PD-L1 Inhibitor Durvalumab Research Articles

CTLA4 blockade abrogates KEAP1/STK11-related resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibitors.

For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with CTLA4 inhibitors and PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (hereafter, PD-(L)1 inhibitors) is associated with higher rates of anti-tumour activity and immune-related toxicities, when compared with treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone. However, there are currently no validated biomarkers to identify which patients willbenefit from dual ICB1,2. Here we show that patients with NSCLC who have mutations in the STK11 and/or KEAP1 tumour suppressor genes derived clinical benefit from dual ICB with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab and the CTLA4 inhibitor tremelimumab, but not from durvalumab alone, when added to chemotherapy in the randomized phase III POSEIDON trial3. Unbiased genetic screens identified loss of both of these tumour suppressor genes as independent drivers of resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibition, and showed that loss of Keap1 was the strongest genomic predictor of dual ICB efficacy-a finding that was confirmed in several mouse models of Kras-driven NSCLC. In both mouse models and patients, KEAP1 and STK11 alterations were associated with an adverse tumour microenvironment, which was characterized by a preponderance of suppressive myeloid cells and the depletion of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, but relative sparing of CD4+ effector subsets. Dual ICB potently engaged CD4+ effector cells and reprogrammed the tumour myeloid cell compartment towards inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-expressing tumoricidal phenotypes that-together with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells-contributed to anti-tumour efficacy. These data support the use of chemo-immunotherapy with dual ICB to mitigate resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibition in patients with NSCLC who have STK11 and/or KEAP1 alterations.

Durvalumab and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer (PDAC): Long-term outcomes and correlative insights.

4174 Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has limited activity in genomically unselected patients (pts) with PDAC. While anti-tumor activity with combination SABR/ICB has been shown, biomarkers of response are poorly defined. We conducted a phase 1/2 study of PD-L1 inhibitor Durvalumab (D) and SABR after induction chemotherapy in LA and BR PDAC (NCT03245541). We report long-term outcomes and correlative biospecimen analyses. Methods: A multi-institutional, single arm phase 1/2 trial was conducted at Cedars-Sinai and Memorial Sloan Kettering. Initial clinical data reported by Tuli et al, ASCO 2023. Pre-treatment tissue assessed for p40 and GATA3 to determine classical vs basal subtype by immunohistochemistry. Tissue interrogated by immunofluorescence for PD-L1 expression and infiltration of immune cell subsets. Multiparametric immunophenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by flow cytometry conducted on baseline and on treatment samples. Wilcoxon rank sum test used to determine difference in biomarkers from each timepoint; p-value <0.05 significant. Results: N= 36 enrolled from 08/2017-05/2022; N=31(86%) LA, N=5 (14%) BR. N= 9 (25%) underwent resection; all R0. At median follow up 36.5 months, 6- and 12-month PFS 69%, 36%. Median PFS 8.7m (95% CI 6.1-14), median OS 16m (95% CI 13-26). N=2 (6%) alive without disease progression. Correlative analyses summarized (table). Key findings; Classical/basal subtyping feasible on N=9 (8 classical, 1 basal). Median PD-L1 score not associated with survival. Peri-tumoral, but not intratumoral CD8+ cells associated with PFS >6 months. Flow cytometry feasible for 70 samples from N=35. Frequency of pre-treatment non-naïve CD4+ FoxP3+ Treg associated with PFS >12. CD103+ CD8+ T Cells significantly expanded on treatment only in patients with PFS>12m (p=0.038) and were significantly enriched relative to PFS<12m on treatment. Conclusions: A proportion of pts with LA PDAC achieve durable control with D and SABR after induction chemotherapy. Baseline peri-tumoral CD8+ cells and peripheral CD103+ CD8 T cells and CD4+ Treg in PBMCs at baseline and on treatment may predict for benefit. Further analyses ongoing and validation in larger cohorts is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03245541 . [Table: see text]

Abstract CT203: Multi-omic analysis of serial biopsies to inform biomarkers of sensitivity to olaparib and durvalumab in patients with metastatic BRCA-wildtype triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

Abstract Background: The phase 2 Adaptive Multi-Drug Treatment of Evolving Cancers (AMTEC) trial (NCT03801369) evaluated the efficacy of the combination of the PARP inhibitor Olaparib (Ola) and the PD-L1 inhibitor Durvalumab (Durva) in participants with BRCA-wildtype mTNBC. The combination was found to be effective with a median progression free survival (mPFS) of 5.5 months (AACR 2022). Here we report on updated biomarker analyses from paired biopsies (Bx) pre- and on-Ola therapy from 14 AMTEC participants. Methods: AMTEC participants undergo a pre-Ola Bx (Bx1), then one (28-day) cycle of Ola monotherapy with a repeat on-Ola Bx (Bx2) before adding Durva to Ola. Multi-omic profiling of DNA, RNA, and protein signals in Bx1 and Bx2 using Deep candidate gene sequencing, RNAseq, Nanostring Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP), and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was correlated with clinical outcomes to identify predictors of Ola + Durva sensitivity, and adaptive resistance to PARPi therapy. Results: We identified over 30 biomarkers, with the optimal predictive value arising from Bx2. Key potential biomarkers were confirmed in an independent test set. Markers of good prognosis: • Basal Immune Activated (BLIA)/Basal Immune Suppressed (BLIS subtype) - A BLIA subtype on Bx2 was associated with a mPFS of 7.36 months compared to 1.71 months for BLIS/Luminal androgen receptor subtypes (p=0.001) • Multi-omic immune composite - A positive immune consensus signature (RNA, DSP, mIHC) on Bx2 was associated with a mPFS of 7.36 months compared to 2.29 months (p=0.005) • B cell activation signature - We developed a novel B-cell RNA activation signature that was highly predictive of response in Bx2, with mPFS of 8.54 and 1.04 months in signature-positive and signature-negative tumors, respectively (p=0.0004) Markers of poor prognosis: • AKT/MAPK pathway - AKT pathway gene mutations in Bx2 with concomitant protein phosphorylation of pathway members correlated with a shorter mPFS of 2.4 months compared to 7.13 months for no pathway mutation/activation (p=0.03). MAPK pathway protein phosphorylation in Bx2 was a negative prognostic factor, with mPFS of 2.17 months (p=0.004) • Angiogenesis - An upregulated Hallmark of Cancer angiogenesis RNA signature on Bx2 was associated with a shorter mPFS of 1.94 months compared to 7.95 months with no angiogenesis upregulation (p=0.0009) The following markers did not show significant association with survival outcomes on AMTEC: • PD-L1 positivity by IHC (defined as >1% Tumor Proportion Score, 22C3 antibody) • Tumor mutational burden • HRD, as measured by Rad51 foci or by mutations in HR pathway members Conclusions: Findings highlight the value of paired Bxs to identify predictive biomarkers of PARPi + immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity. The striking predictive value of the BLIA/BLIS signature warrants evaluation in a larger trial. Emerging resistance mechanisms justify AMTEC trial expansion to include PARPi + MEKi or PARPi + AKTi in biomarker selected patients, which is now in progress. Citation Format: Zahi I. Mitri, Allison L. Creason, Jayne M. Stommel, Daniel Bottomly, Jeong Youn Lim, SMMART Clinical Trials Program, Christopher L. Corless, Shannon McWeeney, Gordon B. Mills. Multi-omic analysis of serial biopsies to inform biomarkers of sensitivity to olaparib and durvalumab in patients with metastatic BRCA-wildtype triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT203.

Abstract 1366: Dual immune checkpoint inhibition enhances the anti-tumor activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan in preclinical models

