You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Basic Research & Pathophysiology IV1 Apr 2016MP83-16 EMETINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE ENHANCES CISPLATIN/GEMCITABINE-MEDIATED GROWTH INHIBITION OF BLADDER TUMOR CELLS IN VIVO Kimberly Foreman, Alexandra Mitchell, Samuel White, Emil Bielecki, Maria Picken, and Gopal Gupta Kimberly ForemanKimberly Foreman More articles by this author , Alexandra MitchellAlexandra Mitchell More articles by this author , Samuel WhiteSamuel White More articles by this author , Emil BieleckiEmil Bielecki More articles by this author , Maria PickenMaria Picken More articles by this author , and Gopal GuptaGopal Gupta More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2198AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES We previously reported that emetine, a natural alkaloid, acts synergistically with cisplatin to inhibit growth of muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) cell lines, but not normal urothelial cells in vitro. These studies were recently extended to show emetine also enhances growth inhibition of tumor cells treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG), a current first-line chemotherapy regime for MIBC patients. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of combined emetine and CG (CG&E) in a xenograft model of MIBC and examined the resulting tumors for evidence of proliferation (Ki67) and apoptosis (activated caspase 3) using immunostaining. METHODS UMUC3, a human MIBC cell line, were injected subcutaneously into nude mice. Established tumors were treated with emetine, CG, CG&E, or left untreated (n=5-6 per group). Tumors were measured every other day, and at various time points, the tumors were excised, formalin fixed, and paraffin embedded. Tissue sections were immunostained for Ki67 and activated caspase 3. Positive and negative cells were counted in 10 high-power fields from each specimen using ImageJ software to quantify the results. RESULTS CG- and CG&E-treated tumors were significantly smaller than untreated and emetine-treated specimens throughout the study. CG&E tumors were significantly smaller compared with CG-treated tumors as early as day 8 post-treatment in animals receiving higher doses of emetine. About day 20 post-treatment, CG-treated tumors began to rapidly grow, while CG&E tumors did not show evidence of growth until day 27. Histologically, untreated and emetine-treated tumors revealed areas of hemorrhage and necrosis among sheets of pleomorphic tumor cells with numerous mitotic figures. In contrast, CG- and CG&E-treated tumors were smaller with nests of tumor cells surrounded by residual matrigel. CG- and CG&E-treated tumors contained significantly fewer Ki67 positive cells than untreated controls (p<0.01), but there was no difference in Ki67 positivity between CG and CG&E-treated tumors. In contrast, activated caspase 3 positivity was significantly higher in CG&E-treated tumors compared to CG-treated tumors (p<0.01) beginning at day 20 post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS The addition of emetine to CG chemotherapy resulted in significantly smaller tumor volumes in a xenograft model of MIBC. While CG effectively reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis, the addition of emetine enhanced this effect, possibly through increased apoptosis. The results suggest addition of emetine to standard of care CG treatment may benefit patients with MIBC. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e1087 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Kimberly Foreman More articles by this author Alexandra Mitchell More articles by this author Samuel White More articles by this author Emil Bielecki More articles by this author Maria Picken More articles by this author Gopal Gupta More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract