PEEP/FiO2 tables.MethodsA single-center, randomized crossover pilot trial comparing EIT-guided PEEP selection versus PEEP selection using the High-PEEP/FiO2 table in patients with moderate–severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary outcome was the change in mechanical power after each PEEP selection strategy. Secondary outcomes included changes in the 4 × driving pressure + respiratory rate (4 ΔP, + RR index) index, driving pressure, plateau pressure, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and static compliance.ResultsEIT was consistently associated with a decrease in mechanical power compared to PEEP/FiO2 tables (mean difference − 4.36 J/min, 95% CI − 6.7, − 1.95, p = 0.002) and led to lower values in the 4ΔP + RR index (− 11.42 J/min, 95% CI − 19.01, − 3.82, p = 0.007) mainly driven by a decrease in the elastic–dynamic power (− 1.61 J/min, − 2.99, − 0.22, p = 0.027). The elastic–static and resistive powers were unchanged. Similarly, EIT led to a statistically significant change in set PEEP (− 2 cmH2O, p = 0.046), driving pressure, (− 2.92 cmH2O, p = 0.003), peak pressure (− 6.25 cmH2O, p = 0.003), plateau pressure (− 4.53 cmH2O, p = 0.006), and static respiratory system compliance (+ 7.93 ml/cmH2O, p = 0.008).ConclusionsIn patients with moderate–severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, EIT-guided PEEP titration reduces mechanical power mainly through a reduction in elastic–dynamic power.Trial registration This trial was prospectively registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 03793842) on January 4th, 2019.

PEEP-FiO2 table versus EIT to titrate PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS

RationaleIt is unknown how to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Guidelines recommend the one-size-fits-all PEEP-FiO2 table. In this retrospective cohort study, an electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided PEEP trial was used to titrate PEEP.ObjectivesTo compare baseline PEEP according to the high PEEP-FiO2 table and personalized PEEP following an EIT-guided PEEP trial.MethodsWe performed an EIT-guided decremental PEEP trial in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19-related ARDS upon intensive care unit admission. PEEP was set at the lowest PEEP above the intersection of curves representing relative alveolar overdistention and collapse. Baseline PEEP was compared with PEEP set according to EIT. We identified patients in whom the EIT-guided PEEP trial resulted in a decrease or increase in PEEP of ≥ 2 cmH2O.Measurements and main resultsWe performed a PEEP trial in 75 patients. In 23 (31%) patients, PEEP was decreased ≥ 2 cmH2O, and in 24 (32%) patients, PEEP was increased ≥ 2 cmH2O. Patients in whom PEEP was decreased had improved respiratory mechanics and more overdistention in the non-dependent lung region at higher PEEP levels. These patients also had a lower BMI, longer time between onset of symptoms and intubation, and higher incidence of pulmonary embolism. Oxygenation improved in patients in whom PEEP was increased.ConclusionsAn EIT-guided PEEP trial resulted in a relevant change in PEEP in 63% of patients. These results support the hypothesis that PEEP should be personalized in patients with ARDS.

Is there a need for individualized adjustment of electrode belt position during EIT-guided titration of positive end-expiratory pressure?

Objective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the variation of tidal volume-to-impedance ratio (V T/Z T) during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurement. Approach. Forty-two patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were retrospectively analyzed. An incremental and subsequently a decremental PEEP trial were performed with steps of 2 cm H2O and duration of 2 min per step during volume-controlled ventilation with decelerating flow. EIT measurement was conducted in the 5th intercostal space and V T was recorded simultaneously. The variation of V T/Z T (RatioV) was defined as the changes in percentage to average ratio per cm H2O PEEP change. A z-score > 1 was considered as a significant variation and an implication that the measurement plane was inadequate. Main results. The RatioV of 42 patients was 1.29 ± 0.80%·cm H2O−1. A z-score of 1 corresponded to the variation of 2.09%·cm H2O−1. Seven patients (16.7%) had a z-score > 1 and showed either positive or negative correlation between the volume-to-impedance ratio and PEEP. Significance. Electrode placement at 5th intercostal space might not be ideal for every individual during EIT measurement. Evaluation of volume-to-impedance ratio variation is necessary for patients undergoing maneuvers with wide alteration in absolute lung volume.

