Periarticular Injection Research Articles

The efficacy and safety of perioperative glucocorticoid for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAn increasing number of individuals undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can result in pain, limited motor function and adverse complications such as infection, nausea and vomiting. Glucocorticoids have been shown anti-inflammatory and antiemetic effects, but can also elevate blood glucose levels and increase the risk of wound infection. Thus, it is essential to investigate the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid usage in TKA.MethodA comprehensive systematic search of PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of glucocorticoid application in TKA. The primary outcomes assessed were the postoperative pain assessment. Secondary outcomes included the range of motion in knee joint, levels of inflammatory cytokines, adverse complications, and the length of hospital stay.ResultsThirty-six randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis. The glucocorticoid group exhibited significant reduction in the resting VAS scores on postoperative days 1, 2 (POD1, 2)and postoperative 3 months (POM3), as well as decreased morphine consumption on POD1 and increased range of motion (ROM) in knee joint on POD1, 3. Additionally, the glucocorticoid group exhibited decreased levels of postoperative inflammatory cytokines and the incidence of PONV along with a shorter length of hospital stay. The blood glucose concentration was significantly increased in the glucocorticoid group on POD1 compared with the control group. While the blood glucose on POD2 and occurrence of postoperative adverse complications were similar between two groups including wound infection and venous thrombosis. The periarticular injection analgesia (PIA) group demonstrated lower VAS scores on POD2 comparing to the systemic administration (SA) group according to two studies. However, there was no significant difference of the resting VAS on POD1 and POD2 between PIA and SA group across all studies.ConclusionPerioperative glucocorticoids treatment in TKA significantly reduced short-term pain score and opioid-use which was probably not patient relevant. The application of glucocorticoids in TKA implied a beneficial trend in analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antiemetic effects, as well as improved range of motion and shortened hospital stay. While it will not increase the risk of continued high glucose, postoperative wound infection and venous thrombosis.

Periarticular cocktail injection is more useful than nerve blocks for pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is commonly associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Notably, various pain control strategies, a femoral nerve block (FNB) with a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCNB), adductor canal block (ACB) with LFCNB, or periarticular cocktail injection (PI), have been investigated. However, no studies compare the effects of FNB with LFCNB, ACB with LFCNB, and PI for pain control after ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of FNB with LFCNB, ACB with LFCNB, and PI for pain relief in the early postoperative period after ACL reconstruction. MethodsThis retrospective controlled clinical trial enrolled 299 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction at our hospital between April 2016 and October 2022. We categorized these cases into groups based on the use of PI (PI group), FNB with LFCNB (FNB group), and ACB with LFCNB (ACB group) for pain management. We selected 40 cases each, with matched age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) from each group, resulting in 120 cases for analysis. In the FNB and ACB groups, 0.75% ropivacaine 15 ml was injected under ultrasound guidance preoperatively. In the PI group, a mixture of 0.75% ropivacaine 20 ml, normal saline 20 ml, and dexamethasone 6.6 mg was injected half at the start of surgery and the rest just before wound closure. Patient demographics (age, sex, height, body weight, and BMI) and surgical data (the requirement for meniscal repair, operative time, and tourniquet inflation time) were analyzed. After ACL reconstruction, patients' numerical rating scale pain scores (NRS) (0-10) were recorded at 30 min and 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. NRS were then compared among the three groups using analysis of variance. In addition, within each group, these data were compared between the NRS ≥7 and NRS ≤6 groups using a t-test. ResultsThere were no significant differences in patient demographics and surgical data. Pain scores were significantly higher in the PI group than in the FCB and ACB groups 30 min postoperatively, but they were lower at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. In the FNB group, there were no significant differences in the demographic and surgical data by NRS pain score. In the ACB group, the number of men was significantly higher in the NRS ≥7 group than in the NRS ≤6 group (p = 0.015). In the PI group, tourniquet inflation time was significantly longer in the NRS ≥7 group than in the NRS ≤6 group (p = 0.008). ConclusionsFollowing ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft, periarticular cocktail significantly reduced early postoperative pain compared with nerve block combinations.

