Pelvic Incidence-lumbar Lordosis Research Articles

THE ASSESSMENT OF THE SAGITTAL SPINOPELVIC ALIGNMENT THROUGH THE L1-PELVIS ANGLE

The spinopelvic alignment is often assessed via the Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch. Here we describe and validate a simplified method to evaluating the spinopelvic alignment through the L1-Pelvis angle (L1P). This method is set to reduce the operator error and make the on-film measurement more practicable.126 standing lateral radiographs of patients presenting for Total Hip Arthroplasty were examined. Three operators were recruited to label 6 landmarks. One operator repeated the landmark selection for intra-operator analysis. We compare PI-LL mismatch obtained via the conventional method, and our simplified method where we estimate this mismatch using PI-LL = L1P - 90°. We also assess the method's reliability and repeatability.We found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the PI-LL mismatch from the conventional method (mean 0.22° ± 13.6) compared to L1P method (mean 0.0° ± 13.1). The overall average normalised root mean square error (NRMSE) for PI-LL mismatch across all operators is 7.53% (mean −3.3° ± 6.0) and 6.5% (mean −2.9° ± 4.9) for the conventional and L1P method, respectively. In relation to intra-operator repeatability, the correlation coefficients are 0.87 for PI, 0.94 for LL, and 0.96 for L1P. NRMSE between the two measurement sets are PI: 9.96%, LL: 5.97%, and L1P: 4.41%. A similar trend is observed in the absolute error between the two sets of measurements.Results indicate an equivalence in PI-LL measurement between the methods. Reproducibility of the measurements and reliability between operators were improved. Using the L1P angle, the classification of the sagittal spinal deformity found in the literature translates to: normal L1P<100°, mild 100°<L1P<110°, and severe L1P>110°. Surgeons adopting our method should expect a small improvement in reliability and repeatability of their measurements, and a significant improvement of the assessment of the mismatch through the visualisation of the angle L1P.

Evaluating Outcomes of Spinopelvic Fixation for Patients Undergoing Long Segment Thoracolumbar Fusion with a Prior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Understanding the relationship between spinal fusion and its effects on relative spinopelvic alignment in patients with prior total hip arthroplasty (THA) is critical. However, limited data exist on the effects of long spinal fusions on hip alignment in patients with a prior THA. Our objective was to compare clinical outcomes and changes in hip alignment between patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum versus to the pelvis in the setting of prior THA. Patients with a prior THA who underwent elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion starting at L2 or above were retrospectively identified. Patients were placed into one of two groups: fusion to the sacrum or pelvis. Preoperative, six-month postoperative, one-year postoperative, and delta spinopelvic and acetabular measurements were measured from standing lumbar radiographs. A total of 112 patients (55 sacral fusions, 57 pelvic fusions) were included. Patients who underwent fusion to the pelvis experienced longer length of stay (LOS) (8.31 vs. 4.21, P < 0.001) and less frequent home discharges (30.8% vs. 61.9%, P = 0.010), but fewer spinal revisions (12.3% vs. 30.9%, P = 0.030). No difference was observed in hip dislocation rates (3.51% vs. 1.82%, P = 1.000) or hip revisions (5.26% vs. 3.64%, P = 1.000) based on fusion construct. Fusion to the sacrum alone was an independent predictor of an increased spine revision rate (odds ratio: 3.56, P = 0.023). Patients in the pelvic fusion group had lower baseline lumbar lordosis (LL) (29.2 vs. 42.9, P < 0.001), six-month postoperative LL (38.7 vs. 47.3, P = 0.038), and greater 1-year ∆ pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (-7.98 vs. 0.21, P = 0.032). Patients with prior THA undergoing long fusion to the pelvis experienced longer LOS, more surgical complications, and lower rate of spinal revisions. Patients with instrumentation to the pelvis had lower LL preoperatively with greater changes in LL and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis postoperatively. No differences were observed in acetabular positioning, hip dislocations, or THA revision rates between groups.

