Placement Of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters Research Articles

Percutaneous Retrieval of a Peeled-off Fragment of a Hydrophilic Wire after a Cuffed Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Placement: A Case Report.

Percutaneous Retrieval of a Peeled-off Fragment of a Hydrophilic Wire after a Cuffed Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Placement: A Case Report.

Feasibility Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters

Radiographic fluoroscopy is the current standard for placement of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) for hemodialysis. Radiographic fluoroscopy requires structural and personnel infrastructure and exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of solely ultrasound-guided placement of tunneled central venous dialysis catheters (USCVCs). We evaluated prospectively collected single-center data regarding safety and catheter function of 134 consecutive patients who underwent USCVC implantation between 2020 and 2021. We used the inset guidewire to visualize the position of the catheter tip. In the case of inadequate visibility by ultrasound, we used intracardiac electrocardiography (ECG) recording or agitated saline. A total of 1844 catheter days were assessed. The optimal CVC position was defined as being within the upper right atrium (URA) and middle to deep right atrium. Of the 134 USCVCs, 87% were placed on the right side. The primary success rate for optimal tip position and catheter function was 98%. Of the USCVCs, 97% were placed solely by ultrasound. Regarding positioning, 6% were in the vena cava superior zone, 70% in the URA and 24% in the middle to deep right atrium, resulting in a rate of 94% with optimal positioning. Effective blood flow averaged 292 ± 39 ml/min. There were no immediate procedure-associated complications. Placement of CVC for hemodialysis solely by ultrasound is an effective alternative to fluoroscopy-assisted placement.

Abstract No. 211 Tunneled hemodialysis catheters: does French size and catheter tip type affect patency and post-procedural complications?

Published studies have long shown tunneled hemodialysis catheters have high rates of infection and thrombus related catheter dysfunction. The aim of our study is to examine French size and catheter tip type in relation to primary patency rates, incidence of catheter related infections and incidence of catheter related malfunction in comparison to current literature. To examine these complications, we performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent a tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement at two hospitals at our institution.

Routine Chest Radiography Following Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter: Use and Clinical Outcomes

Highlights Abstract Background: A postoperative chest x-ray (CXR) remains part of some hospital protocols following tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement despite the use of operative imaging-guided techniques. The aim is to assess the usefulness of this practice and its impact on clinical outcomes and resource use. Methods: A review of medical records and postoperative CXR was done for 78 adult patients who had tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed in the operating room under fluoroscopy guidance. Catheters were inserted by ultrasound-guided puncture (51.3%) or exchanged from an existing catheter over a guide wire (48.7%). The postoperative CXRs were also examined by an independent reviewer to assess the catheter tip position and the need for repositioning to mimic a real-life postoperative setting. Procedural, nursing, and billing records were also reviewed. Results: No patients had a pneumothorax or major complications. On postoperative CXRs, 29 (37.2%) patients had the catheter tips in the right atrium, 23 (29.5%) in the cavoatrial junction, 25 (23.1%) in the superior vena cava, and 1 (1.3%) in the brachiocephalic vein. The independent reviewer found the catheter tips in acceptable anatomical positions in 75 of 78 patients. Only 3 (3.9%) patients had catheter malfunctions during dialysis and exchanged their catheters (2 had high catheters in the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic vein, 1 had a kinked catheter). Postoperative CXRs also caused delays in patient discharge from postanesthesia care units and significant increases in medical expenses (around $199 per patient). Conclusion: Routine CXR after tunneled hemodialysis central venous catheter insertion is unnecessary and does not add to the procedure’s safety or to the patient’s outcome.

Safety of Bedside Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters in the Intensive Care Unit: Translating from the COVID-19 Experience.

