Physician Attitudes Research Articles

164 Characterization of Market Movements and Private Equity in Neurosurgery Practices and Hospitals

INTRODUCTION: Surgical services could be faced with shifts in corporate management, restructuring, and incentives as trends such as private equity (PE) investment in healthcare continue to evolve. The number of surgical services acquired by PE firms has increased significantly over the last 20 years. Due to financial vulnerability and movement towards digital health, PE activity within healthcare has further grownsince the COVID pandemic. METHODS: PitchBook and Mergermarket were used to query deals involving neurosurgical practice within the United States at any time. Exclusion criteria consisted of non-neurosurgery practices and debt restructuring deals without a change in ownership. The company name, deal type, financing year, and state were extracted for each deal. Deal type was stratified by the following categories: angel investment, mergers and acquisitions, private equity and venture capital (PE/VC), and corporate buyout. Internal debt refinancing such as leveraged recapitalization was excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 125 companies were discovered in the initial search. After further review, 63 companies were included in final analysis. The deals occurred between 1994 to 2022 and involved companies in 27 different states. Of the 63 companies, 36 (57.1%) involved mergers or acquisitions, 16 (25.4%) involved private equity or venture capital firms, 7 (11.1%) involved corporate buyouts, and 4 (6.3%) involved angel investments. CONCLUSIONS: PE is increasingly involved with neurosurgery practices, with an associated decline in mergers and acquisitions. Future qualitative investigation is required to help characterize physician attitudes of PE-run practices in comparison to non-PE practices.

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Study of Physician Attitudes and Perceptions in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is rapidly advancing, reshaping diagnostic, prognostic, and operational tasks in healthcare institutions. The adoption of AI among physicians is varied, with concerns over job loss, medical errors, and lack of emotional intelligence. This study aimed to assess physicians' attitudes and perceptions toward AI in clinical practice in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and the factors affecting these attitudes and perceptions. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians at two major hospitals in Jeddah. An in-person digital survey consisted of questions regarding demographic characteristics, attitudes toward clinical AI, and perceptions of AI's impact on healthcare. Results Of the 205 participants, 76% agreed on the accuracy of AI systems, and 60% acknowledged their efficiency as a factor that could influence their willingness to use clinical AI. However, only 25.9% reported using these systems in the past year, with the majority, 74.1%, indicating they had never used them. Notably, there was a significant association between gender and attitude toward AI, with males being more likely to have a positive attitude (p = 0.01). Conclusions While the majority of participants recognized the potential benefits of AI in healthcare, its actual utilization was low. The findings suggest the need for increased AI-related training and education among physicians and the fostering of collaboration between computer scientists, engineers, and medical professionals to accelerate the development of clinically relevant AI tools.

Prescribing Justice: A Close Examination of Physicians Acting As Expert Witnesses in Saudi Arabia.

An expert witness is a person who provides testimony on issues that the court finds to be outside the scope of their expertise and experience. Any physician who has performed an independent medical evaluation or written medical records can and should expect to be requested as an expert witness. Medical malpractice, workers' compensation, and personal injury are the most prominent areas where medical expert witnesses participate and provide opinions and testimony. To our knowledge, this is the first study to be conducted in Saudi Arabia on physicians acting as expert witnesses. This observational descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in Saudi Arabia from November 2022 to July 2023 aimed to assess physicians' experiences, education, training, willingness, self-competency, attitude, and perception as expert witnesses. The study population consisted of physicians working in Saudi Arabia, with at least a specialist level of professional expertise. Participants completed a self-administered online survey, utilizing a researcher-designed questionnaire. In total, 417 participants, with males comprising 51.3% of the sample, responded to the survey. More than half of the physicians (58.3%) had never produced a medical report for the court. Among those who had, the majority had done so one to twice. Similarly, the majority had never testified in court (77.5%), with only a small percentage having done so once or twice. Approximately 80% of participants had no prior education or training as expert witnesses, but among those who did, courses and workshops were the most common forms of education or training. Most participants expressed interest in learning or training for this role (69.1%) and were willing to provide medical reports or court testimony (73.9%). However, half of the participants did not feel competent in writing a medical report for the court, and more than half lacked confidence in giving testimony. The findings highlight the need for increased engagement, education, and training among physicians, particularly early and mid-career professionals, to enhance their confidence and competence as expert witnesses and ensure ethical practices in the medicolegal domain in Saudi Arabia.

