Planar Polarity Genes Research Articles

Sex-limited penetrance of lymphedema to females with CELSR1 haploinsufficiency: A second family.

A second multigeneration family with hereditary lymphedema (LE) secondary to a variant in the planar polarity gene, CELSR1, is described. Dominant inheritance of the variant was discovered using whole-exome sequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. In contrast to heterozygous males, all heterozygous females showed LE during physical examination albeit variable in severity and age of onset. Lymphscintigraphy in affected females showed previously undescribed lymphatic abnormalities consistent with lymphangiectasia, valve dysfunction, and thoracic duct reflux.

A novel planar polarity gene pepsinogen‐like regulates wingless expression in a posttranscriptional manner

Planar cell polarity (PCP) originally referred to the coordination of global organ axes and individual cell polarity within the plane of the epithelium. More recently, it has been accepted that pertinent PCP regulators play essential roles not only in epithelial sheets, but also in various rearranging cells. We identified pepsinogen-like (pcl) as a new planar polarity gene, using Drosophila wing epidermis as a model. Pcl protein is predicted to belong to a family of aspartic proteases. When pcl mutant clones were observed in pupal wings, PCP was disturbed in both mutant and wild-type cells that were juxtaposed to the clone border. We examined levels of known PCP proteins in wing imaginal discs. The amount of the seven-pass transmembrane cadherin Flamingo (Fmi), one of the PCP "core group" members, was significantly decreased in mutant clones, whereas neither the amount of nor the polarized localization of Dachsous (Ds) at cell boundaries was affected. In addition to the PCP phenotype, the pcl mutation caused loss of wing margins. Intriguingly, this was most likely due to a dramatic decrease in the level of Wingless (Wg) protein, but not due to a decrease in the level of wg transcripts. Our results raise the possibility that Pcl regulates Wg expression post-transcriptionally, and PCP, by proteolytic cleavages.

The Wnt Coreceptor Ryk Regulates Wnt/Planar Cell Polarity by Modulating the Degradation of the Core Planar Cell Polarity Component Vangl2

The Wnt signaling pathways control many critical developmental and adult physiological processes. In vertebrates, one fundamentally important function of Wnts is to provide directional information by regulating the evolutionarily conserved planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway during embryonic morphogenesis. However, despite the critical roles of Wnts and PCP in vertebrate development and disease, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying Wnt regulation of PCP. Here, we have found that the receptor-like tyrosine kinase (Ryk), a Wnt5a-binding protein required in axon guidance, regulates PCP signaling. We show that Ryk interacts with Vangl2 genetically and biochemically, and such interaction is potentiated by Wnt5a. Loss of Ryk in a Vangl2(+/-) background results in classic PCP defects, including open neural tube, misalignment of sensory hair cells in the inner ear, and shortened long bones in the limbs. Complete loss of both Ryk and Vangl2 results in more severe phenotypes that resemble the Wnt5a(-/-) mutant in many aspects such as shortened anterior-posterior body axis, limb, and frontonasal process. Our data identify the Wnt5a-binding protein Ryk as a general regulator of the mammalian Wnt/PCP signaling pathway. We show that Ryk transduces Wnt5a signaling by forming a complex with Vangl2 and that Ryk regulates PCP by at least in part promoting Vangl2 stability. As human mutations in WNT5A and VANGL2 are found to cause Robinow syndrome and neural tube defects, respectively, our results further suggest that human mutations in RYK may also be involved in these diseases.

Planar polarity genes and inhibition of supernumerary neurites

Planar cell polarity (PCP) genes have recently emerged as important players in sculpting neuronal connections. The bipolar VC neurons display stereotypical differences in axon extension along the anterior-posterior (AP) body axis: VC1–3 and VC6 polarize along the AP axis while VC4 and VC5 polarize along the orthogonal left-right (LR) axis generated by the developing vulva. vang-1 and prkl-1, the worm orthologs of Van Gogh and Prickle, are required to restrict the polarity of neurite emergence to a specific tissue axis. vang-1 and prkl-1 loss results in ectopic VC4 and VC5 neurites extending inappropriately along the AP axis. Conversely, prkl-1 overexpression in VC neurons suppresses neurite formation. These findings suggest that a PCP-like pathway acts to silence or antagonize neuronal responses to polarity cues that would otherwise be permissive for neurite growth.