Abstract Background Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of an anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Recent clinical trials such as BEGONIA have highlighted the potential therapeutic benefit in combining T-DXd with immuno-oncology (IO) agents such as the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab. Here, we report preclinical findings demonstrating enhanced anti-tumor activity when T-DXd is combined with dual immune checkpoint inhibition. Methods HER2-expressing human cancer cell lines were treated in vitro with T-DXd and assessed for induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD) markers and expression of NK cell-activating ligands. Human macrophages and T cells were incubated with supernatants from treated cancer cells, and their activation status evaluated via flow cytometry. In vivo, the effects of T-DXd in combination with inhibitors of PD-L1, CTLA-4, and a monovalent bispecific anti-PD-1/TIGIT antibody - a murine surrogate of rilvegostomig - on tumor growth were evaluated in BALB/c mice bearing human HER2-low EMT6 murine mammary tumors. The anti-tumor activity of T-DXd in combination with volrustomig, a monovalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, was also assessed in hu-CD34+ NSG mice bearing HER2-low Caki-1 renal cell carcinoma tumors. Results In vitro, T-DXd induced ICD via DXd-mediated extracellular release of inflammatory mediators ATP and HMGB1, and cell surface exposure of calreticulin. This was associated with a greater than 2-fold increase in expression of NK cell-activating ligands, and activation of both macrophages and T cells. In immunocompetent mice bearing human HER2 expressing EMT6 tumors, T-DXd treatment drove tumor growth inhibition (53%, P <0.001) that was associated with an increase in tumoral T cells (2.6-fold, P <0.05) and increased CD8+ T cell expression of the immune checkpoints PD-1, TIGIT, and TIM-3. Tumor growth inhibition relative to vehicle-treated mice was enhanced when T-DXd was combined with inhibitors of PD-L1 (108%, P <0.001), PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 (172%, P <0.001), or a bispecific PD-1/TIGIT inhibitor (181%, P <0.001). Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed how the combination of T-DXd and PD-1/TIGIT inhibition increased tumoral NK cells (3.2-fold, P <0.001) and CD8+ T cells (3.8-fold, P <0.001) relative to vehicle. Consistent with findings in syngeneic models, the combination of T-DXd with a bispecific PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitor also enhanced tumor growth inhibition in a humanised Caki-1 model (121%) compared to T-DXd alone (72%) (P <0.001). Conclusions These data provide insight into the clinical activity observed with T-DXd and provide scientific rationale for combination strategies with novel, bispecific IO agents targeting CTLA-4 or TIGIT in addition to the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Citation Format: Liam Jenkins, Laura Kazlauskas, Matt Wilson, Scott A. Hammond, Theresa Proia, Jerome Mettetal. Dual immune checkpoint inhibition enhances the anti-tumor activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan in preclinical models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1366.

Challenges with Estimating Long-Term Overall Survival in Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Validation-Based Case Study.

The study aimed to explore methods and highlight the challenges of extrapolating the overall survival (OS) of immunotherapy-based treatment in first-line extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Standard parametric survival models, spline models, landmark models, mixture and non-mixture cure models, and Markov models were fitted to 2-year data of the CASPIAN Phase 3 randomised trial of PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab added to platinum-based chemotherapy (NCT03043872). Extrapolations were compared with updated 3-year data from the same trial and the plausibility of long-term estimates assessed. All models used provided a reasonable fit to the observed Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival data. The model which provided the best fit to the updated CASPIAN data was the mixture cure model. In contrast, the landmark analysis provided the least accurate fit to model survival. Estimated mean OS differed substantially across models and ranged from (in years) 1.41 (landmark model) to 4.81 (mixture cure model) for durvalumab plus etoposide and platinum and from 1.01 (landmark model) to 2.00 (mixture cure model) for etoposide and platinum. While most models may provide a good fit to K-M data, it is crucial to assess beyond the statistical goodness-of-fit and consider the clinical plausibility of the long-term predictions. The more complex cure models demonstrated the best predictive ability at 3 years, potentially providing a better representation of the underlying method of action of immunotherapy; however, consideration of the models' clinical plausibility and cure assumptions need further research and validation. Our findings underscore the significance of adopting a clinical perspective when selecting the most appropriate approach to model long-term survival, particularly when considering the use of more complex models.

OGC O06 Long term outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibition in oesophageal cancer