Physician perceptions, attitudes, and strategies towards implementing guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. A survey of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC and the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice.

Recent guidelines recommend four core drug classes (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [RASi/ARNi], beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA], and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor [SGLT2i]) for the pharmacological management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We assessed physicians' perceived (i) comfort with implementing the recent HFrEF guideline recommendations; (ii) status of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) implementation; (iii) use of different GDMT sequencing strategies; and (iv) barriers and strategies for achieving implementation. A 26-question survey was disseminated via bulletin, e-mail and social channels directed to physicians with an interest in HF. Of 432 respondents representing 91 countries, 36% were female, 52% were aged <50 years, and 90% mainly practiced in cardiology (30% HF). Overall comfort with implementing quadruple therapy was high (87%). Only 12% estimated that >90% of patients with HFrEF without contraindications received quadruple therapy. The time required to initiate quadruple therapy was estimated at 1-2 weeks by 34% of respondents, 1 month by 36%, 3 months by 24%, and ≥6 months by 6%. The average respondent favoured traditional drug sequencing strategies (RASi/ARNi with/followed by beta-blocker, and then MRA with/followed by SGLT2i) over simultaneous initiation or SGLT2i-first sequences. The most frequently perceived clinical barriers to implementation were hypotension (70%), creatinine increase (47%), hyperkalaemia (45%) and patient adherence (42%). Although comfort with implementing all four core drug classes in patients with HFrEF was high among physicians, a majority estimated implementation of GDMT in HFrEF to be low. We identified several important perceived clinical and non-clinical barriers that can be targeted to improve implementation.

Sleep disorders, stress coping strategies and neurobehavioral aspects: an outlook on the impact of covid‑19 in first‑year resident physicians.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the physical and mental health of healthcare professionals. The present study explored the relationship between sleep disorders, stress, coping strategies and neurobehavioral aspects among young physicians during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a multi-assessment approach, this cross-sectional study collected sociodemographic and occupational data from first-year resident doctors in southern Italy. Subjective sleep quality, chronotype, work-related stress, coping approach and mood state were assessed by administering validated questionnaires during face-to-face interviews. Among the 258 resident physicians enrolled in the study, ~25% complained of poor sleep quality, mainly male subjects [odds ratio (OR), 2.52]. Alcohol consumption resulted as a risk factor for poor sleep quality (OR, 1.97). None of the participants reported work-related stress showing, on the contrary, a high score for the vigor factor in the profile of mood state, in particular in subjects with previous working experience with COVID patients and prevention (P<0.040 and P<0.035, respectively). Women were more likely to adopt coping strategies that involved the search for social support, confirming their tendency to manage stressful situations through emotion-focused mechanisms. The set of these results represents a sight on the attitude of young physicians in their approach to facing the COVID-19 pandemic, in its second wave. The pandemic has turned the spotlight on the importance of prevention and early diagnosis of physical health and mental well-being. Further studies are performed to monitor long-term consequences on health status.

Early Psychosis Intervention and Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Study of Family Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, Preferences, and Needs.

Family physicians (FPs) play an important but underappreciated role in the pathways to care for people with early psychosis. We conducted a mixed-methods study to describe the knowledge, attitudes, preferences, and needs of FPs towards the recognition and management of early psychosis. We sent a cross-sectional postal survey to a random sample of FPs in Ontario, Canada, and conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with twenty. FPs were generally aware of important early psychosis symptoms, however, there were some knowledge gaps. Among surveyed FPs, 25% were unsure of the availability of early psychosis intervention services in their region, and most (80%) would prefer to co-manage with specialists. In the qualitative interviews, FPs expressed varied comfort levels in recognizing psychosis, and that timely access to psychiatry was a main concern. Our findings suggest that FPs require better support in recognizing and managing early psychosis and facilitating connections with specialized care.