Planar polarity genes in theDrosophilawing regulate the localisation of the FH3-domain protein Multiple Wing Hairs to control the site of hair production

The core planar polarity proteins play important roles in coordinating cell polarity, in part by adopting asymmetric subcellular localisations that are likely to serve as cues for cell polarisation by as yet uncharacterised pathways. Here we describe the role of Multiple Wing Hairs (Mwh), a novel formin homology 3 (FH3)-domain protein, which acts downstream of the core polarity proteins to restrict the production of actin-rich prehairs to distal cell edges in the Drosophila pupal wing. Mwh appears to function as a repressor of actin filament formation and, in its absence, ectopic actin bundles are seen across the entire apical surface of cells. We show that the proximally localised core polarity protein Strabismus acts via the downstream effector proteins Inturned, Fuzzy and Fritz to stabilise Mwh in apico-proximal cellular regions. In addition, the distally localised core polarity protein Frizzled positively promotes prehair initiation, suggesting that both proximal and distal cellular cues act together to ensure accurate prehair placement.

When flies and mice develop cancer

![][1] The Spanish National Cancer Institute (CNIO) Meeting on Development and Cancer took place between 4 and 6 February 2008 in Madrid, Spain, and was organized by K. Basler, G. Morata, E. Moreno and M. Torres. ![][2] Developmental biologists rightly argue that genes regulating developmental pathways are reiterated in cancer development. At the recent Spanish National Cancer Institute (CNIO) Meeting on Development and Cancer, novel concepts and processes that are considered to be common to both embryonic and cancer development were discussed. It is worth pointing out that tumour formation should be considered to be a form of aberrant organ development, in which many developmental pathways that control proliferation, differentiation and growth or morphogenesis are affected. This report is structured in three parts, describing the work presented at the meeting according to the stages of tumour development to which it pertains. First, the normal behaviour of cell populations that are the targets of transformation, in particular adult stem cells and the pathways that regulate their behaviour. Second, processes that occur at the early stages of cancer development before morphological malformations are detectable, in particular the process that is best known from studies in flies as ‘cell competition’. Third, developmental processes and pathways that are active in the growing tumour—which we consider to be an extrinsic organ—for example, the recruitment of blood vessels or the role of morphogens in controlling the size and shape of tumours, and the progression from hyperplasia to invasive tumours (Fig 1). Figure 1. Tumour development and genes involved in the different stages. Schematic representation of how stem cells (A) , by acquiring a mutation through cell competition ( B ) and by the selection of additional mutations, can give rise to the ‘tumour organ’ ( C ). The genes involved in these processes are listed on the right‐hand side, and most of them … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/graphic-2.gif

Differential activities of the core planar polarity proteins during Drosophila wing patterning

During planar polarity patterning of the Drosophila wing, a “core” group of planar polarity genes has been identified which acts downstream of global polarity cues to locally coordinate cell polarity and specify trichome production at distal cell edges. These genes encode protein products that assemble into asymmetric apicolateral complexes that straddle the proximodistal junctional region between adjacent cells. We have carried out detailed genetic analysis experiments, analysing the requirements of each complex component for planar polarity patterning. We find that the three transmembrane proteins at the core of the complex, Frizzled, Strabismus and Flamingo, are required earliest in development and are the only components needed for intercellular polarity signalling. Notably, cells that lack both Frizzled and Strabismus are unable to signal, revealing an absolute requirement for both proteins in cell–cell communication. In contrast the cytoplasmic components Dishevelled, Prickle and Diego are not needed for intercellular communication. These factors contribute to the cell–cell propagation of polarity, most likely by promotion of intracellular asymmetry. Interestingly, both local polarity propagation and trichome placement occur normally in mutant backgrounds where asymmetry of polarity protein distribution is undetectable, suggesting such asymmetry is not an absolute requirement for any of the functions of the core complex.

Genetic basis of planar polarity

Several epitheliums exhibit a clear polarity that lies within the plane of the epithelium. This polarity, referred to as planar polarity or tissue polarity, is oriented perpendicular to the apical-basal polarity of the epithelium. Over the last two decades, the genetic and molecular bases of planar polarity have been intensively investigated in Drosophila. Recent studies have shown that establishment of planar polarity relies on the unipolar distribution of a small number of signaling molecules localizing at the apical cortex. Unipolar localization of planar polarity proteins defines two opposite and complementary cortical domains. These domains show a stereotyped orientation at the tissue level. Positioning of these cortical domains is coordinated at the tissue level by a second class of signaling molecules that form an activity gradient across the epithelium. Together these data have led to a general model of planar polarity establishment. Considering that planar polarity genes have been conserved from flies to vertebrates, this model may be useful for our understanding of epithelium biology in mammals.

