Pedicle Screw Pullout Research Articles

Circumferential Fusion With Anterior Strut Grafting and Short-segment Multipoint Posterior Fixation for Burst Fractures in Skeletally Immature Patients

The Universal Clamp (UC) is a novel vertebral anchor consisting of a sublaminar polyester band connected to fusion rods by a titanium jaw locked with a screw. The authors prospectively studied patients treated for thoracic or lumbar burst fractures with short pedicle screw constructs reinforced with UCs to prevent screw pullout. Eleven patients below 18 years of age underwent 2-stage circumferential fusion for complete burst fractures (Magerl A 3.3). Two pedicle screws reinforced by 2 UCs were inserted in the vertebra proximal to the fracture and 2 pedicle screws reinforced by 2 UCs were inserted in the vertebra distal to the fracture. Within 7 days, cages filled with cancellous bone graft were added for anterior column support. T12 was fractured in 3 patients, L1 in 4, L3 in 2, and L4 in 2 patients. Preoperatively, 10 patients were neurologically intact (Frankel E) and 1 patient had an incomplete spinal cord injury (Frankel C). Mean operative duration for the posterior and anterior procedures was 110±24 and 120±35 minutes, respectively. Average intraoperative blood loss was 355±60 mL. Mean hospital stay was 11±2 days and follow-up averaged 36.1±5 months. Mean kyphotic deformity was corrected from 25±9 to 5.3±4.5 degrees postoperatively (79%), without subsequent loss of correction (P=0.17). Regional kyphosis improved by 20±8 degrees postoperatively, without subsequent loss of correction (P=0.09). No intraoperative complication was observed. There was no neurological deterioration. The patient who had a Frankel C lesion recovered 1 Frankel level (Frankel D) at final follow-up. None of the patients exhibited significant correction loss during follow-up, and there was no pseudarthrosis. Thoracic and lumbar complete burst fractures in skeletally immature patients can be treated using anterior bone graft cages and posterior instrumented fusion augmented with UCs to prevent pedicle screw pullout. With these constructs, which are short to preserve mobile intervertebral segments, kyphosis was corrected, fusion achieved, and correction maintained in all subjects without neurological worsening. Level IV.

Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities—an ex vivo biomechanical study

The pedicle screw fixation system has been used for various spinal disorders. Many studies have been conducted on the fixation ability of the pedicle screw, but variable results have been reported based on bone qualities, pedicle screw properties, insertion techniques, and experimental methods. An experimental and biomechanical study. To evaluate the geometric factors of screws affecting fixation ability after assessing pullout strength based on various pedicle screw designs and different bone densities. Nine types of pedicle screws were prepared according to the outer diameter shape (cylindrical or conical), the inner diameter shape (cylindrical or conical), and thread shape (V shape, buttress shape, and square shape). The pedicle screws were inserted into standardized polyurethane foams of Grades 5, 15, and 20. The pullout strength of each pedicle screw was determined using an MTS 858 machine (Material Testing System Corp., Minneapolis, MN, USA), and the results were analyzed statistically. Pullout strength based on the shape of thread was the highest in the V shape and lowest in the square shape for all foam grades (p<.05). The outer cylindrical and inner conical shape of pedicle screw showed the highest pullout strength in Grades 5 and 15 foam (p<.05). An outer cylindrical and inner conical shape with a V-shaped thread showed the highest pullout strength in all foam grades (p<.05). Pedicle screw with an outer cylindrical and inner conical configuration witha V-shaped thread may have maximum pullout strength, regardless of bone density.

Radiological Outcome of Short Segment Posterior Stabilisation and Fusion in Thoracolumbar Spine Acute Fracture

The optimal management of thoracolumbar spine fractures remains a matter of controversy. The current literature implies that the use of short-segment pedicle screw fixation may be inappropriate because of its high reported failure rate. The purpose of this study is to report the short-term results of thoracolumbar burst and compression fractures treated with short-segment pedicle instrumentation. From 2002 to 2007, 19 patients with thoracolumbar acute traumatic fractures were instrumented with posterior short-segment pedicle screws. The patients' case notes, operation records, preoperative and postoperative radiographs (sagittal index, anterior body compression and regional kyphosis), computed tomography scans, neurological findings (Frankel functional classification), and follow-up records up to 18 months were reviewed. A statistically significant difference was found between the patients' preoperative, postoperative and follow-up sagittal index, anterior body compression and regional kyphosis measurement. One case resulted in screw pedicle screw pullout and subsequently, kyphotic deformity. The patient underwent revision surgery to long-segment posterior instrumentation and fusion. None of the patients showed an increase in neurological deficit. In conclusion, the short-term follow-up results suggest a favourable outcome for short-segment instrumentation. Load shearing classification is essential for the selection of patient for short-segment instrumentation. However, the long-term follow-up evaluation will be needed to verify our findings.

