Period Protein Research Articles

Kinetics of Doubletime Kinase-dependent Degradation of the Drosophila Period Protein

Robust circadian oscillations of the proteins PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM) are hallmarks of a functional clock in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Early morning phosphorylation of PER by the kinase Doubletime (DBT) and subsequent PER turnover is an essential step in the functioning of the Drosophila circadian clock. Here using time-lapse fluorescence microscopy we study PER stability in the presence of DBT and its short, long, arrhythmic, and inactive mutants in S2 cells. We observe robust PER degradation in a DBT allele-specific manner. With the exception of doubletime-short (DBT(S)), all mutants produce differential PER degradation profiles that show direct correspondence with their respective Drosophila behavioral phenotypes. The kinetics of PER degradation with DBT(S) in cell culture resembles that with wild-type DBT and posits that, in flies DBT(S) likely does not modulate the clock by simply affecting PER degradation kinetics. For all the other tested DBT alleles, the study provides a simple model in which the changes in Drosophila behavioral rhythms can be explained solely by changes in the rate of PER degradation.

The novel gene twenty-four defines a critical translational step in the Drosophila clock

Daily oscillations of gene expression underlie circadian behaviours in multicellular organisms1. While attention has been focused on transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms1–3, other posttranscriptional modes have been less clearly delineated. Here we report mutants of a novel Drosophila gene twenty-four (tyf) that display weak behavioural rhythms. Weak rhythms are accompanied by dramatic reductions in the levels of the clock protein PERIOD (PER) as well as more modest effects on TIMELESS (TIM). Nonetheless, PER induction in pacemaker neurons can rescue tyf mutant rhythms. TYF associates with a 5′-cap binding complex, poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) as well as per and tim transcripts. Furthermore, TYF activates reporter expression when tethered to reporter mRNA even in vitro. Taken together, these data suggest that TYF potently activates PER translation in pacemaker neurons to sustain robust rhythms, revealing a novel and important role for translational control in the Drosophila circadian clock.

Light-Mediated TIM Degradation within Drosophila Pacemaker Neurons (s-LNvs) Is Neither Necessary nor Sufficient for Delay Zone Phase Shifts

Circadian systems are entrained and phase shifted by light. In Drosophila, the model of light-mediated phase shifting begins with photon capture by CRYPTOCHROME (CRY) followed by rapid TIMELESS (TIM) degradation. In this study, we focused on phase delays and assayed TIM degradation within individual brain clock neurons in response to light pulses in the early night. Surprisingly, there was no detectable change in TIM staining intensity within the eight pacemaker s-LNvs. This indicates that TIM degradation within s-LNvs is not necessary for phase delays, and similar assays in other genotypes indicate that it is also not sufficient. In contrast, more dorsal circadian neurons appear light-sensitive in the early night. Because CRY is still necessary within the s-LNvs for phase shifting, the results challenge the canonical cell-autonomous molecular model and raise the question of how the pacemaker neuron transcription-translation clock is reset by light in the early night.

A Role for the PERIOD:PERIOD Homodimer in the Drosophila Circadian Clock

Circadian clocks in eukaryotes rely on transcriptional feedback loops, in which clock genes repress their own transcription resulting in molecular oscillations with a period of ∼24 h. In Drosophila, the clock proteins Period (PER) and Timeless (TIM) operate in such a feedback loop, whereby they first accumulate in the cytoplasm of clock cells as a heterodimer. Nuclear translocation of the complex or the individual PER and TIM proteins is followed by repression of per and tim transcription, whereby PER seems to act as the prime repressor. We found that in addition to PER:TIM complexes, functional PER:PER homodimers exist in flies. Specific disruption of PER homodimers results in drastically impaired behavioral and molecular rhythmicity, pointing the biological importance of this clock protein complex. Analysis of PER subcellular distribution and repressor competence in the PER dimer mutant revealed defects in PER nuclear translocation and a disruption of rhythmic period transcription. The striking similarity of these phenotypes with that of reduced CKII activity suggests that the formation or function of the PER dimer is closely linked to this kinase. Our results confirm a previous structural model for PER and provide strong evidence that PER homodimers are important for circadian clock function.

