Fractures In Population Research Articles

Validity and reliability of the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in one-year postoperative ankle fracture patients—a validation study

BackgroundAnkle fracture patients are a heterogenous group with differences in age, sex, fracture morphology, and treatment provided. With the increased focus on patient-centered treatment, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly adopted by clinicians to facilitate best clinical practice. The Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) has demonstrated good measurement properties when used in patients with foot or ankle disease. The PROM has three domains: (1) Pain; (2) Walking/Standing; and (3) Social Interaction. One study found sufficient content validity for the Pain and Walking/Standing domains when used in the evaluation of ankle fracture patients. Another validation study demonstrated acceptable structural validity and reliability for the MOXFQ in ankle fracture patients 12 weeks after injury. The aim of this study is to assess the structural validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the MOXFQ in the context of an ankle fracture patients one year after surgery and provide patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) estimates.MethodsA pragmatic cross-sectional study design was used to collect the one-year MOXFQ follow-up data from patients surgically treated for an ankle fracture in the period 2017 to 2020 at (Stavanger University Hospital). The structural validity and internal consistency were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. A separate test-retest study including patients at least one year since ankle surgery was used in the assessment of reliability and measurement error.ResultsA confirmatory factor analysis of the three-factor model of the MOXFQ had a good model fit (TLI 0.94; CFI 0.95; RMSEA 0.094; SRMR 0.039). However, the measurement model demonstrated poor discriminant validity of the three factors. A unidimensional model of the 16 items had worse model fit, while a second-order factor model demonstrated strong factor loadings for a second-order factor. A bi-factor model also revealed a strong general factor but also unique variance in the Pain and Social Interaction domain. The domains had good internal consistency (McDonald’s omega 0.80 to 0.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.80 to 0.92). The standard errors of measurements for the three domains were between 6.5 and 7.5, and 5.5 for the MOXFQ-Index (scale 0 to 100). PASS estimates for the (sub)scales were: Pain 45; Walking/Standing 39; Social Interaction 19; and MOXFQ-Index 34.ConclusionThe MOXFQ with three domains demonstrated sufficient structural validity and reliability when used in the evaluation of a one-year postoperative ankle fracture population. Reporting the scores of the Pain and Walking/Standing domains was best supported.

Delirium and Cognitive Screening in National Hip Fracture Registries: Scoping Review Protocol.

Delirium and cognitive impairment are common in hip fracture populations and are associated with significant adverse patient outcomes. National hip fracture registries facilitate improvements in patient outcomes and care quality, such as reduced mortality and the development of specialist multidisciplinary services. However, there is substantial variation in the data collected and reported in relation to delirium and cognition, which impedes international comparison and may reduce quality of care. This scoping review aims to identify delirium and cognition data items currently collected by hip fracture registries internationally, to identify associated registry guidance that exists for the administration of delirium and cognitive screening tools, and report outcomes of these data items across the most recently published annual reports of identified hip fracture registries. This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search the following databases: Medline Ovid; Embase; CINAHL EBSCOHost. Relevant websites such as the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) will also be searched. Study selection and review will be carried out independently by two research team members, with discrepancies resolved by a third member of the research team. Data extraction and synthesis will be conducted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy and omissions by another. The scoping review findings will be informed and validated through engagement with the FFN Hip Fracture Audit Special Interest Group, who will share their knowledge, expertise, and research to achieve consensus over core aspects of the scoping review findings. By identifying existing heterogeneity in delirium and cognitive screening tool use and administration, it is hoped that administration and specific screening tool use will become standardised to optimise comparability across countries and ensure that high quality and reliable data are included across international registry reports.

Comparison and Validation of Methods for Restoring Neck Length in Hip Arthroplasty That Can Be Applied for Femoral Neck Fracture.