Abstract Background Phase III studies have shown a survival benefit for the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to conventional chemotherapy for patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. Large scale studies of chemo-immunotherapy prior to and after surgery are under way. We studied the clinical and biological effects of adding the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (D) to peri-operative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in a multi-centre phase II trial and used multiple phenotyping approaches to identify features associated with benefit. Methods Patients suitable for surgery were given D for 4 weeks, then one of Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine (CapOx), fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and taxotere (FLOT), or chemoradiotherapy (CXRT, CROSS regimen) were given with D before surgery, and D was continued for up to 12 further infusions postoperatively. Toxicity, response, and survival were recorded until death, for 3 years or until June 2022 when the study ended. Comparisons were made with propensity score matched patients treated over the same period in the one of the participating sites. Tumour phenotyping was with single cell and bulk sequencing approaches. Results 11 pts received D-CapOx, 9 D-FLOT and 15 D-CXRT. Treatment side effects were as expected. Only 2 out of 35 patients did not have surgery, due to progressive disease on D-CXRT. Two (5.7%) and 6 (17.1%) patients had complete or partial pre-op responses (RECIST) and 3 (8.6%) had progression prior to surgery. Tumour regression at surgery (Mandard 1-3) occurred in 24/33 pts. 2-year survival was 81.8%, 77.8% and 77.8% respectively in the 3 arms. After propensity score matching, there was a survival advantage after addition of ICI (p=0.047). In selected patients we also demonstrate molecular features associated with response. Conclusions Adding D to standard neo-adjuvant regimens for gastro-oesophageal cancer is well tolerated. Survival times and response rates exceeded those expected for the regimens used (2-year survivals with FLOT 68% and CROSS 67%) in this non-randomised multi-centre trial. There was a survival advantage from the addition of ICI when compared to a matched cohort of patients treated in one of the study centres over the same period. Specific pre-treatment tumour phenotypes were associated with durable cure.

A phase I/II study of durvalumab and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer.

4164 Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is largely refractory to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in genomically unselected patients (pts). Synergistic effects of combined ICB and radiotherapy have been suggested in varied solid tumors. Few studies have evaluated this approach in pts with PC. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (D) and SABR after induction chemotherapy, in LA and BR PC. Herein, we present phase II data from two cohorts. Methods: A multi-institutional, non-randomized phase 1/2 trial of SABR and D was conducted at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CS) and Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK). Key eligibility: ECOG 0-1; unresectable PC, with stable/responding disease following 2-3 cycles gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) or 4-6 months (m) FOLFIRINOX (FFX). CS enrolled pts with BR and LA PC; MSK enrolled pts with LA PC only. All pts received SABR between dose 1 and 2 of D, with slight variation in ablative radiation techniques (CS: 33Gy/5#; MSK: MRI adaptive ablative radiation, 50Gy/5#). D dosed on day 1: 750mg x 4 doses Q14 days, and subsequently Q2 or Q4 weeks x 1 year total, or until resection, progression of disease (POD), or limiting toxicity. Primary endpoint: 6-month progression free survival (6 m PFS). Secondary endpoints: rate of downstaging to resectability, objective response by RECIST v1.1, duration of response, PFS, Overall Survival (OS). PFS and OS estimated from consent date using Kaplan-Meier method. Association between surgery and outcomes was analyzed as a time dependent covariate in univariate Cox regression models for OS and PFS. To assess immunogenomic biomarkers of response, pre- and on-treatment tissue, blood and microbiome samples were gathered. Results: Between 08/2017 and 05/2022, N= 36 enrolled. Median age 67.5 years (range 48-79), 39% (14/36) female. Performance Status: N=12 (33%) ECOG 0; N= 24 (67%) ECOG 1. Median duration chemotherapy: 3.5 m (range 1.4, 5.8). Staging: N=31 (86%) LA; N=5 (14%) BR. N = 9 (25%) underwent resection; all R0. Conversion to resection was not associated with PFS (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.17, 1.17, p=0.1) or OS (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.26, 1.84, p=0.5). Survival and response data summarized in table. Toxicities of special interest: Grade 3 treatment-related: in N= 7; diarrhea N= 2; elevated AST/ALT N= 2; lipase/amylase elevation, N=1; nausea N=1. Grade 4: amylase elevation N=1. Conclusions: D and SABR after induction chemotherapy in LA and BR PC is safe, had an encouraging 6-m PFS of 69% and favorable R0 resection rate, warranting further evaluation. Immuno-genomic biospecimen analyses underway. Clinical trial information: NCT03245541 . [Table: see text]

Presurgery Plus Postsurgery Immunotherapy Ups Survival in NSCLC.

