We are often asked by students how to make the greatest impact for animals with their careers. They are frequently considering paths such as becoming animal lawyers or activists. This is in part due to the recent large growth in animal law as an academic discipline (Townsend, 2013) and the gaining popularity of activism, such as Extinction Rebellion.While peaceful activism may have its place, and animal law is the right path for those who love the study and practice of law, academically there are a myriad of options for those wishing to incorporate animal ethics into their discipline. Our work begins from the premise that to change the world for animals, you need to change people's ideas about animals. To that end, we suggest that students continue in the academic field they are passionate about but also bring animal ethics into their research.Admittedly, this can be easier said than done, as in order to do so, students often need to find an accommodating university and an academic supervisor. But the number of academics willing to supervise animal-related projects is on the rise, opening up a great deal of possibilities. Take for example, some of the excellent presentations we see at our Oxford University Animal Ethics Society meetings. They are varied and engaging. They range from topics such as “Nonhumans and Meat-Eating in Horror Films”; “Cripple Crow, Mad Dog: Animal Ethics in Conversation with Disability Studies”; “Shakespeare and Animal Ethics”; “Animal Ethics in J. M. Coetzee's Work”; “Killing Animals in a Man's World: Is There a Link Between Hunting and Toxic Masculinity?”; “Free School Milk: Natural, Normal, and Necessary?”; and “John Cowper Powys and Vivisection” as well as more traditional explorations of the philosophy of eating animals and animals and climate change.It is in the areas where animals are not normally considered that sometimes there is the greatest scope for intellectual exploration. For example, in anthropology, a discipline explicitly focused on human beings, historical human-animal relationships can be explored. One such recent anthropological study argued that it is women, rather than men, who were responsible for domesticating dogs and bringing them into the home (Chambers et al., 2020).As one of us has written elsewhere, there are often fundamental assumptions inside traditional disciplines, such as theology, that normally privilege human perspectives (Linzey, 2009). It is for a new generation of scholars to unpick the anthropocentric tendencies within their disciplines and liberate us from old ways of thinking. This work has already begun with pioneering volumes’ such as Animals and Sociology (Peggs, 2012), Animals and Public Health (Akhtar, 2012), Animals and the Economy (McMullen, 2016), Animals and Social Work (Ryan, 2011), An Introduction to Animals and the Law (Schaffner, 2011), Animals in the Classical World (Harden, 2013), An Introduction to Animals and Visual Culture (Malamud, 2012), and Animal Rights Education (Horsthemke, 2018) to name a few. But there is still a long way to go.So here is the challenge and invitation to the rising scholars in universities and colleges: Pioneer new ways of including animal-related material into your theses and dissertations, query the all-too-common anthropocentrism of many of your teachers, be bold in arguing the case for animal-inclusive disciplines, and show how it can be done in your own area of study.
Read full abstract