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children.

Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children.

Correlation between changes in arterial blood oxygen partial pressure, oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide elimination by the lungs with changes in positive end expiratory pressure: a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION: Since mechanical ventilation remains the main tool of respiratory support, ventilatory aspect of lung function fixed researchers’ attention during last decades, which is reflected by open lung concept and lung-protective ventilation strategy. However, it seems logical to assess function of the lung — biphasic mass exchanger with limited capacity — measuring its gas exchange performance, depending upon lung perfusion the same extent as ventilation. Recently clinicians have got routine access to metabolographers, providing figures of lungs oxygen absorption (VO2) and carbon dioxide exhalation (VCO2). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate interchangeability of metabolographer data and arterial blood gases analysis as tools for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration by comparison of dynamic VO2 and VCO2 changes with PaO2 shifts after standardized PEEP changing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study included 41 patients underwent mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for elective non-cardiothoracic surgery. After anesthesia induction and monitored parameters stabilization, PaO2, VCO2 and VO2 were measured before and after PEEP increasing from 2 to 5 mbar. Correlation was evaluated using Spearman coefficient in R-Studio with ggplot2 visualization package. RESULTS: After PEEP level increase, in 14 patients PaO2 changes were &lt; 5 %, in 15 patients PaO2 increase was observed, and in 12 patients PaO2 has decreased. The Spearman correlation coefficient (rh) between VCO2 and PaO2 was 0.77 (р-value = 3.75 × 10−9), between VO2 and PaO2 — rh = 0.92 (p-value = 2.2 × 10−16). CONCLUSIONS: The VCO2 and VO2 dynamic changes obtained using metabolographer demonstrates high correlation with PaO2 shifts followed PEEP changes, which makes the dynamic analysis of the first two indicators a possible non-invasive alternative for repeated arterial blood gases analysis during РЕЕР level titration. Notable fact is that in significant proportion of observations, PEEP level of 5 mbar, often recommended “by default” for lung-protective ventilation, is excessive from gas exchange performance point of view.

Prediction and estimation of pulmonary response and elastance evolution for volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a core treatment for patients suffering from respiratory disease and failure. However, MV settings are not standardized due to significant inter- and intra- patient variability in response to care, leading to variability in outcome. There is thus a need to personalize MV settings. This research significantly extends a single compartment lung mechanics model with physiologically relevant basis functions, and uses it to identify patient-specific lung mechanics and predict response to changes in MV settings. Nonlinear evolution of pulmonary elastance over positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is modelled by a newly proposed, physiologically relevant and simplified compensatory function to enable prediction of pulmonary response for both volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), and identified as patient-specific using each patient’s data at a baseline PEEP. Predictions at higher PEEP levels test the validity of the proposed models based on errors in predicted peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) in two VCV trials and volume (PIV) in one PCV trial. A total of 210 prediction cases over 36 patients (22 VCV; 14 PCV) yielded absolute predicted PIP errors within 1.0 cmH2O (2.3%) and 3.3 cmH2O (7.3%) for 90% cases in VCV, while predicted PIV errors are within 0.073 L (16.8%) for 85% cases in PCV. In conclusion, a novel deterministic virtual patient model is presented, able to offer accurate prediction of pulmonary response across a wide range of PEEP changes for the two main MV modes used clinically, enabling predictive decision support in real-time to safely personalize and optimize care.

Over-distension prediction via hysteresis loop analysis and patient-specific basis functions in a virtual patient model