Adductor Canal Block Versus Local Infiltration Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure for patients with knee osteoarthritis, often associated with postoperative pain. Effective pain management strategies are essential for improving patient outcomes and satisfaction. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two analgesic modalities, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and adductor canal block (ACB), in providing postoperative pain relief for patients undergoing TKA. This prospective randomized comparative study included 60 patients undergoing TKA for knee osteoarthritis under subarachnoid block (spinal anaesthesia). Patients were divided into two groups: LIA group (local wound infiltration with periarticular injection of bupivacaine 0.125% + dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg)and ACB group (ACB with bupivacaine 0.125% + 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine). Pain relief was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score, time to first rescue analgesic requirement (NRS > 3), and total amount of analgesic needed in the first 24 hours post-surgery. The time to first perception of pain with NRS > 3 was 11.30±0.8 hours in the ACB group and 9.40 ± 1.1 hours in the LIA group, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Additionally, the total number of rescue analgesic doses given in the first 24 hours post-operatively differed significantly between the two groups (p = 0.046). The study concludes that ACB is an effective postoperative analgesic modality, superior to local infiltration analgesia, for patients undergoing TKA.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Analgesic Effectiveness of Periarticular Injections and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and periarticular injection (PAI) provide motor-sparing analgesia following hip surgery. We hypothesized that PAI offers non-inferior pain relief compared with PENG block in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this randomized trial, 66 patients who underwent primary THA under spinal anesthesia were assigned to the PENG or PAI groups. The primary endpoint was the resting pain score 24 h postoperatively. The secondary endpoints included pain scores at rest and during movement at 6 and 48 h postoperatively, quadriceps strength at 24 h postoperatively, and opioid consumption at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. The mean difference in pain scores at rest between the two groups was 0.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.78 to 1.39) at 24 h postoperatively. The upper 95% CI was lower than the non-inferiority margin, indicating non-inferior performance. No significant between-group differences were observed in the pain scores at 6 and 48 h postoperatively. Additionally, no significant differences in quadriceps strength and opioid consumption were observed between the two groups. The PAI and PENG blocks provided comparable postoperative analgesia during the first 48 h after primary THA. Further investigation is required to determine the optimal PAI technique and local anesthetic mixture.

Periarticular Injections with Liposomal Bupivacaine in Comparison with Traditional (Bupivacaine/Ropivacaine) Periarticular Injections in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Objectives This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the current literature to determine whether local infiltration liposomal bupivacaine (LB) used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) results in reduced pain scores and opioid consumption compared to traditional local anesthetics. Methods A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. Articles were screened independently by two investigators based on inclusion criteria of 1) prospective randomized control trials or retrospective cohort studies, 2) conducted after the 2015 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expansion of LB indication to local surgical infiltration, 3) compared LB as a periarticular injection to other local anesthetics used as a periarticular injection, and 4) available in English. Primary outcomes of pain scores and opioid consumption were reported. Secondary outcomes of interest included mobility, length of stay, costs, incidence of adverse events, and readmission rates. Bupivacaine costs $3 per dose, while LB costs $334 per dose. Results A total of seven articles were identified with the inclusion criteria. Four studies concluded that LB improves patient outcomes of pain scores and opioid consumption in patients receiving THA. Three studies found no benefit to using LB compared to their controls. Four studies found no significant reduction in the length of stay between the groups. There were no reported differences in the incidence of adverse events or total costs between the two groups. Conclusion There are minimal benefits of reduced pain scores or opioid consumption when using LB opioid-sparing protocols compared to current protocols for patients undergoing THA. Level of Evidence III

A retrospective review of effectiveness of ERAS post-operative pain protocol in hip replacement surgeries under general anaesthesia at a tertiary orthopaedic hospital