Developmental profiles of PERIOD and DOUBLETIME in Drosophila melanogaster ovary

The clock protein PERIOD (PER) displays circadian cycles of accumulation, phosphorylation, nuclear translocation and degradation in Drosophila melanogaster clock cells. One exception to this pattern is in follicular cells enclosing previtellogenic ovarian egg chambers. In these cells, PER remains high and cytoplasmic at all times of day. Genetic evidence suggest that PER and its clock partner TIMELESS (TIM) interact in these cells, yet, they do not translocate to the nucleus. Here, we investigated the levels and subcellular localization of PER in older vitellogenic follicles. Cytoplasmic PER levels decreased in the follicular cells at the onset of vitellogenesis (stage 9). Interestingly, PER was observed in the nuclei of some follicular cells at this stage. PER signal disappeared in more advanced (stage 10) vitellogenic follicles. Since the phosphorylation state of PER is critical for the progression of circadian cycle, we investigated the status of PER phosphorylation in the ovary and the expression patterns of DOUBLETIME (DBT), a kinase known to affect PER in the clock cells. DBT was absent in previtellogenic follicular cells, but present in the cytoplasm of some stage 9 follicular cells. DBT was not distributed uniformly but was present in patches of adjacent cells, in a pattern resembling PER distribution at the same stage. Our data suggest that the absence of dbt expression in the follicular cells of previtellogenic egg chambers may be related to stable and cytoplasmic expression of PER in these cells. Onset of dbt expression in vitellogenic follicles coincides with nuclear localization of PER protein.

Activating PER repressor through a DBT-directed phosphorylation switch.

Protein phosphorylation plays an essential role in the generation of circadian rhythms, regulating the stability, activity, and subcellular localization of certain proteins that constitute the biological clock. This study examines the role of the protein kinase Doubletime (DBT), a Drosophila ortholog of human casein kinase I (CKI)ɛ/δ. An enzymatically active DBT protein is shown to directly phosphorylate the Drosophila clock protein Period (PER). DBT-dependent phosphorylation sites are identified within PER, and their functional significance is assessed in a cultured cell system and in vivo. The per S mutation, which is associated with short-period (19-h) circadian rhythms, alters a key phosphorylation target within PER. Inspection of this and neighboring sequence variants indicates that several DBT-directed phosphorylations regulate PER activity in an integrated fashion: Alternative phosphorylations of two adjoining sequence motifs appear to be associated with switch-like changes in PER stability and repressor function.

Drosophila DBT Lacking Protein Kinase Activity Produces Long-Period and Arrhythmic Circadian Behavioral and Molecular Rhythms

A mutation (K38R) which specifically eliminates kinase activity was created in the Drosophila melanogaster ckI gene (doubletime [dbt]). In vitro, DBT protein carrying the K38R mutation (DBT(K/R)) interacted with Period protein (PER) but lacked kinase activity. In cell culture and in flies, DBT(K/R) antagonized the phosphorylation and degradation of PER, and it damped the oscillation of PER in vivo. Overexpression of short-period, long-period, or wild-type DBT in flies produced the same circadian periods produced by the corresponding alleles of the endogenous gene. These mutations therefore dictate an altered "set point" for period length that is not altered by overexpression. Overexpression of the DBT(K/R) produced effects proportional to the titration of endogenous DBT, with long circadian periods at lower expression levels and arrhythmicity at higher levels. This first analysis of adult flies with a virtual lack of DBT activity demonstrates that DBT's kinase activity is necessary for normal circadian rhythms and that a general reduction of DBT kinase activity does not produce short periods.

A Small Conserved Domain of Drosophila PERIOD Is Important for Circadian Phosphorylation, Nuclear Localization, and Transcriptional Repressor Activity

We identify in this study a 27-amino-acid motif which is conserved between the Drosophila melanogaster period protein (PER) and the three mammalian PERs. Characterization of PER lacking this motif (PER Delta) shows that it is important for phosphorylation of Drosophila PER by casein kinase I epsilon (CKI epsilon; doubletime protein or DBT) and CKII. S2 cell assays indicate that the domain also contributes significantly to PER nuclear localization as well as to PER transcriptional repressor activity. These two phenomena appear linked, since PER Delta transcriptional repressor activity in S2 cells was restored when nuclear localization was facilitated. Two less direct assays of PER Delta activity in flies can be interpreted similarly. The separate assay of nuclear import and export suggests that the domain functions in part to facilitate PER phosphorylation within the cytoplasm, which in turn promotes nuclear entry. As there is evidence that the kinases also function within the nucleus to promote transcriptional repression, we suggest that there is a subsequent collaboration between phosphorylated PER and the kinases to repress CLK-CYC activity, probably through the phosphorylation of CLK. This is then followed by additional PER phosphorylation, which occurs within the nucleus and leads to PER degradation.