Background: Restoring leg length during total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture is challenging due to the lack of an intact femoral neck on the fractured side. Thus, templating methods typically use size of the intact contralateral hip to estimate length. Common reference points include the distance from the lesser trochanter to the center of the femoral head (LTC) and femoral head diameter (FHD). Objectives: We sought to (1) investigate the LTC:FHD ratio as a preoperative templating method and (2) compare this method with calibrated LTC measurements. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary THA between 2021 and 2022 with recorded intraoperative measurements of LTC and FHD at a single academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Preoperative hip X-rays were used to determine the "predicted LTC length" with 2 separate methods: the LTC:FHD ratio yielding the "Ratio Predicted LTC" and the calibrated measurements method yielding the "Calibrated Predicted LTC." These measurements were compared with intraoperative measurements of the LTC length to determine accuracy. Results: Sixty-two hips in 59 patients were studied. The ratio predicted LTC and contralateral ratio predicted LTC length showed no significant difference from the intraoperative LTC length with a strong correlation between the 2 measurements (correlation coefficient = 0.77 and 0.80). The calibrated predicted LTC lengths were significantly different from the intraoperative LTC lengths (mean difference, 3.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [2.2, 3.8]). Conclusions: This retrospective review suggests the LTC:FHD ratio multiplied by intraoperative FHD may be an accurate method for restoring anatomic femoral head height in THA (LTCa = [LTCr/FHDr] × FHDa). This method may be useful in hip fracture populations with distorted proximal femoral anatomy.

Blood and Bone-Derived DNA Methylation Ages Predict Mortality After Geriatric Hip Fracture: A Pilot Study.

The purpose of this study was to (1) perform the first analysis of bone-derived DNA methylation, (2) compare DNA methylation clocks derived from bone with those derived from whole blood, and (3) establish a relationship between DNA methylation age and 1-year mortality within the geriatric hip fracture population. Patients ≥65 years old who presented to a Level-I trauma center with a hip fracture were prospectively enrolled from 2020 to 2021. Preoperative whole blood and intraoperative bone samples were collected. Following DNA extraction, RRBS (reduced representation bisulfite sequencing) libraries for methylation clock analysis were prepared. Sequencing data were analyzed using computational algorithms previously described by Horvath et al. to build a regression model of methylation (biological) age for each tissue type. Student t tests were used to analyze differences (Δ) in methylation age versus chronological age. Correlation between blood and bone methylation ages was expressed using the Pearson R coefficient. Blood and bone samples were collected from 47 patients. DNA extraction, sequencing, and methylation analysis were performed on 24 specimens from 12 subjects. Mean age at presentation was 85.4 ± 8.65 years. There was no difference in DNA extraction yield between the blood and bone samples (p = 0.935). The mean follow-up duration was 12.4 ± 4.3 months. The mortality cohort (4 patients, 33%) showed a mean ΔAgeBone of 18.33 ± 6.47 years and mean ΔAgeBlood of 16.93 ± 4.02 years. In comparison, the survival cohort showed a significantly lower mean ΔAgeBone and ΔAgeBlood (7.86 ± 6.7 and 7.31 ± 7.71 years; p = 0.026 and 0.039, respectively). Bone-derived methylation age was strongly correlated with blood-derived methylation age (R = 0.81; p = 0.0016). Bone-derived DNA methylation clocks were found to be both feasible and strongly correlated with those derived from whole blood within a geriatric hip fracture population. Mortality was independently associated with the DNA methylation age, and that age was approximately 17 years greater than chronological age in the mortality cohort. The results of the present study suggest that prevention of advanced DNA methylation may play a key role in decreasing mortality following hip fracture. Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Delirium and Cognitive Screening in National Hip Fracture Registries: Scoping Review Protocol

Background Delirium and cognitive impairment are common in hip fracture populations and are associated with significant adverse patient outcomes. National hip fracture registries facilitate improvements in patient outcomes and care quality, such as reduced mortality and the development of specialist multidisciplinary services. However, there is substantial variation in the data collected and reported in relation to delirium and cognition, which impedes international comparison and may reduce quality of care. Objective This scoping review aims to identify delirium and cognition data items currently collected by hip fracture registries internationally, to identify associated registry guidance that exists for the administration of delirium and cognitive screening tools, and report outcomes of these data items across the most recently published annual reports of identified hip fracture registries. Methods This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search the following databases: Medline Ovid; Embase; CINAHL EBSCOHost. Relevant websites such as the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) will also be searched. Study selection and review will be carried out independently by two researchers, with discrepancies resolved by a third researcher. Data extraction and synthesis will be conducted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy and omissions by another. The scoping review findings will be informed and validated through engagement with the FFN Hip Fracture Audit Special Interest Group. Conclusion By identifying existing heterogeneity in delirium and cognitive screening tool use and administration, it is hoped that administration and specific screening tool use will become standardised to optimise comparability across countries and ensure that high quality and reliable data are included across international registry reports.