: The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was first introduced in 1997 by a group of European surgeons led by Henrik Kehlet. The ERAS concept was introduced to target the factors delaying post-operative recovery such as organ dysfunction, surgical stress and to improve the surgical outcomes and length of stay at the hospital. The primary aim of this approach is to reduce the body’s response to surgical stress by implementing a multidisciplinary, multitude of interventions in a coordinated clinical pathway. It was first implemented for colorectal surgeries to improve the post-surgical recovery rates by decreasing the post-operative ileus and thereby reducing the cost and length of hospital stay. Since the successful introduction of the program, ERAS has been used in several other specialties such as breast, urological, gynaecological, and musculoskeletal procedures. Off-late ERAS has become important in orthopaedic surgeries, particularly elective hip and knee arthroplasties. A retrospective review audit was conducted at tertiary Orthopaedic NHS Hospital to determine the effectiveness of ERAS post-operative pain protocol in patients who had primary hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia. The qualitative and quantitative data included the length of stay at the hospital and default rates in the ERAS pain protocol. The length of stay at the hospital in ERAS compliant group was a mean of 3.95 days and in ERAS default group was 4.7 days, showing an increase of 16% in the total duration. The IV PCA group had 4.6 days of the average length of stay.: ERAS pathway advocates for using opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia to control pain, peripheral nerve blocks (single-shot/continuous), and local infiltration /peri-articular injections have become a better alternative to opioids in controlling the immediate post-surgical pain effectively. There is clear evidence to suggest that these techniques can improve patient outcomes and decrease the duration of stay.

Research progress on early postoperative pain management strategies after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

To summarize the early postoperative pain management strategies for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and to select a reasonable and effective pain management plan to promote functional rehabilitation after ACLR. The literature about the early postoperative pain management strategies of ACLR both domestically and internationally in recent years was extensiverly reviewed, and the effects of improving postoperative pain were reviewed. Currently, physical therapy and oral medication have advantages such as economy and simplicity, but the effect of improving postoperative pain is not satisfactory, often requires a combination of intravenous injection or intravenous pump, which is also a common way to relieve pain. However, in order to meet the analgesic needs of patients, the amount of analgesic drugs used is often large, which increases the incidence of various adverse reactions. Local infiltration analgesia (LIA), including periarticular or intra-articular injection of drugs, can significantly improve the early postoperative pain of ACLR, and achieve similar postoperative effectiveness as nerve block. LIA can be used as an analgesic technique instead of nerve block, and avoid the corresponding weakness of innervated muscles caused by nerve block, which increases the risk of postoperative falls. Many studies have confirmed that LIA can alleviate postoperative early pain in ACLR, especially the analgesic effects of periarticular injection are more satisfactory. It can also avoid the risk of cartilage damage caused by intra-articular injection. However, the postoperative analgesic effect and timeliness still need to be improved. It is possible to consider combining multimodal mixed drug LIA (combined with intra-articular and periarticular) with other pain intervention methods to exert a synergistic effect, in order to avoid the side effects and risks brought by single drugs or single administration route. LIA is expected to become one of the most common methods for relieving postoperative early pain in ACLR. Early pain after arthroscopic ACLR still affects the further functional activities of patients, and all kinds of analgesic methods can achieve certain effectiveness, but there is no unified standard at present, and the advantages and disadvantages of various analgesic methods need further research.

Efficacy of a Combined Periarticular and Intraosseous Multimodal Analgesic Injection Technique in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction Early postoperative pain poses a challenge for surgeons to manage after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Various techniques have been employed to optimize pain reduction, including Periarticular Multimodal Analgesia (PMA), recognized as a safe and effective method. Our study aims to enhance PMA through a combined intraosseous injection (PMA-I) and compare it with standard PMA. Methods Forty patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA surgery were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive PMA-I on one side of the knee, while the contralateral knee received standard PMA. Pain scores, bleeding, and range of motion (ROM) were assessed in both groups. Results The PMA-I group demonstrated statistically significant lower visual analog scale (VAS) scores at all postoperative time points, except at 48 hours, where the difference was not statistically significant. Postoperative bleeding and ROM did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusion PMA-I demonstrated both statistically and clinically significant reduction in early post-TKA pain, without additional costs, providing a technique that can be used to optimize postoperative pain control in TKA.

Posteromedial Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study.

