Previous articleNext article No AccessDiscussionsValue and Parity*Joshua GertJoshua Gert Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 114, Number 3April 2004 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/381697 Views: 108Total views on this site Citations: 34Citations are reported from Crossref © 2004 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Chris Tucker Parity, Moral Options, and the Weights of Reasons, Noûs 11 (Apr 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12410Erich H. Rast The Multidimensional Structure of ‘better than’, Axiomathes 32, no.22 (Oct 2020): 291–319.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-020-09525-4Michael Rabenberg Imprecision in the ethics of rescue, Analytic Philosophy 5 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12260Daniel Muñoz Three paradoxes of supererogation, Noûs 55, no.33 (Feb 2020): 699–716.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12326Will Fleisher What's Fair about Individual Fairness?, (Jul 2021): 480–490.https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462621Federico L. G. Faroldi Towards a Logic of Value and Disagreement via Imprecise Measures, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 50, no.22 (May 2021): 131–149.https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.2021.07Martin Peterson INTERVAL VALUES AND RATIONAL CHOICE, Economics and Philosophy 35, no.11 (Jun 2018): 159–166.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000147Jacob Bronsther VAGUE COMPARISONS AND PROPORTIONAL SENTENCING, Legal Theory 25, no.11 (Mar 2019): 26–52.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325219000016Anna Mahtani Vagueness and Imprecise Credence, (Sep 2019): 7–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15931-3_2JOHAN E. GUSTAFSSON Does the Collapsing Principle Rule Out Borderline Cases?, Utilitas 30, no.44 (Apr 2018): 483–492.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820818000079Mozaffar Qizilbash ON PARITY AND THE INTUITION OF NEUTRALITY, Economics and Philosophy 34, no.11 (Dec 2017): 87–108.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267117000281Luke Elson Incommensurability as Vagueness: a Burden-Shifting Argument, Theoria 83, no.44 (Aug 2017): 341–363.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12129Wlodek Rabinowicz From values to probabilities, Synthese 194, no.1010 (Feb 2015): 3901–3929.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0693-5Michael Messerli, Kevin Reuter Hard cases of comparison, Philosophical Studies 174, no.99 (Oct 2016): 2227–2250.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0796-yMauro Rossi THE FITTING-ATTITUDE ANALYSIS OF VALUE RELATIONS AND THE PREFERENCES VS. VALUE JUDGEMENTS OBJECTION, Economics and Philosophy 33, no.22 (Mar 2017): 287–311.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267116000286RUTH CHANG Hard Choices, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3, no.11 (May 2017): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2017.7MAURO ROSSI Value and Preference Relations: Are They Symmetric?, Utilitas 28, no.33 (Sep 2015): 239–253.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820815000369Erich Rast Modeling Value Disagreement, Erkenntnis 81, no.44 (Sep 2015): 853–880.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9772-8Ruth Chang Parity, Imprecise Comparability and the Repugnant Conclusion, Theoria 82, no.22 (Apr 2016): 182–214.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12096Joshua Gert Parity, Preference and Puzzlement, Theoria 81, no.33 (Mar 2015): 249–271.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12069Miriam Schoenfield DECISION MAKING IN THE FACE OF PARITY, Philosophical Perspectives 28, no.11 (Dec 2014): 263–277.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12044Sergio Tenenbaum Minimalism about Intention: A Modest Defense, Inquiry 57, no.33 (Apr 2014): 384–411.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2014.894275Mauro Rossi Sur la symétrie présumée entre valeurs et préférences1, Les ateliers de l'éthique 9, no.22 (Sep 2014): 82–98.https://doi.org/10.7202/1026679arWlodek Rabinowicz Value, Fitting-Attitude Account of, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee311Wlodek Rabinowicz VALUE RELATIONS REVISITED, Economics and Philosophy 28, no.22 (Aug 2012): 133–164.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267112000144Attila Tanyi Desires as additional reasons? The case of tie-breaking, Philosophical Studies 152, no.22 (Nov 2009): 209–227.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9475-6Chrisoula Andreou Choosing Well: Value Pluralism and Patterns of Choice, (Jan 2011): 48–63.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305885_4 by Joshua Gert Color Constancy and the Color/Value Analogy, Ethics 121, no.11 (Jul 2015): 58–87.https://doi.org/10.1086/656042Justin Klocksiem In Defense of the Trichotomy Thesis, Acta Analytica 25, no.33 (Nov 2009): 317–327.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-009-0067-zYitzhak Benbaji Parity, Intransitivity, And A Context-Sensitive Degree Analysis of Gradability, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87, no.22 (Jun 2009): 313–335.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802257754Wlodek Rabinowicz I—Wlodek Rabinowicz: Incommensurability and Vagueness, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83, no.11 (Jun 2009): 71–94.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00173.xWLODEK RABINOWICZ Value Relations, Theoria 74, no.11 (Mar 2008): 18–49.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2008.00008.xGeorg Brun, Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn Ranking policy options for sustainable development, Poiesis & Praxis 5, no.11 (Jul 2007): 15–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-007-0034-yNIEN-HÊ HSIEH IS INCOMPARABILITY A PROBLEM FOR ANYONE?, Economics and Philosophy 23, no.11 (Mar 2007): 65–80.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001228