Adding the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab to chemotherapy before and after surgery led to improved pathological complete response rates and event-free survival in patients with untreated, operable non-small cell lung cancer, according to interim results from the AEGEAN trial. Researchers noted that administering immunotherapy prior to surgery may help in developing more tailored adjuvant treatments based on patients' responses and tumor characteristics.

Is consolidative thoracic radiotherapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer still beneficial in the era of immunotherapy? A retrospective analysis

PurposeExtensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) carries a dismal prognosis. The benefit of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TR) after first-line chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors in this setting remains unclear. As TR can improve overall survival (OS) after conventional chemotherapy, we retrospectively analyzed OS of an inhouse cohort treated either with TR or with chemoimmunotherapy alone.MethodsA total of 41 patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy with PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab or durvalumab) for ES-SCLC at our hospital since 2019 were analyzed. TR was administered in 10 fractions of 3 Gy. Patient characteristics, number of immunotherapy cycles received, brain irradiation, and presence of hepatic and cerebral metastasis at diagnosis were assessed. Primary endpoint was OS after first diagnosis.ResultsConsolidative TR was associated with a significantly longer OS than systemic therapy alone (1-year OS 78.6% and 2‑year OS 37.1% vs. 1‑year OS 39.7% and 2 years not reached, p = 0.019). With regard to radiotherapy indication, survival at 1 year was 88.9% (log-rank p = 0.016) for patients receiving consolidative TR. For patients receiving TR in case of progression, 1‑year survival was 66.7%. Hepatic and cerebral metastasis at first diagnosis had no significant effect on OS.ConclusionTR was significantly associated with longer OS. The survival benefit of TR was most pronounced for consolidative radiotherapy after initial chemoimmunotherapy compared to TR in case of progression. Although retrospective findings need to be interpreted with caution, in the absence of prospective data, our findings provide a basis for offering consolidative TR in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.

Abstract 4387: Total toxicity burden of FDA approved immune checkpoint inhibitors in USA

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for multiple cancers, demonstrating effective and durable responses and becoming the standard of care for a variety of malignancies. However, ICI-based treatment has resulted in the rise of unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs). To date, very little information is available on the frequency, significance, and management of single-organ or multiorgan irAEs in clinic. In this study, the irAEs associated with the treatment of seven FDA-approved ICIs, including three PD-1 inhibitors (cemiplimab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab), three PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, avelumab and durvalumab), and one CTLA4 inhibitor (ipilimumab), were analyzed based on the data of 149,303 report cases (January 1, 2015 - June 30, 2022) collected from FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) public dashboard. Our data reveal that irAEs associated with the treatment of anti-PD-1 ICIs (e.g., pembrolizumab) require less hospital care resources compared with anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 ICIs. Tissue and organ toxicity of ICIs are age and gender specific. ‘Cardiac disorders’ is the main disorder caused by these ICIs in cancer patients aged 65-85, while ‘reproductive system and breast disease’ is the main disorder in cancer patients aged 18-64. There are risks of respiratory and urinary system toxicity in male patients and reproductive system toxicity in female patients when they receive the treatment of ICIs. Studies such as this one provide the statistical data for understanding patients at risk of developing irAEs, which will underscore the importance of further exploring research strategies to predict, detect, and mitigate toxicities from ICIs. Citation Format: Fan Yang, Chloe Shay, Zhaohui Qin, Nabil Saba, Yong Teng. Total toxicity burden of FDA approved immune checkpoint inhibitors in USA. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4387.

Efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis of durvalumab in patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high solid tumours

BackgroundIn this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab across various mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP). This is a clinical study in which patients are treated with drugs outside their labeled indication, based on their tumour molecular profile.Patients and methodsPatients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours who had exhausted all standard of care options were eligible. Patients were treated with durvalumab. The primary endpoints were clinical benefit ((CB): objective response (OR) or stable disease ≥16 weeks) and safety. Patients were enrolled using a Simon like 2-stage model, with 8 patients in stage 1, up to 24 patients in stage 2 if at least 1/8 patients had CB in stage 1. At baseline, fresh frozen biopsies were obtained for biomarker analyses.ResultsTwenty-six patients with 10 different cancer types were included. Two patients (2/26, 8%) were considered as non-evaluable for the primary endpoint. CB was observed in 13 patients (13/26, 50%) with an OR in 7 patients (7/26, 27%). The remaining 11 patients (11/26, 42%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 5 months (95% CI, 2-not reached) and 14 months (95% CI, 5-not reached), respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. We found a significantly higher structural variant (SV) burden in patients without CB. Additionally, we observed a significant enrichment of JAK1 frameshift mutations and a significantly lower IFN-γ expression in patients without CB.ConclusionDurvalumab was generally well-tolerated and provided durable responses in pre-treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H solid tumours. High SV burden, JAK1 frameshift mutations and low IFN-γ expression were associated with a lack of CB; this provides a rationale for larger studies to validate these findings.Trial registrationClinical trial registration: NCT02925234. First registration date: 05/10/2016.