Achieving optimal pain control in total knee arthroplasty has improved with the use of regional anesthesia and periarticular injections (PAIs). When performing a PAI, the relative location of the anesthetic spread is not well defined in comparison with an adductor canal block (ACB). In this study, our aim was to evaluate the location of posteromedial PAI spread compared with a surgeon administered ACB. One PAI and one surgeon-administered ACB were performed in the contralateral limbs of four human cadavers. The injectate was composed of methylene blue dye to visually inspect the dye spread from the tip of the needle. Dissections were performed on each cadaver to quantify the dye spread from the tip of the needle and compare the location of the dye spread. Dye spread location was characterized as either entering the adductor canal or including the posterior capsule. The mean distance of dye spread from the needle tip to the proximal most aspect of the dyed tissue was 10.125 cm in the ACB group compared with 6.5 cm in the posteromedial PAI group. In the ACB group, 4 of 4 injections were present in the adductor canal block group compared with 3 of 4 in the posteromedial PAI group. The posteromedial PAI group also had 3 of 4 injections involve the area around the posterior capsule compared with 0 of 4 in the ACB group. Posteromedial PAI appears to provide local delivery to both the adductor canal and the posterior capsule. Intraoperative, surgeon-administered ACB reliably delivers injectate to the adductor canal only but may allow for more proximal dye spread. Posteromedial PAI may provide a benefit in delivering injectate to the posterior capsule in addition to the ACB. Additional clinical studies are necessary to determine the clinical effects of this finding.

Comparison of a Novel Periarticular Injection Technique with Intra-articular Injection of Platelet-rich Plasma for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Joint Pain in Dogs

Canine osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by degenerative changes in the joints resulting in pain and lameness. The study objective was to compare treatment of OA with a novel peri-articular injection (aqua-acupuncture/aqua-AP) technique using platelet-rich plasma (PRP), with standard intra-articular (IA) injection. Sixteen dogs diagnosed with OA in appendicular skeletal joints were enrolled and assigned to Test (n=8) or Control (n=8) treatment groups. Each subject received an injection at Week 0 and again at Week 4. Treatment outcomes assessed included goniometry (flexion and extension), infrared thermal imaging (IRTI), lameness grading scores and Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) questionnaire. The flexion and extension assessments had no statistically significant changes at 4 or 8-week assessment. Significant score reductions (improvement) were observed in both groups (p&lt;0.001) for pain severity (2, 4, 8 weeks) and activity interference (2, 4, 8 weeks) for CBPI data with no significant difference between study groups concluded (p&gt;0.05). Infrared thermal imaging demonstrated statistically significant (p&lt;0.001), decreased temperature in the inflamed joints for both injection techniques, however, aqua-AP treatment was statistically significant at both 4 and 8 weeks while IA technique didn’t reach significance until 8 weeks post-treatment. Lameness scores had significant improvements at 4 and 8 weeks with no significant difference between groups. The findings suggest that PurePRP® treatment delivered with either the proposed aqua-AP or the standard IA injection may improve pain and thermal outcomes (decrease joint inflammation) with more rapid thermal improvement for aqua-AP. There were no clear effects on goniometry measurements. Further investigations with larger scale trials are warranted.

What Is the Role of a Periarticular Injection for Knee Arthroplasty Patients Receiving a Multimodal Analgesia Regimen Incorporating Adductor Canal and Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee Blocks? A Randomized Blinded Placebo-Controlled Noninferiority Trial.

