We read with great interest the article by Loustaud-Ratti et al., published in a recent issue of HEPATOLOGY.1 The authors concluded that ribavirin exposure at day 0 (D0), an early pharmacokinetic predictor, is significantly related to sustained virological response (SVR) to 48-week combination therapy with peginterferon alfa 2a and ribavirin, and amantadine which was added at week 12 and for 36 weeks. The authors also proposed a minimum area under the curve at hour 0-4 (AUC0-4h) threshold of 1755 μg.hour/L at D0 as a target for ribavirin dose adjustment. In their study, the authors defined rapid virological response (RVR) by either a nondetectable viral load or a viral load drop >2 log10 international units (IU)/mL at week 4, and defined early virological response (EVR) by a nondetectable viral load at week 12. These definitions are not in accordance with the general consensuses that at least a 2-log10 decline from baseline hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level is applied to EVR but not RVR.2-4 Although the authors used the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay HCV Ampliprep TaqMan to determine RVR at week 4, which was more sensitive (cut-off 15 IU/mL) than the Cobas Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction assay (cut-off 50 IU/mL), the reason why the authors chose special definitions of RVR and EVR and the impact on the interpretations of RVR and EVR should be elucidated. Meanwhile, the percentages of RVR were markedly different by the definition of the authors [50.0% (12/24)] and as defined by the general consensus [8.3% (2/24)]. With peginterferon alfa and ribavirin therapy, Ferenci et al. previously reported that about 10% of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 achieved RVR.5 Other studies have demonstrated that the percentage of RVR in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 was 16%-26.7%.4, 6-8 We have recently reported a RVR rate of 43.5% (87/200) among Taiwanese patients infected with HCV genotype 1 in our randomized trial.9 The rates of RVR in patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 differ greatly from different areas. Although we applaud the study conducted by Loustaud-Ratti et al.,1 the predictive value of ribavirin exposure at D0 for SVR and the proposed target for ribavirin dose adjustment of minimum AUC0-4h threshold of 1755 μg.h/L need further confirmatory studies in different countries. Chia-Yen Dai* , Wan-Long Chuang* , Jee-Fu Huang ?, Ming-Yen Hsieh , Ming-Lung Yu* ?, * Faculty of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Hepatobiliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Department of Occupational Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ? Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Read full abstract