Care of patients undergoing withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments: an ICU nurse perspective

BackgroundIntensive care unit (ICU) nurses working in South Korea report experiencing uncertainty about how to care for patients undergoing withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments (WLT). A lack of consensus on care guidelines for patients with WLT contributes to uncertainty, ambiguity, and confusion on how to act appropriately within current law and social and ethical norms. To date, little has been discussed or described about how ICU nurses construct meaning about their roles in caring for dying patients in the context of wider social issues about end-of-life care and how this meaning interacts with the ICU system structure and national law. We aimed to better understand how ICU nurses view themselves professionally and how their perceived roles are enabled and/or limited by the current healthcare system in South Korea and by social and ethical norms.MethodsThis qualitative descriptive study was conducted using in-depth, semi-structured interviews and discourse analysis using Gee’s Tools of Inquiry. Purposive sampling was used to recruit ICU nurses (n = 20) who could provide the most insightful information on caring for patients undergoing WLT in the ICU. The interviews were conducted between December 2021 and February 2022 in three university hospitals in South Korea.ResultsWe identified four categories of discourses: (1) both “left hanging" or feeling abandoned ICU nurses and patients undergoing WLT; (2) socially underdeveloped conversations about death and dying management; (3) attitudes of legal guardians and physicians toward the dying process of patients with WLT; and (4) provision of end-of-life care according to individual nurses’ beliefs in their nursing values.ConclusionICU nurses reported having feelings of ambiguity and confusion about their professional roles and identities in caring for dying patients undergoing WLT. This uncertainty may limit their positive contributions to a dignified dying process. We suggest that one way to move forward is for ICU administrators and physicians to respond more sensitively to ICU nurses’ discourses. Additionally, social policy and healthcare system leaders should focus on issues that enable and limit the dignified end-of-life processes of patients undergoing WLT. Doing so may improve nurses’ understanding of their professional roles and identities as caretakers for dying patients.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward herpes zoster (HZ) and HZ vaccination: Concept elicitation findings from a multi-country study in the Asia Pacific

ABSTRACT Herpes zoster (HZ) is a prevalent disease characterized by a painful rash. A multi‑country study was conducted to elicit public and physician knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward HZ disease and vaccination for the assessment of local factors influencing HZ vaccine perceptions in four Asian-Pacific countries/territories One-to-one qualitative interviews were conducted in 2022, among the public (people aged ≥ 50 years, adults with parents aged ≥ 50 years, zoster vaccine live-vaccinated individuals aged ≥ 50 years in Republic of Korea, and HZ patients; n = 78) and physicians (general practitioners and specialists; n = 24). Themes surrounding KAP toward HZ and HZ vaccination were summarized using a thematic analysis. A substantial knowledge gap related to HZ was observed among the public, including its causes, long-term impacts, and the at-risk population. There was a low perceived risk of HZ and low general awareness of HZ vaccine availability, although country/territory-specific differences existed. Fear of HZ-associated pain contributed toward vaccination intent among HZ patients and adults with parents aged ≥ 50 years. HZ-naïve adults who were encouraged to receive the vaccine by others were not motivated to do so due to optimism bias. Physicians were perceived to be a reliable source of information. However, physicians did not always proactively discuss HZ vaccination due to time constraints and a perceived need to prioritize other vaccinations including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Initiatives are needed to improve public awareness of HZ and its complications, in terms of overall impact on individuals and society, and highlight the important role of physicians in recommending vaccination.

