OBJECTIVE: Preimplantation diagnosis (PGD) for maternally inherited dominant or X-linked disorders may be performed by direct genetic analysis of the blastomere(s) or by sequential analysis of the first and second polar bodies. If blastomere biopsy is performed, it is recommended to analyze 2 blastomeres for preventing misdiagnosis due to allele drop-out (ADO). With PB analysis, the genotype of the embryo is predicted by deduction. The objective of this study was to compare polar body biopsy with blastomere biopsy, in PGD for maternally inherited disorders, regarding accuracy of the analysis as well as the effect of the biopsy method on embryo development.DESIGN: A prospective study, comparing 31 PGD cycles for maternal dominant disorders analyzed by PB biopsy, to 51 PGD cycles for dominant disorders, analyzed by 2 blastomeres biopsy.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 241 embryos, analyzed by PB biopsy, were evaluated according to the following parameters: biopsy failure rate, amplification failure rate, rate of non-informative first PB, ADO and contamination rates, and the proportion of embryos in which a blastomere biopsy was performed also. Cleavage rate, degree of fragmentation and development parameters of the biopsed embryos on day 3 were assessed too.RESULTS: Failure of biopsy of 1st and 2nd PBs was encountered in 7.5% and 15.7%, respectively. Blastomere Biopsy after attempted PB biopsy was performed in 117 (48.5%) of the embryos due to homozygosity of the 1st PB and a lack of informative markers that could excluded ADO (n=110) and contamination (n=7). Cleavage rate, degree of fragmentation and development parameters of embryos on day 3 were similar in both groups. Ongoing pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were 22.5% for PB biopsy and 17.6% for 2-blastomere biopsy.CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that PB biopsy is more difficult to perform and genetic analysis of PB is hampered by inability to detect maternal contamination in the 1st PB, and inability to distinguish between homozygousity of 1st PB and ADO. On the other hand, PB biopsy may be associated with less disruption of embryonic development. Therefore, we are recommending on PB biopsy only in analyses of maternal disorders that are based on more than 3 informative maternal polymorphic markers. This reduces the need for an additional blastomere biopsy when 1st PB is homozygote. OBJECTIVE: Preimplantation diagnosis (PGD) for maternally inherited dominant or X-linked disorders may be performed by direct genetic analysis of the blastomere(s) or by sequential analysis of the first and second polar bodies. If blastomere biopsy is performed, it is recommended to analyze 2 blastomeres for preventing misdiagnosis due to allele drop-out (ADO). With PB analysis, the genotype of the embryo is predicted by deduction. The objective of this study was to compare polar body biopsy with blastomere biopsy, in PGD for maternally inherited disorders, regarding accuracy of the analysis as well as the effect of the biopsy method on embryo development. DESIGN: A prospective study, comparing 31 PGD cycles for maternal dominant disorders analyzed by PB biopsy, to 51 PGD cycles for dominant disorders, analyzed by 2 blastomeres biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 241 embryos, analyzed by PB biopsy, were evaluated according to the following parameters: biopsy failure rate, amplification failure rate, rate of non-informative first PB, ADO and contamination rates, and the proportion of embryos in which a blastomere biopsy was performed also. Cleavage rate, degree of fragmentation and development parameters of the biopsed embryos on day 3 were assessed too. RESULTS: Failure of biopsy of 1st and 2nd PBs was encountered in 7.5% and 15.7%, respectively. Blastomere Biopsy after attempted PB biopsy was performed in 117 (48.5%) of the embryos due to homozygosity of the 1st PB and a lack of informative markers that could excluded ADO (n=110) and contamination (n=7). Cleavage rate, degree of fragmentation and development parameters of embryos on day 3 were similar in both groups. Ongoing pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were 22.5% for PB biopsy and 17.6% for 2-blastomere biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that PB biopsy is more difficult to perform and genetic analysis of PB is hampered by inability to detect maternal contamination in the 1st PB, and inability to distinguish between homozygousity of 1st PB and ADO. On the other hand, PB biopsy may be associated with less disruption of embryonic development. Therefore, we are recommending on PB biopsy only in analyses of maternal disorders that are based on more than 3 informative maternal polymorphic markers. This reduces the need for an additional blastomere biopsy when 1st PB is homozygote.