Abstract Given the multi-objective nature and inherent uncertainty in evaluating ore pillar mining schemes, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy method were applied to determine factor weights. A new combined weighting method was proposed to obtain more objective and accurate results. Seven quantitative and four qualitative indicators were selected based on various mining performance factors and grading standards. A combined weighting–uncertainty measurement theory evaluation model was then constructed, integrating weight values and confidence levels from the recognition criteria. This model was applied to evaluate three proposed schemes, determining their relative merits and ranking. The evaluation demonstrated that the combined weighting–uncertainty measurement model outperformed both the fuzzy theory and the TOPSIS method in delivering comprehensive, objectivity and reliable results for assessing ore pillar mining schemes.
Read full abstract