Radical Experience and the Surveillance State Elizabeth Faue (bio) Howard Brick and Christopher Phelps. Radicals in America: The U.S. Left since the Second World War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 361 pp. Illustrations, bibliography, and index. $24.99. Andrea Friedman. Citizenship in Cold War America: The National Security State and the Possibilities of Dissent. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2014. 288 pp. Illustrations, notes, bibliography, and index. $80.00 (cloth); $25.95 (paper). Jacob Kramer. The New Freedom and the Radicals: Woodrow Wilson, Progressive Views of Radicalism, and the Origins of Repressive Tolerance. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2015. 236 pp. Notes, bibliography, and index. $79.50. William J. Maxwell. F.B. Eyes: How J. Edgar Hoover’s Ghostreaders Framed African American Literature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2015. 384 pp. Illustrations, notes, works cited, and index. $29.95. Kenyon Zimmer. Immigrants against the State: Yiddish and Italian Anarchism in America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2015. 320 pp. Illustrations, notes, bibliography, and index. $95.00 (cloth); $30.00 (paper). The recent presidential campaign has brought into public debate some of the central political issues of the past century: how democracy and radicalism are defined, how political change originates in and emanates from the marginalized Left, and how the state both constrains and shapes the margins seeking to become mainstream. While the politics of gender and race equality have infiltrated broadcast news and twitter feeds, so too has radicalism—on the left and the right—drawn reporters and crowds. Antiestablishment candidates prosper, as national polls suggest a genuine disenchantment with politics as usual. A socialist garnered significant support in the Democratic Party; white supremacists endorsed the Republican candidate. There is an open and heated debate about who belongs and does not belong in our democracy and who [End Page 136] may be kept out by a wall or denied a voice through voter identification laws. The margins have overtaken the mainstream. Understanding the relationship between radical social movements and change, and between radicals and the existing state apparatus, has long occupied historians of the Left. In these five volumes, we revisit the questions of how radical activism shaped and was shaped by the state and the discourse and practice of citizenship within that state. From covering the arguments and deeds of Italian and Yiddish immigrant radicals and the creation of the national security state under the Wilson administration, to exploring mid-century anticommunism and today’s Black Lives Matter movement, these recent studies show us how responses to radicalism not only transformed the state but also continually redefined freedom and democracy from the political margins. At heart, they offer a collective exploration of how radical ideas and practices have transformed our political culture and the meanings and consequences of that transformation. Kenyon Zimmer’s Immigrants against the State is a case in point. Anarchism in the United States has a bifurcated history. Native-born individualist anarchism dates back to the nineteenth century, when William Lloyd Garrison and Henry David Thoreau positioned themselves against state-sanctioned slavery. Its heirs today are allied with libertarianism and its pro-capitalist followers. Communist—or collectivist—anarchism, an ideology that veered from authorizing political assassination to pacifist resistance to state-sanctioned violence, has been understood as chiefly European in origin, with its roots in the ideas of Charles Fourier, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, and Mikhail Bakunin. It also has been viewed as an immigrant ideology, not only foreign in origin but also in advocacy. Immigrant communities among Yiddish- and Italian-language speakers gave shelter to anarchists and supported radical political activities, cultural and educational institutions, and newspapers and journals. It is this world that Kenyon Zimmer captures in his account of Progressive Era Yiddish and Italian anarchists. His attention to detail is at times overwhelming, as names, networks, community organizations, and places are stacked like firewood against forgetting. Still, in trying to resurrect an anarchist movement that has been largely ignored and marginalized, the weight of information matters. And while Zimmer treads some familiar ground here—in particular, the work of Michael Miller Topp and Jennifer Guglielmo—his mapping of immigrant anarchism goes beyond these scholars to an account that covers not only the...
Read full abstract