Non-fusion without decompression for surgical treatment of unstable AO type A thoracolumbar fractures

Objective To discuss the role of non-fusion without decompression in surgical treatment of unstable AO type A thoracolumbar fractures. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 42 patients with AO type A thoracolumbar fractures (T11-L2) treated with short segment pedicle screw fixation from February 2004 to February 2008. Patients were divided into two groups, ie, Croup A (treated with short segmental pedicle screw fixation without decompression or fusion) and Group B (treated with short segmental pedicle screw fixation without decompression but with fusion). The pre-operative, postoperative and follow-up local kyphotic angle, vertebrae compression rate were compared between two groups. Results In Croup A, average local kyphotic angle and average vertebrae compression rate were 19.1° (15. 4°-29. 8°) and 46% (30%-63%) respectively before operation, but 5. 0° (0. 3°-10.3°) and 10% (0-28%) respectively after operation. Twenty-one patients were followed up for average 21.2 months (12-46 months), which showed average local kyphotic angle of 7° (1.8°-10.7°) and average vertebrae compression rate of 10% (2% -22%) at final follow-up. In Croup B, average local kyphotic angle and average vertebrae compression rate were 25.8° (15.9°-34.5°) and 55% (30%-76%) respectively before operation, but 7.1° (1.5°-19. 1°) and 15% (0-28%) respectively after operation. Fifteen patients were followed up for mean 17.9 months (12-31 months) , which showed mean local kyphotic angle of 8.3° (0.7°-19.2°) and average vertebrae compression rate of 15% (l%-26%) at final follow-up. There was no pseudarthrosis, implant breakage, pedicle screw pull-out or severe back pain. There was statistical difference in local kyphotic angle and vertebrae compression rate between two groups.Conclusion Unstable AO type A thoracolumbar fractures with minor neurological deficit can be treated with pedicle screw fixation only without decompression or fusion. Key words: Spinal fractures; Thoracic vertebrae; Lumbar vertebrae; Fracture fixation, internal; Bone fusion

Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae

Transpedicular instrumentation at C-7 has been well accepted, but salvage techniques are limited. Lamina screws have been shown to be a biomechanically sound salvage technique in the proximal thoracic spine, but have not been evaluated in the lower cervical spine. The following study evaluates the anatomical feasibility of lamina screws at C-7 as well as their bone-screw interface strength as a salvage technique. Nine fresh-frozen C-7 cadaveric specimens were scanned for bone mineral density using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Prior to testing, all specimens were imaged using CT to obtain 1-mm axial sections. Caliper measurements of both pedicle width and laminar thickness were obtained. On the right side, pedicle screws were first inserted and then pulled out. Salvage intralaminar screws were inserted into the left lamina from the right spinous process/lamina junction and then pulled out. All screws were placed by experienced cervical spine surgeons under direct fluoroscopic visualization. Pedicle and lamina screws were 4.35- and 3.5-mm in diameter, respectively. Screws sizes were chosen based on direct and radiographic measurements of the respective anatomical regions. Insertional torque (IT) was measured in pounds per inch. Tensile loading to failure was performed in-line with the screw axis at a rate of 0.25 mm/sec using a MiniBionix II system with data recorded in Newtons. Using lamina screws as a salvage technique generated mean pullout forces (778.9 +/- 161.4 N) similar to that of the index pedicle screws (805.3 +/- 261.7 N; p = 0.796). However, mean lamina screw peak IT (5.2 +/- 2.0 lbs/in) was significantly lower than mean index pedicle screw peak IT (9.1 +/- 3.6 lbs/in; p = 0.012). Bone mineral density was strongly correlated with pedicle screw pullout strength (r = 0.95) but less with lamina screw pullout strength (r = 0.04). The mean lamina width measured using calipers (5.7 +/- 1.0 mm) was significantly different from the CT-measured mean lamina width (5.1 +/- 0.8 mm; p = 0.003). Similarly, the mean pedicle width recorded with calipers (6.6 +/- 1.1 mm) was significantly different from the CT-measured mean pedicle width (6.2 +/- 1.3 mm; p = 0.014). The mean laminar width measured on CT at the thinnest point ranged from 3.8 to 6.8 mm, allowing a 3.5-mm screw to be placed without difficulty. These results suggest that using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7 provides similar fixation strength as the index pedicle screw. The C-7 lamina appears to have an ideal anatomical width for the insertion of 3.5-mm screws commonly used for cervical fusions. Therefore, if the transpedicular screw fails, using intralaminar screws appear to be a biomechanically sound salvage technique.