Disparities in Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scan Utilization Across Race/Ethnic Groups Before and After Hip Fractures.

Geriatric hip fractures are common and important sentinel events regarding bone health. Although dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans are a standard method for determining bone density, differences in use among various race/ethnic groups around the time of hip fracture may reveal disparities within the healthcare system. The 2014 to 2016 Medicare Standard Analytic Files PearlDiver data set was used to identify geriatric patients sustaining hip fracture. From that cohort, those who had a DEXA scan before or after their fracture were defined. For the defined cohorts, patient age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, race/ethnicity, and income (based on zip code) were defined and compared with univariate and multivariate analyses. Of 58,099 hip fracture patients, only 19.8% had had a DEXA scan before fracture and 3.9% of the remaining group had the DEXA scan after fracture. Of the hip fracture population, 91.0% identified as White and 9.0% as non-White (Native American, Black, Hispanic, Asian, or Other). Before hip fracture, controlling for other variables and compared with White patients, all non-White categories were at lesser odds of having had the DEXA scan. After hip fracture, Black, Hispanic, and other patients were also at lesser odds of having the DEXA scan. Using a large Medicare data set, controlling for patient age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and income marker, this study revealed disparities in DEXA scan utilization across race/ethnic groups before and after presenting with a hip fragility fracture. Identification of such disparities highlights the needs for improved medical access and care for this at-risk hip fracture population.

Identifying and prioritizing recommendations to optimize transitions across the care journey for hip fractures: Results from a mixed-methods concept mapping study.

Individuals who experience a hip fracture have numerous care transitions. Improving the transition process is important for ensuring quality care; however, little is known about the priorities of different key interest groups. Our aim was to gather recommendations from these groups regarding care transitions for hip fracture. We conducted a concept mapping study, inviting persons with lived experience (PWLE) who had a hip fracture, care partners, healthcare providers, and decision-makers to share their thoughts about 'what is needed to improve care transitions for hip fracture'. Individuals were subsequently asked to sort the generated statements into conceptual piles, and then rate by importance and priority using a five-point scale. Participants decided on the final map, rearranged statements, and assigned a name to each conceptual cluster. A total of 35 participants took part in this concept mapping study, with some individuals participating in multiple steps. Participants included 22 healthcare providers, 7 care partners, 4 decision-makers, and 2 PWLE. The final map selected by participants was an 8-cluster map, with the following cluster labels: (1) access to inpatient services and supports across the care continuum (13 statements); (2) informed and collaborative discharge planning (13 statements); (3) access to transitional and outpatient services (3 statements); (4) communication, education and knowledge acquisition (9 statements); (5) support for care partners (2 statements); (6) person-centred care (13 statements); (7) physical, social, and cognitive activities and supports (13 statements); and (8) provider knowledge, skills, roles and behaviours (8 statements). Our study findings highlight the importance of person-centred care, with active involvement of PWLE and their care partners throughout the care journey. Many participant statements included specific ideas related to continuity of care, and clinical knowledge and skills. This study provides insights for future interventions and quality improvement initiatives for enhancing transitions in care among hip fracture populations.

Patient satisfaction after conservative treatment of anterior wall frontal sinus fractures

This study aims to determine patient forehead aesthetics satisfaction after conservative treatment of non-dislocated and dislocated anterior wall frontal sinus fractures. Prospectively, patients older than 15 years of age with a frontal sinus fracture, treated conservatively between the period of 2010-2020, were analysed. The Face-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, and the fracture dimensional properties were measured using computed tomography. The results were compared with a matched non-fractured control group. The mean total Face-Q questionnaire score was 114.77 (SD=17.38) versus 114.23 (SD=15.23) (research-versus control group, respectively), with a mean difference of 0.55 (SD=4.85), which was not significant (p=0.91). The size of impression area did not appear to have a linear relationship with patient satisfaction within the entire population (p=0.87; r=0.00). Presence of a scar in the fracture site was a significant predictor of patient satisfaction, contributing to 31% of the entire population's overall score (p=0.01) and 57% in the dislocated fracture population (p=0.003). The conservatively treated patients' satisfaction score was comparable to the control group. A higher satisfaction score after a conservative treatment is associated with the absence of a scar on the fracture site, even with dislocations up to 6mm at the deepest impression point.