A temperature-compensated model for circadian rhythms that can be entrained by temperature cycles

From the viewpoint that reaction rates will change with temperature, we present a general method to build circadian clock models that generate circadian oscillations with almost constant period under different constant ambient temperature, and propose an algorithm estimating the parameter condition for compensated period against the change of temperature based on the PER single-feedback loop model of Goldbeter [1995. A model for circadian oscillations in the Drosophila period protein (PER). Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 261, 319–324] for Drosophila. We show that the model with derived parameters can realize the temperature compensation over a wide range of temperature, and simultaneously can realize the entrainment to temperature cycles.

Molecular Analysis of Sleep: Wake Cycles inDrosophila

Sleep is controlled by two major regulatory systems: a circadian system that drives it with a 24-hour periodicity and a home-ostatic system that ensures that adequate amounts of sleep are obtained. We are using the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to understand both types of regulation. With respect to circadian control, we have identified molecular mechanisms that are critical for the generation of a clock. Our recent efforts have focused on the analysis of posttranslational mechanisms, specifically the action of different phosphatases that control the phosphorylation and thereby the stability and/or nuclear localization of circadian clock proteins period (PER) and timeless (TIM). Resetting the clock in response to light is also mediated through posttranslational events that target TIM for degradation by the proteasome pathway; a recently identified ubiquitin ligase, jet lag (JET), is required for this response. Our understanding of the homeostatic control of sleep is in its early stages. We have found that mushroom bodies, which are a site of synaptic plasticity in the fly brain, are important for the regulation of sleep. In addition, through analysis of genes expressed under different behavioral states, we have identified some that are up-regulated during sleep deprivation. Thus, the Drosophila model allows the use of cellular and molecular approaches that should ultimately lead to a better understanding of sleep biology.

Neurohormones as putative circadian clock output signals in the central nervous system of two cricket species

Antisera to the neuropeptides corazonin (Crz) and crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) and to the diapause hormone (DH) react with small sets of neurones in the cephalic ganglia of the crickets Dianemobius nigrofasciatus and Allonemobius allardi. The distribution of their immunoreactivities is similar in the two species and overlaps with the locations of presumed circadian clock components in the optic lobes, protocerebrum, tritocerebrum, suboesophageal ganglion (SOG) and frontal ganglion. D. nigrofasciatus contains two Crz-immunoreactive (Crz-ir) cells in each optic lobe, six cell groups in the protocerebrum, four in the tritocerebrum, and one in SOG, whereas A. allardi harbours only five Crz-ir groups in the protocerebrum and four in the tritocerebrum. CCAP immunoreactivity occurs in both species in four protocerebrum cell clusters, four tritocerebrum cell clusters, four SOG cell clusters, one frontal ganglion cell cluster, and two optic lobe cell clusters; D. nigrofasciatus possesses two additional cells with unique links to the lamina in the optic lobe. DH-related antigens are present in four cell clusters in the optic lobe, six (D. nigrofasciatus) or eight (A. allardi) in the protocerebrum, four in the tritocerebrum, and three (A. allardi) or five (D. nigrofasciatus) in the SOG. Some of the detected cells also react with antibody to the clock protein Period (PER) or lie close to PER-ir cells. Crickets reared at two different photoperiods do not differ in the distribution and intensity of immunoreactivities. No changes have been detected during the course of diurnal light/dark cycles, possibly because the antisera react with persistent prohormones, whereas circadian fluctuations may occur at the level of their processing or of hormone release. The projection of immunoreactive fibres to several brain regions, the stomatogastric nervous system and the neurohaemal organs indicates multiple functions of the respective hormones.

The circadian clock-containing photoreceptor cells in Xenopus laevis express several isoforms of casein kinase I

The frog ( Xenopus laevis) retina has been an important model for the analysis of retinal circadian rhythms. In this paper, several isoforms of X. laevis casein kinase I (CKI) were analyzed to address whether they are involved in the phosphorylation and degradation of period protein (PER), as they are in the circadian oscillators of other species. cDNAs encoding two splice variants of CKIδ (a full-length form and deletion isoform, which is missing an exon that encodes a putative nuclear localization signal and two evolutionarily conserved protein kinase domains) were isolated and analyzed, together with a previously isolated CKIε isoform. Both CKIδ and CKIε were shown to be constitutively expressed in the photoreceptors of the retina, where a circadian clock has been localized. Both the full-length CKIδ and CKIε were shown to have kinase activity in vitro, and the full-length CKIδ phosphorylated and degraded Drosophila PER when expressed in Drosophila S2 cells. The expression and biochemical characteristics of these CKIs are consistent with an evolutionarily conserved role for CKI in the Xenopus retinal clock. The CKIδ deletion isoform did not exhibit kinase activity and did not trigger degradation of PER. Subcellular localization of both CKIδ isoforms was cytoplasmic in several cell culture lines, but the full-length CKIδ, and not the deletion CKIδ isoform, was localized to both the nucleus and the cytoplasm in Drosophila S2 cells. These results indicate that the sequences missing in the deletion CKIδ isoform are important for the nuclear localization and kinase activity of the full-length isoform and that one or both of these features are necessary for degradation of Drosophila PER.

