Bill Grueskin, Ava Seave and Lucas Graves, The Story So Far: What We Know about the Business of Digital Journalism (New York: Columbia Journalism Review Books, 2011) 132 pages, $12.95 (paperback).Review by Lurene Cachola KelleyIt was 2006 and my first time inside the digital department of a major metro newspaper. The one-room department was small, so small that digital ad sales people sat next to news reporters. More shocking-the? The advertising representatives were discussing possible story ideas with reporters. There was no attempt to coerce reporters into writing favorable stories about clients. The sales people were pitching legitimate story ideas, unrelated to their ad base. This group was in it together, just trying to make their little unit run and prosper.The psychological and even physical wall between news and advertising was once the norm, and still is, in many U.S. news operations. But it is slowly being dismantled, in many cases by necessity. The Story So Far: What We Know about the Business of Digital Journalism is a 132-page report arguing that journalists must take a new approach to the content/sales relationship if they want their craft to thrive.After researching the digital operations of dozens of U.S. for-profit news organizations, the authors confirm what some leading journalism thinkers have preached for years: Profitable online operations typically employ unorthodox methods, create niche, web-specific content, find innovative ways to engage audiences, and are nimble - ready for constant change. This is a tall order for legacy news operations with management, sales, and news staffs accustomed to the old paradigm, one in which advertisers were forced to pay top-dollar for the privilege of appearing next to content consumed by a significant mass audience.Now advertisers have alternative ways to reach audiences - methods that are cheaper, highly targeted, and interactive. Columbia University journalism professor and dean of academic affairs Bill Grueskin and co-authors Ava Seave, principal of a New York City marketing consulting firm, and journalism Ph.D. candidate Lucas Graves spent close to a year examining the business outcomes and practices of digital journalism operations. They've found that advertisers will still contribute to a news organization's healthy bottom line-if it is willing to make significant change.Some of the successful practices the authors unearthed may be troubling to those schooled in traditional journalism standards. In Chapter 9, the report outlines Forbes magazine's decision to encourage its largest advertisers to contribute content directly to the magazine and the site as part of their advertising buy. This may sound similar to advertorials commonly found in magazines and newspapers. What makes this approach different, and more controversial, is how content is produced. In the Forbes model, the advertiser is given its own page and access to publish directly to the magazine's site. The content is not edited by Forbes staff. AltThough clearly labeled AdVoice, these advertiser-produced stories are mixed seamlessly with regular content.This model not only gives advertisers direct access to the consumers but encourages the advertiser to create content that will drive more traffic to the site. It's a financial double-dip for the magazine-advertisers pay to create content that increases Forbes' readership.The Story So Far also urges journalists to rethink and embrace the A word in some journalism circles-aggregation. In March 2011, The New York Times' Bill Keller wrote a column comparing content aggregation, as practiced by the Huffington Post, to piracy. …
Read full abstract