Long-term outcomes from adding durvalumab to neoadjuvant treatment of operable gastroesophageal cancers: Results from a multicenter study LUD2015-005.

398 Background: Phase III studies have shown a survival benefit for the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to conventional chemotherapy for patients with gastroesophageal cancer (GEC). Large scale studies of chemoimmunotherapy prior to and after surgery are under way. We sought to characterise the effects of the PDL1 inhibitor durvalumab (D) with standard neo-adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy regimens in an open label phase I/II study in patients (pts) with operable GEC (LUD2015-005, NCT02735239, EudraCT 2015-005298-19). Methods: In pts identified as suitable for potentially curative surgery we gave D (750mg q2w) alongside their standard treatment. Pts had D only at first then Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine (CapOx) q3w or fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and taxotere (FLOT) starting with the third cycle of D. Chemotherapy and further D were given for 6 (CapOx) or 8 (FLOT) weeks before pts had surgery and for up to 12 further infusions of D after operation. Patients on FLOT could also have more chemotherapy. Pts suitable for chemoradiotherapy (CXRT, CROSS regimen) were offered two cycles of D before starting their treatment, and were able to have up to 12 further cycles after recovering from surgery. Participants were followed for toxicity, response and survival from the time of study enrolment until death, for 3 years or until June 2022 when the study ended. Results: 11 pts received D-CapOx, 9 D-FLOT and 15 D-CXRT. All were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Treatment side effects were as expected for the agents used with diarrhoea, nausea and fatigue the most commonly reported and no new safety signals. 156 of 160 planned pre-op D doses were given. Only 2 out of 35 patients did not have surgery, both due to progressive disease on D-CXRT. 23 of the 33 patients having surgery had post-operative treatment. Amongst 33 evaluable pts 2 (5.7%) and 6 (17.1%) had complete or partial pre-op responses (RECIST) and 3 (8.6%) progression prior to surgery. Tumor regression at surgery (Mandard 1-3) occurred in 24/33 pts. Median recurrence free survival was 25.4 months (mo) (D-CapOx), 32.0 mo (D-FLOT) and not reached (D-CXRT). 2 year survival was 81.8%, 77.8% and 77.8% respectively in the 3 arms. Conclusions: Adding D to standard neo-adjuvant regimens for GEC is well tolerated. Survival times and response rates exceeded those expected for the regimens used (2 year survivals with FLOT 68% and CROSS 67%) in this non-randomised multi-centre trial. Clinical trial information: NCT02735239 .

Patterns of toxicity burden for FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors in the United States

BackgroundImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) are a common phenomenon in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Surprisingly, the toxicity burdens of these irAEs have not been illustrated clearly. In this study, we analyzed irAEs for seven FDA-approved ICIs in cancer treatment to show the pattern of toxicity burden among cancer patients.MethodsirAEs associated with seven FDA-approved ICIs, including three PD-1 inhibitors (cemiplimab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab), three PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, avelumab and durvalumab), and one CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab), were analyzed based on data from 149,303 reported cases (from January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2022) collected from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) public dashboard. Proportions of serious irAEs and correlations with tumor type, age and sex were assessed via R package and GraphPad software.ResultsirAEs related to anti-PD-1 ICIs required less hospital care resources compared with anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 ICIs. Patients treated with pembrolizumab had relatively fewer serious cases. Treatment with ICIs led to the highest probability of serious irAEs in patients with lung cancer. ‘Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders’ and ‘gastrointestinal disorders’ were the two most common groups of disorders caused by the seven ICIs studied. ‘Cardiac disorders’ was the main type of disorders caused by these ICIs in cancer patients aged 65–85, while ‘reproductive system and breast disease’ was the main type of disorder in cancer patients aged 18–64. ‘Respiratory, thoracic, mediastinal diseases’ and ‘reproductive system and breast diseases’ were the main types of disorders associated with treatment with these ICIs in male and female patients, respectively.ConclusionTissue and organ toxicities of ICIs are age and sex specific. There are risks of respiratory and urinary system toxicity in male patients and reproductive system toxicity in female patients treated with the ICIs studied. Future studies on the toxicity burden of ICIs should incorporate age and sex differences to better understand the relevance of ICI toxicity burden to human immune function to develop appropriate tumor immune and therapeutic intervention strategies.

