Recently, alkali metal hydrate melts, which are molten hydrated salts at room temperature, have attracted attention as electrolytes realizing high-voltage aqueous batteries.1 K+ ion has a smaller Stokes radius than that of Li+ ion due to weaker interaction with water molecules. Thus, K hydrate melt electrolytes demonstrate higher ionic conductivity than the Li ones.1 Our group and Ko et al. reported a new K hydrate melt mixing two anions, bis(fluorosulfonyl)amide (FSA−) and trifluoromethanesulfonate (OTf−).2,3 However, electrochemical performance and reaction mechanism of K+ ion insertion materials in the hydrate melt is not fully understood, and the demonstration of high-voltage aqueous KIBs is still challenging. In this study, we investigate electrochemical performance of potential K+ insertion materials, such as Prussian blue analogues and organic compounds, for high-voltage aqueous K-ion battery (KIB).A series of K(FSA)1-x (OTf) x ·nH2O were prepared at room temperature to check formation of hydrate melt. The electrochemical stability windows were examined by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). Pt and Al foils were used as working electrodes to evaluate anodic and cathodic stability, respectively. Galvanostatic charge/discharge tests of K2Fe0.5Mn0.5[Fe(CN)6] and 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylicdiimide (PTCDI), which is a potential positive electrode and negative electrode, respectively, for aqueous KIBs,4 were conducted with three-electrode cells assembled with activated carbon as a counter electrode. An aqueous K-ion full cell was fabricated by combining the positive electrode and negative electrode in the weight ratio of 1:2.1.Among the prepared K(FSA)1-x (OTf) x ·nH2O solution, K salts monohydrate melt of K(FSA)0.6(OTf)0.4·1.0H2O contains the least H2O content. Figure 1a displays the LSV curves in the electrolytes of K(FSA)0.6(OTf)0.4·1.0H2O and the endmembers of KFSA·1.8H2O and KOTf·2.8H2O. KFSA·1.8H2O and KOTf·2.8H2O had a potential window of 2.67 V and 2.01 V, respectively. On the other hand, K(FSA)0.6(OTf)0.4·1.0H2O exhibited that of 2.89 V, which was much wider than KFSA·1.8H2O and KOTf·2.8H2O. In KOTf·2.8H2O, K2Fe0.5Mn0.5[Fe(CN)6] electrode delivered a low initial capacity of 53 mAh g-1 at the initial cycle and capacity degradation over 50 cycles (Fig. 1b, top). In contrast, the electrode delivered a higher initial capacity of 124 mAh g-1 in K(FSA)0.6(OTf)0.4·1.0H2O and better cycle performance (Fig. 1b, bottom) than that in KOTf·2.8H2O. Similar to the positive electrode, the PTCDI electrode exhibited continuous capacity degradation in KOTf·2.8H2O (Fig. 1c, top), whereas the electrode delivered an excellent cycle performance in K(FSA)0.6(OTf)0.4·1.0H2O over 200 cycles (Fig. 1c, bottom). Figure 1d compares charge/discharge curve of PTCDI//K2Fe0.5Mn0.5[Fe(CN)6] full cells filled with KOTf·2.8H2O and K(FSA)0.6(OTf)0.4·1.0H2O. The K(FSA)0.6(OTf)0.4·1.0H2O cell demonstrated a much better cycle performance over 50 cycles than that in KOTf·2.8H2O. The PTCDI//K2Fe0.5Mn0.5[Fe(CN)6] full cell exhibited average voltage of 1.5 V. Moreover, K(FSA)0.6(OTf)0.4·1.0H2O electrolyte realized 2 V-class aqueous KIBs by selecting a proper negative electrode material. In addition, we will discuss charge/discharge mechanism including insertion species of K2Fe0.5Mn0.5[Fe(CN)6] and PTCDI.
Read full abstract