Critical care nurses’ experiences of caring challenges during post-resuscitation period: a qualitative content analysis

BackgroundPatients in the post-resuscitation period experience critical conditions and require high-quality care. Identifying the challenges that critical care nurses encounter when caring for resuscitated patients is essential for improving the quality of their care.AimThis study aimed to identify the challenges encountered by critical care nurses in providing care during the post-resuscitation period.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Sixteen nurses working in the intensive care units of three teaching hospitals were selected through purposive sampling. The Data collected were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.ResultsParticipants experienced individual, interpersonal, and organizational challenges when providing post-resuscitation care. The most significant challenges include inadequate clinical knowledge and experience, poor management and communication skills, lack of support from nurse managers, role ambiguity, risk of violence, and inappropriate attitudes of physicians towards nurses’ roles. Additionally, nurses expressed a negative attitude towards resuscitated patients.ConclusionCritical care nurses face several challenges in providing care for resuscitated patients. To enhance the quality of post-resuscitation care, address the challenges effectively and improve long-time survival it is crucial to implement interventions such as In-service education, post-resuscitation briefing, promotion of interprofessional collaboration among healthcare teams, providing sufficient human resources, clarifying nurses’ roles in the post-resuscitation period and increasing support from nursing managers.

Harnessing the Power of Generative AI for Clinical Summaries: Perspectives From Emergency Physicians

ImportanceThe workload of clinical documentation contributes to healthcare costs and professional burnout. The advent of generative AI language models presents a promising solution. The perspective of clinicians may contribute to effective and responsible implementation of such tools. ObjectiveTo evaluate 3 uses for generative AI for clinical documentation in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM), measuring time savings, effort reduction, physician attitudes, and identifying potential risks and barriers. DesignA mixed-methods study. SettingSingle Pediatric Emergency Department. Participants10 PEM attending physicians. InterventionParticipants were asked to write a supervisory note for four clinical scenarios, with varying level of complexity, twice without any assistance and twice with the assistance of ChatGPT Version 4.0. Participants evaluated two additional ChatGPT-generated clinical summaries: a structured handoff and a visit summary for a family, written at an 8th grade reading level. Finally, a semi-structured interview was performed to assess physicians’ perspective on the use of ChatGPT in PEM. Main Outcomes and MeasuresBetween subjects’ comparison of the effort and time taken to complete the supervisory note with and without ChatGPT assistance. Effort was measured using a self-reported Likert scale of 0-10. Physicians’ scoring of and attitude toward the ChatGPT-generated summaries was measured using a 0-10 Likert scale and open-ended questions. Summaries were scored for completeness, accuracy, efficiency, readability, and overall satisfaction. A thematic analysis was performed to analyze the content of the open-ended questions and to identify key themes. ResultsChatGPT yielded a 40% reduction in time and a 33% decrease in effort for supervisory notes in intricate cases, with no discernible impact on simpler ones. ChatGPT-generated summaries for structured handoffs and family-letters were highly rated, ranging from 7.0 to 9.0 out of 10, and most participants favored their inclusion in clinical practice. However, there were several critical reservations, out of which a set of general recommendations for applying ChatGPT to clinical summaries was formulated. ConclusionsPEM attendings in our study perceived that ChatGPT can deliver high-quality summaries while saving time and effort in many scenarios, but not all.

Provider Perceptions of an Electronic Health Record Prostate Cancer Screening Tool.

We conducted a focus group to assess the attitudes of primary care physicians (PCPs) toward prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-screening algorithms, perceptions of using decision support tools, and features that would make such tools feasible to implement. A multidisciplinary team (primary care, urology, behavioral sciences, bioinformatics) developed the decision support tool that was presented to a focus group of 10 PCPs who also filled out a survey. Notes and audio-recorded transcripts were analyzed using Thematic Content Analysis. The survey showed that PCPs followed different guidelines. In total, 7/10 PCPs agreed that engaging in shared decision-making about PSA screening was burdensome. The majority (9/10) had never used a decision aid for PSA screening. Although 70% of PCPs felt confident about their ability to discuss PSA screening, 90% still felt a need for a provider-facing platform to assist in these discussions. Three major themes emerged: (1) confirmatory reactions regarding the importance, innovation, and unmet need for a decision support tool embedded in the electronic health record; (2) issues around implementation and application of the tool in clinic workflow and PCPs' own clinical bias; and (3) attitudes/reflections regarding discrepant recommendations from various guideline groups that cause confusion. There was overwhelmingly positive support for the need for a provider-facing decision support tool to assist with PSA-screening decisions in the primary care setting. PCPs appreciated that the tool would allow flexibility for clinical judgment and documentation of shared decision-making. Incorporation of suggestions from this focus group into a second version of the tool will be used in subsequent pilot testing.