Optimal analgesic protocols for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients remain controversial. Multimodal analgesia is advocated, often including peripheral nerve blocks and/or periarticular injections (PAIs). If 2 blocks (adductor canal block [ACB] plus infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee [IPACK]) are used, also performing PAI may not be necessary. This noninferiority trial hypothesized that TKA patients with ACB + IPACK + saline PAI (sham infiltration) would have pain scores that were no worse than those of patients with ACB + IPACK + active PAI with local anesthetic. A multimodal analgesic protocol of spinal anesthesia, ACB and IPACK blocks, intraoperative ketamine and ketorolac, postoperative ketorolac followed by meloxicam, acetaminophen, duloxetine, and oral opioids was used. Patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA were randomized to receive either active PAI or control PAI. The active PAI included a deep injection, performed before cementation, of bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine, 30 mL; morphine; methylprednisolone; cefazolin; with normal saline to bring total volume to 64 mL. A superficial injection of 20 mL bupivacaine, 0.25%, was administered before closure. Control injections were normal saline injected with the same injection technique and volumes. The primary outcome was numeric rating scale pain with ambulation on postoperative day 1. A noninferiority margin of 1.0 was used. Ninety-four patients were randomized. NRS pain with ambulation at POD1 in the ACB + IPACK + saline PAI group was not found to be noninferior to that of the ACB + IPACK + active PAI group (difference = 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI], [-0.9 to 1.5], P = .120). Pain scores at rest did not differ significantly among groups. No significant difference was observed in opioid consumption between groups. Cumulative oral morphine equivalents through postoperative day 2 were 89 ± 40 mg (mean ± standard deviation), saline PAI, vs 73 ± 52, active PAI, P = .1. No significant differences were observed for worst pain, fraction of time in severe pain, pain interference, side-effects (nausea, drowsiness, itching, dizziness), quality of recovery, satisfaction, length of stay, chronic pain, and orthopedic outcomes. For TKA patients given a comprehensive analgesic protocol, use of saline PAI did not demonstrate noninferiority compared to active PAI. Neither the primary nor any secondary outcomes demonstrated superiority for active PAI, however. As we cannot claim either technique to be better or worse, there remains flexibility for use of either technique.

Ultrasound-guided injection of steroids versus platelet-rich plasma for sacroiliac joint chronic pain management

Background The spectrum of pain and disability from sacroiliac joint dysfunction is extremely variable. The treatment of SIJ pain remains a therapeutic challenge. Intra-articular SIJ infiltrations with local anesthetic and corticosteroids have the most reliable evidence supporting their use. New modalities have been introduced, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection. Aim This study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of ultrasound (US) guided intra-articular and peri-articular SIJ injection with steroids (methylprednisolone) versus platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in relieving chronic SIJ pain and to assess the patient’s satisfaction, record any complications and deal with them accordingly. Patients and methods Fifty patients undergoing sacroiliac joint injection for the treatment of SIJ pain were included in the study. All patients have been randomly allocated to one of two groups: Group S received US-guided intra-articular and peri-articular injection of bupivacaine and methylprednisolone. Group P received US-guided intra-articular and peri-articular SIJ injection of bupivacaine and PRP. Results Demographic data showed no statistically significant difference between both groups. The provocative tests, the VAS score, and the MODQ score at preinjection showed no statistically significant difference. At 2 and 4 weeks postinjection, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups showing higher values in group S than in group P. At six weeks postinjection, provocative tests were recorded in both groups with no significant difference between them. On the other hand, at eight weeks and four months postinjection, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups showing higher values for group P than group S. The SAPS score was compared between the two groups and showed no statistically significant difference between them in any of the follow-up periods. As for the efficacy between the two groups, no statistically significant difference was noted. Regarding the complications between the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion US-guided PRP and steroid (methylprednisolone) injections into the SIJ are safe and effective modalities for reducing functional disability as well as decreasing low back pain.

Результаты лечения хронической боли в области плечевого пояса с применением препаратов на основе полинуклеотидов и коллагена