Impact of emergency department boarding on patients outcomes in hip fractures

Boarding time in the Emergency Department (ED) is an area of concern for all patients and potentially more problematic for the hip fracture population. Identifying patient outcomes impacted by ED boarding and improving emergent care to reduce surgical delay for this patient population is a recognized opportunity. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of ED boarding in relation to patient outcomes in the surgical hip fracture population. This is a retrospective study of hip fracture patients who presented at the ED of a Level 1 trauma center between January 2020 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into four quartiles based on boarding time. Study outcomes-hospital length of stay, time to surgery, visit to ICU post-operative, total blood products, in-hospital complications, discharge disposition, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission-were compared among these four quartiles. The outcome endpoints were comparable among the four quartiles except for time to surgery. Time to surgery significantly differed among the quartiles, increasing from 20.39 to 29.03h (p<0.001) from the first to fourth quartile. In contrast to the existing literature, ED boarding in our study was not associated with adverse outcomes except for time to surgery. By expediting the time to surgery in accordance with established guidelines, adverse outcomes were mitigated even when our patients boarded for a longer duration. System processes including a 24/7 trauma nurse practitioner model, availability of in-house orthopedic surgeons, and timely cardiac evaluation need to be considered in relation to time to surgery, in turn impacting ED boarding and patient outcomes.

The Impact of Concomitant Neck of Femur Fractures and Upper Limb Fractures on Length of Stay and Key Performance Indicators: A Single-Centre Study.

Background Hip fractures are one of the most common serious injuries seen today and constitute one of the most serious healthcare problems affecting the elderly worldwide. Due to the elderly population, associated falls and osteoporosis increase theincidence of hip fractures. Patients may remain hospitalized for several weeks, leading to one and a half million hospital bed days used each year.The reported incidence of a concurrent upper limb and a lower limb fracture is between 3% and 5%. It has been shown in the literature that patients who sustain both a hip fracture and an upper limb fracture have difficulties with rehabilitation which causes prolonged stays. The available literature on concomitant hip fracture and upper extremity fracture is limited. This study aimed to review patients with concurrent upper limb injury and hip fractures and to analyse the pattern of associated upper limb fractures, management of these fractures, length of hospital stay, mortality rates, and complications. Methodology We performed a retrospective data collection of all patients with a concomitant upper limb fracture and hip fracture from January 2017 to December 2020 at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Patients were identified from the registers maintained in the ward. All patients aged over 60 years with a fragility hip fracture (managed operatively) and a concurrent upper limb fracture were included in the study. Patients aged less than 60 years were excluded. The local research department registered and approved this study as a service evaluation and therefore did not need ethical committee approval. The anatomical location of the upper limb and hip fractures was confirmed using the imaging database (Synapse). Results Of the 760 patients admitted with neck of femur fractures during this period, 39 (5.1%) patients had concomitant upper limb fractures. Only one upper limb fracture was managed with fixation, and for this study, that patient was excluded. Our retrospective search identified 38 patients, of whom 11 were men and 27 were women. Distal radius fractures were the most commonly associated upper limb fractures (55%). There was a significant increase in length of stay(43.6 days vs. 16.6 days) and delay in mobilization (58.9% vs. 81%) compared to an isolated hip fracture. There was no difference in the 30-day mortality rates.We were unable to collect the data for the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence compliant surgery, and this KPI was excluded from our study. Of the remaining five KPIs, our group of patients displayed better averages in three of the five categories, including prompt orthogeriatric review (92%), not delirious postoperatively (87%), and return to original residence (79%). Conclusions Due to the ageing population, hip fractures are increasing, and within one year of operation, have shown higher mortality rates. Annually, reports show that the worldwide incidence of fractures in the adult population ranges between 9.0 and 22.8 per 1,000. These fractures are more frequent in osteoporotic patients with weak bone quality. Following hip fractures, upper extremity fractures are the second most common among the osteoporotic, elderly population, with distal radius fractures being the most common. With the length of stay almost tripled (from 16.6 to 44.4 days), one can see this has a very big effect on costs in the National Health Service system.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Nonoperatively Managed Patients With Hip Fracture Using the Dutch Hip Fracture Audit.

