The uniqueness of this book lies in its dynamic analysis of belief and unbelief as closely related in terms of the functions they perform in psychic life. Dr. Pruyser is a clinical psychologist, Harry March Pfeiffer Professor at the Menninger Foundation, one of the coauthors of The Vital Balance ( I ), and author of A Dynamic Psychology ofReligion (2). Dr. Pruysen undertook this book to deal with “the contemponary phenomena of secularization, disaffiliation from religion and religious institutions, disbelief, and unbelief” (p. xii), which he had not analyzed in his previous writings. The discussion focuses as much on belief as on unbelief, however, because Pruysen sees an increase in interest in transcendental experiences, charismatic movements, and folk religion in recent years as well as a more long-term process of secularization and decline in beliefand commitment. The thesis of the book is that both belief and unbelief are to be understood in terms of man’s pursuit of happiness. This punsuit is seen in dialectical relation with tension. Pruyser states, “The life worth living and examining is a life lived in tension, . . . tensions are a perennial feature of the human condition” (p. xvii). This tension is demanding on the mind as well as on the feelings. Pnuyser’s position on this subject has kinship with Freud’s pleasure-reality principles, especially if more attention is given the ego. However, the range of fields of knowledge from which Pruyser draws is greater than Freud used. Pruyser also analyzes the dynamics of unbelief as well as belief as rigorously as Freud discussed the latter. Although beliefs of a religious kind, along with corresponding unbeliefs, are central to this book, Pruyser also considers other kinds of belief and unbelief. Among the topics specifically analyzed are alienation, dependency, autonomy, mystery, options, Providence, fantasy, and the various meanings of reality. Object relations theory is used to suggest that both beliefs and unbeliefs may be either love objects or hate objects. Since he has worked in a psychiatric setting for a quarter century, Pruyser’s judgment that many psychiatrists and their colleagues feel uncomfortable in assessing the religious beliefs of their patients suggests the special value of this book for mental health professionals. There is no better way to feel more at home in any kind of appraisal than to understand the dynamics behind outward appearance. Despite his compressed but readable discussion of ontological bases of belief or unbelief, Pruysen has no quarrel with the need to take a nonphilosophical view of the world in clinical practice. However, he implies that even psychiatrists may permit clinical pragmatic necessity to produce what is widespread throughout our society, namely, a view of reality that is too dull and too flat. The author’s style has admirable clarity, but the depth and complexity of his analyses are such that even speed-reading psychiatrists are likely to have to slow down. The process is very much worth the effort. Even as a theologian who has also studied psychiatry and psychology for many years, I found that this book often revealed gems of insight that had not occurred to me. I have only two criticisms of this work, and they may be mattens of choice. The first is Pruyser’s decision not to use a developmental schema to deal with his topic. Although he justifies his approach very well, more attention to developmental stages would have increased the book’s value for clinicians. The seeond critique is not of the way some topics are analyzed, but of the way the questions are asked. I would differ, for example, on the way the question of Providence is posed. However, any such critiques may simply be differences in perspective between a psychologist knowledgeable about reli-
Read full abstract