Effect of Muscularity and Fatty Infiltration of Paraspinal Muscles on Outcome of Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Lumbar paraspinal muscles play an important role in maintaining global spinal alignment and are associated with lower back pain; however, only a few studies on the effect of the paraspinal muscles on the surgical outcome exist. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the association of preoperative muscularity and fatty infiltration (FI) of paraspinal muscles with the outcome of lumbar interbody fusion. Postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed in 206 patients who underwent surgery for a degenerative lumbar disease. The preoperative diagnosis was spinal stenosis or low-grade spondylolisthesis, and the surgery performed was posterior lumbar interbody fusion or minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Indications for surgery were a complaint of severe radiating pain that did not improve with conservative treatment and neurological symptoms accompanied by lower extremity motor weakness. Patients with fractures, infections, tumors, or a history of lumbar surgery were excluded from this study. Clinical outcome measures included functional status, measured using the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for lower back and leg pain. Other radiographic parameters included measures of spinal alignment, including lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, C7 sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. Lumbar muscularity (LM) and FI were measured preoperatively using a lumbar magnetic resonance image (MRI). The high LM group showed more significant improvement in VAS score for lower back pain than the low LM group. In contrast, the VAS score for leg pain demonstrated no statistical significance. The high LM group showed more significant improvement in ODI postoperatively than the medium group. The severe FI group showed more significant improvement in ODI postoperatively, whereas the less severe FI group showed more significant improvement in the sagittal balance postoperatively. Patients with high LM and mild FI ratio observed on preoperative MRI demonstrated more favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion. Therefore, preoperative paraspinal muscle condition should be considered when planning lumbar interbody fusion.

Cranially Directed Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Screw Angles Are Associated With Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

A retrospective cohort study. To evaluate the impact of the upper instrumented vertebral (UIV) screw angle in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery on: (1) proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/F), (2) mechanical complications and radiographic measurements, and (3) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The effect of UIV screw angle in ASD surgery on patient outcomes remains understudied. A single-institution, retrospective study was undertaken from 2011 to 2017. UIV screw angle was trichotomized into positive: cranially directed screws relative to the superior endplate (2°≤θ), neutral: parallel to the superior endplate (-2°<θ<2°), and negative: caudally directed screws relative to the superior endplate (-2°≥θ). The primary outcome was PJK/F. Secondary outcomes included remaining mechanical complications, reoperation, and PROMs: Oswestry Disability Index, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) back/leg, and EuroQol. Regression controlled for age, body mass index, postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic incidence lumbar-lordosis mismatch. Among 145 patients undergoing ASD surgery, UIV screw angles were 35 (24.1%) cranially directed, 24 (16.6%) neutral, and 86 (59.3%) caudally directed. PJK occurred in 47(32.4%) patients. Positive screws were independently associated with increased PJK [odds ratio (OR)=4.88; 95% CI, 1.85-13.5, P =0.002] and PJF (OR=3.06; 95% CI, 1.32-12.30, P =0.015). Among 108 (74.5%) patients with lower thoracic UIV, PJK occurred in 38 (35.1%). Cranially directed screws were independently associated with an increased odds of PJK (OR=5.56; 95% CI, 1.86-17.90, P =0.003) with a threshold of 0.2° (area under the curve =0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76, P <0.001), above which the risk of PJK significantly increased. No association was found between positive screw angle and PJF (OR=3.13; 95% CI, 0.91-11.40, P =0.073). Because of the low number of patients with an upper thoracic UIV (N=37, 25.5%), no meaningful conclusions could be drawn from this subgroup. There was no association between UIV screw angle and remaining mechanical complications, reoperations, postoperative SVA and T1-pelvic angle, or PROMs. Cranially directed UIV screw angles increased the odds of PJK in patients with lower thoracic UIV. Meticulous attention should be paid to the lower thoracic UIV screw angle to mitigate the risk of PJK in ASD.

How Is Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Associated with Spinopelvic and Lower-Extremity Alignments in the Elderly.

A retrospective cohort study. Our aim is to investigate the relationship between degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS), and whole-body alignment, including spinopelvic and lower extremity alignments. DLS is a deformity commonly associated with aging. However, the correlation between whole-body alignment and DLS remains controversial. Adult volunteers aged over 50 years were included in the study after participating in the screening program. Characteristic data and standing radiographic parameters were assessed. A propensity score model was established with adjustments for age and sex after a preliminary analysis, and cases were divided into DLS (Cobb angle >10°) and non-DLS (Cobb angle ≤10°) groups. There were significant differences in age, sex, C2 sagittal vertical axis (C2-SVA), C7-SVA, T1 pelvic angle (TPA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), PI minus LL (PI-LL), knee angle, ankle angle, pelvic shift, C7-center sacral vertical line, L4 tilt, femur-tibia angle, and hip-knee-ankle angle (all p <0.05) using a preliminary analysis of 261 cases (75 DLS and 186 non-DLS). A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was used after 70 pairs of cases were selected. There were no significant differences in the characteristic data for lower extremity parameters. There were still significantly higher values of C2-SVA, TPA, PI, PT, and PI-LL in DLS group than in non-DLS group (all p <0.05). This study showed an important relationship between DLS and sagittal spinal deformity. However, DLS was not associated with the sagittal and coronal lower extremity alignments.