United States Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Meningococcal Vaccination for Healthy Adolescents and Young Adults

PurposeThe United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends vaccination against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY) for all 11–12-year-olds, with a booster dose for 16-year-olds, and against meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) for 16–23-year-olds under shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). However, uptake of the MenB vaccine and the MenACWY booster dose is low. This study investigated United States physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding recommending MenB and MenACWY vaccines to non-high-risk older adolescents and young adults. MethodsAn online survey was conducted in April–May 2022 among pediatricians, family physicians (FPs), general practitioners (GPs), and internists who had recommended the MenB and/or the MenACWY vaccine(s) to at least one 16–23-year-old in the past year. ResultsAmong 407 participants, 50% correctly identified MenB as the leading cause of meningococcal disease among adolescents and young adults. Furthermore, 46% of physicians (47% of pediatricians, 40% of FPs and GPs, 53% of internists) answered correctly that MenB vaccination is recommended under SCDM, and 82% of physicians (96% of pediatricians, 70% of FPs and GPs, 65% of internists) answered correctly that MenACWY vaccination is routinely recommended. Among MenB-vaccinators, 78% reported having received some training or other information on implementing SCDM, and 65% rated recommending MenB vaccination as very important. DiscussionKnowledge gaps, which varied by specialty, were identified regarding meningococcal disease and vaccine recommendations, particularly regarding MenB. Targeted education of physicians may facilitate discussions about MenB vaccination.

Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes of Physicians and Pharmacists on Probiotics: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Probiotics have been gaining increased attention from the public recently, which originates concerns about their rationale use among healthcare professionals. Although there is evidence on the efficacy and safety of probiotics in certain gastrointestinal disorders, it is important to identify healthcare professionals' opinions on probiotics. This study aimed to identify the opinions of pharmacists and physicians on the use of probiotics. This cross-sectional study was conducted between November, 2017 and August, 2018 among pharmacists and physicians practicing in Ankara, Türkiye. An electronic survey was designed and sent to the participants via e-mail. A total of 361 pharmacists (74.5% female) and 356 physicians (42.4% female) participated in the study. Approximately two-thirds of pharmacists and physicians were familiar with the mechanism of action and indications of probiotics. Most pharmacists and physicians recommended probiotics to be used in gastrointestinal system disorders (99.7% and 97.7%). Other areas that probiotics are commonly recommended was genitourinary system (29.3%) by pharmacists and dermatological symptoms (15.1%) by phycisians, respectively. Considering patient advice regarding the probiotics, pharmacists (63.3%) seemed to receive more requests compared to physicians (30.9%); and with regard to the probiotic recommendation, 70.7% and 38.2% of pharmacists and physicians, respectively, indicated that they have no concerns, but 61% of physicians have concerns on reimbursement policy when prescribing. Pharmacists and physicians are healthcare providers commonly asked about probiotics by patients. Therefore, it is important to address healthcare professionals' concerns and increase their knowledge of the use of probiotics for different health conditions. Given that probiotic products can be purchased without a prescription, healthcare professionals in primary care settings should be more vigilant about the rational use of probiotics.

KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDE OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PHYSICIANS REGARDINGOBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA IN TABUK CITY

Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common type of sleep disorder breathing and is characterized by repeated brief episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep for more than 10 seconds. It is a growing public health challenge with most of the cases remaining unidentified. The study aims to evaluate the general knowledge and attitude of primary health care physicians toward OSA in Tabuk city, Saudi Arabia during 2023. It is a cross-sectional study. The estimated sample size is based on comprehensive data collection in which all primary healthcare physicians are invited to participate in our research. The validated Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitudes Questionnaire (OSAKA)was used. The data analysis was done by using SPSS for Windows version 21and GrpahPadPrism version 8.4.2. The level of significance is 0.05.The present study found that 65.7% of the participants (N=94) had good knowledge regarding OSA. The majority of participants had a positive attitude towards OSA. Additionally, results showed gender, nationality, and years of graduation had an association with knowledge regarding OSA (p=0.043, 0.047, 0.03 respectively). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between knowledge and attitude (Spearmans rho = 0.29, p = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that females have good knowledge as compared to males (p=0.047*).

Navigating the doctor-patient-AI relationship - a mixed-methods study of physician attitudes toward artificial intelligence in primary care

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly advancing field that is beginning to enter the practice of medicine. Primary care is a cornerstone of medicine and deals with challenges such as physician shortage and burnout which impact patient care. AI and its application via digital health is increasingly presented as a possible solution. However, there is a scarcity of research focusing on primary care physician (PCP) attitudes toward AI. This study examines PCP views on AI in primary care. We explore its potential impact on topics pertinent to primary care such as the doctor-patient relationship and clinical workflow. By doing so, we aim to inform primary care stakeholders to encourage successful, equitable uptake of future AI tools. Our study is the first to our knowledge to explore PCP attitudes using specific primary care AI use cases rather than discussing AI in medicine in general terms.MethodsFrom June to August 2023, we conducted a survey among 47 primary care physicians affiliated with a large academic health system in Southern California. The survey quantified attitudes toward AI in general as well as concerning two specific AI use cases. Additionally, we conducted interviews with 15 survey respondents.ResultsOur findings suggest that PCPs have largely positive views of AI. However, attitudes often hinged on the context of adoption. While some concerns reported by PCPs regarding AI in primary care focused on technology (accuracy, safety, bias), many focused on people-and-process factors (workflow, equity, reimbursement, doctor-patient relationship).ConclusionOur study offers nuanced insights into PCP attitudes towards AI in primary care and highlights the need for primary care stakeholder alignment on key issues raised by PCPs. AI initiatives that fail to address both the technological and people-and-process concerns raised by PCPs may struggle to make an impact.

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Physicians Towards Yoga: A Self Determination Theory Approach

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Physicians Towards Yoga: A Self Determination Theory Approach

Sichtweisen einer Stichprobe überwiegend jüngerer Ärztinnen und Ärzte zum ärztlich-assistierten Suizid

ZusammenfassungHintergrundAm 26.02.2020 hat das Bundesverfassungsgericht den § 217 StGB, der die geschäftsmäßige Förderung der Selbsttötung unter Strafe stellte, für nichtig erklärt. Seitdem wird eine mögliche gesetzliche Neuregelung diskutiert. Ziel dieser Studie war es, Wissen, Erfahrungen und Einstellungen jüngerer Ärztinnen und Ärzte zur Suizidassistenz zu untersuchen.MethodenVon November 2022 bis März 2023 wurde eine quantitative Umfrage in Fortbildungskursen zur Notfallmedizin, Intensivmedizin und Hämatologie durchgeführt und deskriptiv ausgewertet.ErgebnisseInsgesamt wurden 1163 Datensätze (Rücklaufquote 82,1 %) ausgewertet. 90,8 % der Befragten hatten bereits Sterbende betreut. 62,3 % befürworteten eine Suizidassistenz nur bei Menschen in palliativen Behandlungssituationen, 20,1 % befürworteten Suizidassistenz unabhängig vom Gesundheitszustand des Menschen. 33,1 % wurden bereits um Suizidassistenz gebeten. 3,3 % hatten persönlich bei einer Suizidassistenz mitgewirkt. 71,0 % kannten den Inhalt des Bundesverfassungsgerichtsurteils zum § 217 nicht, 72,0 % waren über die Gesetzesvorschläge zur Neuregelung des assistierten Suizids nicht informiert. 66,4 % sahen Ärztinnen und Ärzte als die richtigen Ansprechpartner, um über die Zulässigkeit eines Suizidwunsches zu entscheiden.DiskussionDie Untersuchung zeigt, dass jüngere Ärztinnen und Ärzte einen deutlichen Unterschied in ihrer Haltung zur Suizidassistenz zwischen Menschen ohne Vorerkrankungen und solchen in palliativen Behandlungssituationen machen. Weitere Untersuchungen über die Ursachen der häufigen Unkenntnis der normativen Grundlagen sind notwendig. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass mehr Aufklärungsarbeit über Suizidalternativen und palliativmedizinische Versorgungsmöglichkeiten geleistet werden muss.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of physicians towards familial hypercholesterolaemia in north regions of Saudi Arabia.

