Pakistan’s constitutional amendment process reflects a persistent tension betweendemocratic aspirations and authoritarian legacies, shaped by political dynamics and legalambiguities. The 1973 Constitution, amended 26 times, oscillates between empoweringdemocracy (e.g., the18th Amendment’sfederalism) and entrenching autocracy (e.g.,Zia’s8th Amendment). WhileArticles 238-239mandate a two-thirds parliamentary majorityfor amendments, military regimes and elite negotiations have frequently subverted this process. The judiciary’s inconsistent application of abasic structure doctrineevident in cases likeNRO (2009)andDistrict Bar Association (2015)further complicates the balance between parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional supremacy.Challenges include politicization (e.g., Musharraf’s 17th Amendment), instability from frequent changes, and public distrust due to exclusionary elite bargaining. Comparative lessons from India’s basic structure jurisprudence and Bangladesh’s post-crisis reforms highlight the need for participatory mechanisms, judicial consistency, and military accountability. Reforms like digital crowdsourcing of amendments and sunset clauses for emergency measures could transform Pakistan’s Constitutioninto a resilient, inclusive framework.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
5753 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Political Dynamics
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
5693 Search results
Sort by Recency