Intralaminar Screw Insertion of Thoracic Spine in Children With Severe Spinal Deformities

Case report. To describe a technique of thoracic fixation in pediatric cases with anatomy not amenable to hooks and pedicle screws. Intralaminar screws have been described in cervical and lumbar spines. There is only 1 report of the use of thoracic intralaminar screws being used for kyphotic deformity in adult patients. We performed fixation of the thoracic spine using laminar screws in 2 patients with severe spinal deformities in whom pedicle screws and hooks failed to maintain the desired correction. Clinical and radiologic features of both cases are reported. The surgical technique is described. Intralaminar screws of the thoracic spine were successfully placed in 2 children with severe spinal deformities to achieve proximal fixation. Neither dorsal nor ventral cortical bone violations of the laminae were identified. In 1 case, pedicles were too small and sclerotic to accommodate pedicle screws. The second case was characterized by pedicle screw pull-out after corrective procedure, and the following revision with hooks caused fracture of the lamina. The intralaminar screws were subsequently used as proximal fixation to correct the deformity. No screw failure was encountered. Neither patient developed neurologic complications as a result of the screws. This procedure was used as a salvage technique in this series. However, our experience outlines the applicability of this technique at different thoracic levels and appears to be a useful tool in the armamentarium of the spinal surgeon dealing with patients with complex spinal deformities and difficult anatomy.

Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws

Transfacet pedicle screws provide another alternative for standard pedicle screw placement for plate fixation in the lumbar spine. However, few studies looking at transfacet pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine are available. Therefore, cervical transfacet pedicle screw fixation and standard pedicle screw fixation techniques were biomechanically compared in this study. Ten fresh human cadaveric cervical spines were harvested. On one side, transfacet pedicle screws were placed at the C3-4, C5-6, and C7-T1 levels. On the other side, pedicle screws were placed at the C3, C5, and C7 levels. The screw insertion technique at each level was randomized for right or left. The starting point for the transfacet pedicle screw insertion was located at the midpoint of the inferolateral quadrant of the lateral mass and the direction of the screw was about 50 degrees caudally in the sagittal plane and about 45 degrees toward the midline in the axial plane. Screws were placed from the inferior articular process, across the facet complex and the pedicle into the body of the caudal vertebra. The entry point for the pedicle screw was located at the midpoint of the superolateral quadrant of the lateral mass, and the direction of the screw was about 45 degrees toward the midline in the axial plane and toward the upper third of the vertebral body in the sagittal plane. After screw placement we performed axial pullout testing. All the cervical transfacet pedicle screws and the pedicle screws were inserted successfully. The mean pullout strength for the transfacet pedicle screws was 694 N, while for the pedicle screws 670 N (P=0.013). In all but six instances (10%), the pedicle screw pullout values exceeded the values for the transfacet pedicle screws; this occurred three times at the C3/C4 level, twice at the C5/C6 level and once at the C7/T1 level. The greatest pullout strength difference at a single level was observed at the C5/C6 level, with a mean difference of 38 N (t=-1.557, P=0.154). The C7/T1 level had a mean difference of 26 N and the C3/C4 level had a mean difference of 14 N. Cervical transfacet pedicle screws exhibited higher pullout strength than pedicle screws. Posterior transfacet pedicle screw fixation in the cervical spine may afford an alternative to standard screw placement for plate fixation and cervical stabilization.