To identify and compare characteristics of patients with hip fracture treated nonoperatively versus those treated operatively. Retrospective cohort study. Hip fracture population-based study. All adult patients with hip fractures (OTA/AO 31A and 31B) were included. Patients with pathological or periprosthetic hip fractures were excluded. Patients were categorized according to the type of management (operative vs. nonoperative) and type of fracture (nondisplaced vs. other). Patient and fracture characteristics associated with nonoperative management (NOM) were analyzed. A total of 94,930 patients with hip fracture were included. Of these, 3.2% were treated nonoperatively. Patients receiving NOM were older [86 years (interquartile range, 79-91 years) vs. 81 years (interquartile range, 72-87 years); P < 0.001], more frequently institutionalized (42.4% vs. 17.6%), and were more dependent in activities of daily living (22.2% vs. 55.0%). Various clinical characteristics, including dementia [odds ratio (OR) 1.31 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.18-1.45) P < 0.001], no functional mobility [OR 4.39 (95% CI, 3.14-3.68) P < 0.001], and activities of daily living (ADL) measured as KATZ-6-ADL [OR 1.17 (95% CI, 1.14-1.20) P < 0.001] were independently associated with NOM. Seven-day mortality was 37.6%, and 30-day mortality was 57.1% in patients treated nonoperatively. The first step in understanding patients who potentially benefit from NOM is evaluating the current standard of care. This study provides insight into the current hip fracture population treated nonoperatively. These patients are older, have higher percentage of dementia, more dependent, and show higher short-term mortality rates. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Together is better – RibScore and SCARF in the prediction of pulmonary complications and association with SSRF

Optimal treatment of patients with rib fractures requires identification of those patients at risk of pulmonary complications. It is also important to determine which patients would benefit from Surgical Stabilisation of Rib Fractures (SSRF). This study aims to validate two scoring systems (RibScore and SCARF score) in predicting complications and association with SSRF in an Australian trauma population. Clinical observation suggests that complications and criteria for SSRF is associated with anatomical and physiological factors. Therefore it is hypothesized that utilisation of an anatomical (RibScore) and physiological (SCARF) in conjunction will have improved predictive ability. Retrospective cohort study of rib fracture patients admitted to an Australian Level I trauma centre from Jan 2017 to Jan 2021. RibScore and SCARF score were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors associated with complications and SSRF, as well the scoring systems' ability via ROC AUC. 1157 patients were included. Higher median RibScore (1vs0; p < 0.001) and SCARF score (3vs1, p < 0.001) was associated with development of complications. Similarly for SSRF, RibScore (3vs0; p < 0.001), SCARF score (3vs1; p < 0.001) were higher. On multivariate analysis, increasing RibScore and SCARF score were associated with an increased risk of respiratory failure, pneumonia, death, and SSRF. The sensitivity for a patient with a high risk score in either RibScore or SCARF increased to 96.3 % in identifying pulmonary complications (from 66.7 % in RibScore and 88 % in SCARF, when used individually) and 91.9 % in identifying association with SSRF (from 86.5 % in RibScore and 70.3 % in SCARF). RibScore and SCARF score demonstrate predictive ability for complications and SSRF in an Australian trauma rib fracture population. Combining a radiological score with a clinical scoring system demonstrates improved sensitivity over each score individually for identifying patients at risk of complications from rib fractures, those who may require SSRF, and those who are low risk. Retrospective Cohort Study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Dysphagia is associated with increased mortality risk after hip fracture surgery.