Effects of bone cement augmentation for uppermost instrumented vertebra on adjacent disc segment degeneration in lumbar fusions

We investigated the long-term effects of bone cement-augmented instrumentation in multilevel lumbar fusions in a retrospective cohort study. The use of cement-augmented screws is one of the techniques used to reduce early mechanical failure in treating multilevel lumbar fusion, especially in the elderly. However, little information is available regarding the long-term effects. A total of 51 patients who had undergone ≥3 levels of lumbar fusion were divided into two groups according to the use of bone cement-augmented screw fixation involving the upper instrumented vertebra: 22 patients in the cement-augmented group (group I) and 29 patients in the non-cement-augmented group (group II). Analysis of radiographic adjacent disc segment degeneration (ASD) revealed patients with lumbosacral fusion with a similar degree of osteoporosis. Radiologic ASD was defined as progression of >2 UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) grades at 2 years postoperatively. Other sagittal parameters and the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging Pfirrmann grades at the adjacent levels, possibly related to ASD, were also analyzed. No significant differences were present in the preoperative demographic and radiographic parameters between the 2 groups. However, the postoperative kyphotic changes at 3 months were greater for the non-cement-augmented group. In terms of the long-term effects, the incidence of radiologic ASD (group I, n= 20 [95.2%]; vs group II, n= 15 [53.6%]) was significantly higher in the cement-augmented group. Logistic regression analysis of radiologic ASD, including other clinical and radiologic parameters, postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (odds ratio, 5.201; 95% confidence interval, 1.123-24.090; P= 0.035), and cement augmentation (odds ratio, 20.193; 95% confidence interval, 2.195-185.729; P= 0.008) showed a significant correlation with the development of radiologic ASD at 2 years postoperatively. Although bone cement-augmented screw implantation can prevent kyphotic deformation at the proximal junction of upper instrumented vertebra in the early postoperative stages of multilevel lumbar fusion, a careful selection of patients is required because of possibly accelerated degeneration of adjacent segments.

The importance of thoracolumbar junctional orientation, change in thoracolumbar angle, and overcorrection of lumbar lordosis in development of proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Changes in the thoracolumbar angle (TLA) would play a pivotal role in the reciprocal changes following spine realignment surgery, thereby leading to the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). This study aimed to investigate the association between TLA and the development of PJK following adult spinal deformity surgery. A total of 107 patients were divided into PJK+ and PJK- groups according to the development of PJK within 12 months after surgery. The TLA and spinopelvic radiological parameters were compared between the PJK+ and PJK- groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the risk factors for PJK. The receiver operating characteristic curves of the regression models were used to investigate the cutoff values of significant parameters needed so that PJK would not occur. The change in TLA (ΔTLA) in the PJK+ group was significantly larger than in the PJK- group (6.7° ± 7.9° and 2.2° ± 8.1°, respectively; p = 0.006). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, and ΔTLA were significant risk factors for PJK. The risk of developing PJK was higher when the postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis was < 5.2 and the ΔTLA was > 3.58°. The present study highlights the thinking that extensive correction of TLA and lumbar lordosis should be avoided in patients with adult spinal deformity. Overcorrection of TLA of > 3.58° could result in higher odds of PJK.

Focusing on the amount of immediate changes in spinopelvic radiographic parameters to predict the amount of mid-term improvement of quality of life in adult degenerative scoliosis patients with surgery

IntroductionSurgery is still an effective treatment option for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS), but how to predict patients’ significant amount of the improvement in quality of life remains unclear. The previous studies included an inhomogeneous population. This study aimed to report the results about concentrating on the amount of immediate changes in spinopelvic radiographic parameters to predict the amount of mid-term improvement in quality of life in ADS patients.Materials and methodsPre-operative and immediately post-operative radiographic parameters included Cobb angle, coronal vertical axis (CVA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI) and LL/PI matching (PI–LL). Quality of life scores were evaluated pre-operatively and at the final follow-up using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). The amount of immediate changes in spinopelvic radiographic parameters (Δ) and the amount of mid-term improvement in quality of life (Δ) were defined, respectively.ResultsPatients showed significant change in radiographic parameters, ODI and VAS pre- and post-surgery, except CVA and PI. Univariate analysis showed a significant correlation between ΔTK, ΔLL, ΔCVA and the amount of mid-term improvement in quality of life, but multivariate analysis did not get a significant result. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that ΔSVA was still a significant predictor of ΔVAS and ΔODI. The changes in the other radiographic parameters were not significant. The equations were developed by linear regression: ΔODI = 0.162 × ΔSVA − 21.592, ΔVAS = 0.034 × ΔSVA − 2.828. In the ROC curve for ΔSVA in the detection of a strong ΔODI or ΔVAS, the cut-off value of ΔSVA was − 19.855 mm and − 15.405 mm, respectively.ConclusionsThis study shows that ΔSVA can predict the amount of mid-term improvement in quality of life in ADS patients. The changes in the other radiographic parameters were not significant. Two equations were yielded to estimate ΔODI and ΔVAS. ΔSVA has respective cut-off value to predict ΔODI and ΔVAS.