Background and objectiveRecruitment maneuvers (RMs) with subsequent positive-end-expiratory-pressure (PEEP) have proven effective in recruiting lung volume and preventing alveolar collapse. However, a suboptimal PEEP could induce undesired injury in lungs by insufficient or excessive breath support. Thus, a predictive model for patient response under PEEP changes could improve clinical care and lower risks. MethodsThis research adds novel elements to a virtual patient model to identify and predict patient-specific lung distension to optimise and personalise care. Model validity and accuracy are validated using data from 18 volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) patients at 7 different baseline PEEP levels (0–12cmH2O), yielding 623 prediction cases. Predictions were made up to ΔPEEP = 12cmH2O ahead covering 6x2cmH2O PEEP steps. ResultsUsing the proposed lung distension model, 90% of absolute peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) prediction errors compared to clinical measurement are within 3.95cmH2O, compared with 4.76cmH2O without this distension term. Comparing model-predicted and clinically measured distension had high correlation increasing to R2 = 0.93–0.95 if maximum ΔPEEP ≤ 6cmH2O. Predicted dynamic functional residual capacity (Vfrc) changes as PEEP rises yield 0.013L median prediction error for both prediction groups and overall R2 of 0.84. ConclusionsOverall results demonstrate nonlinear distension mechanics are accurately captured in virtual lung mechanics patients for mechanical ventilation, for the first time. This result can minimise the risk of lung injury by predicting its potential occurrence of distension before changing ventilator settings. The overall outcomes significantly extend and more fully validate this virtual mechanical ventilation patient model.

Effect of Respiratory Physiological Changes on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Cerebral Oxygen Saturation in Patients With Acute Traumatic Brain Injury.

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is a noninvasive method for the assessment of raised ICP. Manipulation of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) are often used to optimize ICP and improve oxygenation in TBI patients. This study evaluated the effects of PEEP and ETCO2 on ONSD and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) in patients with acute TBI. A total of 14 patients (11 males) aged older than 18 years with acute severe TBI were included in this study. ONSD and rScO2 were assessed before and after changes in PEEP from 5 to 10 cm H2O and in ETCO2 from 40 to 30 mm Hg on both pathologic and nonpathologic sides. Increasing PEEP and reducing ETCO2 resulted in changes in ONSD and rScO2 on both pathologic and nonpathologic sides. On the pathologic side, ONSD and rScO2 were highest with a PEEP of 10 cm H2O:ETCO2 40 mm Hg combination and lowest with PEEP of 5 cm H2O:ETCO2 30 mm Hg (ONSD 5.24±0.49 vs. 4.27±0.36 mm, P<0.001; rScO2 70.7±9.91% vs. 66.3±9.75%, P<0.001); both PEEP and ETCO2 had significant effects on ONSD and rScO2 (P<0.001). On the nonpathologic side, ONSD and rScO2 were highest and lowest with PEEP of 10 cm H2O:ETCO2 40 mm Hg and PEEP of 5 cm H2O:ETCO2 30 mm Hg combinations, respectively (ONSD: 4.93±0.46 vs. 4.02±0.40 mm, P<0.001; rScO2: 74.77±8.30% vs. 70.69±8.12%, P<0.001). ETCO2 had a significant effect on rScO2 (P<0.001), but the impact of PEEP on rScO2 was not statistically significant (P=0.05). Increasing PEEP resulted in significant increases in ONSD and rScO2, whereas reducing ETCO2 significantly decreased ONSD and rScO2.

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

ObjectiveMeasurement of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced recruitment lung volume using passive spirometry is based on the assumption that the functional residual capacity (FRC) is not modified by the PEEP changes. We aimed to investigate the influence of PEEP on FRC in different models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).MethodsA randomized crossover study was performed in 12 pigs. Pulmonary (n = 6) and extra-pulmonary (n = 6) ARDS models were established using an alveolar instillation of hydrochloric acid and a right atrium injection of oleic acid, respectively. Low (5 cmH2O) and high (15 cmH2O) PEEP were randomly applied in each animal. FRC and recruitment volume were determined using the nitrogen wash-in/wash-out technique and release maneuver.ResultsFRC was not significantly different between the two PEEP levels in either pulmonary ARDS (299 ± 92 mL and 309 ± 130 mL at 5 and 15 cmH2O, respectively) or extra-pulmonary ARDS (305 ± 143 mL and 328 ± 197 mL at 5 and 15 cmH2O, respectively). The recruitment volume was not significantly different between the two models (pulmonary, 341 ± 100 mL; extra-pulmonary, 351 ± 170 mL).ConclusionsPEEP did not influence FRC in either the pulmonary or extra-pulmonary ARDS pig model.

