This research systematically compares the science curricula of primary education in Greece and Serbia, aiming to identify key similarities and differences that impact educational outcomes in each context. The study provides a nuanced understanding of these educational landscapes by examining the frameworks for teaching science and revealing how national policies, pedagogical approaches, and cultural contexts influence curriculum development in both nations. The study looks at a number of topics, including curriculum content, instructional strategies, evaluation methods, and general educational goals that are common in every country's educational system. The study emphasizes the historical pedagogy that has shaped these educational systems and each nation's particular difficulties over the years, including sociopolitical elements that have impacted educational reforms, such as wars and regime changes. Additionally, the study supports PISA results, which highlight the value of encouraging students to apply their knowledge to real-world situations and cultivating the critical thinking and social awareness necessary for active citizenship. The study also considers historical events when designing curricula, showing how educational frameworks are connected to particular historical contexts and how these influences impact pedagogical approaches and content. Finally, by highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each system and promoting the discussion of curriculum innovation in a quickly changing global education environment, this comparative analysis provides insightful information for possible educational reforms that could help both nations.
Read full abstract