Background: Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and kidney dysfunction often require tunneled hemodialysis catheter (TDC) placement for kidney replacement therapy, typically under fluoroscopic guidance to minimize catheter-related complications. This entails transportation of patients outside the intensive care unit to a fluoroscopy suite, which may potentially expose many healthcare providers to COVID-19. One potential strategy to mitigate the risk of viral transmission is to insert TDCs at the bedside, using ultrasound and anatomic landmarks only, without fluoroscopic guidance. Methods: We reviewed all COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit who underwent right internal jugular TDC insertion at the bedside between April and December 2020. Outcomes included catheter placement-related complications such as post-procedural bleeding, air embolism, dysrhythmias, pneumothorax/hemothorax, and catheter tip malposition. TDC insertion was considered successful if the catheter was able to achieve blood flow sufficient to perform either a single intermittent or 24 h of continuous hemodialysis treatment. Results: We report a retrospective, single-center case series of 25 patients with COVID-19 who had right internal jugular TDCs placed at the bedside, 10 of whom underwent simultaneous insertion of small-bore right internal jugular tunneled central venous catheters for infusion. Continuous veno-venous hemodialysis was utilized for kidney replacement therapy in all patients, and a median catheter blood flow rate of 200 mL/min (IQR: 200–200) was achieved without any deviation from the dialysis prescription. No catheter insertion-related complications were observed, and none of the catheter tips were malpositioned. Conclusions: Bedside right internal jugular TDC placement in COVID-19 patients, using ultrasound and anatomic landmarks without fluoroscopic guidance, may potentially reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission among healthcare workers without compromising patient safety or catheter function. Concomitant insertion of tunneled central venous catheters in the right internal jugular vein for infusion may also be safely accomplished and further help limit personnel exposure to COVID-19.

Introduction to Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter (Permacath) Placement

Introduction to Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter (Permacath) Placement

Bedside Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Placement in Patients with COVID-19

BackgroundCOVID-19, the syndrome caused by the novel SARS-CoV2, is associated with high rates of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). It is well known that despite the ease of bedside insertion, the use of nontunneled dialysis catheters (NTDCs) is associated with increased complications compared to tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs). Our objective was to develop a strategy for TDC placement at the bedside to provide effective dialysis access, conserve resources and decrease personnel exposure at our medical center in an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA technique for bedside TDC insertion with ultrasound and plain radiographs in the intensive care unit was developed. Test or clinically COVID-19-positive patients requiring RRT were evaluated for bedside emergent NTDC or nonemergent TDC placement. Patients who underwent NTDC placement were monitored for ongoing RRT needs and were converted to TDC at the bedside after 3–5 days. We prospectively collected patient data focusing on complications and mortality.ResultsOf the 36 consultations for dialysis access in COVID-positive patients from March 19 through June 5, 2020, a total of 24 bedside TDCs were placed. Only one patient developed a complication, which was pneumothorax and cardiac tamponade during line placement. In-hospital mortality in the cohort was 63.9%.ConclusionsBedside TDC placement has served to conserve resources, prevent complications with transport to and from the operating room, and decrease personnel exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic. This strategy warrants further consideration and could be used in critically ill patients regardless of COVID status.

Safety and efficacy of placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheter without the use of fluoroscopy.

The implantation of acute or chronic vascular accesses for hemodialysis (HD) in end-stage kidney disease patients is a critical skill procedure for nephrologists, with an impact on short- and long-term outcomes of the modality and patient survival. Placement circumstances, however, may depend on the availability of technological support and will likely vary across the world. We retrospectively reviewed our local experience with ultrasound-guided tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) insertions but without access to fluoroscopic guidance. Data were available for 63 patients with TDCs placed by faculty nephrologists at the dialysis unit procedure rooms between March 2015 and February 2018. We reviewed circumstances of TDC placement, patient characteristics, and procedural outcomes. The mean age was 62 (±41) years, and 46% of the patients were male. All TDC placements were technically successful and no major complications occurred. Most TDCs (52.8%) were a de novo placement. In the de novo patient group, there were 27 right-sided internal jugular vein (IJV) and 6 left-sided IJV cannulations. Blood pump flow was 284.6 (±58) mL/min via the temporary catheter 1month before and 316.7 (±46) mL/min 1month after TDC placement (p < 0.0001). The majority of catheter tips (63%) reached the right atrial placement position successfully. Technologically successful TDC placement can be performed without fluoroscopic tip guidance and result in improved access flows and dialysis efficacy when compared to temporary hemodialysis catheters.

