A new sedment trap system intended for use in lakes and marine coastal and shelf areas is presented. The system is designed to (1) keep the sediment collection tubes in a steady vertical position, (2) avoid contamination of the samples by material detached from overhead rigging, (3) fachtate quick exchange of collection tubes at sea, and (4) provide duplicate samples. In situ experimental s tudes , SCUBA v T: trap retaining line; G : ground line; S: surface line. Line T is always taut whereas G and S are usually slack. ICT: inset collection tube; BB: buoyant body; F: frame; AS: attachment swivel. Dimensions of hollow frame: outer length 110 cm, outer width 30 cm, outer diameter of the tubes 5 cm, wall thickness 0.4 cm and marine coastal and shelf areas. Similar mooring arrangements are used to deploy current sensors (cf. Duxbury 1971). Study location and field test. The new sediment trap was tested in the Baltic Sea, near the Ask6 Laboratory about 65 km south of Stockholm, Sweden, in an archipelago area with negligible tide. The main test was carried out at 1.5 m depth in a narrow, 3.5 m deep sound, with relatively turbulent currents of up to 40 cm S-' . The degree of vertical stability of the collection tubes was recorded in situ by time-lapse filming. An 8 mm film camera was enclosed in a waterproof housing and mounted at the bottom of one of the collection tubes; the other tube was counterbalanced with gravel. The inner diameter of the tubes had to be 150 mm, to allow space for the camera. The entire trap was therefore scaled up according to the difference between the tubes in this test trap and the regular trap described above. At the top of the camera tube, 2 independent protractors were mounted, and readings recorded on film every 30 S. One protractor acted as a pendulum, recorhng the deviation from the vefical of the tube, the other was connected to an outside arm in order to give a relative reading of the current velocity. To relate the relative readings to actual current velocities a current meter was deployed close to the trap, integrating current velocities over 10 S. Readings were taken at intervals of 1 to 5 min. These current measurements were correlated to the corresponding protractor readings recorded on the film, using non-linear regression by SAS software (Allen Rey 1982). The regression equation (protractor reading = 0.203 current vel o ~ i t ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ , n = 26) was then used to estimate water currents every 30 S. Results. Despite highly variable water currents (5 to 40 cm S-') the collection tube of the new sediment trap Fig. 2. Predicted ambient water current velocities (above) and simultaneous recording, by time-lapse filming in situ. of the inclination from vertical of the collection tube of the EXPOSURE TIME (min) sediment trap (below) Larsson et al.: New sediment trap system 207 never deviated more than + 2.5 from a true vertical position (Fig. 2). Observations by water glass confirmed that the trap does not wobble and invariably maintains an alignment perpendicular to the current direction. In situ inspections of the regular trap by SCUBA diving at water depths down to 12 m in a coastal area support these observations. Not even when the diver rocked the trap frame did the collection tubes deviate noticeably from the vertical. Concluding remarks. The new sediment trap rnaintains satisfactory stabdity of the collection tubes and an alignment perpendicular to the current direction at highly variable current velocities (up to at least 40cm S-'). The buoyancy of the trap permits a noninterfering mooring arrangement. The new trap has functioned reliably for more than 4 yr in a coastal area of the Baltic Sea. Acknowledgements. Ragnar Elmgren and Jiirg Bloesch commented on the manuscript, Sture Hansson assisted in the divmg, Leif Lundgren drew the figures and Maureen Moir typed and corrected the language. This work was supported by the National Swedish Environment Protection Board and the Swedish Natural Science Research Council.
Read full abstract