This study aims to explore the prevalence of dysphagia, as well as mortality associated with dysphagia in the elderly population receiving surgical treatment for a hip fracture. A retrospective cohort study was completed at an academic level 1 tertiary care center. Patients older than or equal to 65 admitted with a hip fracture diagnosis from January 2015 to December 2020 (n = 617) were included. The main outcome was the prevalence of dysphagia and association with mortality. Secondary analysis included timing of dysphagia and contributions to mortality. Fifty-six percent of patients had dysphagia, and the mortality rates were higher in patients with dysphagia (8.9%) versus those without dysphagia (2.6%), chi-square p = 0.001, and odds ratio 3.69 (CI 1.6-8.5). Mortality rates in patients with acute dysphagia were also higher (12.4%) than those with chronic dysphagia (5%) and chi-squared p = 0.02. Mortality rates in patients with a perioperative dysphagic event (13.9%) were higher than those with non-perioperative dysphagia (4%) and chi-squared p = 0.001. Mortality rates in patients who had acute perioperative dysphagia (21.2%) were higher than those with chronic dysphagia that presented perioperatively (6.8%) and chi-squared p = 0.006. This study demonstrates high rates of dysphagia in the elderly hip fracture population and a significant association between dysphagia and mortality. Timing and chronicity of dysphagia were relevant, as patients with acute perioperative dysphagia had the highest mortality rate. Unlike other identified risk factors, dysphagia may be at least partially modifiable. More research is needed to determine whether formal evaluation and treatment of dysphagia lowers mortality risk.

The effect of distal locking mode on postoperative mechanical complications in intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective cohort study of five hundred andseven patients.

The optimal choice of distal locking modes remains a subject due to limited available data, and therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between distal locking mode and postoperative mechanical complications in an intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) population who underwent closed reduction and intramedullary fixation with a PFNA-II. Patients aged 65years or older who underwent surgery with PFNA-II fixation in a university teaching hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were potentially eligible. Based on the distal locking mode, patients were classified into static, dynamic, and limited dynamic groups, among which the differences were tested using univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine whether the distal locking mode was independently associated with the risk of postoperative oneyear mechanical complications, adjusting for covariates and potential confounders. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings. Among 507 eligible patients, 33 (6.5%) developed postoperative mechanical complications. In the univariate analysis, sex (P = 0.007), fracture type (P = 0.020), LAT Parker ratio (P = 0.023), and lateral femoral (P = 0.003) wall showed that the differences were significant. Compared to the static group, the limited dynamic group and the dynamic group showed higher odds of postoperative mechanical complications (OR = 3.314, 95% CI: 1.215-9.041; and OR = 3.652, 95% CI: 1.451-9.191, respectively). These associations were robust across a series of analyses, including adjusting for confounders and subgroup analyses. Using a distal non-static locking mode significantly increases the risk of postoperative mechanical complications, and static locking could be a preferable option when treating an intertrochanteric fracture.

Vitamin D and pediatric bone health: Important information and considerations for the pediatric orthopaedic surgeon

Vitamin D and pediatric bone health: Important information and considerations for the pediatric orthopaedic surgeon

Dual Plating of Distal Femoral Fractures.