EGF Signaling and Ommatidial Rotation in the Drosophila Eye

The ommatidia of the Drosophila eye initiate development by stepwise recruitment of photoreceptors into symmetric ommatidial clusters. As they mature, the clusters become asymmetric, adopting opposite chirality on either side of the dorsoventral midline and rotating exactly 90° (Figures 1A and 1B, [1]). The choice of chirality is governed by higher activity of the frizzled (fz) gene in one cell of the R3/R4 photoreceptor pair [2] and by Notch-Delta (N-Dl) signaling [3–5]. The 90° rotation also requires activity of planar polarity genes such as fz as well as the roulette (rlt) locus [2, 6]. We now show that two regulators of EGF signaling, argos and sprouty (sty), and a gain-of-function Ras85D allele, interact genetically with fz in ommatidial polarity. Furthermore, we find that argos is required for ommatidial rotation, but not chirality, and that rlt is a novel allele of argos. We present evidence that there are two pathways by which EGF signaling affects ommatidial rotation. In the first, typified by the rlt phenotype, there is partial transformation of the “mystery cells” toward a neuronal fate. Although most of these mystery cells subsequently fail to develop as neurons, their partial transformation results in inappropriate subcellular localization of the Fz receptor, a likely cue for regulating ommatidial rotation. Secondly, reducing EGF signaling can specifically affect ommatidial rotation without showing transformation of the mystery cells or defects in polarity protein localization.

Identification of Vangl2 and Scrb1 as planar polarity genes in mammals.

In mammals, an example of planar cell polarity (PCP) is the uniform orientation of the hair cell stereociliary bundles within the cochlea. The PCP pathway of Drosophila refers to a conserved signalling pathway that regulates the coordinated orientation of cells or structures within the plane of an epithelium. Here we show that a mutation in Vangl2, a mammalian homologue of the Drosophila PCP gene Strabismus/Van Gogh, results in significant disruptions in the polarization of stereociliary bundles in mouse cochlea as a result of defects in the direction of movement and/or anchoring of the kinocilium within each hair cell. Similar, but less severe, defects are observed in animals containing a mutation in the LAP protein family gene Scrb1 (homologous with Drosophila scribble). Polarization defects in animals heterozygous for Vangl2 and Scrb1 are comparable with Vangl2 homozygotes, demonstrating genetic interactions between these genes in the regulation of PCP in mammals. These results demonstrate a role for the PCP pathway in planar polarization in mammals, and identify Scrb1 as a PCP gene.

The asymmetric subcellular localisation of components of the planar polarity pathway.

Recent studies in Drosophila have shown that during the establishment of planar cell polarity in the developing wing, the protein products of several key planar polarity genes adopt asymmetric subcellular localisations. These asymmetric distributions precede other signs of overt polarisation of the cells in the planar axis, and prefigure the final polarity adopted. This review describes what is known about this phenomenon and its genetic control. Possible mechanisms for establishing asymmetric subcellular localisations, and its likely significance, are discussed.

Asymmetric Localization of Frizzled and the Determination of Notch-Dependent Cell Fate in the Drosophila Eye

Background: During patterning of the Drosophila eye, a critical step is the Notch-mediated cell fate decision that determines the identities of the R3/R4 photoreceptor pair in each ommatidium. Depending on the decision taken, the ommatidium adopts either the dorsal or ventral chiral form. This decision is directed by the activity of the planar polarity genes, and, in particular, higher activity of the receptor Frizzled confers R3 fate.Results: We present evidence that Frizzled does not modulate Notch activity via Rho GTPases and a JNK cascade as previously proposed. We find that the planar polarity proteins Frizzled, Dishevelled, Flamingo, and Strabismus adopt asymmetric protein localizations in the developing photoreceptors. These protein localizations correlate with the bias of Notch activity between R3/R4, suggesting that they are necessary to modulate Notch activity between these cells. Additional data support a mechanism for regulation of Notch activity that could involve direct interactions between Dishevelled and Notch at the cell cortex.Conclusions: In the light of our findings, we conclude that Rho GTPases/JNK cascades are not major effectors of planar polarity in the Drosophila eye. We propose a new model for the control of R3/R4 photoreceptor fate by Frizzled, whereby asymmetric protein localization is likely to be a critical step in modulation of Notch activity. This modulation may occur via direct interactions between Notch and Dishevelled.