This paper is an attempt to analyze meaning of basic concepts of stratigraphy. It is, by its very nature, personal and subjective interpretation, even if throughout whole essay deliberate effort has been made to maintain an objective and unbiased attitude and rigorous and exacting method in analysis of somewhat complex problems involved. The first part of essay deals with concepts of stratigraphy, space, locality, material things, formations, time, events, simultaneity, and succession. This part lays down basis, and states premises, on which second part of essay is built up by simple process of deductive reasoning. The fundamental premises set forth are: (1) stratigraphy is the study of shape, dimensions, and spatial relations of of and of space-time relations of which of represent; (2) bodies of rock or formations are purely three-dimensional material things divorced from idea of time; (3) means both date and duration, first concept being fundamental one, as second concept can be expressed n terms of first one, whereas reverse is not true; (4) is system of imaginary infinitesimal world-wide instants in space-time continuum, constituting kind of frame in which we locate of external world; (5) of geology are happenings in external world; (6) there are two kinds of events: instantaneous and (7) bodies of rock, though purely material things, are record of past lithogenetic flow and (8) time relationships between lithogenetic flow can be classed as simultaneous, partly simultaneous, successive, or subsequent. The second part of essay deals essentially with concepts of correlation, time-table, key-events, relationship between stratigraphy and zones, stages, time-rock units, and time-units. A strict deductive reasoning, based on premises set forth in first part of essay, leads me to conclude that (1) means the establishment of temporal relations between and that this can only be achieved indirectly, by means of linking connecting unrelated events; (2) geological is tabular statement of chronological order in which took place; (3) key-events of time-table are and (4) we can correlate se imentary flow represented by of rocks with unrelated paleontological of time-table only by means of linking event: fossil content of of rock. This leads naturally to regard zones as events of historical paleontology, and to define as the life-range of or of group of associated species, and to accept Oppel's definition of as grouping of However, same deductive reasoning shows that present concept of stage transcends Oppel's definition and has developed into correlation concept, with net result that is now conceived as image of a dynamic as opposed to mere association of static species in successive zones. A as correlation concept, is recorded life range of whole dynamic fauna, which though diversified in phyla and classes, unevenly distributed in space and time, and undergoing changes with passing of time, yet forms coherent whole, congruent totum characterized by state of evolution once given and never repeated. Both concepts, those of and stage, are, therefore, concepts of historical paleontology and not concepts of historical stratigraphy. Pursuing subject further, same deductive thinking leads me to conclusion that what many stratigraphers call time-rock units are, in truth, zone event-stratigraphical units, i.e., concept that ties together number of past through their results (rocks), with given event, also through its results (fossils). And pushing argument still further, to its ultimate end, I see no intrinsic difference between so-called time-units and paleobiological To my way of thinking, Tremadocian Age and Tremadocian Stage, for instance, are interchangeable expressions, because both concepts are based not on pure time, but on succession of paleontological events. To summarize this abstract: physical stratigraphy is science that deals with spatial relationship of material things; historical stratigraphy deals with spatial and temporal relationships of events.
Read full abstract