Aim: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra- and peri-articular administration of injectable gel implant containing polynucleotides and collagen implants in patients with adhesive capsulitis / impingement syndrome / cervical spondylosis (uncovertebral arthrosis, spondylosis) with clinical reflex and reflex compression signs and orthopedic conditions. Patients and Methods: this prospective multicenter longitudinal 6-month study included 100 men and women (mean age 45 years). The patients were divided into 4 groups (25 patients in each group) based on the diagnosis. Treatment strategy (intra- and peri-articular administration of injectable gel implant containing polynucleotides and collagen implants) was determined by diagnosis and joint inflammation. Before and after treatment, the functional state of the shoulder and pain severity were assessed using questionnaires and laboratory and instrumental tests. Efficacy was assessed by pain relief, improvement in the functional activity of the shoulder joint, and changes in the range of movements in the shoulder joint and cervical spine. Treatment safety was assessed by the adverse effects. Results: after treatment, most patients reported an increase in the range of movements in the cervical spine and shoulder joint, a decrease in pain severity in the cervical spine and shoulder joint, and improvement in the functionality of the shoulder joint. After treatment, a decrease in the CRP levels and ESR was observed. No severe adverse effects were detected. Conclusion: intra- and peri-articular administration of gel implant containing poly-nucleotides and collagen implants for upper shoulder girdle disorders is effective and safe. KEYWORDS: upper shoulder girdle, cervical spine, shoulder joint, chronic pain, polynucleotides, collagen, collagen implant, intraarticular injection, periarticular injection. FOR CITATION: Shcherbakov G.I., Kovtun S.N., Potkina T.N. Outcomes of treatment for chronic shoulder pain using drugs containing polynucleotides and collagen. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2024;8(2):102–109 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2024-8-2-8.

Реконструктивная локальная инъекционная терапия

The article discusses the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) as the most common joint disease. The recommendations from professional associations for the patient management in OA using hyaluronic acid (HA) preparations differ somewhat depending on the affected joint, although they generally indicate positive effects of their use. Studies have shown the HA participation in the phagocytosis reduction, as well as in lowering the levels of prostaglandins, fibronectin, cAMP and a number of other anti-inflammatory effects. There is also a hypothesis that HA can prevent the release of arachidonic acid, block nociceptors and reduce the bradykinin formation, as well as it has chondroprotective properties. At the same time, total joint replacement is considered optimal (which has proven itself to be an effective and safe type of surgery) during the OA progression, the preservation of severe pain and loss of joint function, and the inefficacy of conservative treatment. The authors draw attention to the most common complication that occurs during total joint replacement — contralateral limb pain, and explain the mechanisms of its progression. They also present their case follow-ups of patients after total joint replacement with the development of synovitis in the contralateral hip joint and synovitis in combination with ligamentitis in the contralateral knee joint. Besides, the article highlights the clinical picture patterns and the methods of reconstructive local injection therapy with HA. KEYWORDS: osteoarthritis, knee joint, hip joint, hyaluronic acid, total joint replacement, contralateral limb pain, intra-articular injection, periarticular injection. FOR CITATION: Filatova Yu.S., Solovyov I.N., Solovyov E.I. Reconstructive local injection therapy. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2024;8(4):208– 214 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2024-8-4-4.

Implementation of a nonopioid multimodal analgesia protocol significantly reduces opioids prescribed after total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective study

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a nonopioid multimodal pain protocol on the amount of opioids prescribed, pain level, and complications in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) compared to a standard opioid regimen. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 2 consecutive cohorts who underwent either primary anatomic or reverse TSA by a single surgeon. The opioid cohort included patients from 2016 to 2020 who received an intraoperative periarticular injection (Ropivacaine, Epinephrine, and Ketorolac cocktail) and were prescribed Oxycodone/Acetaminophen 5/325 mg on discharge. The nonopioid cohort included patients from 2020 to 2022, consisting of preoperative oral analgesics (Celecoxib, Pregabalin, and Tramadol); intraoperative intravenous Dexamethasone and Acetaminophen and periarticular injection; and postoperative oral Dexamethasone and oral analgesics (Pregabalin, Tizanidine, Magnesium, Ibuprofen, and Acetaminophen). The nonopioid cohort had the option to ask for an opioid prescription postoperatively if needed. Patient-reported outcomes collected included visual analog scale scores for pain and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System up to 1 year after surgery. Opioid consumption using Morphine Milligram Equivalents were compared up to 3 months postoperatively. ResultsThere were 232 patients in the opioid and 112 in the nonopioid cohorts, respectively. The nonopioid protocol had lower mean visual analog scale scores at preoperative (6.4 vs. 7.4, P < .05), 10-day (3.5 vs. 4.2, P < .05), and 6-week postoperative time points (2.1 vs. 2.8, P < .05), but no differences between the groups were noted 3 months postoperatively. No differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–upper extremity, pain interference, or depression were found preoperatively and up to 1 year after surgery. Opioid consumption was lower in the nonopioid cohort at all time periods (P < .01). Patients in the nonopioid cohort had significantly lower Morphine Milligram Equivalents at discharge, 10-day, 6-week, and 90-day time periods (P < .01) when compared to the opioid cohort. When analyzing risk factors for continued opioid prescriptions for the whole cohort, preoperative opioid use within 90 days before surgery (relative risk 4.69 [95% confidence interval 3.18-6.91; P < .01) and current tobacco use (relative risk 2.61 [95% confidence interval 1.50-4.54]; P = .01) were associated with continued refills >30 days. Complications in the perioperative period and 90-day hospital readmissions were not significantly different between the groups. ConclusionA nonopioid postoperative regimen for patients undergoing TSA significantly reduces opioid prescriptions with similar patient-reported outcomes, subjective pain scores, and without increased complication rates compared to an opioid-only regimen.

