You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP66-07 EVALUATING THE REACH AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A BLADDER HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAM USING AN IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE FRAMEWORK Jacky Chu, Aditi Sharma, and Kathleen M. Kan Jacky ChuJacky Chu More articles by this author , Aditi SharmaAditi Sharma More articles by this author , and Kathleen M. KanKathleen M. Kan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003329.07AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Behavioral and lifestyle changes in the form of bladder health education (BHE) effectively treat pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms (pLUTS). High volumes of pLUTS patients have led to long wait times at our institution’s pediatric urology clinic. To address this access issue, we developed a virtual, group-based BHE program called Bladder Bootcamp (BB) in English and Spanish. BB is undergoing program evaluation using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework with the aim of assessing its efficacy, sustainability, and areas for improvement. Here we present findings from the Reach and Implementation portions of the study. METHODS: Through a retrospective review of our clinic’s scheduling data from July 2020-July 2022, we calculated Reach as the percentage of BB participants out of those eligible. Patients age 5-17 years with new visits for pLUTS were eligible, as our clinic automatically offers BB in this scenario. We also compared BB attendance by patient language, defined as the percentage of participants out of scheduled non-participants, using Fisher’s exact test. Implementation was defined as the BB staff’s process of implementing BB. We conducted a focus group with seven BB staff regarding: BB’s purpose; logistics and resources needed; and staff and patient barriers. Two investigators independently performed open coding for emerging concepts, which were organized into themes after peer debriefing. RESULTS: Of 1,099 eligible patients, 135 participated, representing a Reach of 12.3%. Attendance did not significantly differ between English- and Spanish-speaking participants (45.1% vs. 33.9%, p=0.077). Focus group results revealed three themes: 1) BB aims to empower patients through timely access to group-based BHE and reduce wait times and staff workload; 2) To meet high demand, BB requires adequate staffing, improved workflow, and evaluation of outcome measures with potential for multi-site growth; 3) BB participants experience attendance barriers due to technology access, language barriers, and stigma around bladder health. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies the potential of virtual, group-based programs to increase access to BHE. Challenges of this format include high demand, inadequate staffing, and technology access. Next steps are to evaluate BB’s Efficacy, Adoption, and Maintenance using RE-AIM, as well as continue tracking attendance by language to ensure no disparity exists. Our future work will aim to improve BB and inform future interventions that increase access to BHE. Source of Funding: Funding provided by the Stanford Medical Scholars Fellowship Program © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e934 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jacky Chu More articles by this author Aditi Sharma More articles by this author Kathleen M. Kan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract