Since the 2004 release of the European seismic code – Eurocode 8, various improvements have been proposed to its rules. The standard is being revised and, in its current revised state, it has been restructured and expanded in content. The revisions related to steel structures and especially to the design of steel moment-resisting frames (SMRFs) are notable. Modifications in the definition of the ductility classes, grade-dependent material randomness factors, behaviour factors, inter-storey drift sensitivity index (θ), the local hierarchy criteria, and the design rules for the dissipative ductility classes (DC2 & DC3) are a few of the notable proposed changes. This paper aims to study and compare seismic designs and performances of SMRFs using the revised specific rules for steel design. To this end, a parametric case study, consisting of 96 frames, is devised by varying the key parameters such that the effects of the recent changes can be highlighted. The parameters varied are the design code, ductility classes, number of storeys, span length, and material strength. The case study frames are analysed and designed to both versions of the EC8. Later, the seismic performance of the case study SMRFs designed to the current and revised EC8 provisions are investigated through non-linear static and dynamic analyses using OpenSees. Additionally, the significance of two distinct joint modelling techniques is explored.The results show that stability is not the governing requirement with the revised code. Lighter solutions in terms of steel mass were possible for the regularly spaced frames using the revised code. It was noted, however, that contrary to the design intent and despite the higher behaviour factor used in DC3 & DCH frames, their solutions were not found to be lighter than those designed to DC2 & DCM in both code versions. The actual behaviour factors estimated from non-linear analyses were also found to be different from those used in design by a considerable margin. The over-strength component of the behaviour factor varied significantly between frames of different steel grades and ductility classes. It was observed that the component plays such a significant role in the overall behaviour factor that assigning a constant value may result in misleading estimates. The dynamic analyses results showed that the frames designed to both versions of EC8 demonstrated acceptable performance even at the near collapse limit state.