Reviewed by: Papers on Quintilian and Ancient Declamation by Michael Winterbottom W. Martin Bloomer Michael Winterbottom. Papers on Quintilian and Ancient Declamation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. Pp. xxvi, 371. $115.00. ISBN 978-0-19-883605-6. From the vast (19 books listed in the complete bibliography), various (mostly Latin prose from Cicero through medieval Latin, text critical studies, editions, and studies of Quintilian and declamation), and long-standing (1962-present) researches of Winterbottom, this volume republishes 24 studies and 12 reviews on Quintilian and declamation. To read this book through is to review the constitution of the state of scholarship on declamation, most essentially, the text itself--but not by Winterbottom alone of course. One virtue of gathering all of the papers together is that we see Winterbottom in conversation and correspondence with the other great Latin prose editors, Häkanson, Shackelton-Bailey; a phrase will thank G. Goold or M. Reeve; notices of discussion with Donald Russell. For example, Ch. 15, "More Problems in Quintilian," offers a few revisions to the 1970 monograph Problems in Quintilian and includes textual critical notes to accompany his OCT, but this chapter derives from a reconsideration of all of Quintilian in discussion with Russell for his Loeb edition. The reader may wish he had been a fly on the wall. The papers on textual criticism are an education in problem-solving. The great strength of Winterbottom's opus has been his process of emendation. Very often he detects a problem by seeing a gap, a lacuna or the suppression or compression of the excerpted version of a text (where we lack the original). To detect the gap is no simple matter of seeing the idiom, syntax, or sense is faulty. Winterbottom is alive to the idiosyncracies of his text's genre. Declamation can be free-wheeling and allusive. A declamatory treatment is always a present version meant to surprise the audience, which has just heard or remembers from schooldays or another performance other versions of the same or similar theme, law, character. What is the indignant father going to say this time about his daughter shacking up with a pirate? If it is good, it will have zest and surprise. So when some aggrieved son says, "I'm double disowned," I imagine one Roman saying to the other, did he really just say ab his abdicor and his neighbor says no, he said bis abdicor. And another saying, huh? The scribes or the excerptor may have missed the point as well. Winterbottom is good of course at assembling relevant evidence (parallels, variants, earlier editors' solutions or failures). But to follow his researches is a wonderful, dense education, better in my experience than [End Page 482] trying to glean why Houseman preferred something (in failing to get the point I am like the dullard Roman in the declamatory audience above or the dolts that constitute the lion's share of the universe). Winterbottom doesn't call anybody a dolt, but he is clear about editors and editions he finds wanting, and why. Bile and the implicit appeal to taste (the approach of "clearly the conjecture just advanced is the best and only Latin expression and you should be appropriately smitten") and the failure to be clear about the ratio edendi (a feature of the extreme economy of the OCT critical apparatus) are absent. One reservation: I do wish that five of the twelve review articles had not been sustained criticism of Cousin's Budé edition of Quintilian. Who needs to read five times the details that "The apparatus pullulates with error"? The papers on rhetoric and declamation and philosophy and declamation are the most helpful for those interested in the intellectual and educational milieu of declamation. Winterbottom is very good at describing the affinities of declamation or Quintilian with Cicero. A crucial point he has made several times: Seneca the elder was wrong in believing that declamation began in his day; it began with Greek teachers of rhetoric and Cicero, especially but not only in his early style, was deeply affected by this ethical, emotional, and sententious mode. Chapter 3 on "Quintilian and Rhetoric" charts Quintilian's return to Cicero. This had...
Read full abstract