P1347A DYNAMIC ULTRASOUND-IMAGING-BASED GUIDED TECHNIQUE TO TUNNELED DIALYSIS CATHETER BY MICROBUBBLES

Abstract Background and Aims In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the use of cuffed, tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) for hemodialysis has become integral to treatment plans. Fluoroscopy is a widely accepted method for the insertion and positioning of cuffed dialysis catheters, because it is easy to use, accurate and reliable, and has a relatively low incidence of complications. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement without the use of fluoroscopy but with a dynamic ultrasound-imaging-based guided technique. Method From January 2015 to December 2017, we performed an observational prospective cohort study of 56 patients with ERDS who required TDC placement. Results The overall success rate for ultrasound-guided central access was 100%, with a mean number of 1.16 (± 0.4) attempts per patient. There were no incidences of guide wire coiling/kinking, carotid puncture, pneumothorax, or catheter malfunction. Catheter flow during dialysis was 286 (± 38) ml/min. The total number of catheter days was 7,451, with a mean of 133 days and a range of 46 to 322 days. Life table analysis revealed primary patency rates of 100%, 96%, and 53% at 30, 60, and 120 days, respectively. Conclusion Dynamic ultrasound-based visualization of microbubbles in the right atrium is a highly accurate method to detect percutaneous implantation of large-lumen, tunneled, central venous catheters without the need for fluoroscopic guidance technology.

Percutaneous access of the superior vena cava in patients with bilateral jugular-subclavian vein occlusion using wire-target access for placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters: An important new tool for gaining upper body vascular access.

This study presents the technique of percutaneous wire-target access of the superior vena cava (SVC) in patients with bilateral jugular-subclavian vein occlusion requiring a tunneled hemodialysis catheter. A 3-year retrospective review of five patients was performed. The femoral vein is accessed percutaneously and a 5F sheath inserted. This is followed by placement of a pigtail catheter (wire-target) in the SVC with cavography. The SVC is percutaneously cannulated at the level of the pigtail under fluoroscopy, and a guidewire is passed into the vena cava with confirmation by injection of contrast material. A tunneled hemodialysis catheter is then placed. The wire-target technique of SVC access can be used safely and effectively to establish upper body catheter access when traditional techniques are not possible.

Percutaneous Access of the Superior Vena Cava in Patients With Bilateral Jugular-Subclavian Vein Occlusion Using Wire-Target Access for Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters

The purpose of this study was to present the use of “wire-target” access at the jugular-subclavian vein junction for performing percutaneous superior vena cava (SVC) access in patients with bilateral jugular-subclavian vein occlusion requiring tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement, thereby avoiding groin access use. A 3-year retrospective review of all wire-target SVC accesses for tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement performed at our institution was conducted. There were a total of four patients requiring this. Description of the technique in adults and review of intraoperative imaging are presented (Figs 1 and 2). The femoral vein is accessed percutaneously using the modified Seldinger technique, and a 5F sheath is inserted. This is followed by placement of a pigtail catheter (“wire-target”) in the SVC with flush superior venacavography and jugular-subclavian vein junction venography (Fig 1). Using wire-target access (pigtail location) of the jugular-SVC junction, the SVC is percutaneously cannulated at the level of the pigtail catheter under fluoroscopy, and a guidewire is passed into the inferior vena cava with confirmation by injection of contrast material (Fig 2). A tunneled dialysis catheter is then placed from above. The pigtail catheter is removed from the SVC. Tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement in adults with upper extremity venous occlusion can be challenging if not impossible, usually necessitating femoral catheter placement with all of its attendant morbidity. The wire-target technique of SVC access is a procedure that can be used safely and effectively to establish upper body catheter access when traditional techniques for tunneled dialysis catheter placement are not possible.Fig 2Guidewire.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement in persistent left superior vena cava: A rare but potential hemodialysis vascular access

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a common congenital thoracic venous anomaly. Asymptomatic cases are often diagnosed incidentally during invasive cardiovascular procedures such as the placement of central venous access catheters. It is important for the physicians to be aware of clinical implications that may occur during catheter placement. We describe our experience with PLSVC during the placement of a tunneled hemodialysis (HD) catheter (permcath) through the left internal jugular venous route. The diagnosis was confirmed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. PLSVC can be a potential site for HD catheter placement.

Agitated saline bubble-enhanced ultrasound for the positioning of cuffed, tunneled dialysis catheters in patients with end-stage renal disease.

