Polymer solar cells (PSC) is a current frontier international research and development area owing to inherent advantages in these devices[1-5]. It includes cost effectiveness, flexibility, easy processibility, large area applications etc. Power conversion efficiency of ~ 10 % have already been achieved in bulk-heterojunction solar cells in single cell geometry and more than 11% in tendom configuration[8.9]. One of the limitations in the commercialization of this photovoltaic technology is the stability issue. To address both the efficiency and stability in these devices, there is another promising approach wherein inorganic semiconductor quantum dots are doped in polymer donor-acceptor composite matrix[6.7]. The advantage of these hybrid devices is that the inorganic components viz. quantum dots provide stability and enhanced mobility of charge carrier in the nanomatrix which in turn results in increase in efficiency as well. In this work we demonstrate the effect of Cadmium Selenide (CdSe) quantum dots (size~5nm) doping in poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT):[6,6]-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM), and 2-methoxy-5-(2-ethylhexyloxy)-polyphenylenevinylene (MEH-PPV): PCBM bulk heterojunction matrix where it results in considerable enhancement in efficiency in these devices. In fact the devices have been made in ambient air rather than in inert glove box conditions to illustrate conceptually the effect of CdSe quantum dots where it results in the enhancement of efficiency from 1.3 to 2% for P3HT:PCBM matrix, and 0.6 to 1.5 % for MEH-PPV:PCBM matrix. This enhancement of efficiency on CdSe quantum dot doping has been attributed to the pivotal role played by CdSe quantum dots viz. (i) it results in faster separation of excitons at donor-acceptor interface, (ii) it enables the faster transport of electrons after separation and their subsequent extraction/collection at the electrodes. This work owes promise for developing further cost effective, better efficient and stable hybrid polymer solar cells. REFERENCES Scharber M. C., Mühlbacher D., Koppe M., Denk P., Waldauf C., Heeger A. J., Brabec C. J., Adv. Mater. 18 (2006) 789–794.Ma W., Yang C. Gong X., Lee K., Heeger A. J., Adv. Funct. Mater. 15 (2005) 1617-1622.Heinemann M. D., Maydell K. von, Zutz F., Kolny-Olesiak J., Borchert H., Riedel I., Parisi J., Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 (2009) 3788–3795.Riedel I., Parisi J., Dyakonov V., Lutsen L. Vanderzande D., Hummelen J.C., Adv. Funct. Mater. 14 (2004) 38-44.Yu G., Gao J., Hummelen J. C., Wudi F., Heeger A. J., Science 270 (1995)1789-1791.Huynh W.U., Dittmer J. J., Alivisatos A. P., Science 295 (2002) 2425- 2427.Greenham N. C., Peng X., Alivisatos A. P., Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 17628.Sih-Hao Liao, Hong-Jyun Jhuo, Po-Nan Yeh, Yu-Shan Cheng, Yi-Lun Li, Yu-Hsuan Lee, Sunil Sharma & Show-An Chen, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2014) 4 : 6813.By Yongye Liang, Zheng Xu, Jiangbin Xia, Szu-Ting Tsai, Yue Wu, Gang Li,*Claire Ray, and Luping Yu, Adv. Mater. 22 (2010) E135–E138.
Read full abstract