Recruitability and effect of PEEP in SARS-Cov-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome

BackgroundA large proportion of patients with a SARS-Cov-2-associated respiratory failure develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It has been recently suggested that SARS-Cov-2-associated ARDS may differ from usual non-SARS-Cov-2-associated ARDS by higher respiratory system compliance (CRS), lower potential for recruitment with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) contrasting with severe shunt fraction. The purpose of the study was to systematically assess respiratory mechanics and recruitability in SARS-Cov-2-associated ARDS.MethodsGas exchanges, CRS and hemodynamics were assessed at 2 levels of PEEP (15 cmH2O and 5 cmH2O) within 36 h (day1) and from 4 to 6 days (day 5) after intubation. The recruited volume was computed as the difference between the volume expired from PEEP 15 to 5 cmH2O and the volume predicted by compliance at PEEP 5 cmH2O (or above airway opening pressure). The recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio (i.e. the ratio between the recruited lung compliance and CRS at PEEP 5 cmH2O) was used to assess lung recruitability. A R/I ratio value higher than or equal to 0.5 was used to define highly recruitable patients.ResultsThe R/I ratio was calculated in 25 of the 26 enrolled patients at day 1 and in 15 patients at day 5. At day 1, 16 (64%) were considered as highly recruitable (R/I ratio median [interquartile range] 0.7 [0.55–0.94]) and 9 (36%) were considered as poorly recruitable (R/I ratio 0.41 [0.31–0.48]). The PaO2/FiO2 ratio at PEEP 15 cmH2O was higher compared to PEEP 5 cmH2O only in highly recruitable patients (173 [139–236] vs 135 [89–167] mmHg; p < 0.01). Neither PaO2/FiO2 or CRS measured at PEEP 15 cmH2O or at PEEP 5 cmH2O nor changes in PaO2/FiO2 or CRS in response to PEEP changes allowed to identify highly or poorly recruitable patients.ConclusionIn this series of 25 patients with SARS-Cov-2 associated ARDS, 64% were considered as highly recruitable and only 36% as poorly recruitable based on the R/I ratio performed on the day of intubation. This observation suggests that a systematic R/I ratio assessment may help to guide initial PEEP titration to limit harmful effect of unnecessary high PEEP in the context of Covid-19 crisis.

Transpulmonary thermodilution detects rapid and reversible increases in lung water induced by positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome

PurposeIt has been suggested that, by recruiting lung regions and enlarging the distribution volume of the cold indicator, increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may lead to an artefactual overestimation of extravascular lung water (EVLW) by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD).MethodsIn 60 ARDS patients, we measured EVLW (PiCCO2 device) at a PEEP level set to reach a plateau pressure of 30 cmH2O (HighPEEPstart) and 15 and 45 min after decreasing PEEP to 5 cmH2O (LowPEEP15′ and LowPEEP45′, respectively). Then, we increased PEEP back to the baseline level (HighPEEPend). Between HighPEEPstart and LowPEEP15′, we estimated the degree of lung derecruitment either by measuring changes in the compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) in the whole population, or by measuring the lung derecruited volume in 30 patients. We defined patients with a large derecruitment from the other ones as patients in whom the Crs changes and the measured derecruited volume were larger than the median of these variables observed in the whole population.ResultsReducing PEEP from HighPEEPstart (14 ± 2 cmH2O) to LowPEEP15′ significantly decreased EVLW from 20 ± 4 to 18 ± 4 mL/kg, central venous pressure (CVP) from 15 ± 4 to 12 ± 4 mmHg, the arterial oxygen tension over inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ratio from 184 ± 76 to 150 ± 69 mmHg and lung volume by 144 [68–420] mL. The EVLW decrease was similar in “large derecruiters” and the other patients. When PEEP was re-increased to HighPEEPend, CVP, PaO2/FiO2 and EVLW significantly re-increased. At linear mixed effect model, EVLW changes were significantly determined only by changes in PEEP and CVP (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively, n = 60). When the same analysis was performed by estimating recruitment according to lung volume changes (n = 30), CVP remained significantly associated to the changes in EVLW (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn ARDS patients, changing the PEEP level induced parallel, small and reversible changes in EVLW. These changes were not due to an artefact of the TPTD technique and were likely due to the PEEP-induced changes in CVP, which is the backward pressure of the lung lymphatic drainage.Trial registration ID RCB: 2015-A01654-45. Registered 23 October 2015