A demineralized calf vertebra model as an alternative to classic osteoporotic vertebra models for pedicle screw pullout studies

Screws, clamps and other spinal instrumentation materials are tested using healthy animal and healthy human vertebrae, but the application of similar tests to an osteoporotic vertebra is generally neglected because of high costs and limited availability of high quality and consistent osteoporotic vertebrae. The objective of this study is to develop an in-vitro method to decrease the mineral content of an animal vertebra utilizing decalcifying chemical agents that alters the bone mineral density and some biomechanical properties to such an extent that they biomechanically mimic the osteoporotic spine. This study was performed on 24 fresh calf lumbar vertebrae. Twelve out of these 24 vertebrae were demineralized and the others served as control. A hole was opened in the pedicles of each vertebrae and the bone mineral density was measured. Each vertebra was then placed into a beher-glass filled with hydrochloric acid decalcifier solution. The decalcifier solution was introduced through the holes in the pedicles with an infusion pump. The vertebrae were then subjected to DEXA to measure post process BMD. Pedicle screws were introduced into both pedicles of each vertebrae and pullout testing was performed at a rate of 5 mm/min. The difference of BMD measurements between pre- and post-demineralizing process were also statistically significant (p < 0.001). The difference of pullout loads between pre- and post-demineralizing process were also statistically significant (p < 0.001). The acid demineralizing process may be useful for producing a vertebra that has some biomechanical properties that are consistent with osteopenia or osteoporosis in humans.

Primary Pedicle Screw Augmentation in Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae

Pedicle screw pullout testing in osteoporotic and control human cadaveric vertebrae, comparing augmented and control vertebrae. To compare the pullout strengths of pedicle screws fixed in osteoporotic vertebrae using polymethyl methacrylate delivered by 2 augmentation techniques, a standard transpedicular approach and kyphoplasty type approach. Pedicle screw instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine carries an increased risk of screw loosening, pullout, and fixation failure. Osteoporosis is often cited as a contraindication for pedicle screw fixation. Augmentation of the vertebral pedicle and body using polymethyl methacrylate may improve fixation strength and construct survival in the osteoporotic vertebrae. While the utility of polymethyl methacrylate has been demonstrated for salvage of screws that have been pulled out, the effect of the cement technique on pullout strength in osteoporotic vertebrae has not been previously studied. Thirteen osteoporotic and 9 healthy human lumbar vertebrae were tested. All specimens were instrumented with pedicle screws using a uniform technique. Osteoporotic pedicles were augmented with polymethyl methacrylate using either a kyphoplasty type technique or a transpedicular augmentation technique. Screws were tested in a paired testing array, randomly assigning the augmentation techniques to opposite sides of each vertebra. Pullout to failure was performed either primarily or after a 5000-cycle tangential fatigue conditioning exposure. After testing, following screw removal, specimens were cut in the axial plane through the center of the vertebral body to inspect the cement distribution. Pedicle screws placed in osteoporotic vertebrae had higher pullout loads when augmented with the kyphoplasty technique compared to transpedicular augmentation (1414 +/- 338 versus 756 +/- 300 N, respectively; P < 0.001). An unpaired t test showed that fatigued pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae augmented by kyphoplasty showed higher pullout resistance than those placed in healthy control vertebrae (P = 0.002). Both kyphoplasty type augmentation (P = 0.007) and transpedicular augmentation (P = 0.02) increased pullout loads compared to pedicle screws placed in nonaugmented osteoporotic vertebrae when tested after fatigue cycling. Pedicle screw augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate improves the initial fixation strength and fatigue strength of instrumentation in osteoporotic vertebrae. Pedicle screws augmented using the kyphoplasty technique had significantly greater pullout strength than those augmented with transpedicular augmentation technique and those placed in healthy control vertebrae with no augmentation.

Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths

Although successful clinical use of cervical pedicle screws has been reported, anatomical studies have shown the possibility for serious iatrogenic injury. However, there are only a limited number of reports on the biomechanical properties of these screws which evaluate the potential benefits of their application. To investigate if the pull-out strengths after cyclic uniplanar loading of cervical pedicle screws are superior to lateral mass screws. An in vitro biomechanical study. Twenty fresh-frozen disarticulated human vertebrae (C3-C7) were randomized to receive both a 3.5 mm cervical pedicle screw and lateral mass screw. The screws were cyclically loaded 200 times in the sagittal plane. The amount of displacement was recorded every 50 cycles. After cyclical loading, the screws were pulled and tensile load to failure was recorded. Bone density was measured in each specimen and maximum screw insertion torque was recorded for each screw. During loading the two screw types showed similar stability initially, however the lateral mass screws rapidly loosened compared to the pedicle screws. The rate of loosening in the lateral mass screws was widely variable, while the performance of the pedicle screws was very consistent. The pullout strengths were significantly higher for the cervical pedicle screws (1214 N vs. 332 N) and 40% failed by fracture of the pedicle rather than screw pullout. Pedicle screw pullout strengths correlated with both screw insertion torque and specimen bone density. Cervical pedicle screws demonstrated a significantly lower rate of loosening at the bone-screw interface, as well as higher strength after fatigue testing. These biomechanical strengths may justify their use in certain limited clinical applications.