In patients with end-stage renal disease, the use of cuffed, tunneled dialysis catheters for hemodialysis has become integral to treatment plans. Fluoroscopy is a widely accepted method for the insertion and positioning of cuffed dialysis catheters, because it is easy to use, accurate and reliable, and has a relatively low incidence of complications. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement without the use of fluoroscopy but with a dynamic ultrasound-imaging-based guided technique. From January 2015 to December 2017, we performed an observational prospective cohort study of 56 patients with end-stage renal disease who required tunneled dialysis catheter placement. The overall success rate for ultrasound-guided central access was 100%, with a mean number of 1.16 (±0.4) attempts per patient. There were no incidences of guide wire coiling/kinking, carotid puncture, pneumothorax, or catheter malfunction. Catheter flow during dialysis was 286 (±38) mL/min. The total number of catheter days was 7451, with a mean of 133 days and a range of 46-322 days. Life table analysis revealed primary patency rates of 100%, 96%, and 53% at 30, 60, and 120 days, respectively. Dynamic ultrasound-based visualization of microbubbles in the right atrium is a highly accurate method to detect percutaneous implantation of large-lumen, tunneled, central venous catheters without the need for fluoroscopic guidance technology. Future research should further develop and confirm these initial findings.

Regional anesthesia with epinephrine-containing lidocaine reduces pericatheter bleeding after tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement.

Pericatheter bleeding (PB) following tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) placement is a common phenomenon. In addition to complicating securement of the THC, the PB may loosen the adhesive catheter dressing and delay wound healing. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether epinephrine-containing local anesthetics rather than plain ones reduce superficial PB after THC placement. The study was based on the retrospective analysis of the prospectively gathered data. Forty-six patients receiving local analgesia during THC placement were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to two groups according to local anesthetic mixtures used (n =22 to prilocaine group [group 1]; n =24 to epinephrine-containing lidocaine group [group 2]). Presence or absence of PB after the THC placement was evaluated. Differences between groups with and without controlling other variables were statistically analyzed. Epinephrine-containing lidocaine (group 2) significantly reduced PB in comparison with prilocaine, P = 0.003. Use of epinephrine-containing lidocaine (group 2) was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of PB (Odds ratio = 0.017). Meanwhile, use of prilocaine (group 1) had 59.7 times higher odds in the likelihood of PB after THC placement. Lower rate of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in group 2 patients after 5 minutes of injections was also noted, P = 0.008. Epinephrine-containing lidocaine was well tolerated and caused no significant cardiovascular disturbance. Local infiltration of epinephrine-containing lidocaine instead of plain local anesthetics during THC insertion may reduce superficial PB and improve patient comfort.

Surgical technique of placement of an external jugular tunneled hemodialysis catheter in a large pig model.

Currently, there is insufficient knowledge about the surgical anatomy and surgical techniques in large animals that can be used to test medical devices designed for human use. We encountered this problem in our study requiring the placement of jugular vein, tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheter in 70 kg pigs. Despite the operator's extensive expertise in placing tunneled hemodialysis catheters in humans, the important differences in anatomy made the procedure and choosing the appropriate catheter length challenging. The following article describes the anatomy and our technique for the placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheter in the pig model. We consider our surgical technique to be sound because in all animals the catheters were placed in the desired location, the procedures were well tolerated by the animals, and there were no immediate or late complications. We present our experience to help other researchers who might encounter the same problem.

Placement of tunnelled hemodialysis catheters across stenotic and occluded central veins.

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with occluded or stenotic central veins. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Data were prospectively collected for 26 patients (11 male, 15 female, mean age 52 years) referred for placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters with central venous stenoses or occlusions. The central venous occlusions or stenoses were recanalized using traditional interventional catheter and guidewire techniques.<br />RESULTS. Thirty central venous access procedures were performed of which 28 (93%) procedures resulted in successful tunneled catheter insertion. Twenty-one internal jugular venous (13 right, 8 left) and 7 subclavian venous (3 right, 4 left) catheters were placed. Eighteen stenotic and 10 occluded venous segments were crossed including the brachiocephalic vein (n = 22), subclavian vein (n = 2), and the superior vena cava (4). One patient required insertion of a metallic stent to facilitate passage of the hemodialysis catheter across an occluded brachiocephalic vein. No procedure-related complications occurred. No episodes of upper extremity swelling or superior vena cava syndrome occurred following catheter insertion.<br />CONCLUSIONS. Insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheter across occluded or stenotic central veins is technically feasible and safe. The use of occluded or stenotic central veins for catheter access preserves patent central veins for future shunt access.