The Relationship Among Surgeon Experience, Complications, and Radiographic Outcomes in Spine Deformity Surgery: The Experience of a Junior Surgeon

To examine complication rates and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) by a junior surgeon. A study was conducted of a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent an open posterior interbody fusion of the thoracic and/or lumbar regions by a single surgeon for ASD between 2018 and 2022. Patient characteristics, complications, and common radiographic parameters of spinopelvic alignment were collated. A total of 112 patients with an average of 4.2 comorbidities underwent surgical correction of ASD. Thirty-seven patients (33.0%) experienced 52 major complications and 50 patients (44.6%) experienced 66 minor complications. Twenty-three patients (20.5%) required a revision operation. Both sagittal vertical axis (P < 10-14) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (P < 10-7) significantly improved postoperatively. Number of levels (P < 0.05), operative time >650 minutes (P < 0.01), estimated blood loss >1500 mL (P < 0.01), length of intensive care unit stay >1 day (P < 0.05), and hospitalization length >5 days (P < 0.05) all significantly increased the risk of a major complication. No patient factors significantly increased the risk of minor complications or revision surgery. Observed complication and revision rates in this cohort were consistent with rates reported in the literature. No preoperative patient risk factors significantly increased risk of complications or need for revision, suggesting that no patient population is at increased risk undergoing surgery by a junior surgeon. The relatively high rate of complications observed in this cohort may be a result of high baseline morbidity.

Radiological and Clinical Outcomes comparing 2-level MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Retrospective Cohort Study. To compare early postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes between 2-level minimally invasive (MIS) trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Fifty three consecutive patients undergoing 2-level lumbar interbody fusion from L3-L5 for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were enrolled. Twenty four patients underwent LLIF and 29 underwent TLIF. Operative time and length of stay were similar between LLIF and TLIF (272.8 ± 82.4 vs 256.1 ± 59.4 minutes; 5.5 ± 2.8 vs 4.7 ± 3.3 days, P > .05), whereas blood loss was lower for LLIF (229.0 ± 125.6 vs 302.4 ± 97.1mls, P = .026). Neurological deficits were more common in LLIF (9 vs 3, P = .025), whereas persistent deficits were rare for both (1 vs 1, P = 1). For both groups, all patient reported outcomes visual analogue scale (VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, ODI, SF-36 physical) improved from preoperative to 2-years postoperative (P < .05), with both groups showing no significant differences in extent of improvement for any outcome. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion demonstrated superior restoration of disc height (L3-L4: 4.1 ± 2.4 vs 1.2 ± 1.9mm, P < .001; L4-L5: 4.6 ± 2.4 vs .8 ± 2.8mm, P < .001), foraminal height (FH) (L3-L4: 3.5 ± 3.6 vs 1.0 ± 3.6mm, P = .014; L4-L5: 3.0 ± 3.5 vs -.1 ± 4.4mm, P = .0080), segmental lordosis (4.1 ± 6.4 vs -2.1 ± 8.1°, P = .005), lumbar lordosis (LL) (4.1 ± 7.0 vs -2.3 ± 12.6°, P = .026) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch (-4.1 ± 7.0 vs 2.3 ± 12.6°, P = .019) at 2-years follow-up. The superior radiological outcomes demonstrated by 2-level trans-psoas LLIF did not translate into difference in clinical outcomes compared to 2-level TLIF at the 2-years follow-up, suggesting both approaches are reasonable for 2-level lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Evaluation of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment on Analgesic Efficacy of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection in Geriatric Patients.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sagittal imbalance based on pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch on the analgesic efficacy of epidural steroid injection in geriatric patients. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 65 years or older who received lumbar epidural steroid injections under fluoroscopy were enrolled. The cutoff of PI-LL mismatch >20° was used as an indicator of a marked sagittal imbalance. The cross-sectional area of the psoas and paraspinal muscles, as well as the paraspinal fat infiltration grade were measured. A 50% or more decrease in pain score at four weeks after injection was considered as good analgesia. Variables were compared between PI-LL ≤ 20° and >20° groups and multivariate analysis was used to identify factors related to pain relief after injection. Results: A total of 237 patients consisting of 150 and 87 patients in the PI-LL ≤ 20° and >20° groups, respectively, were finally analyzed. Female patients, patients with lumbar surgery history, and the smaller cross-sectional area of the psoas muscles were predominantly observed in patients with sagittal imbalance. There was no difference in analgesic outcome after injection according to the PI-LL mismatch (good analgesia 60.0 vs. 60.9%, p = 0.889). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-injection opioid use, moderate to severe foraminal stenosis, and high-graded paraspinal fat infiltration were significantly associated with poor analgesia after injection. Conclusions: There was no significant correlation between sagittal spinopelvic alignment and pain relief after lumbar epidural steroid injection for geriatric patients.