Modelling periodic oscillation in gene regulatory networks by cyclic feedback systems

In this paper, we develop a new methodology to analyze and design periodic oscillators of biological networks, in particular gene regulatory networks with multiple genes, proteins and time delays, by using negative cyclic feedback systems. We show that negative cyclic feedback networks have no stable equilibria but stable periodic orbits when certain conditions are satisfied. Specifically, we first prove the basic properties of the biological networks composed of cyclic feedback loops, and then extend our results to general cyclic feedback network with less restriction, thereby making our theoretical analysis and design of oscillators easy to implement, even for large-scale systems. Finally, we use one circadian network formed by a period protein (PER) and per mRNA, and one biologically plausible synthetic gene network, to demonstrate the theoretical results. Since there is less restriction on the network structure, the results of this paper can be expected to apply to a wide variety of areas on modelling, analyzing and designing of biological systems.

The cycling and distribution of PER-like antigen in relation to neurons recognized by the antisera to PTTH and EH in Thermobia domestica

The cephalic nervous system of the firebrat contains antigens recognized by antisera to the clock protein period (PER), the prothoracicotropic hormone (PTTH) and the eclosion hormone (EH). The content of the 115 kDa PER-like antigen visualized on the western blots fluctuates in diurnal rhythm with a maximum in the night. The oscillations entrained in a 12:12 h light/dark (LD) cycle persist in the darkness and disappear in continuous light. They are detected by immunostaining in 14 pairs of the protocerebral neurons and are extreme in four suboesophageal neurons and two cells in each corpus cardiacum that contain PER only during the night phase. No circadian fluctuations occur in three lightly stained perikarya of the optic lobe. Five cell bodies located in each brain hemisphere between the deuto-and the tritocerebrum retain weak immunoreactivity under constant illumination. In all cells, the staining is confined to the cytoplasm and never occurs in the cell nuclei. The cells containing PER-like material do not react with the anti-PTTH and anti-EH antisera, which recognize antigens of about 50 and 20 kDa, respectively. The anti-PTTH antiserum stains in each brain hemisphere seven neurons in the protocerebrum, eight in the optic lobe, and 3–5 in the posterior region of the deutocerebrum. The antiserum to EH reacts in each hemisphere with just two cells located medially to the mushroom bodies. No cycling of the PTTH-like and EH-like antigens was detected.

Sequential nuclear accumulation of the clock proteins period and timeless in the pacemaker neurons of Drosophila melanogaster.

Antisera against the circadian clock proteins Period (PER) and Timeless (TIM) were used to construct a detailed time course of PER and TIM expression and subcellular localization in a subset of the ventrolateral neurons (vLNs) in the Drosophila accessory medulla (AMe). These neurons, which express pigment-dispersing factor, play a central role in the control of behavioral rhythms. The data revealed several unexpected features of the circadian clock in Drosophila. First, TIM but not PER was restricted to the cytoplasm of vLNs throughout most of the early night. Second, the timing of TIM and PER nuclear accumulation was substantially different. Third, the two subsets of vLNs, the large and small vLNs, had a similar timing of PER nuclear accumulation but differed by 3-4 hr in the phase of TIM nuclear accumulation. These aspects of PER and TIM expression were not predicted by the current mechanistic model of the circadian clock in Drosophila and are inconsistent with the hypothesis that PER and TIM function as obligate heterodimers. The differing profiles of TIM and PER nuclear accumulation suggest that PER and TIM have distinct functions in the nuclei of vLNs.

Sequential Nuclear Accumulation of the Clock Proteins Period and Timeless in the Pacemaker Neurons ofDrosophila melanogaster

Antisera against the circadian clock proteins Period (PER) and Timeless (TIM) were used to construct a detailed time course of PER and TIM expression and subcellular localization in a subset of the ventrolateral neurons (vLNs) in theDrosophilaaccessory medulla (AMe). These neurons, which express pigment-dispersing factor, play a central role in the control of behavioral rhythms. The data revealed several unexpected features of the circadian clock inDrosophila. First, TIM but not PER was restricted to the cytoplasm of vLNs throughout most of the early night. Second, the timing of TIM and PER nuclear accumulation was substantially different. Third, the two subsets of vLNs, the large and small vLNs, had a similar timing of PER nuclear accumulation but differed by 3–4 hr in the phase of TIM nuclear accumulation. These aspects of PER and TIM expression were not predicted by the current mechanistic model of the circadian clock inDrosophilaand are inconsistent with the hypothesis that PER and TIM function as obligate heterodimers. The differing profiles of TIM and PER nuclear accumulation suggest that PER and TIM have distinct functions in the nuclei of vLNs.