160P COLUMBIA-1: A phase Ib/II, open-label, randomized, multicenter study of durvalumab plus oleclumab in combination with chemotherapy and bevacizumab as first-line (1L) therapy in metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS-mCRC)

Despite advances in the treatment of mCRC combining chemotherapy regimens with biologics, most patients (pts) still progress within 11 months of receiving 1L chemotherapy. Addition of novel therapies to the standard of care (SoC) to improve antitumor activity is urgently needed. The randomized part 2 of COLUMBIA-1 (NCT04068610) evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining SoC (bevacizumab [BEV] + FOLFOX) with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (D) and the anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody oleclumab (O).

Durvalumab-induced thyroiditis in a patient with non-small cell lung carcinoma: a case report and review of pathogenic mechanisms

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) have become the current standard-of-care for advanced cancers. This novel therapeutic approach comes with its costs in the form of immune-related adverse events (irAE), including endocrinopathy.Case presentationA 63-year-old woman was diagnosed with a non-small cell lung carcinoma of the right superior lobe, cT3N2M0. She developed thyrotoxicosis followed by hypothyroidism induced by consolidation immunotherapy with durvalumab (anti-PD-L1). Analysis of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region showed HLA-DR4 (susceptible) and DR13 (protective). The possible mechanisms are subsequently discussed in detail.ConclusionsThe case of a patient with thyroiditis associated with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is described, highlighting the need for proactive monitoring of thyroid hormone levels. Identifying biomarkers associated with an increased risk of ICI-induced side effects (such as HLA) is of interest for better patient selection, optimal management and improved understanding of the mechanisms involved.

Gallbladder Cancer: Current Multimodality Treatment Concepts and Future Directions.

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common primary tumor site of biliary tract cancer (BTC), accounting for 0.6% of newly diagnosed cancers and 0.9% of cancer-related deaths. Risk factors, including female sex, age, ethnic background, and chronic inflammation of the gallbladder, have been identified. Surgery is the only curative option for early-stage GBC, but only 10% of patients are primary eligible for curative treatment. After neoadjuvant treatment, up to one-third of locally advanced GBC patients could benefit from secondary surgical treatment. After surgery, only a high-risk subset of patients benefits from adjuvant treatment. For advanced-stage GBC, palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is the current standard of care in line with other BTCs. After the failure of gemcitabine and cisplatin, data for second-line treatment in non-resectable GBC is poor, and the only recommended chemotherapy regimen is FOLFOX (5-FU/folinic acid and oxaliplatin). Recent advances with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab open the therapy landscape for immune checkpoint inhibition in GBC. Meanwhile, targeted therapy approaches are a cornerstone of GBC therapy based on molecular profiling and new evidence of molecular differences between different BTC forms and might further improve the prognosis of GBC patients.

Recent advances in immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small lung cancer treatment.

Lung cancer is one of the deadliest types of cancer responsible for thousands of cancer-related deaths. Its treatment has remained a challenge for researchers, but an increase in the knowledge of molecular pathways and biology of lung cancer has dramatically changed its management in recent decades. Immunotherapies and immunomodulation of lung cancer have previously failed for a long time but thanks to continuous research work and enthusiasm, now, this field is emerging as a novel effective therapy. Now, it is hope with potential benefits and promising results in the treatment of lung cancer. This review article focuses on immune checkpoints inhibitors: CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab and tremelimumab) and PDL-1 inhibitors (durvalumab and atezolizumab) that can be blocked to treat lung carcinoma. It is also focused on critically analyzing different studies and clinical trials to determine the potential benefits, risks, and adverse events associated with immunotherapeutic treatment.