Sacroiliac Joint Pain Should Be Suspected in Early Buttock and Groin Pain after Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An Observational Study.

Sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) is one of the pathological conditions of adjacent segment disorders occurring after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that even in ASD surgery using S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws, SIJP can develop much earlier than reported previously and can be rescued by ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint block. Overall, 94 patients with ASD treated with long spinal fusion using S2AI screws were prospectively investigated for SIJP postoperatively, and the effect of ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint block was evaluated. Additionally, the relationship between the symptomatic side of the SIJP and the surgical procedure; the preoperative and postoperative whole-spine sagittal and coronal alignment, lumbar pelvis sagittal plane alignment, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis were retrospectively compared between the groups with and without SIJP. Eleven of 94 cases (11.7%) developed SIJP. The average onset was 12.0 (±6.2) days after surgery. The "one-finger test," "Gaenslen test," and "tenderness of the posterosuperior iliac spine" had high positivity rates for SIJP. Night pain occurred in 81.8% of patients and was one of the diagnostic features. There were no significant relationships between the symptomatic side of SIJP and the approach-side of lumbar interbody fusion, donor site of the iliac bone graft, or malposition of the S2AI screw. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics and radiological parameters between the SIJP-positive and -negative groups preoperatively, postoperatively, or in postoperative changes. Two of the 11 cases required the SIJ block four times, but all patients eventually achieved >70% pain relief with no recurrence. For good pain control and physical therapy, the fact that early buttock-groin pain after spinal fusion surgery has a 12% likelihood of being due to SIJP and can be relieved with the ultrasound-guided SIJ block is clinically important for diagnosis and pain management.

Pelvic Nonresponse Following Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: Influence of Realignment Strategies on Occurrence.

Despite adequate correction, the pelvis may fail to readjust, deemed pelvic nonresponse (PNR). To assess alignment outcomes [PNR, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), postoperative cervical deformity (CD)] following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery utilizing different realignment strategies. ASD patients with two-year data were included. PNR defined as undercorrected in age-adjusted pelvic tilt (PT) at six weeks and maintained at two years. Patients classified by alignment utilities: (a) improvement in Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab sagittal vertical axis, (b) matching in age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, (c) matching in Roussouly, (d) aligning Global Alignment and Proportionality (GAP) score. Multivariable regression analyses, controlling for age, baseline deformity, and surgical factors, assessed rates of PNR, PJK, and CD development following realignment. A total of 686 patients met the inclusion criteria. Rates of postoperative PJK and CD were not significant in the PNR group (both P >0.15). PNR patients less often met substantial clinical benefit in Oswestry Disability Index by two years [odds ratio: 0.6 (0.4-0.98)]. Patients overcorrected in age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, matching Roussouly, or proportioned in GAP at six weeks had lower rates of PNR (all P <0.001). Incremental addition of classifications led to 0% occurrence of PNR, PJK, and CD. Stratifying by baseline PT severity, Low and moderate deformity demonstrated the least incidence of PNR (7.7%) when proportioning in GAP at six weeks, while severe PT benefited most from matching in Roussouly (all P <0.05). Following ASD corrective surgery, 24.9% of patients showed residual pelvic malalignment. This occurrence was often accompanied by undercorrection of lumbopelvic mismatch and less improvement of pain. However, overcorrection in any strategy incurred higher rates of PJK. We recommend surgeons identify a middle ground using one, or more, of the available classifications to inform correction goals in this regard. III.

Importance of physiological age in determining indications for adult spinal deformity surgery in patients over 75years of age: a propensity score matching analysis.