A Retrospective Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Multimodal Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background and Objectives: Adequate pain management during early rehabilitation is mandatory for improving the outcomes of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Conventional pain management, mainly comprising opioids and epidural analgesia, may result in certain adverse effects such as dizziness, nausea, and motor blockade. We proposed a multimodal analgesic (MA) strategy involving the use of peripheral nerve block (NB), periarticular injection (PAI), and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA). This study compared the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of the proposed MA strategy and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Materials and Methods: We enrolled 118 patients who underwent TKA under spinal anesthesia. The patients followed either the MA protocol or received PCEA after surgery. The analgesic effect was examined using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The adverse effects experienced by the patients were recorded. Results: A lower proportion of patients in the MA group experienced motor blockade (6.45% vs. 22.98%) compared to those in the PCEA group on the first postoperative day. Furthermore, a lower proportion of patients in the MA group experienced numbness (18.52% vs. 43.33%) than those in the PCEA group on the first postoperative day. Conclusions: The MA strategy can be recommended for reducing the occurrence of motor blockade and numbness in patients following TKA. Therefore, the MA strategy ensures early rehabilitation while maintaining adequate pain relief.

Periarticular injection in addition to interscalene nerve block can decrease opioid consumption and pain following total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison cohort study.

Interscalene nerve block (INB) is an effective technique to provide postoperative analgesia for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, the analgesic effects of the block typically resolve between 8 and 24 hours postadministration, which results in rebound pain and subsequent increased opioid use. The objective of this study was to address this issue by determining how adding an intraoperative periarticular injection (PAI) in combination with INB affects acute postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in patients undergoing TSA. We hypothesized that compared with INB alone, INB+PAI will significantly reduce opioid consumption and pain scores for the first 24 hours postsurgery. We reviewed 130 consecutive patients who underwent elective primary TSA at a single tertiary institution. The first 65 patients were treated with INB alone, followed by 65 patients treated with INB+PAI. The INB used was 15-20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. The PAI used was 50 mL of a combination of ropivacaine (123 mg), epinephrine (0.25 mg), clonidine (40 μg), and ketorolac (15 mg). The PAI was injected using a standardized protocol: 10 mL into the subcutaneous tissues prior to incision, 15 mL into the supraspinatus fossa, 15 mL at the base of the coracoid process, and 10 mL into the deltoid and pectoralis muscles-a protocol analogous with a previously described technique. For all patients, a standardized postoperative oral pain medication protocol was used. The primary outcome was acute postoperative opioid consumption represented by morphine equivalent units (MEUs), whereas the secondary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores over the first 24 hours postsurgery, operative time, length of stay, and acute perioperative complications. No significant differences in demographics existed between patients who received INB alone vs. INB+PAI. Patients who received INB+PAI had a significantly lower 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption compared to the INB alone group (38.6±30.5 MEU vs. 60.5±37.3 MEU, P<.001). Additionally, VAS pain scores for the first 24 hours postsurgery in the INB+PAI group were significantly lower compared to those for the INB alone group (2.9±1.5 vs. 4.3±1.6, P ≤ .001). No differences existed between groups regarding operative time, length of inpatient stay, and acute perioperative complications. Patients undergoing TSA with INB+PAI demonstrated significantly decreased 24-hour postoperative total opioid consumption and 24-hour postoperative pain scores compared to the group treated with INB alone. No increase in acute perioperative complications related to PAI was observed. Thus, compared to an INB, the addition of an intraoperative periarticular cocktail injection appears to be a safe and effective method to reduce acute postoperative pain following TSA.