EP14.05-009 LUMINANCE: A Phase IIIb Study of Durvalumab + Platinum-Etoposide for First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage SCLC (ES-SCLC)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have become standard-of-care first-line treatment for ES-SCLC in recent years. In the phase III CASPIAN study, the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab, in combination with platinum-etoposide (EP), demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) vs EP alone in first-line treatment of ES-SCLC (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.59-0.91; p=0.0047]); OS benefit was sustained after >3 years median follow-up (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.60‒0.86; nominal p=0.0003]).

52MO A randomized phase II trial of durvalumab and tremelIMUmab with gemcitabine or gemcitabine and cisplatin compared to gemcitabine and cisplatin in treatment-naïve patients with CHolangio- and gallbladdEr Carcinoma (IMMUCHEC)

Topaz-1 was the first phase-III study demonstrating efficacy for the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (D) in combination with gemcitabine (Gem) and cisplatin (Cis), and the combination has the potential to become a new first-line standard of care in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to evaluate the efficacy of tremelimumab (two dosing regimens) in combination with CTx+D.

Abstract CT126: A phase 2 trial of first-line AZD0171 + durvalumab and chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and CD8+ T cell infiltration

Abstract Background: Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is an immunosuppressive cytokine linked to tumor growth and metastasis. LIF overexpression correlates with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in multiple tumor types including PDAC. Preclinical data show that LIF promotes an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, hindering cytotoxic CD8+ T cell recruitment; low T cell infiltration also correlates with mortality in patients with PDAC. Preclinical studies show LIF-blocking antibodies sensitize tumors to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition, inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and prolong survival in combination with CT. In patients with PDAC, higher LIF levels correlate with more aggressive pathology, elevated CA19-9 (a PDAC biomarker), and lower response and survival rates. AZD0171 (formerly MSC-1), a first-in-class, humanized, IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds specifically and potently to LIF, preventing downstream signaling. In a phase 1 dose escalation study (NCT03490669), AZD0171 monotherapy had manageable safety and led to stable disease (SD) in 34.2% of patients with advanced solid tumors across all dose levels. AZD0171 + CT may improve survival outcomes vs CT alone. Based on preclinical data, AZD0171 may function to stimulate antitumor immune response, and combination with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab could prolong that response and overcome peripheral tolerance in patients with metastatic PDAC. Methods: This is a phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of AZD0171 + durvalumab and CT in treatment-naive patients with metastatic PDAC (NCT04999969). Eligible patients must have an ECOG performance status 0 or 1, a Gustave Roussy Immune Score 0 or 1, ≥1 measurable target lesion per RECIST v1.1, and confirmed presence of tumoral CD8+ T cells. Patients with central nervous system metastasis, history of leptomeningeal disease or cord compression, a thromboembolic event ≤3 months prior to study treatment, unresolved grade ≥2 toxicities from prior therapy, or a sensitizing mutation or tumor characteristic for which there is a preferred treatment, are excluded. As PDAC is poorly immune infiltrated, a novel clinical trial assay will be used to select for patients who have existing resident CD8+ T cells and may therefore be more likely to respond. About 115 patients will receive intravenous AZD0171, durvalumab and CT until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints are safety and overall survival (OS) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, disease control rate (confirmed response or SD ≥16 weeks), duration of response, median progression-free survival (PFS), PFS rate at 4 months, median OS, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (changes in serum CA19-9 level and tumor CD8+ T cell infiltration) and immunogenicity. The trial is currently recruiting. Citation Format: Grainne O'Kane, Teresa Macarulla, Fiyinfolu Balogun, Antoine Hollebecque, Matthew J. Reilley, Sreenivasa R. Chandana, Jim Eyles, Oluwaseun Ojo, Philip Overend, Douglas C. Palmer, Nadia Luheshi, Mayukh Das, Antoine Italiano, Joan Seoane. A phase 2 trial of first-line AZD0171 + durvalumab and chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and CD8+ T cell infiltration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT126.