Physiologically, people age at different rates, which leads to a discrepancy between physiological and chronological age. Physiological age should be a priority when considering the indications for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. The primary objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of the postoperative course, surgical outcomes, and complication rates to extend the healthy life expectancy of older ASD patients (≥ 75years). The secondary objective was to clarify the importance of physiological age in the surgical treatment of older ASD patients, considering frailty. A retrospective review of 109 consecutive patients aged ≥ 65years with symptomatic ASD who underwent a corrective long fusion with lateral interbody fusion from the lower thoracic spine to the pelvis from 2015 to 2019 was conducted. Patients were classified into two groups according to age (group Y [65-74years], group O [≥ 75years]) and further divided into four groups according to the ASD-frailty index score (Y-F, Y-NF, O-F, and O-NF groups). To account for potential risk factors for perioperative course characteristics, complication rates, and surgical outcomes, patients from the database were subjected to propensity score matching based on sex, BMI, and preoperative sagittal spinal alignment (C7 sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt). Clinical outcomes were evaluated 2years postoperatively, using three patient-reported outcome measures of health-related quality of life: the Oswestry Disability Index, Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22), and Short Form 36 (SF-36). Additionally, the postoperative time-to-first ambulation, as well as minor, major, and mechanical complications, were evaluated. In the comparison between Y and O groups, patients in group O were at a higher risk of minor complications (delirium and urinary tract infection). In contrast, other surgical outcomes of group O were comparable to those of group Y, except for SRS-22 (satisfaction) and time to ambulation after surgery, with better outcomes in Group O. Patients in the O-NF group had better postoperative outcomes (time to ambulation after surgery, SRS-22 (function, self-image, satisfaction), SF-36 [PCS]) than those in the Y-F group. Older age warrants monitoring of minor complications in the postoperative management of patients. However, the outcomes of ASD surgery depended more on frailty than on chronological age. Older ASD patients without frailty might tolerate corrective surgery and have satisfactory outcomes when minimally invasive techniques are used. Physiological age is more important than chronological age when determining the indications for surgery in older patients with ASD.

Do Spinopelvic Parameters Relate with Secondary Hip Spine Syndrome in Secondary Hip Arthritis?

The prevalence of low back pain (LBP) with primary osteoarthritis (OA) hip undergoing total hip replacement (THA) has been studied. However, secondary OA hip affects younger individuals where changes in the sagittal spinal parameters (SSPs) could be reversible to reduce LBP. The study aims to document changes in clinical and radiological parameters following THA. Thirtypatients with secondary OA hip were included in the prospective analysis, excluding anyone with previous spine/hip surgery of known spinal diseases, including deformity, inflammatory or infective pathology. Visual analog scale for (VAS) hip and LBP, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Harris core (HHS) along with SSPs were measured at baseline and three months and analyzed. Mean age was 42.8 ± 8.9years which 17 unilateral (U/L) and 13 bilateral (B/L) OA. Overall, no significant changes were seen in SSPs that included pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) was seen except for an improvement in the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) [40.22 ± 36.67 to 24.06 ± 21.93, p < 0.001]. However, clinical variables such as VAS hip and LBP, ODI, and HHS improved post-hip THA. Similar findings were seen in sub-group analysis when U/L affected were compared to B/L affected. The sagittal SSPs except SVA does not change significantly following THA in patients with secondary OA, though LBP improves clinically. Hence, we assume routine measurement of these parameters is not mandatory when planning for THA in these patients.

Feasibility Analysis of 3D Printing-Assisted Pedicle Screw Correction Surgery for Degenerative Scoliosis.

Objective To explore the feasibility of 3D printing-assisted pedicle screw correction surgery for degenerative scoliosis. Methods From January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2020, patients with degenerative scoliosis who received corrective surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped based on the fixation methods. Patients in the control group received traditional pedicle screw internal fixation, while those in the study group received 3D printing-assisted pedicle screw fixation. The therapeutic effects were compared. Results There were 78 cases in the control group and 82 cases in the study group. There were no significant differences in scoliotic Cobb's angle, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), VAS score, JOA score, social function, physical function, role function, or cognitive function between the study group and the control group before the surgery, but there were differences in the above parameters between the two groups after surgery. The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was also significantly lower in the study group. Conclusion 3D printing-assisted pedicle screw correction surgery provides a strong 3D correction force with reliable effect and fewer complications, and is a good treatment choice for degenerative scoliosis.

Optimal immediate sagittal alignment for kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis following corrective osteotomy.