THE PERIOD GENE OF THE GERMAN COCKROACH AND ITS NOVEL LINKING POWER BETWEEN VERTEBRATE AND INVERTEBRATE

Circadian clock protein PERIOD (PER) is essential for the endogenous clockworks in diverse lineages within Metazoa, but the protein sequences, the clock protein interactions, and the photic responses are variant and different between vertebrate and invertebrate PER homologs. Here we identified the German cockroach PER homologs and found it could bridge the huge phylogenetic gap and make possible a more precise protein sequence comparison between vertebrate and invertebrate PER homologs. Seven blocks of conserved regions (c1–c7) interspersed within PER proteins were defined, and two new significant homologies were found in the upstream portion of c3 region and in the c7 region, respectively. In addition, we found all dipteran insects PER homologs lack the c7 region and its following amino acid residues. Our results not only reveal the homology and divergence, but also imply the constraint and plasticity of divergent PER proteins during the course of evolution. These findings lay a solid foundation for understanding the general and divergent properties of circadian clockworks in diverse lineages within Metazoa.

Biochemical Oscillations and Cellular Rhythms: The Molecular Bases of Periodic and Chaotic Behaviour

1. Introduction Part I. Glycolytic Oscillations: 2. Oscillatory enzymes: simple periodic behaviour in an allosteric model for glycolytic oscillations Part II. From Simple to Complex Oscillatory Behaviour 3. Birhythmicity: coexistence between two stable rhythms 4. From simple periodic behaviour to complex oscillations, including bursting and chaos Part III. Oscillations Of Cyclic Amo In Dictyostelium Cells: 5. Models for the periodic synthesis and relay of camp signals in Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae 6. Complex oscillations and chaos in the camp signalling system of Dictyostelium 7. The onset of camp oscillations in Dictyostelium as a model for the ontogenesis of biological rhythms Part IV. Pulsatile Signalling In Intercellular Communication: 8. Function of the rhythm of intercellular communication in Dictyostelium. Link with pulsatile hormone secretion Part V. Calcium Oscillations: 9. Oscillations and waves of intracellular calcium Part VI. The Mitotic Oscillator: 10. Modelling the mitotic oscillator driving the cell division cycle Part VII. Circadian Rhythms: 11. Towards a model for circadian oscillations in the Drosophila period protein (PER) 12. Conclusions and perspectives References.

Organization of the Circadian System in Insects

The circadian systems of different insect groups are summarized and compared. Emphasis is placed on the anatomical identification and characterization of circadian pacemakers, as well as on their entrainment, coupling, and output pathways. Cockroaches, crickets, beetles, and flies possess bilaterally organized pacemakers in the optic lobes that appear to be located in the accessory medulla, a small neuropil between the medulla and the lobula. Neurons that are immunoreactive for the peptide pigment-dispersing hormone (PDH) arborize in the accessory medulla and appear to be important components of the optic lobe pacemakers. The neuronal architecture of the accessory medulla with associated PDH-immunoreactive neurons is best characterized in cockroaches, while the molecular machinery of rhythm generation is best understood in fruit flies. One essential component of the circadian clock is the period protein (PER), which colocalizes with PDH in about half of the fruit fly's presumptive pacemaker neurons. PER is also found in the presumptive pacemaker neurons of beetles and moths, but appears to have different functions in these insects. In moths, the pacemakers are situated in the central brain and are closely associated with neuroendocrine functions. In the other insects, neurons associated with neuroendocrine functions also appear to be closely coupled to the optic lobe pacemakers. Some crickets and flies seem to possess central brain pacemakers in addition to their optic lobe pacemakers. With respect to neuronal organization, the circadian systems of insects show striking similarities to the vertebrate circadian system. (Chronobiology International, 15(6), 567-594, 1998)

Temperature Compensation of Circadian Rhythms: Control of the Period in a Model for Circadian Oscillations of the Per Protein in Drosophila

The factors affecting the period are examined in a model for circadian oscillations of the period protein (PER) in Drosophila. The model for the circadian clock is based on multiple phosphorylation of PER and on the negative feedback exerted by PER on the transcription of the period (per) gene. The results are used to address the possible bases of the relative invari-ance of the period of oscillations with respect to temperature. Such a phenomenon, referred to as temperature compensation, represents one of the most conspicuous properties of circadian rhythms. (Chronobiology International, 14(5), 511–520, 1997)