Dual plating of the distal femur is indicated for the treatment of complex intra-articular fractures, supracondylar femoral fractures, low periprosthetic fractures, and nonunions. The aim of this procedure is anatomical alignment of the articular surface, restoration of the articular block, and prevention of varus collapse. Following preoperative planning, the patient is positioned supine with the knee flexed at 30°. The lateral incision is made first, with a mid-lateral incision that is in line with the femoral shaft. If intra-articular work is needed this incision can be extended by curving anteriorly over the lateral femoral condyle. Next, the iliotibial band is transected in line with its fibers. The vastus lateralis fascia is incised and elevated off the septum, working distal to proximal. Care should be taken to maintain hemostasis when encountering femoral artery perforating vessels. Once there is adequate exposure, several reduction aids can be utilized, including a bump under the knee, Schanz pins, Kirschner wires, and reduction clamps. A lateral precontoured plate is placed submuscularly, and the most proximal holes are filled percutaneously. The medial incision begins distally at the adductor tubercle and is a straight incision made proximally in line with the femoral shaft. The underlying fascia is transected in line with the skin incision, and the vastus medialis is elevated. Care should be taken to avoid the descending geniculate artery, as well as its articular branch and the muscular branch to the vastus medialis. A lateral tibial plateau plate is contoured and placed. Nonoperative treatment of distal femoral fractures is rare, but relative indications for nonoperative treatment include frailty of the patient, lack of ambulatory status, a non-reconstructible fracture, or a stable fracture. These patients are placed in a long-leg cast followed by a hinged knee brace1. There are several other surgical fixation options, including lateral plating, retrograde intramedullary nailing, distal femoral replacement, and augmentation of a retrograde nail with a plate. Dual plating has several benefits, depending on the clinical scenario. Biomechanical studies have found that dual plating results in increased stiffness and construct strength2,3. Additional construct stability can be offered through the use of locking plates, particularly in osteoporotic bone. Taken together, this increased stability and construct strength can allow for earlier weight-bearing, which is particularly important for fractures in the geriatric population. Furthermore, the increased stiffness and construct strength make this procedure a favorable treatment option for nonunion, and it has been shown to result in lower rates of postoperative nonunion compared with lateral plating alone4-7. Adjunctive use of a medial plate also has been suggested to prevent varus collapse, particularly with metaphyseal comminution and poor bone quality2,3,8. Finally, in the periprosthetic fracture population, dual plating also removes the concern of incompatibility with a retrograde nail. The outcomes of dual plating are promising, given the severity of the injury. When comparing operative to nonoperative treatment outcomes, nonoperatively managed patients had worse functional outcomes and higher rates of complications related to immobility1. Dual plating of supracondylar fractures and intra-articular distal femoral fractures yields nonunion rates ranging from 0% to 12.5%, lower than the 18% to 20% reported with lateral locking plates4-7,9-12. This reduction in nonunions has been shown to lead to fewer revisions when compared with single-plating techniques7. In prior studies, 95% of nonunions treated with the dual-plating technique achieved union postoperatively11. One concern when utilizing the medial approach is critical damage to medial vascularity; however, this result has not been reported in the literature, and there is a safe operating window13. Despite the benefits of dual plating, there are relatively high rates of infection following dual plating (0% to 16.7%) compared with lateral plating alone (3.6% to 8.5%)5,14-17. However, many of these studies are small case series, highlighting that a surgeon's comfort and skill with these procedures is paramount to patient outcomes. Meticulous placement and contouring of lateral and medial plates are required to prevent malreduction of the articular block that creates a "golf-club deformity."18,19During the medial approach, be aware of descending geniculate artery-particularly its muscular branch, which is ∼5 cm from the adductor tubercle/medial epicondyle, and its root, which enters the compartment at the adductor hiatus at ∼16 cm13.

The Impact of Implementation of Palliative, Non-Operative Management on Mortality of Operatively Treated Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

(1) Background: Hip fracture patients with very limited life expectancy can opt for non-operative management (NOM) within a palliative care context. The implementation of NOM in the palliative context may affect the mortality of the operatively treated population. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether the operatively treated geriatric hip fracture population would have a lower in-hospital mortality rate and fewer postoperative complications after the introduction of NOM within a palliative care context for patients with very limited life expectancy. (2) Methods: Data from 1 February 2019 to 1 February 2022 of patients aged 70 years or older were analyzed to give a comparison between patients before and after implementation of NOM within a palliative care context. (3) Results: Comparison between 550 patients before and 485 patients after implementation showed no significant difference in in-hospital or 1-year mortality rates (2.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.139; 22.4% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.404, respectively). Notably, post-implementation, fewer patients had prior dementia diagnoses (15% vs. 21%, p = 0.010), and intensive care unit admissions decreased (3.5% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.025). (4) Conclusions: The implementation of NOM within a palliative care context did not significantly reduce mortality or complications. However, NOM within palliative care is deemed a more patient-centered approach for geriatric hip fracture patients with very limited life expectancy.