PurposeTo investigate the optimal immediate sagittal alignment of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) following corrective osteotomy.MethodsSeventy-seven AS patients who underwent osteotomy were enrolled. Radiographic parameters, including global kyphosis (GK), lumbar lordosis (LL), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and PI and LL mismatch (PI–LL), were collected. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). At the final follow-up, SVA > 5 cm was regarded as sagittal imbalance, and a total ODI ≤ 20 or total SRS-22 score ≥4 was considered to indicate a good clinical outcome.ResultsSeventy-seven patients with an average age of 37.4 ± 8.6 years were followed up for 29.4 ± 4.2 months. At the final follow-up, GK, LL, PT, SS, TPA, and T1SPI showed some degree of correction loss (P < 0.05). The follow-up parameters could be predicted with the immediate postoperative parameters through their linear regression equation (P < 0.05). The postoperative immediate T1SPI, TPA, SVA, and PI were also highly correlated with the clinical outcome (ODI and/or SRS-22) at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). Based on the relationship, the optimal immediate sagittal alignment for obtaining good clinical outcome was determined: T1SPI ≤ 0.9°, TPA ≤ 31.5°, and SVA ≤ 9.3cm. AS patients with PI ≤ 49.2° were more likely to achieve the optimal alignment and obtained lower ODI and a lower incidence of sagittal imbalance than those with PI > 49.2° at the final follow-up (P < 0.05).ConclusionPostoperative immediate parameters could be used to predict the final follow-up parameters and clinical outcome. The optimal postoperative immediate sagittal alignment of AS patients was T1SPI ≤ 0.9°, TPA ≤ 31.5°, and SVA ≤ 9.3 cm, providing a reference for kyphosis correction and a means for clinical outcome evaluation. Patients with a lower PI (≤49.2°) were more likely to achieve optimal alignment and obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system

BACKGROUNDDegenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common pathologies addressed by surgeons. Recently, data demonstrated improved outcomes with fusion in conjunction with laminectomy compared to laminectomy alone. However, given not all degenerative spondylolistheses are clinically comparable, the best treatment option may depend on multiple parameters. Specifically, the impact of spinopelvic alignment on patient reported and clinical outcomes following fusion versus decompression for grade I spondylolisthesis has yet to be explored. PURPOSEThis study assessed two-year clinical outcomes and one-year patient reported outcomes following laminectomy with concomitant fusion versus laminectomy alone for management of grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis. The present study is the first to examine the effect of spinopelvic alignment on patient-reported and clinical outcomes following decompression alone versus decompression with fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective sub-group analysis of observational, prospectively collected cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE679 patients treated with laminectomy with fusion or laminectomy alone for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and comorbid spinal stenosis performed by orthopaedic and neurosurgeons at three medical centers affiliated with a single, tertiary care center. OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome was the change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Global Physical Health (GPH), and Global Mental Health (GMH) scores at baseline and post-operatively at 4-6 and 10-12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative parameters (estimated blood loss and operative time), and two-year clinical outcomes including reoperations, duration of postoperative physical therapy, and discharge disposition. METHODSRadiographs/MRIs assessed stenosis, spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt; from this data, two cohorts were created based on pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PILL), denoted as “high” and “low” mismatch. Patients underwent either decompression or decompression with fusion; propensity score matching (PSM) and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were used to create matched cohorts of “cases” (fusion) and “controls” (decompression). Binary comparisons used McNemar test; continuous outcomes used Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Between-group comparisons of changes in PROMIS GPH and GMH scores were analyzed using mixed-effects models; analyses were conducted separately for patients with high and low pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PILL) mismatch. RESULTS49.9% of patients (339) underwent lumbar decompression with fusion, while 50.1% (340) received decompression. In the high PLL mismatch cohort at 10-12 months postoperatively, fusion-treated patients reported improved PROs, including GMH (26.61 vs. 20.75, p<0.0001) and GPH (23.61 vs. 18.13, p<0.0001). They also required fewer months of outpatient physical therapy (1.61 vs. 3.65, p<0.0001) and had lower 2-year reoperation rates (12.63% vs. 17.89%, p=0.0442) compared to decompression-only patients. In contrast, in the low PLL mismatch cohort, fusion-treated patients demonstrated worse endpoint PROs (GMH: 18.67 vs. 21.52, p<0.0001; GPH: 16.08 vs. 20.74, p<0.0001). They were also more likely to require skilled nursing/rehabilitation centers (6.86% vs. 0.98%, p=0.0412) and extended outpatient physical therapy (2.47 vs. 1.34 months, p<0.0001) and had higher 2-year reoperation rates (25.49% vs. 14.71%,p=0.0152). CONCLUSIONSLumbar laminectomy with fusion was superior to laminectomy in health–related quality of life and reoperation rate at two years postoperatively only for patients with sagittal malalignment, represented by high PILL mismatch. In contrast, the addition of fusion for patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and spinopelvic harmony (low PILL mismatch) resulted in worse quality of life outcomes and reoperation rates.