To assess knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians regarding familial hypercholesterolaemia. The cross-sectional study was conducted from October to December 2022 in Aljouf, Tabouk, Hail and northern border regions of Saudi Arabia after approval from the ethics review committee of Qurayyat Health Affairs. Those included were physicians specialising in familial hypercholesterolaemia and having experience in family medicine, endocrinology, paediatrics, cardiology, internal medicine and obstetrics and gynaecology. Their knowledge, attitude and practice were assessed using a predesigned questionnaire. Data were analysed using SPSS 20. Of the 430 subjects, 220(51.2%) were males, 89(20.7%) were aged 36-40 years, 169(39.3%) were residents, and 146(34%) had experience >15 years. Overall, 270(62.8%), 286(66.5%) and 287(66.7%) subjects did not know about the clinical diagnostic algorithms of Simon Broom, Dutch Lipid Clinic Network and United States MedPed programme investigated criteria, respectively. There were, 149(34.7%) subjects with high awareness level, and the level of awareness was significantly affected by gender, level of training, medical specialty, and familiarity with familial hypercholesteremia (p<0.05). There were 343(79.8%) subjects who said they had never diagnosed familial hypercholesterolaemia. There were knowledge gaps, low awareness, and inappropriate practices related to familial hypercholesterolemia, indicating the need for targetted programmes.

Retraction notice: Measuring the knowledge and attitudes of physicians towards patients with HIV/AIDS: study of Anatolian group

Retraction notice: Measuring the knowledge and attitudes of physicians towards patients with HIV/AIDS: study of Anatolian group

Physicians' attitudes and confidence toward dementia care: A cross-sectional study at primary healthcare facilities in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Primary care physicians play an essential role in the health of older adults as they are frequently the first point of contact. Their positive attitude and knowledge influence the quality of care provided to patients with dementia and their caregivers. This study examined the attitudes of primary care physicians towards dementia care and their confidence in their own dementia-care skills. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 316 primary care physicians working in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that included questions related to demographic characteristics, Dementia Care Attitude Scale (DCAS) to assess attitudes towards dementia, and Confidence in Dementia Care Skills (CDCS) Scale to measure confidence. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29; mean and standard deviation (SD) were computed for continuous and categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Mann Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis test were used to compare attitude and confidence scores by categorical variables. The mean DCAS score was 36.4 ± 5.41 out of 50. On a scale ranging from 15 to 75, the mean CDCS was 51.89 ± 10.20. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) relation was found between confidence and professional rank, knowing close relatives with dementia, and number of dementia and elderly patients treated. Overall, 78.9% of physicians lacked confidence to prescribe memory medications; 32% felt that dementia management was generally more frustrating than rewarding. Primary care physicians had a positive attitude toward caring for patients with dementia. However, they lacked confidence in their dementia care skills in several areas. The confidence in their diagnostic skills was higher than their management skills. Most challenging skills were recognizing and managing behavioral symptoms of dementia. Need to develop educational and training interventions that target healthcare providers to help improving dementia care in primary care settings.