Trabecular bone mineral density as measured by thoracic vertebrae predicts incident hip and vertebral fractures: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Osteoporosis affects an enormous number of patients, of all races and both sexes, and its prevalence increases as the population ages. Few studies have evaluated the association between the vertebral trabecular bone mineral density(vBMD) and osteoporosis-related hip fracture in a multiethnic population, and no studies have demonstrated the predictive value of vBMD for fractures. We sought to determine the predictive value of QCT-based trabecular vBMD of thoracic vertebrae derived from coronary artery calcium scan for hip fractures in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis(MESA), a nationwide multicenter cohort included 6814 people from six medical centers across the USA and assess if low bone density by QCT can predict future fractures. Measures were done using trabecular bone measures, adjusted for individual patients, from three consecutive thoracic vertebrae (BDI Inc, Manhattan Beach CA, USA) from non-contrast cardiac CT scans. Six thousand eight hundred fourteen MESA baseline participants were included with a mean age of 62.2 ± 10.2years, and 52.8% were women. The mean thoracic BMD is 162.6 ± 46.8mg/cm3 (95% CI 161.5, 163.7), and 27.6% of participants (n = 1883) had osteoporosis (T-score 2.5 or lower). Over a median follow-up of 17.4years, Caucasians have a higher rate of vertebral fractures (6.9%), followed by Blacks (4.4%), Hispanics (3.7%), and Chinese (3.0%). Hip fracture patients had a lower baseline vBMD as measured by QCT than the non-hip fracture group by 13.6mg/cm3 [P < 0.001]. The same pattern was seen in the vertebral fracture population, where the mean BMD was substantially lower 18.3mg/cm3 [P < 0.001] than in the non-vertebral fracture population. Notably, the above substantial relationship was unaffected by age, gender, race, BMI, hypertension, current smoking, medication use, or activity. Patients with low trabecular BMD of thoracic vertebrae showed a 1.57-fold greater risk of first hip fracture (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.38-1.95) and a nearly threefold increased risk of first vertebral fracture (HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.87-4.59) compared to normal BMD patients. There is significant correlation between thoracic trabecular BMD and the incidence of future hip and vertebral fracture. This study demonstrates that thoracic vertebrae BMD, as measured on cardiac CT (QCT), can predict both hip and vertebral fractures without additional radiation, scanning, or patient burden. Osteopenia and osteoporosis are markedly underdiagnosed. Finding occult disease affords the opportunity to treat the millions of people undergoing CT scans every year for other indications.

Intravenous Versus Locally Injected Tranexamic Acid in a Fragility Hip Fracture Population: A Retrospective Review.

Evaluate differences between blood transfusion and complication rates among fragility hip fracture patients treated with locally injected (Local) versus intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA). Design: Retrospective comparative cohort. Tertiary referral orthopaedic specialty hospital; Level I trauma center. Patients aged 50 years and over who underwent surgical treatment for a proximal femur fragility fracture (Orthopedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen 31A and 31B). Between March 2018 and April 2022 with or without the use of local TXA during wound closure or IV TXA. Postoperative blood transfusion, venous thromboembolism, surgical site infections, and 30-day readmissions compared between those who received IV TXA, Local TXA, and controls that did not receive any TXA. Seven hundred forty-six patients (258 received IV TXA, 252 received Local TXA, and 236 controls that did not receive any TXA) were studied. Both Local and IV TXA groups received fewer blood transfusion versus controls. IV TXA was associated with a transfusion rate reduction of 12% compared with Local TXA ( P < 0.001). Regression analysis indicated that IV TXA reduced the odds of a postoperative blood transfusion by 48% compared with Local TXA ( P = 0.017). There were no differences in complication rates among the groups; however, patients receiving IV TXA had a significantly lower 30-day readmission rate (5%) than the control (13.9%) or Local (13.8%) TXA groups ( P = 0.001). IV TXA significantly reduced the risk of postoperative transfusion compared with controls and patients receiving Local TXA. There was no increased risk of complications, and a lower 30-day readmission was observed for the IV TXA group. IV TXA seems to be a safe and effective way to reduce postoperative blood transfusion in patients with fragility hip fractures. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The MCID of the PROMIS physical function instrument for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures

Understanding minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient reported outcome measurement are important in improving patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) domain for patients who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture. All patients with tibial plateau fractures that underwent operative fixation at a single level 1 trauma center were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients without PROMIS PF scores or an anchor question at two-time points postoperatively were excluded. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were calculated. The MCID for PROMIS PF scores was 4.85 in the distribution-based method and 3.93 (SD 14.01) in the anchor-based method. There was significantly more improvement in the score from the first postoperative score (<7 weeks) to the second postoperative time (<78 weeks) in the improvement group 10.95 (SD 9.95) compared to the no improvement group 7.02 (SD 9.87) in the anchor-based method (P<0.001). The percentage of patients achieving MCID at 7 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 37-42%, 57-62%, 80-84%, and 95-87%, respectively. This study identified MCID values for PROMIS PF scores in the tibial plateau fracture population. Both MCID scores were similar, resulting in a reliable value for future studies and clinical decision-making. An MCID of 3.93 to 4.85 can be used as a clinical and investigative standard for patients with operative tibial plateau fractures.