Comparison of local and regional radiographic outcomes in minimally invasive and open TLIF: a propensity score-matched cohort.

Local and regional radiographic outcomes following minimally invasive (MI) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus open TLIF remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of local and regional radiographic parameters following MI-TLIF and open TLIF. The authors hypothesized that open TLIF provides greater segmental and global lordosis correction than MI-TLIF. A single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing MI- or open TLIF for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis was performed. One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match patients who underwent open TLIF to those who underwent MI-TLIF. Sagittal segmental radiographic measures included segmental lordosis (SL), anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), foraminal height (FH), percent spondylolisthesis, and cage position. Lumbopelvic radiographic parameters included overall lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT). Change in segmental or overall lordosis after surgery was considered "lordosing" if the change was > 0° and "kyphosing" if it was ≤ 0°. Student t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare outcomes between MI-TLIF and open-TLIF groups. A total of 267 patients were included in the study, 114 (43%) who underwent MI-TLIF and 153 (57%) who underwent open TLIF, with an average follow-up of 56.6 weeks (SD 23.5 weeks). After PSM, there were 75 patients in each group. At the latest follow-up both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in assessment scores obtained with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the numeric rating scale for low-back pain (NRS-BP), without significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in SL, ADH, and percent corrected spondylolisthesis compared to baseline (p < 0.001). However, the MI-TLIF group experienced significantly larger magnitudes of correction with respect to these metrics (ΔSL 4.14° ± 4.35° vs 1.15° ± 3.88°, p < 0.001; ΔADH 4.25 ± 3.68 vs 1.41 ± 3.77 mm, p < 0.001; percent corrected spondylolisthesis: -10.82% ± 6.47% vs -5.87% ± 8.32%, p < 0.001). In the MI-TLIF group, LL improved in 44% (0.3° ± 8.5°) of the cases, compared to 48% (0.9° ± 6.4°) of the cases in the open-TLIF group (p > 0.05). Stratification by operative technique (unilateral vs bilateral facetectomy) and by interbody device (static vs expandable) did not yield statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). Both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and local radiographic parameters, with neutral effects on regional alignment. Surprisingly, in our cohort, change in SL was significantly greater in MI-TLIF patients, perhaps reflecting the effect of operative techniques, technological innovations, and the preservation of the posterior tension band. Taking these results together, no significant overall differences in LL between groups were demonstrated, which suggests that MI-TLIF is comparable to open approaches in providing radiographic correction after surgery. These findings suggest that alignment targets can be achieved by either MI- or open-TLIF approaches, highlighting the importance of surgeon attention to these variables.

Single Level Spondylolisthesis Associated Sagittal Plane Imbalance Corrected by Pre-Psoas Interbody Fusion Using Anterior Column Release with 30° Expandable Hyperlordotic Cage

Background: Loss of lumbar lordosis caused by single level degenerative spondylolisthesis can trigger significant sagittal plane imbalance and failure to correct lumbopelvic parameters during lumbar fusion can lead to poor outcome or worsening deformity. Anterior column release (ACR) through a pre-psoas approach allows the placement of a hyperlordotic cage (HLC) to improve lumbar lordosis, but it is unclear if the amount of cage lordosis affects radiological outcomes in real-life patient conditions. Methods: Three patients were treated with ACR and 30° expandable HLC for positive sagittal imbalance secondary to single-level spondylolisthesis. Patients reported baseline and post-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Pain Score (NRS). Radiographic parameters of sagittal balance included lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL). Results: Surgical indications were sagittal plane imbalance caused by L4–L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis (n = 2) and L3–L4 spondylolisthesis secondary to adjacent segmental degeneration (n = 1). Average post-operative length of stay was 3 days (range 2–4) and estimated blood loss was 266 mL (range 200–300). NRS and ODI improved in all patients. All experienced improvements in LL (preop = 33°, postop = 56°), SVA (preop = 180 mm, postop = 61 mm) and PI-LL (preop = 26°, postop = 5°). Conclusion: ACR with expandable HLC can restore sagittal plane balance associated with single-level spondylolisthesis. Failure to perform ACR with HLC placement during pre-psoas interbody fusion may result in under correction of lordosis and poorer outcome for these patients.