Effects of pilot hole preparation technique on pedicle screw fixation in different regions of the osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar spine

The authors evaluated the effects of pilot hole preparation technique on insertional torque and axial pullout resistance in osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Using a probe technique and fluoroscopy, 102 pedicle screws were placed in 51 dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-proven osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar levels. Screws were inserted using the same-size tapping, one-size-under tapping, or no-tapping technique. Insertional torque and axial pullout resistance were measured. Analysis of variance, Fisher exact test, and regression analysis were performed. Same-size tapping decreased pullout resistance in the lumbar spine. There was no effect on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine. Pullout resistance values were lower for all insertion techniques in the upper thoracic spine. Insertional torque and bone mineral density correlated with pullout resistance in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Tapping decreased pedicle screw pullout resistance in the osteoporotic human lumbar spine, although it did not affect pullout strength in the thoracic spine. Tapping decreased insertional torque in upper thoracic levels. Surgeons should optimize overall construct rigidity when placing thoracic pedicle screws in patients with spinal segment osteoporosis.

A NEW SCREW PULLOUT TEST INCORPORATING THE EFFECTS OF STRESS RELAXATION

In this study, we analyzed the effects of viscoelastic properties of bone such as stress relaxation on pedicle screw pullout strength. Our results primarily showed that stress relaxation, which would most likely occur in-vivo, significantly decreased the pullout strength and stiffness of the screw compared to what the standard in-vitro pullout test could predict. This highlights the fact that the stress relaxation alters the expected mechanical performance of the screw in pullout. Secondly, the results suggested that pullout rate has no significant effect on the screw holding power and stiffness in-vitro.

Evaluation of calcium sulfate paste for augmentation of lumbar pedicle screw pullout strength

Background context: Many authors have evaluated the components responsible for ultimate pullout strength of pedicle screws. In these studies, one important variable has been the screw fixation. Because pedicle screw fixation has increased in popularity over recent years, so has the need for augmentation in difficult situations. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been established as the gold standard in terms of strength of fixation but has the potential for severe complications when applied in spine surgery. Calcium sulfate is an alternative to PMMA, because it lacks the exothermic reaction, is potentially osteoconductive and is resorbed by the body in 30 to 60 days.Purpose: To determine the strength of a new calcium sulfate cement in terms of pedicle screw augmentation. The purpose was to evaluate calcium sulfate versus PMMA in terms of pullout strength. PMMA was considered the gold standard in terms of strength for this experiment.Study design: Lumbar vertebrae implanted with pedicle screws were subjected to axial pullout tests. The force required to cause implant failure was measured and compared for three methods of fixation.Outcome measures: Force to failure (Newtons) for each pedicle test was recorded and analyzed with results from similarly augmented pedicles.Methods: Lumbar vertebrae were harvested from four cadavers and implanted with pedicle screws. These screws were either placed in native bone or augmented with either calcium sulfate paste or PMMA. In those pedicles that had augmentation, the material was permitted to set for a minimum of 24 hours. Axial pullout tests were then performed using an MTS (Materials Testing System Corporation, Minneapolis, MN) testing machine. The screws were pulled out over a distance of up to 6 mm at 0.25 mm/sec. This rate and distance ensured failure in each case. The load to failure was recorded for each pedicle.Results: Calcium sulfate augmentation improved pedicle screw pullout strength significantly when compared with native bone (p=.0003). This represented an average increase of 167% over the native bone. Likewise, PMMA improved the pullout strength significantly over native bone (p<.0001) for an average increase of 199%. There were no significant differences between the calcium sulfate and PMMA augmentation (p=.0791), although the PMMA averaged 119% of the strength of calcium sulfate.Conclusions: Although PMMA is considered the gold standard in terms of fixation strength, its use around the spine has been limited because of concern over complications. The calcium sulfate bone paste tested in this study demonstrated strength similar to PMMA without the major risks to the spinal cord. In addition, the calcium sulfate paste allows for possible osteoconduction to aid in spinal fusion. Further study is needed to determine the applicability of this calcium sulfate paste in the clinical setting of spine surgery.

Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines

The authors conducted a biomechanical study to evaluate pedicle screw pullout strength in osteoporotic cadaveric spines. Nonaugmented hemivertebrae were compared with pressurized polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented hemivertebrae. Six formalin-fixed cadaveric thoracolumbar spines at least two standard deviations below the mean bone mineral density (BMD) for age were obtained. Radiographic and BMD studies were correlated to grades I, II, and III osteoporosis according to the Jekei scale. Each of the 21 vertebrae underwent fluoroscopic placement of 6-mm transpedicular screws with each hemivertebra serving as the control for the contralateral PMMA-augmented hemivertebra. Pedicle screws were then evaluated for biomechanical axial pullout resistance. Augmented hemivertebrae axial pullout forces were increased (p = 0.0005). The mean increase in pullout force was 181% for Grade I, 206% for Grade II, and 213% for Grade III osteoporotic spines. Augmented Grade I osteoporotic spines demonstrated axial pullout forces near those levels reported in the literature for nonosteoporotic specimens. Augmented Grade II osteoporotic specimens demonstrated increases to levels found in nonaugmented vertebrae with low-normal BMD. Augmented Grade III osteoporotic specimens had increases to levels equal to those found in nonaugmented Grade I vertebrae. Augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae in PMMA-assisted vertebroplasty can significantly increase pedicle screw pullout forces to levels exceeding the strength of cortical bone. The maximum attainable force appears to be twice the pullout force of the nonaugmented pedicle screw for each osteoporotic grade.

Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out

Background context: Biomechanical studies show that bone-mineral density, pedicle morphology, and screw thread area affect pedicle screw pullout failure. The current literature is based on studies of cylindrical pedicle screw designs. Conical screws have been introduced that may provide better “fit and fill” of the dorsal pedicle as well as improved resistance to screw bending failure. However, there is concern about loss of fixation if conical screws must be backed out after insertion.Purpose: To determine that conical screws have comparable initial stiffness and fixation strength compared with standard, cylindrical screws, and to assess whether conical screw fixation deteriorates when screws are backed out from full insertion. Study design/setting: This biomechanical analysis compared pullout strength of cylindrical and conical pedicle screw designs, using porcine lumbar vertebrae in a paired testing format. Methods: Porcine lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with conical and cylindrical pedicle screws with the same thread pitch, area and contour, and an equivalent diameter at the pedicle isthmus, 1.2 cm distal to the hub. Axial pullout was performed at 1.0 mm/minute displacement. Pullout loads, work and stiffness were recorded at 0.02-second intervals. Conical versus cylindrical screws were tested using three paired control configurations: fully inserted, backed out 180 degrees and backed out 360 degrees. Fully inserted values were compared with each set of back-out values to determine relative loss of fixation strength. Screw pullout data were analyzed using a Student's t test. Results: Pullout loads in these porcine specimens were comparable to data from healthy human vertebrae. Conical screws provided a 17% increase in the pullout strength compared with cylindrical screws (P<.10) and a 50% increase in initial stiffness (P<.05) at full insertion. There was no loss in pullout strength, stiffness or work to failure when conical or cylindrical screws were backed out 180 or 360 degrees from full insertion. Conclusions: Conical screws offer improved initial fixation strength compared with cylindrical screws of the same size and thread design. Our results suggest that appropriately designed conical screws can be backed out 180 to 360 degrees for intraoperative adjustment without loss of pullout strength, stiffness or work to failure. Intraoperative adjustments of these specific conical screws less than 360 degrees should not affect initial fixation strength. These results may not hold true for screws with a smaller thread area or larger minor diameter.

The role of imaging and in situ biomechanical testing in assessing pedicle screw pull-out strength.

This study determined the predictive ability of quantitative computed tomography, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, pedicular geometry, and mechanical testing in assessing the strength of pedicle screw fixation in an in vitro mechanical test of intra-pedicular screw fixation in the human cadaveric lumbar spine. To test several hypotheses regarding the relative predictive value of densitometry, pedicular geometry, and mechanical testing in describing pedicle screw pull-out. Previous investigations have suggested that mechanical testing, geometry, and densitometry, determined by quantitative computed tomography or dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, predict the strength of the screw-bone system. However, no study has compared the relative predictive value of these techniques. Forty-nine pedicle screw cyclic-combined flexion-extension moment-axial pull-out tests were performed on human cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The predictive ability of quantitative computed tomography, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, insertional torque, in situ stiffness, and pedicular geometry was assessed using multiple regression. Several variables correlated to force at failure. However, multiple regression analysis showed that bone mineral density of the pedicle determined by quantitative computed tomography, insertional torque, and in situ stiffness when used in combination resulted in the strongest prediction of pull-out force. No other measures provided additional predictive ability in the presence of these measures. Pedicle density determined by quantitative computed tomography when used with insertional torque and in situ stiffness provides the strongest predictive ability of screw pull-out. Geometric measures of the pedicle and density determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry do not provide additional predictive ability in the presence of these measures.

Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws.

Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force. To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols. Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously. Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data. The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pullout force was significantly greater than that of specimens secured without polymer resin and that of embedded specimens for which intrusion did not occur. Polymer resin intrusion can have a significant effect on the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-pedicle screw interface. When polymer resins are used to secure vertebral specimens for in vitro biomechanical tests of the bone-pedicle screw interface, it is important to either prevent intrusion (e.g., with a latex wrapping) or document post-test (e.g., through the methods described in this article) that intrusion did not occur for the specimens included in the analysis.

Lumbar Pedicle Screw Salvage

Although research has determined pedicle screw pullout strengths for normal and osteoporotic bone, this study provides the first biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw salvage. Ten fresh frozen human lumbar spines were separated into individual vertebrae; 6.0 x 40 mm pedicle screws were placed in each pedicle; and an axial pullout test was performed to establish control values. Ultimate load, initial stiffness, work, and displacement data were calculated. Each vertebra was reinstrumented with one 7.0 x 40 mm variable screw placement (VSP) screw side by side with either a 7.0 mm Cotrel Dubousset sacral screw (CD) or a 7.0 mm Compact Cotrel Dubousset pedicle screw (CCD). Pullout tests were repeated and compared to control data for individual screws and for each VSP/CD or VSP/CCD pair. Vertebrae were then reinstrumented with 8.0 mm VSP and CD screws and paired pullouts repeated. Statistical analysis was carried out using a paired T test. Analysis of intravertebral and intergroup variation of controls was carried out using a Paired Two Sample T test. The 7.0 mm CCD screws restored pullout strength to 62% of control pullouts; 7.0 mm CD screws, to 85%; 7.0 mm VSP screws, to 99%; 8.0 mm CD screws, to 109%; and 8.0 mm VSP screws, to 148% of control pullouts. The 7.0 mm VSP salvage screws exceeded CD screws in ultimate load by 22.5% (p < .03) and CCD screws by 33.5% (p < .05). The 8.0 mm salvage screws significantly increased pullout relative to both controls and all 7.0 mm salvage screws, with 8.0 mm VSP exceeding 8.0 mm CD by 34% (p < .03). Initial stiffness was also significantly greater in VSP than CD screws. Although applied in a smaller number of vertebrae, 8.0 mm screws sufficiently outperformed smaller screws to provide statistically significant differences. The 7.0 mm VSP salvage screws restored pullout to control levels, roughly equivalent to outcomes previously obtained with unpressurized polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).

Pedicle screw pullout strength. Correlation with insertional torque.

This study was designed to correlate several parameters regarding pedicle screw bone/metal interface strength. The insertional torque measured during tapping and placement of pedicle screws was correlated with the bone mineral density of the vertebral body, the dimensions of the pedicle, the method of preparation of the pedicle, and the amount of load and number of cycles to failure of the bone/metal interface. Thirty human cadaveric lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with 6.5-mm pedicle screws. The maximum torque achieved during insertion was digitally recorded. A cyclic pedicle screw pullout test was performed. A linear correlation existed between both the insertional torque when tapping or when inserting a screw and the number of cycles to ultimate pedicle screw pullout. An inverse linear relationship was found between the pedicle width and cycles to failure. There was no linear correlation found when comparing the number of cycles to failure to bone mineral density. These findings suggest that insertional torque is a good predictor of bone-metal interface failure. Bone mineral density of the vertebral body was less effective as a predictor of failure. Smaller pedicle width correlated with increased insertional torque and cycles to failure. This may explain why patients with osteoporosis on radiography may still obtain stable fixation with pedicle screws. Other factors, such as pedicle dimensions and shape, affect screw purchase as much as vertebral body bone density. Insertional torque less than 4.0 inch-pounds led to early pedicle screw pullout. This study forms the basis for the authors' clinical use of an instrumented torque screwdriver to measure insertional torque in the operating room.