Association Between Allergies and Psychiatric Disorders in Patients Undergoing Invasive Procedures

Associations between allergies and psychiatric disorders have been reported in the context of depression and suicide; psychiatric disorders may affect pain perception. To investigate the relationship of allergies with psychiatric disorders and pain perception in the context of invasive procedures, specifically during tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement. We identified 89 patients (51 men, 38 women), mean age 66 years (range: 23-96), who underwent tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement (1/2014-2/2015), recording numeric rating scale pain scores, medications, psychiatric history, allergies, and smoking status. Of 89 patients, 47 patients had no allergies, and 42 had ≥1 allergy. Patients with allergies were more likely to have a pre-existing psychiatric disorder compared to those without allergies, odds ratio 2.6 (95% CI: 1.0-6.8). Having allergies did not affect procedural sedation or postprocedural pain scores. Multiple logistic regression with age, sex, smoking, presence of allergies, psychiatric history, inpatient/outpatient status, procedure time, and procedural sedation administration as inputs and postprocedural pain as the outcome showed that the only independent predictor was receiving procedural sedation (P = 0.005). Findings corroborate anecdotal reports of allergies as a marker for psychiatric history. However, having allergies was not associated with increased pain or need for more sedation. Further studies could prospectively assess whether allergies and psychiatric disorders affect patient/doctor perceptions beyond pain during invasive procedures.

PC134. Incidence of Central Venous Stenosis and Other Adverse Outcomes Related to Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters During Maturation of Autogenous Arteriovenous Fistulas

PC134. Incidence of Central Venous Stenosis and Other Adverse Outcomes Related to Placement of Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters During Maturation of Autogenous Arteriovenous Fistulas

Use of an ECG-based confirmatory technique for bedside placement of reverse-tunneled cuffed dialysis catheters in three morbidly obese patients

We are currently in the midst of a worldwide obesity epidemic, including in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Placing hemodialysis catheters is a particular challenge in patients with extreme obesity. Here we describe the merging of two technologies to place catheters in patients who are too heavy (over 225 kg) to be placed safely on a procedure table for fluoroscopic guidance. The first technology is ECG-guided placement of catheters, well established for guidance of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and tunneled and nontunneled central venous catheters. The second is reverse-tunneling dialysis catheters, which allow precise placement of the tip of the catheter before creating the tunnel. We successfully placed catheters in three morbidly obese patients with acute kidney injury and followed them until their kidneys recovered and the catheters were removed. The catheters were placed in the patient's bed in a procedure room with subsequent confirmatory chest radiographs. Catheter performance based on blood flow rates was excellent and there were no complications. We suggest placement of ECG-guided tunneled hemodialysis catheters using a reversed-tunneling technique in those patients with extreme obesity who are too heavy to place on a fluoroscopy procedure table.

Catheter tip malposition after percutaneous placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters.

The percutaneous catheterization of central veins is increasingly used in nephrological practice as a temporary or permanent vascular access. The aim of our study was to present and to analyze episodes of catheter tip malposition during percutaneous tunneled hemodialysis catheter insertion in the large, unselected group of patients. All patients who underwent the procedure of catheter insertion in our department during year 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. One hundred four tunneled hemodialysis catheters were inserted in 101 patients. In 58 patients, the catheter was inserted at the initiation of hemodialysis therapy as the first access and in 46 the catheter was placed because of the failure of the existing one. In 68 patients, the catheter was inserted into the right internal jugular vein and in 20 patients into the left internal jugular vein (LIJV). Subclavian veins were used in five cases and femoral veins in 11 cases. Malposition of the catheter tips occurred in six patients. In all cases, the LIJV was cannulated. In two cases, the catheter tip malposition was in the right innominate vein and in four cases in the azygos vein. Our data demonstrate that with the blind insertion of tunneled hemodialysis catheters, the risk of catheter tip malposition is significantly higher with the left side insertion. As catheter insertion through the LIJV holds very high (30%) risk of the tip malposition, it should always be performed under the fluoroscopic control.