Efficacy of Intra-Operative Periarticular Injections among Patients Undergoing Total HIP Arthroplasty

Efficacy of Intra-Operative Periarticular Injections among Patients Undergoing Total HIP Arthroplasty

Comparative Analysis of Early and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease Using the DIAM Stabilizer and Standard Rehabilitation Program: A Preliminary Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-Up.

Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability and work absenteeism. The cause of LBP may be degeneration of the intervertebral disc. LBP is characterized by considerable variability and tends to develop into chronic pain. Treatment of LBP includes conservative and rehabilitative treatments, surgery, and so-called minimally invasive treatment. One of the most commonly performed procedures is interspinous stabilization using a dynamic interspinous DIAM (device for intervertebral assisted motion) stabilizer. There is still no clear, strong evidence for the effectiveness and superiority of surgical treatment over conservative treatment. This study aimed to compare the early and long-term outcomes of patients with LBP using the DIAM interspinous stabilizer in relation to patients treated conservatively. A group of 86 patients was prospectively randomized into two comparison groups: A (n = 43), treated with the DIAM dynamic stabilizer for degenerative lumbar spine disease (mean age = 43.4 years ± SD = 10.8 years), and B (n = 43), treated conservatively. Pain severity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), whereas disability was assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI). The difference in preoperative and postoperative ODI scores ≥ 15 points was used as a criterion for treatment effectiveness, and the difference in VAS scores ≥ 1 point was used as a criterion for pain reduction. In patients under general anesthesia, the procedure only included implantation of the DIAM system. Patients in the control group underwent conservative treatment, which included rehabilitation, a bed regimen, analgesic drug treatment and periarticular spinal injections of anti-inflammatory drugs. It was found that all patients (n = 43) continued to experience LBP after DIAM implantation (mean VAS score of 4.2). Of the 36 patients who experienced LBP with sciatica before the procedure, 80.5% (n = 29) experienced a reduction in pain. As for the level of fitness, the average ODI score was 19.3 ± 10.3 points. As for the difference in ODI scores in the pre-treatment results vs. after treatment, the average score was 9.1 ± 10.6. None of the patients required reoperation at 12 months after surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in either early (p = 0.45) or long-term outcomes (p = 0.37). In conclusion, neurosurgical treatment with the DIAM interspinous stabilizer was as effective as conservative treatment and rehabilitation during the one-year follow-up period.

Efficacy of Periarticular Infiltration with Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine plus Adductor Canal Block Relative to That of Adductor Canal Block Alone for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Matched Study.

Periarticular infiltration (PI) is a common procedure during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for postoperative pain management. This retrospective, case-matched study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PI with dexamethasone and bupivacaine in combination with an adductor canal block (ACB) and compare it with that of ACB alone in reducing postoperative pain in patients with TKA. Data were collected from 66 patients who underwent TKA performed by a single surgeon. Thirty-three of them received ACB + PI, and 33 received ACB alone. However, both groups underwent identical surgical techniques and postoperative care protocols. The pain scores and fentanyl consumption of the two groups were compared. The ACB + PI group had significantly lower pain scores than the ACB alone group at 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively (p=0.033, 0.004, 0.038, and 0.049, respectively). The percentage of patients requiring fentanyl as a rescue medication was significantly higher for the ACB alone group (90.9%) than for the ACB + PI group (69.7%, p=0.03). The total fentanyl consumption was also lower for the ACB + PI group (p < 0.001). The periarticular injection of the combination of dexamethasone and bupivacaine plus ACB was more effective than ACB alone in reducing postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption in patients undergoing TKA. Further studies comparing different doses of dexamethasone or other cocktail regimens may provide additional insights into this approach.